logo
Newsom's ties to CCP under microscope in new book exposing alleged corruption: 'Fleeced American citizens'

Newsom's ties to CCP under microscope in new book exposing alleged corruption: 'Fleeced American citizens'

Fox News10-03-2025

FIRST ON FOX: A new book sounding the alarm about corruption in California spends a chapter focusing on Gov. Gavin Newsom's history with a nonprofit organization that the authors say served as a major "gateway" for corrupt CCP-aligned corporations to flood into the state.
In their book, "Fool's Gold: The Radicals, Con Artists, and Traitors Who Killed the California Dream and Now Threaten Us All," authors Jedd McFatter and Susan Crabtree write extensively about Newsom's relationship with the Chinese community in the Bay Area and his ties to CCP businesses.
The book explains that Newsom came into office as San Francisco's mayor in 2004 after receiving strong support from Chinese voters, enough so that he celebrated his victory in Chinatown and the authors write that from an early point in his tenure he was ready to "go full steam ahead with Chinatown's interests."
One of those interests, according to Chapter 3 of the book, was a nonprofit organization initiative started by Newsom called ChinaSF that the book argues served as a gateway for CCP officials and Chinese criminals to exploit California.
The book describes a Newsom trip to China, where he was hosted in a Shanghai "clubhouse" by Vincent Lo, a Chinese businessman with deep ties to the CCP.
"It was during this meeting that Newsom and Lo hatched a long-​term plan to turn San Francisco into the premiere gateway through which Chinese companies could invest and expand their businesses in the United States," the book says. "Upon his return from China, starry-​eyed Gavin told his staff that he was going to set aside a couple of million dollars to set up a public-​private partnership called ChinaSF that would open the floodgates to Chinese money and business like never before. It turns out the young mayor wasn't just blowing smoke: three years later, Newsom and Lo joined forces in Shanghai to co‑launch ChinaSF."
The book says that ChinaSF impacted the Bay Area arguably "more than any other" program that Newsom created as mayor and that the initiative hauled in almost $5.5 billion of economic impact to San Francisco from 2008 to 2018 while recruiting 108 Chinese companies into the city.
The book alleges that during this time period, ChinaSF "helped several corrupt Chinese corporations come to America."
One of the several companies discussed in the book was Suntech, a Chinese solar company developed by the CCP that was personally recruited by Newsom into the United States, and he publicly praised the company's CEO, Dr. Zhengrong Shi, multiple times, and made him an advisory board member for ChinaSF.
In addition to green energy companies who streamed through ChinaSF, real estate companies were also involved, and the book alleges that Newsom received over $23,000 in anonymous contributions from Chinese real estate company Z&L, whose billionaire owner was criminally sentenced for bribing a San Francisco government official.
Chapter 3, titled "Feeding the Dragon," goes into detail about a variety of potential red flags on Newsom's ties with China, including ChinaSF being used as a "tool to build San Francisco into a global hub for biotechnology and pharmaceutical science."
"Dozens of Chinese biotech companies were drawn to the Bay Area with huge tax breaks and other incentives, but it appears that there was very little vetting," the book states. "One of ChinaSF's most concerning recruits is the biotech company JOINN Laboratories, which has close ties to China's military."
Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom's office for comment and received a response pointing to an article about conspiracy theories with the headline, "Conspiracy theorists really do see the world differently, new study shows."
The book goes on to discuss ChinaSF's involvement with biotechnology and pharmaceutical science companies that were "drawn to the Bay Area" with tax breaks and "little vetting" along with a liquor company called Kweichow Moutai, which has a history of "several major corruption scandals involving bribery by CCP officials."
The book also alleges that as California's lieutenant governor, Newsom trademarked wines he owns in China and poured them for CCP elites at a lavish Shanghai tasting.
The authors also drew attention to the controversial connection between ChinaSF and Huawei, a company that has been involved in a myriad of questionable practices that have drawn scrutiny from U.S. presidential administrations, resulting in restrictions.
"However, no one seemed to notice when an infamous Chinese company became their top financial sponsor in 2016," the book says. "This might be because the U.S. government has long identified that company, Huawei Technologies, as one of China's most dangerous tech companies. According to an internal report, ChinaSF hosted two events in 2016, headlined by Huawei, which led to Huawei establishing a new research and development office in San Francisco. The amount of money Huawei funneled to ChinaSF is unknown, but it's worth noting that in 2016, Huawei generated more than $75 billion in revenue, so they had plenty of cash to flash around."
ChinaSF once described itself as a nonprofit, including on its now defunct website, the book explains, but between 2009 and 2014 it was a limited liability corporation whose only member was the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce.
"In other words, for a period of time, ChinaSF was a private entity embedded in a local chamber of commerce," the book says.
The chapter closes with a summary of why ChinaSF's influence in the state deserves more scrutiny.
"Close analysis of available data reveals that most descriptions of ChinaSF by government and media have been vacuous and misleading,": the book says. "Essentially, ChinaSF is the branded name of a complex bureaucratic mirage used as cover to legitimize the massive transfer of Bay Area technology, property, and wealth to China while streamlining the establishment of Chinese business in the United States. It's the secret elixir Newsom concocted to help transform San Francisco into the primary entry point and hub of China's BRI in the United States."
"On the surface, the flurry of MOUs, press conferences, ribbon cuttings, and so forth – propped up by reassuring proclamations from chambers of commerce and government officials like Newsom – cohere into what may look like an innovative job-​generating public-​private partnership. But the deeper you probe into who's funding ChinaSF, who's failing to vet all the Chinese companies coming in, and who's making money off the deals – you discover there's no reasonable public accountability structure in place, not enough records for the public to review, and no clear explanations for why the San Francisco mayor's office has a right to engage in risky subnational business schemes in some cases with People's Republic of China criminals and shady Chinese firms who have exploited and damaged the US economy and fleeced American citizens with their fraudulent schemes."
"San Francisco is proud of its long-standing relationship with China and its sister city, Shanghai," Newsom said in 2008. "ChinaSF builds on this history of shared cultural and economic ties, and strengthens future economic prosperity through enhanced relationships between San Franciscan and Chinese businesses."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's National Guard deployment intensifies long-running feud with California
Trump's National Guard deployment intensifies long-running feud with California

