Japan opens Osprey base on Kyushu as China ramps up military presence
The first V-22 Osprey is expected to arrive later on July 9
TOKYO - The Ground Self- Defence Force (GSDF) opened a new camp in south-western Japan on July 9 to host its fleet of Osprey transport aircraft s , part of efforts to strengthen defenses of remote islands due to fears over China's increasing military ambitions.
The first V-22 Osprey is expected to arrive later on July 9 at the new Camp Saga, in the prefecture of the same name on the main island of Kyushu, transferring from Camp Kisarazu in Chiba Prefecture near Tokyo. The GSDF's tilt-rotor aircraft have been temporarily based there since July 2020.
Operations at the new camp, staffed by about 420 personnel, begin as safety concerns linger following a series of Osprey accidents in Japan and abroad, including a fatal crash two years ago.
Ospreys can take off and land like helicopters but cruise like airplanes. The primary mission of the V-22 unit is to transport personnel and equipment for the GSDF's Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade in the event of an emergency.
Dubbed the Japanese Marines, the brigade is based in Sasebo, Nagasaki Prefecture, adjacent to Saga, and specialises in defending remote islands.
The relocation of the Ospreys reflects Tokyo's recent focus on bolstering deterrence and response capabilities in the south-western Nansei island chain, a strategically vital area due to its proximity to the potential geopolitical flashpoint of Taiwan.
China considers Taiwan a renegade province to be reunified with the mainland, by force if necessary. It has stepped up military pressure on the self-ruled democratic island and increased maritime assertiveness in the East and South China seas.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Asia Why Japan and South Korea are on different paths in the latest US trade salvo
World Trump says steep copper tariffs in store as he broadens his trade war
Opinion Hyper-competitive classrooms feed the corporate world's narcissist pipeline
Opinion Is Donald Trump unstoppable?
Singapore Keep citizens at the centre of public service, Chan Chun Sing tells civil servants
Business 'It's our grandfather's company, we won't sell', says Wong family as shareholders reject GE delisting bid
Singapore Police officer taken to hospital after motorcycle accident on PIE
Asia Ex-Malaysian PM Najib's wife Rosmah wins $30,000 in suit against TikToker
The GSDF plans to transfer the remaining 16 Ospreys from Chiba to Saga in several waves by mid-August, landing the aircraft on the runway of the prefecture's main commercial airport, located next to Camp Saga.
The US military also deploys Ospreys in Japan. In November 2023, one crashed off Yakushima Island in Kagoshima Prefecture in south-western Japan during a routine training flight, killing all eight crew members.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Truce between Cambodia and Thailand secured under Asean chair Malaysia, but can it hold?
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Deal reflects Asean's reliance on external pressure and proactive chairmanship rather than robust institutional mechanisms, say observers. (From left) Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Thai acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai after a special meeting in Kuala Lumpur on July 28. SINGAPORE – Asean notched a diplomatic win on July 28, with chair Malaysia securing a ceasefire agreement between Thailand and Cambodia after deadly border clashes left more than 30 dead and raised fears of further escalation. The breakthrough, announced after a special meeting in Kuala Lumpur hosted by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, is victory for the grouping, whose relevance has been increasingly questioned amid inaction on other regional challenges. But observers say that whether this will translate into lasting peace remains far from certain. The conflict had simmered since May, with deadly clashes erupting since July 24 t hat killed over 30 people, mostly civilians. Just hours before the ceasefire took effect at midnight on July 29, diplomatic pressure intensified, led by Malaysia and strongly backed by both the United States and China. The t alks were hastened after US President Donald Trump warned on July 27 that Washington would not pursue trade deals with either side until the violence stopped. Both Thailand and Cambodia face the prospect of a 36 per cent US tariff from Aug 1. China also played an active role. Beijing on July 24 expressed concern over the fighting and pledged to promote dialogue, de-escalation and peace. Both the US and China were present at the July 28 meeting, which Malaysia said was co-organised by Washington, with Beijing's active participation. Analysts say the agreement reflects a successful case of Asean-led diplomacy, but also highlights the grouping's reliance on external pressure and proactive chairmanship rather than robust institutional mechanisms. Dr Mustafa Izzuddin, a senior international affairs analyst at business consultancy Solaris Strategies Singapore, said that the ceasefire can be billed an Asean success. 'Malaysia's leadership was crucial as the organisation's chair to mediate between Thailand and Cambodia, while also leveraging on the importance of China and the US, both dialogue partners of Asean, to further reaffirm that this ceasefire can be brought into fruition,' he said. Under the agreement, both sides committed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire. The peace roadmap also includes informal meetings between military commanders, and a g eneral b order c ommittee session scheduled for Aug 4. Malaysia, in its capacity as Asean chair, offered to coordinate an observer team and consult fellow member states about participating, a move aimed at providing regional support for verification. But experts caution that implementation may prove difficult, given the grouping's lack of enforcement tools. 'A ceasefire is an immediate and very short-term solution. What is more important is for the ceasefire to hold in the long run while Cambodia and Thailand negotiate their border disputes,' said Dr Abdul Rahman Yaacob, a research fellow at the Lowy Institute think-tank. 