logo
Point Piper mansion sells for $55m, equal top sale of the year

Point Piper mansion sells for $55m, equal top sale of the year

News.com.au17-06-2025
A Point Piper mansion has sold for $55m, equalling the record for the highest priced property sold so far this year.
The most recent deal was for the home of Retail Apparel Group co-founder Stephen Liebowitz and his wife, Pam, via Ray White Double Bay's Adam Reichman and Elliott Placks, in conjunction with Michael Pallier of Sotheby's.
The four-bedroom Wolseley Rd residence is still listed as for sale on realestate.com.au, though sources say the hush-hush deal was finalised on Friday night to a Sydney buyer.
The property was first listed in February 2024 with ambitious $65m price hopes, but, like the other $55m sale this February, the vendors had to lower their expectations to get the deal done.
Billionaire chicken heiresses record-breaking sale
For that sale, 12 Dumaresq Rd, Rose Bay, vendors recycled shopping bag tycoon Frank Qiang Gengh and his wife Juanjuan Zhao had to accept a $20m price cut.
Agents Brad Pillinger of Pillinger and Michael Pallier of Sotheby's had initially listed that residence for $75m the previous June, though the $55m was still sufficient to nab the Rose Bay house price record.
The property was the top sale in the first quarter, as revealed by The Dyson Austen Top 10 Prestige Residential Survey.
The buyer was media baron Linge Dai.
No word yet on the buyer in Wolseley Rd, Point Piper.
At the time it was listed for the Wentworth Courier House of the Week, Reichman had described the Leslie Wilkinson-designed property known as Vaynol as having everything a Point Piper buyer would want.
'This property showcases all of Sydney's best icons in full view and offers an absolutely unmatched lifestyle,' he told Kirsten Craze.
'Created by Wilkinson, one of Australia's most well-known architects, and updated by Michael Suttor, the whole home is extraordinary with three unbelievably sized bedrooms all on the one level.'
The period property has been tightly held since the Liebowitzs bought it for $12m in 2004 from James Packer's right-hand man, Ben Tilley.
The Liebowitzs have moved to Double Bay, having paid $24.9m for an off-the-plan penthouse in the luxury Ode building.
Records show the heritage-listed Wolseley Rd residence was created in 1955 for WWI hero Colonel Leslie James Morehead for a cost of £15,555.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Three rules for holding onto property for life
Three rules for holding onto property for life

News.com.au

time7 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Three rules for holding onto property for life

Cash flow is the oxygen of investment; run out of it and it's all over very quickly. Understanding and managing cash flow is what brings many investors, from property to shares and everything in between, unstuck. Here's a sobering truth: the percentage of property investors owning multiple properties has hardly changed in the past 30 years, despite house prices increasing by more than tenfold. Think about that for a minute. If property values have been doubling every decade or so, why aren't more people building portfolios of five, six or even 10 properties? The answer is: Because they sell too soon. Most investors offload their properties within seven years of purchasing them – long before compounding growth can do its magic. And the number one reason they sell? The property costs them too much to hold. But the reality is that selling is the worst thing a property owner can do because it interrupts the process of compounding growth. Let me share with you the three rules homeowners should follow to ensure their property costs as little as possible to hold and the process of compound growth is realised. Borrow interest only The difference between a $650,000 loan paying interest only and principal and interest is $600 per month or $7,200 per annum. That's not pocket change; that's a safety net, and unless your family home is fully paid off, there's no good reason to pay down investment debt. Once your home is sorted, you may consider paying principal and interest on one or two investment loans – but only if your cash flow comfortably allows it. Treat property investing like a business. Minimise outgoings. Maximise runway. If the family home is paid off, we should then commit to paying principal and interest toward investment debt if our budgets can afford it. My rule is to typically pick just one or two loans to pay principal and interest on, once the family home is paid off. Buy new, not old The average Aussie pays $35,000 in tax per annum. Why not use some of that money to fund your investment? The secret? Depreciation. Depreciation is a paper loss that reduces your taxable income - without costing you a cent out of pocket. New properties offer the highest depreciation benefits, especially in the first 10 years when cash flow matters most. One in two property investors buy older properties with little to no depreciation benefits, missing out on tens of thousands of extra cash flows that could be going toward funding their investments. Stick to the middle of the market Cash flow isn't just about tax benefits and finance structures. One of the most underestimated impacts on cash flow is keeping the property rented. Vacancy kills returns. Even two or three weeks a year without a tenant can turn a neutral-holding property into a money pit. The solution to this? Stay in the Goldilocks zone – not too cheap, not too premium. Mid-market properties tend to attract the largest pool of reliable, long-term tenants. That's where occupancy is highest and cash flow is most stable. High-end rentals sit vacant longer. Low-end rentals often come with higher risk. The middle? It's the sweet spot. If you want to build real wealth through property, you need to hold long enough to let compounding do its work. That means getting cash flow right from day one. Follow these three rules: •Use interest-only loans (strategically) •Buy new properties for maximum depreciation •Stay in the middle of the rental market Do that, along with pushing rents and holding the bank accountable, and you'll give yourself the best shot to grow and keep growing wealth. We don't need to time the market, but we do need time in the market.