San Francisco Chronicle​

time38 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump's National Guard deployment intensifies long-running feud with California

SACRAMENTO — California officials were already bracing for President Donald Trump to try clawing back a big chunk of federal funding when he intensified his attacks on the state in a different way by deploying federal troops to Los Angeles. The deployment represents an escalation in the long-simmering feud between state officials and the Trump administration. Heading into the weekend, California officials were preparing to respond if Trump followed through on reported plans to revoke a wide swath of federal grants from the state. But before announcing any major cuts, Trump instead trained his attention on protests in Los Angeles and some neighboring cities over federal immigration enforcement. The deployment comes as Trump has encountered legal roadblocks in his challenges to liberal California policies with which he disagrees. A judge blocked his latest attempt to withhold billions of federal dollars from sanctuary cities and states earlier this year. Last month, another judge blocked him from revoking college student visas, including ones for international students in California. Last week, another judge blocked his efforts to dismantle AmeriCorps in California and 23 other states. California has already launched 22 lawsuits against the Trump administration since the start of his second term in January, according to a tracker by the news outlet CalMatters. Judges have blocked or partially blocked Trump's actions in 10 of those cases. But Trump has continued to attack the state. In recent weeks, he's threatened to challenge or withhold funding over many other California policies, including those letting transgender children compete in youth sports, promoting diversity in schools and funding construction of the state's high-speed rail project. The National Guard deployment is unusual not just because it wasn't requested by state or local leadership, but because state and local leaders have aggressively protested the move. Gov. Gavin Newsom condemned the move in social media posts Saturday evening and followed up with a more comprehensive response in an email the next morning soliciting donations for his Campaign for Democracy effort. Local and state law enforcement in Los Angeles was adequately responding to the protests without National Guard backup, he said. Trump and his allies sent the troops to provoke the protesters, Newsom said. 'They want the violence,' Newsom wrote. 'They think this is good for them politically.' 'Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes and unrest,' Trump wrote on his social media website Saturday night. 'Thank you to the National Guard for a job well done!' Troops did not arrive in Los Angeles until Sunday morning, when they were filmed mostly standing around. The deployment followed two days of protests in Los Angeles, Compton and Paramount, where protesters had attempted to block some Border Patrol vehicles and police had fired tear gas, flash-bang explosives and pepper balls at the crowd. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the deployment was 'completely unnecessary' in response to the roughly 120 protesters in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday evening. She told local news station KTLA that local police responded adequately to the instances of vandalism during the protest. 'I'm very disappointed that he chose to do this because it is just not necessary,' she said of Trump's deployment. 'There was nothing that was happening in downtown Los Angeles that the Los Angeles Police Department could not manage.' Newsom urged protesters not to take the bait. 'Don't give them the spectacle they want,' Newsom wrote. 'Never use violence. Speak out peacefully and in large numbers.' On Sunday, tensions grew as the day wore on. Hundreds of people gathered in downtown Los Angeles to protest the troops' presence there, according to live feeds broadcast by the Associated Press. Newsom's office issued a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth formally asking that the troops be withdrawn. 'The decision to deploy the National Guard, without appropriate training or orders, risks seriously escalating the situation,' wrote David Sapp, Newsom's legal affairs secretary. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation.' State Senate Republican Leader Brian Jones of Santee (San Diego County) blamed Democrats for the ICE raids that sparked protests in the first place, saying that state sanctuary policies have forced federal immigration officials to conduct raids in communities rather than focusing on deporting people in jails. 'Now the Feds have to run broader raids, like what we're seeing in LA, which sweep up way more people,' Jones said. 'This whole thing was easily preventable.'

