New Measures Aim to Accelerate Green Aviation Fuel Production
The UK Government has also announced an additional £400,000 of funding for producers so that new clean fuels can get to market quicker.
SAF is an alternative to fossil jet fuel and reduces greenhouse gas emissions on average by 70% on a lifecycle basis. While the fuel is more costly to produce than jet fuel, the UK Government's SAF measures protect industry and consumers from excessive costs, it said.
In addition, the revenue certainty mechanism (RCM) will keep ticket price changes minimal – keeping fluctuations to £1.50 a year on average – and will be industry funded through a levy on aviation fuel suppliers. The Department for Transport (DfT) said it would continue to engage with industry on the details of the RCM, including pricing.
A new round of government funding is also being announced to offer fuel producers a share of £400,000 to support the testing and qualification of green fuels, helping to get them to market quicker. This support for producers follows £63 million of funding made available through the Advanced Fuels Fund this year.
Aviation Minister, Mike Kane, said:
'I want to see a golden age for green aviation and today sees take off for sustainable flights.
'Aviation continues to be one of the fastest growing and most integral parts of the UK's economy, offering more jobs across engineering, tourism and hospitality – and as we support aviation expansion, we need to move at full throttle towards decarbonisation.'
The new legislation will help industry meet its requirements under the SAF Mandate, introduced in January this year, which specifies that at least 10% of all jet fuel used in flights taking off from the UK from 2030, be made with sustainable fuel, rising to 22% by 2040.
The UK Government said its approach on low carbon fuels could add up to £5 billion to the economy by 2050 and position the UK as a global hub for SAF production.
Tim Alderslade, Chief Executive of Airlines UK, said:
'This is a welcome announcement given the importance of the RCM to commercialising and scaling-up SAF production in the UK, a technology key to decarbonising aviation by 2050. A UK SAF industry, kick-started by the RCM and SAF Mandate, can create tens of thousands of jobs across the country whilst supporting our world-class aviation sector to deliver economic growth.
'We look forward to working with government on scheme design and how contracts are allocated, so that we balance the need to deliver the SAF required to support mandate compliance, whilst keeping costs as low as possible through a competitive and transparent bidding process that places the consumer at its heart.'
Duncan McCourt, Chief Executive of Sustainable Aviation, said:
'We hugely welcome the publication of this important legislation. SAF is a crucial element in the plan to decarbonise aviation as it can be used in existing aircraft with existing infrastructure.
'The challenge now is to scale the industry, ensuring we have enough SAF to meet the mandate whilst keeping costs low and create thousands of jobs in the process. This legislation will help to do that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
20 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Patrick Harvie: 'Trump is not welcome in Scotland'
Now reports suggest that the first convicted criminal ever to serve as President of the United States is planning another visit to our shores. In 2023, Trump was found guilty of thirty-four charges relating to false accounting in his business, after he paid $130,000 in hush money to cover up an affair with a porn star. Trump also has dozens of sexual assault allegations against him dating back to the 1970s. His contempt for women, his racism, and his climate denial have all been clear for decades. At home, Trump has sent troops onto the streets to threaten his own citizens. He is constructing a concentration camp in Florida, and sending agents to terrorise working-class immigrant communities across America, where people are being seized from their homes, businesses, and places of worship, and deported without fair process, ripping families apart. He has slashed funding from crucial services – a move which has already cost the lives of working-class people – to give tax breaks to his billionaire pals. Donald Trump rides roughshod over the rights of his own citizens, but his actions show the same contempt for international law, from withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement to welcoming Israel's Prime Minister to Washington D.C. while Netanyahu has an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for war crimes. It's revolting to see this celebration of the man behind the ongoing atrocities and genocide of innocent civilians in Gaza and the West Bank. Leaders who break international law, who show such utter disdain for human rights at home and abroad, should not be treated like other world leaders. They should be treated like pariahs, not normalised. Recently, Trump's Vice President directly attacked Scottish democracy, spreading lies about a bill led by my Green MSP colleague Gillian Mackay and passed overwhelmingly by Parliament. One of the most senior people in another nation's government had deliberately spread misinformation about our politics and laws, and yet the UK Government still plans to welcome his regime with open arms. Trump has forfeited the right to the red carpet treatment, and it is frankly embarrassing to see UK leaders continuing to pander to him instead of calling him out. Given Keir Starmer's track record, we can expect a display of deference without a single word of challenge to Trump's fascism. But it's not just down to Westminster and the UK Government. The Scottish Government must also make it clear that Trump is not welcome here. We in the Scottish Greens have long called for an investigation into Donald Trump's finances in Scotland through an Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) – a power held by the Scottish Government to investigate the finances of politically active individuals who have gained wealth through suspicious means. Trump's Menie Estate golf course, which he is set to visit this month, was cited in one of his felony charges, which makes it clearer than ever that a UWO must be used. Playing golf while babies starve to death in a man-made, live-streamed genocide is a sickening display of wealth and power. The SNP Government should make it clear that we in Scotland are not playing along.
