Top Chinese general ousted from body that oversees China's military
Miao Hua, a senior admiral from the People's Liberation Army (PLA) navy, was the director of the political work department of the central military commission (CMC), making him responsible for ideology and loyalty within the armed forces. The six-person CMC is one of the most powerful institutions in China and is headed by Xi, China's leader.
On Friday, a statement from the Chinese government confirmed that Miao had been dismissed. He was suspended last year and placed under investigation for 'serious violations of discipline', a byword for corruption. He was expelled from the National People's Congress, China's parliament, in April.
The dismissal makes Miao one of the highest ranking CMC officials to be purged since the 1960s, and the latest in a rush of senior military figures targeted.
He Weidong, a vice-chair of the CMC, is also reported to be under investigation.
The CMC is the governing body of the PLA, and also oversees China's coastguard. Xi is the chair of the CMC, as well as being the leader of China's ruling Communist party (CCP) and the president.
Miao's dismissal reflects the latest ructions in China's armed forces. Beijing is keen to present an image of strength and stability on the world stage. The purges risk disrupting that image, although at a time when global attention is focused on wars in the Middle East and Ukraine, senior personnel changes in China's military leadership may garner less attention.
US-China military dialogue, seen as essential for avoiding accidental conflicts, particularly in the Taiwan strait, have been limited under the presidency of Donald Trump, who has also fired several senior military officials. US military representatives travelled to Shanghai for talks in April, but there have been no public signs of high-ranking meetings.
The US and Chinese defence ministers sometimes meet at the Shangri-la Dialogue, an annual defence forum held in Singapore last month. But this year China only sent a small, lower-ranking delegation.
In the past two years, Xi has purged two defence ministers, Li Shangfu and Wei Fenghe, two heads of the PLA's rocket force – responsible for missiles and the nuclear arsenal – and two senior CMC officials. Senior aerospace and defence business leaders have also been removed from a CCP advisory body.
Many of the recent purges appear to be related to an investigation into corruption in military procurement. Li, who was ousted as defence minister in 2023 and expelled from the CCP last year, previously led the equipment procurement department. Several of his associates from the military and the equipment procurement department were also purged.
Miao is the eighth member of the CMC to be ousted since Xi took power in 2012. The expulsion of CMC members was previously unheard of since the era of Mao Zedong.
Xi took power with a promise to root out corruption in China, vowing to come after both the 'tigers and the flies'. Since then, millions of officials have been investigated, and hundreds of thousands reportedly penalised, including high profile expulsions or prosecutions.
But having now ruled for more than a decade, many of the senior figures coming into the crosshairs of anti-corruption campaigns are people, like Miao and Li, who Xi had personally appointed, raising questions about his ability to suitably vet important appointments.
One of the most high-profile of Xi's picks to fall was former foreign minister Qin Gang. Qin disappeared from public view in June 2023, drawing global attention as one of China's most public-facing officials. Speculation that he was under investigation ran rampant until October when Beijing announced he had been removed from his post. No reason was given.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
South Korean President Lee to visit Japan for summit with Ishiba, Seoul says
SEOUL, Aug 13 (Reuters) - South Korean President Lee Jae Myung will visit Japan between August 23-24 and hold a summit with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Lee's office said at a briefing on Wednesday. The leaders will discuss ways to improve regional peace and boost trilateral cooperation with Washington, Kang Yoo-jung, Lee's spokesperson, told reporters. Kang did not specify the date of the summit during Lee's two-day visit. Lee has in the past been critical of efforts by administrations in Seoul to improve ties with Tokyo, though when he met Ishiba for their first summit on the sidelines of a G7 meeting in Canada in June they vowed to deepen the relationship. Ties between the U.S. allies have often been strained, rooted in historical disputes stemming from Japan's colonial rule over the Korean peninsula from 1910-1945. Their second summit meeting will also take place as the Asian economic powerhouses grapple with the implications of U.S. tariffs imposed by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. Lee's trip to Japan comes just ahead of his visit to the U.S., where he is scheduled to hold a summit with Trump on August 25.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Wholly political campaign for independence is a terrible idea
This week, I want to argue that a wholly political campaign is a terrible idea. Most shifts in public opinion are not led either by politicians or resulting from a political process. Yet still we're stuck with the idea that until politicians either create a mass shift in public sentiment themselves or they secure some sort of referendum process, the rest of us just need to wait. This has sidetracked us into another daft debate about whether politicians should be cautious (to not scare off the wavering voter) or bold (to energise the public). It stops us from asking whether they're the right messengers in the first place. READ MORE: Seamus Logan: We need new bold independence strategy instead of focusing on the past They're not. An Ipsos poll from December 2023 gets to the point. It lists more than 30 professions and asked the public who they trust most. Politicians came bottom with fewer than one in 10 people saying they trust what a politician says. By contrast, nurses, pilots, librarians, engineers, doctors, teachers and professors are all trusted by more than three out of four people. We're sending out our least effective message carriers and refusing to deploy our most effective advocates. Wavering voters trust civic voices much more than political ones. Politics is a crucial part of this process – political parties are partners in a civic campaign, not least because we all have to be on the same page and follow the same strategy. But having politicians front and centre is not our most effective formation. This is why, of all the acts of self-harm the independence movement has inflicted over the past decade, none has been more destructive or more counterproductive than the closing down of Yes Scotland as a cross-and-no-party means of communicating to the public. There are many other problems with the politics-only model. If you accept the 'we must have strong support' argument then success or failure rests on the next 10% of the population that gets us from 50% to 60%. Hardly any of that group of people have ever voted SNP. The SNP have