Feds vow to continue immigration enforcement 'every day in L.A.' Here are your rights
Feds vow to continue immigration enforcement 'every day in L.A.' Here are your rights

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Feds vow to continue immigration enforcement 'every day in L.A.' Here are your rights

As the number of immigration raids has increased across Southern California over the last week, there are more questions than ever about how to handle an interaction with federal agents. Agents with Immigration and Customs Enforcement made arrests in the garment district, specifically at Ambiance Apparel, where immigration authorities detained employees inside the clothing wholesaler, and other locations on Friday. Protests followed into the weekend, prompting the deployment of National Guard troops in downtown Los Angeles by the Trump administration. The raids are the latest in a string of high-profile immigration enforcement actions over the last week, part of President Trump's deportation crackdown. A few days ago, immigration agents raided a popular San Diego restaurant and made arrests, sparking a standoff with outraged residents. Agents also arrested Chinese and Taiwanese nationals at an underground nightclub in the Los Angeles area. Officials suggest that many more raids are coming. 'I'm telling you what, we're going to keep enforcing law every day in L.A.,' Trump's "border czar," Tom Homan, told NBC News. 'Every day in L.A., we're going to enforce immigration law. I don't care if they like it or not.' Read more: What really happened outside the Paramount Home Depot? The reality on the ground vs. the rhetoric Officials have not said how long the raids will last or described the larger operation. But in the deployment memo sending the National Guard to L.A., officials said 'the duration of duty shall be for 60 days or at the discretion of the Secretary of Defense. In addition, the Secretary of Defense may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion.' Over the last few months, The Times has asked experts for guidance for employees and employers who find themselves in the crosshairs. Here is a summary of what we found: If you're home alone or with family members and you hear a knock at the door, check the window, security camera or peephole so you can identify whether ICE agents are outside. When you find yourself in this situation, the first step is to keep your door closed and locked, advised advocacy groups and legal experts. You must open your door and allow agents inside your home if they present a valid search warrant. Advocates say agents must identify themselves and show you the warrant by putting it against the window or slipping it under your door. A valid warrant must be: issued by a court; have the correct name and address of the person being seized; signed by a judge or magistrate judge. This can be an overwhelming and scary situation. All those emotions are valid, said Pedro Trujillo, director of organizing for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights. Take a moment to gather yourself, he suggests, because there isn't a time limit on the visit. If you need help verbalizing your rights, show the agent a Red Card that helps explain your rights. Read more: The National Guard comes to Los Angeles: What's going to happen next? Red Cards can be downloaded from the website for the Immigration Legal Resource Center. By showing this card, you're affirming that you want to remain silent and wish to speak to a lawyer. The card states that the person ICE agents are inquiring about has the right to decline answering questions and signing or handing over documents based on their 5th Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. You can present this card to agents, whether it's a physical copy or a photo on your phone, by displaying it through the window. If ICE agents enter your home without consent, you have the right to say: 'I do not consent to this entry or search," according to advocates. Don't physically resist. Instead, you have the right to document what happens, including: getting officers' names and badge numbers; documenting details of their actions; and gathering contact information for any present witnesses. After agents have left, you have the right to reach out to and consult with a legal representative. You have the right to remain silent. For example, if you're asked about your immigration status, where you were born or how you entered the United States, you may refuse to answer or remain silent, according to the National Immigration Law Center. You can simply say, 'I want to remain silent' or 'I am exercising my right to remain silent.' Experts advise that you are not required to sign documents or provide personal information. If ICE agents are present when you're on public transportation: You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions. If agents want to conduct a search of you and your belongings, you have the right to refuse the search by saying you do not consent. An agent may 'pat down' your clothes if he or she suspects you have a weapon. You can ask, 'Am I free to leave?' If the agent says yes, calmly walk away. You may record interactions to document any violations of your rights. If ICE agents approach you while you're in the