Sign banks gearing up to deliver rates shock out of sync with RBA
Sign banks gearing up to deliver rates shock out of sync with RBA

News.com.au

time7 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Sign banks gearing up to deliver rates shock out of sync with RBA

Reserve Bank moves to slash interest rates this month could fail to materialise for homeowners as signs emerge some lenders may not pass on an 'almost certain' cash rate cut today. Anticipation of another RBA cut has been growing stronger over recent weeks, with 88 per cent of economists polled by comparison group predicting a July drop in rates. Some argue the cut is 'locked in' given that inflation has been trending well below RBA targets, while consumer spending is in need of a boost after falling in recent months. This month's cash rate cut would be the third time the Reserve Bank has dropped the cash rate since February. Banks quickly passed on the earlier cuts – with all but one passing on the February cut, and every lender passing on the May cut – but loan experts said banks may be more hesitant about the new cut. Part of the reason is that some of their other costs have been on the rise, making the case for passing on the RBA cut weaker. Owl Home Loans director and broker Aidan Hartley said recent bank messaging to brokers has suggested some lenders may be gearing up to not pass the cuts on in full. Mr Hartley pointed to industry communications where banks stressed that the Reserve Bank was not the only source of funding for them. He said the communications suggested banks were trying to adjust expectations around what they would be passing on. 'There is a high chance some lenders will not pass on the cuts,' he said. 'Recent messaging from banks has opened the door to them not passing on the cut … the cost of funding for banks will not be matching the (cash rate drop). 'Some lenders may not pass on the full cut. They will give the best rates to new borrowers, rather than existing customers.' History also suggested banks were more reluctant to pass on the later cuts in a rate cutting cycle, he said. 'We saw this in the last rate cutting cycle. When rates were falling in 2019 and 2020, the big bank four banks only passed on about 80 per cent of each cut.' THE BANKS LESS LIKELY TO PASS ON SAVINGS One broker told The Daily Telegraph mid-tier lenders who aggressively chased market share prior to the February rate cut may be less inclined to pass on a July cut to customers. Their earlier competitive variable rates meant there was less scope to pass on new cuts to existing borrowers and, for these banks, the focus was often on prioritising new customers, the broker said. Compare the Market economic director David Koch agreed that there could be a mismatch between rates for new borrowers and existing customers. 'Banks are not obliged to pass on rate cuts, so discounts are never guaranteed,' Mr Koch said. 'And just because your rate might be reduced, it doesn't necessarily mean you're getting a good deal. It's crucial homeowners be vigilant, to make sure their rate remains competitive. 'We know (rates for new customers) are often much more enticing than the rates available to older customers.' head of consumer research Graham Cooke said some banks could hold back on passing on new cuts to protect their margins. 'Lenders are fighting against each other in an increasingly competitive market. This has been great for consumers, who have received maximum savings (so far),' he said. 'What remains to be seen is if that continues. The RBA's previous cutting cycle (2019-2020) saw a total reduction of 125 basis points across five cuts, but the big four only passed on 86 basis points to customers on average. 'Banks would argue that their costs do not necessarily go down proportionally as rates decrease. So I would say we will likely start to see some lenders pulling back as rates continue to drop.' Mr Cooke said the first bank to break ranks with the RBA would likely be in the firing line of public opinion but such a move could smooth the way for other lenders to do the same. MOVE THAT WOULD OPEN 'FLOODGATES' Canstar data insights director Sally Tindall said she expected banks to pass on a July cut in full but she said the likelihood of banks holding some of the savings would increase with subsequent cash rate cuts. 'If the cash rate continues to fall, then banks could decide not to pass on each cut in full,' she said. 'Alternatively, they could decide to hand out a smaller cut to particular types of borrowers. 'If a decent-sized bank takes the fall by not passing on a cut in full, the next time around, other lenders could well follow … If a big bank breaks ranks then the floodgates will well and truly be open.' Mozo money expert Rachel Wastell said the case for banks to pass on the cut from a customer welfare point of view was strong given that there were 13 rate hikes between 2022 and 2023. 'With more cuts expected, most lenders are facing the same challenges – tight margins, limited wiggle room and strong competition,' she said. 'Banks may be worried about profit margins, but for borrowers this isn't about profits. It's about staying out of the red. If cuts don't come from your lender, switching might be the way to get a better deal.' Mr Koch said he expected most banks to pass the discount in full but he pointed out that there was a high disparity between what rates lenders were offering. 'Compare the Market has found there can be a 0.50 per cent difference between some advertised rates, so you can effectively create your own rate cut by shopping around. That could represent a saving of $210 on monthly repayments – or $2,520 over a year – for someone with an average $660,000 loan.'