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
DOGE sprouts in red states, as governors embrace the cost-cutter brand and make it their own
The brash and chaotic first days of President Donald Trump 's Department of Government Efficiency, once led by the world's richest man Elon Musk, spawned state-level DOGE mimicry as Republican governors and lawmakers aim to show they are in step with their party's leader. Governors have always made political hay out of slashing waste or taming bureaucracy, but DOGE has, in some ways, raised the stakes for them to show that they are zealously committed to cutting costs. Many drive home the point that they have always been focused on cutting government, even if they're not conducting mass layoffs. 'I like to say we were doing DOGE before DOGE was a thing,' Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds said in announcing her own task force in January. Critics agree that some of these initiatives are nothing new and suggest they are wasteful, essentially duplicating built-in processes that are normally the domain of legislative committees or independent state auditors. At the same time, some governors are using their DOGE vehicles to take aim at GOP targets of the moment, such as welfare programs or diversity, equity and inclusion programs. And some governors who might be eyeing a White House run in 2028 are rebranding their cost-cutting initiatives as DOGE, perhaps eager to claim the mantle of the most DOGE of them all. No chainsaws in the states At least 26 states have initiated DOGE-style efforts of varying kinds, according to the Economic Policy Institute based in Washington, D.C. Most DOGE efforts were carried out through a governor's order — including by governors in Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, Montana, New Hampshire and Oklahoma — or by lawmakers introducing legislation or creating a legislative committee. The state initiatives have a markedly different character than Trump's slash-and-burn approach, symbolized by Musk's chainsaw-brandishing appearance at a Conservative Political Action Committee appearance in February. Governors are tending to entrust their DOGE bureaus to loyalists, rather than independent auditors, and are often employing what could be yearslong processes to consolidate procurement, modernize information technology systems, introduce AI tools, repeal regulations or reduce car fleets, office leases or worker headcounts through attrition. Steve Slivinski, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute who researches state government regulatory structures, said that a lot of what he has seen from state-level DOGE initiatives are the 'same stuff you do on a pretty regular basis anyway' in state governments. States typically have routine auditing procedures and the ways states have of saving money are 'relatively unsexy," Slivinski said. And while the state-level DOGE vehicles might be useful over time in finding marginal improvements, "branding it DOGE is more of a press op rather than anything new or substantially different than what they usually do,' Slivinski said. Analysts at the pro-labor Economic Policy Institute say that governors and lawmakers, primarily in the South and Midwest, are using DOGE to breathe new life into long-term agendas to consolidate power away from state agencies and civil servants, dismantle public services and benefit insiders and privatization advocates. 'It's not actually about cutting costs because of some fiscal responsibility,' EPI analyst Nina Mast said. Governors promoting spending cuts Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry rebranded his 'Fiscal Responsibility Program' as Louisiana DOGE, and promoted it as the first to team up with the federal government to scrub illegitimate enrollees from welfare programs. It has already netted $70 million in savings in the Medicaid program in an 'unprecedented' coordination, Landry said in June. In Oklahoma, Gov. Kevin Stitt — who says in a blurb on the Oklahoma DOGE website that 'I've been DOGE-ing in Oklahoma since before it was cool" — made a DOGE splash with the first report by his Division of Government Efficiency by declaring that the state would refuse some $157 million in federal public health grants. The biggest chunk of that was $132 million intended to support epidemiology and laboratory capacity to control infectious disease outbreaks. The Stitt administration said that funding — about one-third of the total over an eight-year period — exceeded the amount needed. The left-leaning Oklahoma Policy Institute questioned the wisdom of that, pointing to rising numbers of measles and whooping cough cases and the rocky transition under Stitt of the state's public health lab from Oklahoma City to Stillwater. Oklahoma Democrats issued rebukes, citing Oklahoma's lousy public health rankings. 'This isn't leadership,' state Sen. Carri Hicks said. 'It's negligence." Stitt's Oklahoma DOGE has otherwise recommended changes in federal law to save money, opened up the suggestion box to state employees and members of the general public and posted a spreadsheet online with cost savings initiatives in his administration. Those include things as mundane as agencies going paperless, refinancing bonds, buying automated lawn mowers for the Capitol grounds or eliminating a fax machine line in the State Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Surveyors. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed an executive order in February creating a task force of DOGE teams in each state agency. In the order, DeSantis recited 10 points on what he described as his and Florida's 'history of prudent fiscal management' even before DOGE. Among other things, DeSantis vowed to scrutinize spending by state universities and municipal and county governments — including on DEI initiatives — at a time when DeSantis is pushing to abolish the property taxes that predominantly fund local governments. His administration has since issued letters to universities and governments requesting reams of information and received a blessing from lawmakers, who passed legislation authorizing the inquiry and imposing fines for entities that don't respond. After the June 30 signing ceremony, DeSantis declared on social media: 'We now have full authority to DOGE local governments.' In Arkansas, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders launched her cost-cutting Arkansas Forward last year, before DOGE, and later said the state had done the 'same thing' as DOGE. Her administration spent much of 2024 compiling a 97-page report that listed hundreds of ways to possibly save $300 million inside a $6.5 billion budget. Achieving that savings — largely by standardizing information technology and purchasing — would sometimes require up-front spending and take years to realize savings. ___