car: Pull over safely if stopped by law enforcement. Ask the law enforcement officers to identify if they are highway patrol, police or ICE agents by showing their badge. If it is an ICE agent, you have the right to remain silent and not offer any information, said Shiu-Ming Cheer, California Immigration Policy Center's deputy director of immigrant and racial justice. Keep your hands visible on the steering wheel and provide law enforcement or highway patrol officers requested documents such as your license and registration. If you can identify they're ICE agents, remain silent and do not provide any information. You can say, 'I do not consent to a search,' if they ask to search your car. Officers may still conduct a search if they believe it contains evidence of a crime. If you are detained or taken into custody, you have the right to reach out to an attorney and receive a phone call from an attorney. You can prove you have a lawyer by giving the officer your signed Form G-28, a federal document that details your lawyer's information and your consent to their legal representation. Read more: Immigration raids roil L.A., dozens of people detained. What we know so far Don't have a lawyer? You can ask the ICE official for a list of pro-bono lawyers. You can also ask to contact the consulate, which may be able to assist you in finding a lawyer. Get familiar with the rules of the detention center you've been placed in. You can do so by asking for a copy of the Detainee Handbook to understand the detention center's rules, your rights and how you can communicate with loved ones. The book is available in 19 languages, including English, Spanish, Arabic, Bengali, French, Haitian Creole, Hindi, K'iche' (Quiché)/Kxlantzij, Mam, Portuguese, Pulaar, Punjabi, Q'eqchi' (Kekchí), Romanian, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Turkish, Vietnamese and Wolof. A raid is when ICE agents arrive at a work site without warning the employer. They can be accompanied by other agencies or appear in large numbers, according to the California Employers Assn. ICE agents can go to a business to try to find a particular person, or people, according to the National Immigration Law Center. The California Employers Assn. recommends creating a four-step response plan that should address the following: Who needs to be alerted if ICE shows up or a notice is received? Who is authorized to speak to law enforcement agents on behalf of the company? What information can be gathered from the agents? Is there a designated place for agents to wait? Who should be alerted: Alerting management and employee/union representatives within an organization can help reduce workplace disruption and keep employees calm, said Giuliana Gabriel, vice president of human resources at the California Employers Assn. 'Rumors and misinformation tend to create panic amongst a workforce, and some employees may even try to flee or confront agents,' she said. 'Running could give the agents reason to detain or arrest someone, so having an employee representative or member of management to maintain order and keep employees calm is advisable.' Legal counsel should immediately be notified when ICE shows up because they can help 'protect your organization and your employees from agents overstepping their boundaries or taking liberties as far as what they are authorized to do at your workplace,' she added. Authorized speakers: Examples of people who can be designated to speak with agents include the business owner or a member of the management team, such as a general manager or human resources representative. 'Ideally it would be someone familiar with your response plan, if you have one, and authorized to speak on behalf of the company,' Gabriel said. The identified person or people should be able to communicate confidently, clearly and remain composed 'while protecting the privacy of your organization and its employees,' she said. Gathering ICE agent information: You have the right to ask immigration officials which agency they represent as well as for their names, badge numbers and business cards. 'There have been reports of citizens impersonating ICE agents to target, detain and harass others,' Gabriel said. Designated waiting area: Find a conference room or office where agents can wait. This can limit workplace disruptions. Businesses should enact their response plan immediately when immigration officials arrive. Before ICE agents can enter private areas of your business (public areas are parking lots or lobbies), they must present a valid warrant to conduct their search. As when a warrant is presented at a private home, at the workplace a valid warrant must be issued by a court, have the correct name and address of the person being seized and be signed by a judge or magistrate judge. Businesses should ensure that employees know their rights and that they should refrain from engaging with ICE officials, according to the National Employment Law Project. If ICE agents have questions or requests, workers should not respond and instead direct the officials to speak with their employer. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Noem says Guard wouldn't be needed in LA if Newsom had done his job
Noem says Guard wouldn't be needed in LA if Newsom had done his job