Inheriting a home: how to avoid a family feud
Inheriting a home: how to avoid a family feud

News.com.au

time7 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Inheriting a home: how to avoid a family feud

Family fallouts are on the rise as an ageing generation leave their million dollar assets to their children and grandchildren. Most Australians' homes are their most valuable asset and that has become even more apparent through the generations. An exclusive PropTrack study showed that when adjusted for inflation, current prices were four times higher than in 1980, with a typical house back then costing $65,000, the same as around $338,000 in todays money. With an ageing population, many Aussies are set to inherit a family home within the next few years and for a typical Sydney house, that means inheriting an asset worth over $1.5m. For others that may be millions of dollars more. Fury: Elite Aus school's $39m brothel move With that comes the loss of a loved one and the task of sifting through a lifetime's worth of belongings before getting the benefit of the asset. This emotional and difficult task often leads to many family feuds and fallouts. Bob Morton, co-founder and director of The Property Clearance Company has seen many of these different high tension scenarios play out. 'The actual disagreements can manifest in different ways, what we often see is sadly tension about how to move forward, potentially on who has rights to certain items among the home and who's taking responsibility for what,' he said. 'Quite often there are financial values of different items that are often clouded by sentiment. A family history rarely translates to being financially valuable, that emotional undercurrents can sort of distort people's values. 'You can spend a lot of time trying to extract extra value out of possessions, but that time may be better spent on the key asset which is the home,' Mr Morton said. Getting legal and financial advice to distribute any items written within a will, then choosing to gift other items of sentimental value on behalf of the deceased was a good place to start, Mr Morton said. 'It may be extra items or art work or could even be white goods to the grandchild who's just establishing their first flat,' he said. Putting extra time and money into styling could be better spent then trying to derive extra money from items in the house, he added. 'It's natural to look at the problem areas and try to work out strategies, but there are ways to successfully and fairly manage this process which don't affect family relationships,' he said. Engaging a third party for the next step could ensure transparency, fairness and the removal of emotional bias to go through the remaining belongings. This could include using professional clearance experts to create an inventory, value items and even donate, recycle or prepare for sale. 'At the end of the day it should be those wishes that should be driving everything, I'd keep that front of mind,' Mr Morton said. 'Many have done that and gotten to a point where they have fulfilled the wishes of their loved one.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store