Health Check: Little Green Pharma's European success is more than pot luck
Botanix raises $48 million of debt for its anti-sweating drug, Sofdra
The DNA of Genetic Technologies soon will be … financial advice
Little Green Pharma's (ASX:LGP) European foray is paying off, with the Perth-based medical cannabis supplier more than doubling its Continental and UK revenue in the year to March.
Overall, Little Green grew its revenue by 43%, to a record $36.8 million 'against a backdrop of significant regulatory change and intense competition".
Adjusted for a slew of non-cash items, underlying earnings came in at $2.9 million compared with a previous $1.6 million loss.
Aided by $8.1 million of accrued tax losses, Little Green managed a net profit of $3.3 million compared with a previous $8.2 million deficit.
Little Green stamped its European footprint in 2021 by purchasing a Danish facility from Canada's Canopy Growth.
Little Green paid around $20 million for the facility – Europe's biggest – compared with the $100 million Canopy had invested.
In its 2020-21 accounts, Little Green recorded a $25 million "gain on bargain purchase" resulting in a $24.6 million reported net profit.
It's fair enough the company potted a bargain, given we provided the Danes with a valuable Tassie Queen.
Continental drift
Little Green still derives 82% of its revenue from the difficult Australian market, but this has trended from 88% the previous year as the Euro ops kick up a notch.
The company cites partial legalisation in the capacious Germany market, which has 'driven unprecedented growth in medicinal cannabis patient numbers.'
In France, Little Green supplies to an extended government pilot scheme, ahead of planned legalisation.
'Across both Australia and Europe, we are witnessing the shift from niche to mainstream – a dynamic Little Green has long anticipated and is prepared for,' chairman Michael D Lynch-Bell says.
Sadly, Little Green shares wilted 4% this morning and they have lost 15% of their value year to date.
Management highlights net tangible assets of 24 cents per share, more than twice the prevailing market price.
FDA makes a RAD move
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has bestowed fast track designation on Radiopharm Theranostics' (ASX:RAD) imaging tool, RAD101, to image brain metastases.
RAD 101 has been used in a US phase II clinical trial to distinguish between recurrent disease and the treatment effect of brain metastases from other solid tumours.
RAD101 targets fatty acid synthase, a protein overexpressed in many solid tumours, including cerebral metastases.
The company says more than 300,000 patients are diagnosed with brain metastases in the US annually.
The company plans to release top-line results in the December quarter.
Among other things, FDA fast track designation enables more frequent communication with the agency – a valuable asset given the upheaval at the agency.
While Radiopharm enjoys life in the fast lane, the FDA in late April issued a 'complete response' to sector big daddy Telix Pharmaceuticals (ASX:TLX).
This was in relation to the company's marketing approval application for Pixclara, its tool to image the rare brain cancer glioma.
Telix is confident the agency will approve Pixclara after it provides more clinical data.
Cyclopharm's patent extension
In other regulatory news from Trumpian shores, the US Patent and Trademark Office has granted Cyclopharm (ASX:CYC) a five-year patent extension – the maximum allowable – out to 2031.
This pertains to Cyclopharm's FDA-approved lung imaging tool, Techengas.
The agency took a mere 16 years to approve Technegas, which explains why its patent life was running low.
No sweat, Botanix raises debt
Botanix Pharmaceuticals (ASX:BOT) has secured a circa US$30 million ($48 million) debt facility to further the US rollout of Sofdra, its approved drug for excessive sweating.
The facility, with UK venture debt financier Kreos Capital, follows a $40 million institutional placement in April this year.
Investment giant Blackrock owns Kreos.
Botanix chairman Vince Ippolito says the facility will enable the company to make rapid decisions about Sofdra's commercialisation and to avail of "expansion opportunities'.
The $48 million adds to the $28 million of cash in hand, as of the end of March.
The facility provides for circa $30 million to be drawn now, with the remainder to be tapped by October 1.
Under certain conditions, Kreos Capital can convert part of the loan into Botanix shares.
Kreos also pockets just over three million warrants to acquire Botanix shares at 33 cents apiece, within the next five years.
And now for something completely different
In the most extreme pivot since HIV drug developer Avexa went coal mining in Alabama 14 years ago, Genetic Technologies (ASX:GTG) is reinventing itself as a financial advisory firm.
In essence, it's a back-door listing.
Genetic has signed binding term sheets to acquire Ellerfield Wealth Pty Ltd and Walker Capital Private Wealth Pty Ltd.