'One possible mechanism is the deployment of Malaysia n or Asean observers along the Thai-Cambodia border. This is critical, given the strategic mistrust between (the two sides).' Observers note that Asean lacks a standing peacekeeping force or formal verification tools. Previous attempts to introduce monitoring mechanisms, such as Indonesia's proposal to send observers during the 2011 Preah Vihear clashes, were rejected, primarily over sovereignty concerns. That earlier conflict between Cambodia and Thailand also ended in a ceasefire, but tensions persisted for years. 'The biggest risks lie in lingering distrust and potential miscommunication along contested border areas, and the absence of any formal verification mechanism,' said Ms Joanne Lin, senior fellow at the ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. 'Asean does not have institutional tools like independent observers or peace monitors to oversee implementation on the ground.' These limitations raise broader questions about how Asean handles internal conflict. Some experts warn that without follow-up action, the grouping may revert to inaction once the immediate crisis fades. 'The outcome was driven largely by Malaysia's personal diplomacy and strong external pressure, rather than any institutional mechanism within Asean,' said Ms Lin, referring to the ceasefire. 'Without efforts to institutionalise these crisis response lessons, the group risks falling back into passivity.' Dr Rahman echoed this, saying the group has the capacity to maintain peace – if political will exists. But he added that an Asean-led ceasefire is more acceptable than one imposed by external powers, and said the grouping has provided its two conflicting members with a familiar platform to discuss a ceasefire and resolve the crisis. Others also framed the breakthrough as a significant win for Malaysia's diplomacy. Mr Adib Zalkapli, managing director of geopolitical consultancy Viewfinder Global Affairs, said that it showed how Malaysia can step up and play an important role in maintaining peace in the region. Domestically, the deal may also offer a brief political boost to Datuk Seri Anwar. 'Anwar of course scores some brownie points in brokering this peace that could potentially offset some of his domestic political troubles,' said Dr Oh Ei Sun, senior fellow at think-tank Singapore Institute of International Affairs. Still, observers agree the coming weeks will determine whether the ceasefire holds and whether Asean can rise to the challenge of sustaining peace. 'While holding the talks can be seen as a success, there will not be easy solutions to this long-standing issue,' said Dr Bridget Welsh, honorary research associate at the University of Nottingham Asia Research Institute Malaysia. For a group long criticised for its inaction on crises like Myanmar and the South China Sea, the truce offers a chance to prove its relevance and if it can maintain the momentum. 'The real test now lies in verifying the ceasefire and whether Asean can follow through with implementing its own peace mechanisms,' said Ms Lin. The ceasefire, as much of a win as it is, is a fragile one because ground realities suggest that it could readily break down, said Dr Mustafa. 'So it is incumbent on the political leaderships of both Cambodia and Thailand to maintain the ceasefire by not succumbing to domestic political pressures, and on Malaysia as the honest broker to remind both countries about their bilateral obligations in keeping the peace,' he said.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US senator wants Musk to block use of Starlink by financial fraud groups in Southeast Asia
Find out what's new on ST website and app. U.S. Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) speaks during an event at NHTI Concord Community College in Concord, New Hampshire, U.S., October 22, 2024. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo WASHINGTON - A Democratic senator on Monday urged SpaceX CEO Elon Musk to block transnational criminal groups in Southeast Asia from using Starlink satellite internet service to commit fraud against Americans. Senator Maggie Hassan cited recent reports that Starlink is being used to facilitate fraud against Americans by a broad range of transnational criminal organizations operating "scam compounds" in Southeast Asia. The U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network said these groups defrauded Americans out of billions of dollars, she added. "Scam networks in Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia, and Laos, however, have apparently continued to use Starlink despite service rules permitting SpaceX to terminate access for fraudulent activity," Hassan wrote in a letter to Musk seen by Reuters. "SpaceX has a responsibility to block criminals from using the service to target Americans." SpaceX did not immediately respond to a request for comment. For years, criminal networks have trafficked hundreds of thousands of people to scam compounds across Southeast Asia, including many along the Thai-Myanmar border, where victims are forced to work in illegal online schemes, according to the United Nations. "While most people have probably noticed the increasing number of scam texts, calls, and emails they're receiving, they may not know that transnational criminals halfway across the world may be perpetrating these scams by using Starlink internet access," Hassan wrote. Since February, Thailand has halted electricity, internet, and fuel supplies to five Myanmar border areas, including Myawaddy, in a bid to disrupt the scam centers, which have become an escalating regional security concern. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thailand, Cambodia agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Asia Gunman kills 5 near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: BCA to conduct independent probe, act against any non-compliance Singapore Foreign workers who rescued woman from sinkhole given tokens of appreciation Singapore COE quota up 2.6% to 18,701 for August-October period Business SIA's first-quarter profits fall by 59%; airline group sees volatile times ahead Singapore Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty on Aug 4 in case linked to ex-transport minister Iswaran Singapore Jail for former pre-school teacher who tripped toddler repeatedly, causing child to bleed from nose International pressure to shut down the scam centers intensified following the abduction of Chinese actor Wang Xing, who was kidnapped after arriving in Thailand in January. He was later rescued by Thai police, who located him across the border in Myanmar. Criminal networks, mainly emanating from China, are known to run several of these scam centers, including those in the Myawaddy region, according to the United States Institute of Peace. REUTERS