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Government should help fund disabled facilities
A councillor and accessibility campaigner has called upon the Scottish Government to set minimum standards for disabled facilities in football stadiums, and urged them to help clubs fund vital improvements. Scottish Greens councillor for Forth, Kayleigh Kinross O'Neill, who holds the Transport & Environment portfolio for the Edinburgh Green Councillor Group and sits on the party's Disabled Greens representative group committee, believes that much more has to be done to improve accessibility at grounds throughout the country. As a wheelchair user and having faced the hurdles that disabled fans encounter when attending football matches first hand, Kinross O'Neill also feels that the introduction of a 'national sport access card' could help ease some of the problems she herself has encountered when trying to buy tickets to attend sporting events, such as having to prove their disabled status. Many clubs currently work to the guidelines laid down by CAFE (Centre for Access to Football in Europe) or the Scottish FA's Disability Equality Guide. While acknowledging that these clubs are often doing the best they can under the financial limitations they are operating within, she would like to see the government helping them out by not only introducing legislation to guarantee minimum standardised facilities, but to also help the clubs to pay for them. "Definitely,' Kinross O'Neill said. 'What I would like to see are minimum standards for infrastructure, so where folk can sit and go to the toilet, a minimum standard for staff and engagement, so that staff are all able and willing to communicate and help disabled folk, and equally, that the clubs are also able to support disabled staff as well. 'And then finally, ticketing, having something like a national access card that reduces the barriers, but also protects disabled people in getting a fair price and support that they need. 'If you had a national sport access card, I would be supportive of that as that reduces the barriers of actually getting the ticket. 'A big thing for me, and a thing that I'm trying really hard to get the message across about, is that as a person with a disability, going to a sporting event is tied into most disabled people's experience of 'normal life,' and everything that everybody else takes for granted. 'So, when we're going to an event, we've got to ask and worry about, 'How am I going to get from the entrance to my seat?', 'What if I need to go to the toilet during the game?', 'What if I need to go to the toilet during the break when everyone's running about trying to get a drink?' and all these sorts of things. 'Disabled people make up 20% to 24% of the population. If the government is not treating this as a priority, they're neglecting a large chunk of society. 'The fan experience should be for everyone, and it should also not be an afterthought or something that is a 'nice to have.' Accessibility should be planned from the get-go. I personally would say that in a lot of stadiums, including culture and transport spaces, disability is usually an afterthought. You've got the basics, but then anything else is an extra. 'Right now, it's the clubs themselves that have the responsibility for access and inclusion; I think that it should be higher up where that is mandated and executed, which comes to the point about government funding. 'I appreciate it's difficult when different clubs are doing different things, so I would say that we should standardise the requirements for access and have some sort of national guidance. (Image: Kayleigh Kinross O'Neill) 'In transport, for example, you have a system of guidance; a bare minimum that every company or business, or if it's council-owned, what councils have to do to meet the minimum standards for accessible travel. So, it's not up to a council to say, 'Well, we don't really have the money.' 'If this came from the government saying every club of a certain size or club in an area would get X amount of money, and they had to spend it on updating the disabled toilet to be of a certain standard, for example, then that would really help.' As well as competing for funding, Kinross O'Neill appreciates that the subject of accessibility is competing for space in the national consciousness, but she hopes that by shining a spotlight on the issue it can inspire a serious conversation about how to improve things for disabled fans. After all, with so many people either directly or indirectly being impacted by disability at some point in their lives, improving such facilities is to the benefit of everyone. "I think the subject is something of a taboo,' she said. 'It's a thing that people aren't really as socially comfortable to discuss as maybe other things. And that's unfortunate, because everyone will have an experience with a disability at one point in their life, whether it's through a family member or themselves or old age or illness. 'I think it's just so important that everyone talks about it and stops being scared because it can be part of life, and why should that stop people from engaging in a sport that they love or engaging in a community that they've always been a part of? There's nothing more heartbreaking than being isolated and left behind for whatever reason. 'Disabled access is actually about access for everyone. It can happen to anybody.' Through her work in Transport & the Environment, Kinross O'Neill is also keenly aware of how simple things like adequate parking can greatly impact a disabled person's experience. 'If you make things more accessible, including parking, that's also going to help older folk that maybe can't walk as far but wouldn't say they're disabled,' she said. 'Or it would help folks that want to bring their young children, like in buggies, or just people that don't want to walk for three miles to a football game or a rugby game. So, access does so much more for people's independence, health, well-being, for their autonomy, for just general community cohesion than I think people realise. 'That community aspect of it is so important. It's a thing that's supposed to connect people and you make friends there, you make connections there, and you get out of the house. 'I know that when I go to see Motherwell, where I'm originally from, I'll see groups of people that have been coming since they were 8 or 10 years old, and that is maybe the only time that they're going to go out that week. 'So, the opportunity that has can be quite powerful, but if it's not done right, that's when it starts being quite sad and detrimental for folk's well-being and confidence.'