Genetic chairman Michael Walker owns 51% of Ellerfield Wealth Pty Ltd and all of Walker Capital Private Wealth Pty Ltd.
The payment of $7.84 million will be by way of Genetic shares, after which the company will undergo a share consolidation.
Genetic shares remain suspended.
The transaction depends on due diligence and the ASX agreeing to relist the company in its new guise.
Genetic entered voluntary administration in November last year after a colourful listed life.
Post administration, the company sold its Genetype cancer and disease risk assessment test business to Rhythm Biosciences (ASX:RHY) for $625,000.
Genetic also sold its Easy DNA and Affinity DNA direct-to-consumer businesses to Endeavour DNA Inc, for $525,000.
Last month shareholders approved a deed of arrangement that resulted in Walker Capital acquiring 88% of the company.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
22 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Powerball jackpot skyrockets to $30m after no winning entry on Thursday
Powerball has soared to $30m after there was no winning entry in Thursday night's draw. The winning numbers for Powerball draw 1526 were 33, 5, 12, 14, 19, 32, and 1, with the Powerball number 10. No one took home the Division 1 prize of $20m, meaning the jackpot has increased to a whopping $30m for next Thursday's Powerball. Despite no one claiming the largest prize, three Division 2 winners took home $168,353 each. A total of 51 players won Division Three, each pocketing $12,312, and 1031 players won $529 in Division Four. On Thursday, members of The Lott pounded the pavement in Sydney to try and track down the mysterious Division One winner of the $100m Powerball earlier this year. The elusive player had purchased the winning ticket at Bondi Junction Newsagency for Powerball draw 1217, which was drawn on June 12. In NSW, ticketholders have six years to claim their winnings before it expires. In an effort to inspire the mysterious winner to check their wallet, a band of runners from The Lott conducted a 'memory jog' across Bondi. 'It has now been 63 days since the elusive ticket holder won this massive $100m prize and throughout that time we have been eagerly waiting to unite the winner with their Powerball windfall,' The Lott spokesman Matt Hart said. 'Each day during the past nine weeks, we've been asking ourselves 'is today the day the winning ticket is presented?'' Entries to Thursday's Powerball draw 1527 close at 7.30pm AEST, with the draw shortly after.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Australian full-time wages just passed an historic milestone, so why do we all feel broke?
The average Australian full-time worker is now earning more than $2000 a week for the first time in history. New figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) show the average ordinary full-time weekly earnings for adults hit $2011.40 before tax in May. It comes to a 4.5 per cent rise compared to the same time last year. Men working full-time are now earning an average of $2106.40 a week, while women earned $1864.10. 'This is the first time that average weekly ordinary time earnings for full-time adults have been greater than $2000,' ABS head of labour statistics Sean Crick said. 'Annual growth in May 2025 remained high at 4.5 per cent, a rise of $86.60 a week from May 2024. This was just below the annual growth rate of 4.6 per cent in the year to November 2024.' Across the states and territories, the ACT recorded the highest average full-time weekly earnings at $2236, followed by Western Australia at $2154. Tasmania was the lowest at $1793. Industry data showed mining workers were the highest paid, averaging $3174 a week, while employees in accommodation and food services earned the least at $1459. Public sector workers earned more on average ($2167) than those in the private sector ($1966). The ABS also reported the unemployment rate fell to 4.2 per cent in July after a small increase the previous month. Despite the historic wage milestone, many working Australians report feeling poorer than ever, as the rising cost of everyday essentials continues to outpace income growth. A recent Canstar survey found the average weekly grocery bill for a family of four has jumped 11 per cent in the past year, rising from $215 to $240. Weekly pay packets are also being eaten away by housing pressures. Renters are facing historic challenges with availability pushing up prices. Sydney's median weekly rent has hit a whopping $730, while firstâ€'home buyers are finding the market increasingly out of reach. Research shows that to buy a medianâ€'priced house outright without mortgage stress, a household now needs an annual income of about $203,000 across the country, and nearly $300,000 in Sydney. Labor has acknowledged the 30 per cent of Australians with mortgages being kicked by interest rate rises, but renters continue to feel left out of the conversation as their excess cash, normally put away for a home deposit, gets set aside to fund their landlord's mortgage via a rent rise. A further study by the Australia Institute found that 72 per cent of respondents felt their wages had grown slower than the prices they're paying, while 53 per cent said their financial situation had worsened over the past two years. In fact, nearly half of all Australian workers believe their salaries are not keeping pace with living costs. According to the Employee Sentiment Index, 45 per cent of employees report growing financial strain, and many are just managing to get by. It's all a bit wonky in 2025 By and large, Australia's baby boomer generation, and even some of the next, was able to build a family on a single wage. They