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
US-China relations: Between confrontation and transaction
THE return of Donald Trump to the White House in January has ushered in a new chapter of Sino-American relations marked by aggressive economic policies, strategic unpredictability and a pattern of escalation followed by tactical negotiations. Six months into his second presidency, Trump's approach to China has proved both more confrontational and more transactional than many observers anticipated. And there are now signs that his administration is starting to reassess its moves. Trump signalled a hard line on China with hawkish Cabinet picks, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Michael Waltz. He also wasted little time in implementing his campaign promises on China trade policy. Within weeks of inauguration, the administration launched what many economists dub the most aggressive trade war in recent history. On Feb 1, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from China. Starting in April, Trump imposed a minimum 10 per cent tariff on nearly everything the US imports, although goods from China faced a higher tariff of 34 per cent. The administration's broader China strategy plans to fundamentally restructure economic ties between the two nations. Trump pledged to revoke China's preferential trade status and had threatened at least 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports during his campaign, signalling a departure from decades of economic engagement and the start of a process of decoupling. Beyond trade, the Trump administration is also expanding restrictions on Chinese ownership of American assets. The president has said he will pressure Chinese companies to sell holdings that threaten national security interests. This encompasses farm land, natural resources, technology companies and ports. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up These moves represent a broader shift towards viewing the trade relationship through national security lenses, promoted by the China hawks in office. Economic competition is being framed as a matter of strategic rivalry rather than mere trade disputes. Despite the aggressive opening moves, Trump's second term has also demonstrated his willingness to pull back from maximum pressure when it serves his interests. In mid-May, Washington reached an agreement with Beijing to lower tariffs dramatically and open some markets that both sides had closed off as tensions rose. Tariffs on Chinese imports fell to 35 per cent from 145 per cent – a historic level reached in April following retaliatory hikes. That dramatic reduction demonstrated Trump's transactional approach to international relations. The 90-day suspension of the heaviest tariffs has created space for ongoing negotiations, with both sides apparently recognising the economic costs of sustained pressure. US companies have faced particular challenges adapting to the volatile policy environment. The clash has also seen China retaliating through restrictions on critical minerals and magnets needed by US factories. Some sectors have received temporary relief, with the administration exempting certain technology products from the harshest tariffs, but many businesses report difficulties with long-term planning amid policy uncertainty. Trump's confrontational approach extended beyond China to traditional allies, potentially reshaping regional dynamics in Asia. By pressuring Canadian, Mexican and European partners, his administration has created opportunities for China to strengthen relations with countries seeking alternatives to US partnerships. The unpredictability of Trump's approach has forced some regional powers to recalculate their strategic positions, with some hedging their bets between the two superpowers rather than aligning clearly with the US. The rising costs of a growing confrontation with China has led to the reassessment of these policies in Washington. Most intriguingly, the Trump administration reversed its position on technology controls, notably allowing Nvidia to sell lower-level artificial intelligence chips, the H20, to China this month after banning such sales in April. Some suggest that this dramatic about-turn from the administration's initial hardline stance may reflect the eroding power of the China hawks in the administration, including personnel changes. Alex Wong, a known China hawk and former deputy national security advisor, has been reassigned to another role, and the State Department has shuttered the team involved in South China Sea security. These changes appear tied to Trump's broader diplomatic strategy. Some in Washington are speculating that he may be angling for a Chinese trip as he courts a more assertive China. But it is doubtful that the administration is planning to reset the relationship with China through direct engagement rather than continued confrontation. In a way, several patterns have emerged in Sino-American relationships under Trump. The administration appears committed to using economic pressure as its primary tool for reshaping the relationship, but remains willing to negotiate when faced with economic or political costs at home. The relationship is now defined by cycles of escalation followed by tactical compromises, reflecting Trump's preference for dramatic gestures and dealmaking. Still, neither side appears willing to accept a return to the pre-2016 status, suggesting that heightened tensions and economic competition will remain defining features of US-China relations.