never achieved 50% of the votes cast in a General Election in their existence. Why are we targeting our key voters with a political party they have serially refused to support? On top of that, there is one thing worse than a politician to send out to win over voters, and that is a politician from a party which has been in power for an extended period of time. You cannot disentangle those politicians from the track record of their government. A politician may well want to talk to a voter about independence, but the voter may well want to talk about schools, or hospital waiting lists, or ferries. Plus, there is always a good electoral reason for a political party to not promote independence. Remember when, in 2019, the SNP clearly decided that 'stopping Brexit' was a bigger vote winner than arguing for independence? That will always happen. Once again, this isn't an anti-SNP thing. There are very, very few instances of single parties getting majority support in multi-party parliamentary elections, any party would have a built-in self-interest in not promoting independence at some point or other, and it's not that the SNP's politicians are uniquely unpopular, it's that they are just normally unpopular. There is virtually no civic movement left. We don't have prominent leaders in their professions or communities who regularly act as public advocates of independence. The power-hoarding of the politicians has resulted in the long, slow death of the 2014 coalition. It will need to be rebuilt from scratch. We're stuck because we've been saying twe won't convert the public to independence until after someone gives us a referendum and that we're going to get that by making independence a politicians-only zone. Both pillars of this argument are false, yet those have been the sole terms of debate for a decade now. We have explored every avenue of how to skip the consent-building phase and jump to the legislative process stage through party politics and we've not found a way to do it – because there isn't a way to do it. It means we didn't do an autopsy on the 2014 defeat because it wasn't politically expedient – so we've learned nothing. It means we haven't examined the views of voters – so we don't know our audience. It means we haven't communicated to voters in a meaningful or consistent way – so all they've heard is politicians on the BBC. In these two articles, I have not set out my strategy for Scottish independence – you can find that in detail in my book. Sorted. Sadly, we're still pretty far from a credible discussion of strategy. I fear we will waste another year until after the Scottish election. Because frankly, if we're really in a phase where a political party polling at about 30% demands a vote of over 50% as a condition for progress, we're not a serious proposition. It didn't work when the SNP were at their peak and it certainly won't work now. This is all maddening. There is compelling evidence that our target voters are increasingly ready to listen to a fresh pitch on independence. If so, the timescale for getting from 50% to 60% support is not long. Then, if we had 60% of public support, lots and lots of possible avenues to independence open up, with a referendum only being one of them. So what are we going to do? One more shot at finding a loophole in the rules that will let us escape the UK without winning over the public? Two more shots? Or something different? We'll have to choose soon.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Solitary cell with mattress on the floor for South Korea's once powerful ex-first lady
SEOUL, Aug 13 (Reuters) - South Korea's former first lady Kim Keon Hee will spend her first day in jail on Wednesday in a cell much like the one her husband and ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol occupies as prosecutors pursue the once high-flying couple in a widening criminal probe. Kim was formally booked into the Seoul Nambu Detention Center on the western edge of the capital, a comparatively new correctional facility that opened in 2011 and one of the few run by a female warden. She will be treated in the same way as other inmates but will receive minor adjustments in her daily routine given her status as a high-profile figure, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters. Kim was imprisoned after a court approved a warrant for her arrest late on Tuesday on the grounds that she might destroy evidence amid an ongoing investigation into allegations of bribery, stock fraud and influence peddling. Kim's lawyers have denied the accusations against her and dismissed as groundless speculation news reports about some of the gifts she allegedly received in return for favours. Kim apologised for causing concern in the country and called herself "a nobody" as she appeared for questioning last week. Her solitary cell has a small table that can be used as a desk and for eating meals and a floor mattress to sleep on, said the source, who asked not to be identified because he was not authorised to speak to the media. Kim will have separate access to a common shower room and be allowed to exercise outdoors for an hour every day except on Sundays, the time staggered to avoid overlap with other inmates, the source said. Prison will be an entirely new experience for Kim, unlike for her husband who has already spent about 100 days in jail. Yoon is on trial over his botched attempt to impose martial law, on charges of insurrection, an accusation he denies. He has been imprisoned at the Seoul Detention Center, which despite its name is outside the capital to the south. The former first couple had lived in a spacious apartment in an upscale district of Seoul before Yoon's election as president in May 2022 and had returned there after his ouster for the martial law decree that resulted in a political disaster for him, his party and now for his wife. Kim is a wealthy businesswoman in her own right and most of the couple's assets including the apartment belong to her, according to a government database. Now, Kim will receive the same food as the average inmate, usually traditional Korean fare prepared at a cost of about 1,500 won ($1.08) per meal. On Wednesday, toast with strawberry jam, sausages and salad were on the menu for breakfast. A fine art expert who founded and ran a successful curation agency, Kim has been embroiled in a number of scandals before and after her husband's election in 2022, with the controversies at times overshadowing Yoon's turbulent presidency. Her fashion choices and policy lobbying in areas like promoting a ban on eating dog meat made her controversial in a country where a first lady has typically kept a low profile. Han Dong-soo, a former judge and a prosecutor who worked with Yoon, said Kim had "a politically strategic mind" and was a driving force behind her husband's ascent to top office. After she married Yoon when he was 52, Kim became the main influence of practically all of his thinking and decisions, Han said. Kim was 39 when they wed. "Kim Keon Hee chose him," said Han. "And she gave him the strategy and energy to be president" ($1 = 1,382.8000 won) (This story has been corrected to specify the detention facility opened in 2011, not 11 years ago, in paragraph 2)