were also able to capitalise on dirt-cheap real estate, use it to leverage more purchases, and then profit from historically unprecedented price rises. That idea is a fever dream for young Aussies today, unless they've somehow landed themselves a quarter-million-per-year job or fallen into a trust fund or inheritance. Associate Professor at the University of Sydney Gareth Bryant, explains that the housing 'phenomenon' in the early 2000s saw a rapid increase in the home-price-to-income ratio that has never been rectified. He says that the high interest rates of the late 80s and 90s meant home ownership was hard, but it was mostly an 'income issue', meaning you could eventually work your way up to a position to afford high rates. But now, with the average dwelling costing seven to 10 times the average Aussie wage, it's become more than just an income issue. 'The problem now is you still need high income but a reasonable amount of wealth to have the deposit,' Prof. Bryant told 'It used to be much more possible for those with good jobs to save for a deposit. 'For a lot of people in decent jobs, it's really difficult to save, unless you've got some kind of additional assistance.' He says the rise in housing has naturally forced millions to enter the housing market later in life, or not at all. 'There's a delay. People are buying and forming families later, there are many who will be lifelong renters, or 'generation rent'.' In 1980, Australian households typically spent about 60 per cent of their disposable income on essential living expenses, including housing, food, transport, and utilities. This left a modest buffer for savings or discretionary spending. Almost one in two households were single-income, with one partner typically staying at home. By 2025, despite higher average incomes, the proportion of income required for living costs has increased significantly. Rising housing costs, particularly in major cities, have forced many households to allocate a larger share of their income to essentials. Today, around 73 per cent of families with children under 15 have both parents employed. We have also seen the great devaluing of tertiary education. In 1980, approximately 5 per cent of Australians aged 15-74 held a bachelor's degree or higher. By 2024, this figure had risen to a whopping 33 per cent. In the 80s, you could build a family on one income, even if you were among the outstanding majority (95 per cent) of those without university qualifications. Today, the story is the opposite, with several couples claiming their monthly expenses are too high to consider children, despite both working in fields requiring tertiary educations. But yes, wages are 'higher than ever'.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Why do we need to boost productivity?
INGA TING, ABC DATA JOURNALIST: For those of us toiling five full days a week, the idea of a working four days a week – at 100 per cent of pay – sounds almost too good to be true. But at the upcoming economic roundtable, Australia's unions will cite research showing it not only boosts living standards, but also productivity. To understand how that might work, we first need to understand what productivity is, what it measures and what it doesn't. Put simply, productivity measures how much we output compared to how much we input. It's about quantity, not cost or profit. Today, the average Australian worker takes just one hour to produce the same amount produced over an entire day in 1901. That's thanks to a bunch of factors like economies of scale, higher skilled and educated workers, better management practices and - the single biggest factor historically – technology. A series of reports from the Productivity Commission have highlighted a long-standing productivity problem, showing Australians are working record-long hours and yet productivity growth is at its slowest in 60 years. And that trend is across most industrialised countries, not just Australia. So how does that work? Labour productivity typically measures the number of hours it takes to produce a good or service. This is fairly straightforward when you're looking at manufacturing or agriculture, and measuring, say, the number of cars or tonnes of wheat produced per worker. But it gets trickier when applied to sectors like care services, health or education, where the maths might tell you that bigger class sizes mean more productive teachers while the reality for students suggests the opposite. Bear in mind that nearly 90 per cent of Australians now work in the service industry, and we start to see how the way we typically measure productivity is starting to unravel. The picture gets muddier still, when we consider that labour isn't the only driver of productivity. Physical capital – like buildings, machines and equipment – as well as intangible capital like intellectual property, also have big impacts. This chart compares labour productivity to multifactor productivity, which measures the combined input from both labour and capital. It shows both types of productivity have been declining but capital productivity has lagged labour productivity for the best part of 30 years. The Productivity Commission has made the same point; that the added hours workers are putting in have not been matched by business investment in the systems and technologies that would allow workers to use those hours more efficiently. So, can we actually work less but produce more? The data suggests, yes especially if investments in better management and new technology are matched with less burnout, better staff retention and more motivated employees. Work smarter, not longer - that's the challenge for next week's roundtable.