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Noem says Guard wouldn't be needed in LA if Newsom had done his job

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem blamed California Gov. Gavin Newsom for the need to deploy the National Guard to assist in putting down violent clashes between police and immigration protesters in Los Angeles. Newsom has said local authorities don't need the help and accused President Donald Trump of inflaming the situation," calling the move "purposefully inflammatory" and saying it will "only escalate tensions." Noem disagreed with Newsom. MORE: LA immigration protests live updates "Margaret, if he was doing his, job people wouldn't have gotten hurt the last couple of days," she told CBS' Margaret Brennan on "Face the Nation." "We wouldn't have officers with a shattered wrist from bricks thrown through their vehicles, vehicles being burned, flags burned in the street and Molotov cocktails being thrown." "Governor Newsom has proven that he makes bad decisions, the president knows that he makes bad decisions and that's why the president chose the safety of this community over waiting for Governor Newsom to get some sanity," she said. Ahead of his departure for Camp David from New Jersey on Sunday, President Donald Trump was asked by ABC News' Rachel Scott if he is prepared to invoke the Insurrection Act. "Depends on whether or not there is an insurrection," Trump replied. Pressed on whether he believes there is an insurrection in California, Trump said, "No, no. But you have violent people, and we are not going to let them get away with it." White House border czar Tom Homan said Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass could face charges if their response to Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations exceeds the legal boundaries. "I'll say about anybody: You cross that line, it's a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It's a felony to impede law enforcement from doing their job," Homan told NBC News. Noem said Trump was making the move to protect the impacted communities and law enforcement. "So these 2,000 National Guard soldiers that are being engaged today are ones that are specifically trained for this type of crowd situation where they will be with the public and be able to provide safety around buildings and to those that are engaged in peaceful protests and also to our law enforcement officers so they can continue their daily work," she said. Reaction from lawmakers broke along party lines. House Speaker Mike Johnson told ABC News' "This Week" that Trump "did exactly what he needed to do." "These are federal laws and we have to maintain the rule of law. And that is not what is happening. [California Gov.] Gavin Newsom has shown an inability or unwillingness to do what is necessary there." "That is real leadership, and he has the authority and the responsibility to do it," the speaker said, defending Trump's decision. Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., dismissed Newsom's assertion the deploying the Guard would escalate tensions. MORE: National Guard troops arrive in Los Angeles after immigration protests turn violent "Well, words are cheap, especially when you got video. And so you asked me did it look like it was under control, I'll ask you: Did it look like it was under control? It doesn't. It is absolutely not in control. You saw rioters throwing rocks, throwing fireworks. And being extremely aggressive towards not just federal agents, but even the county and the local PD that was there. So does it look like it's under control? Absolutely not," he told CNN's "State of the Union." Democratic Rep. Nanette Barragán, who represents part of the area, said Trump's action will make things worse. "I've spoken to the sheriffs on the ground who have said they have things under control. There is no need for the National Guard. They have the manpower that they need," she said. "So this is really just an escalation of the president coming into California. We haven't asked for the help. "This is him escalating it, causing tensions to rise. It's only going to make things worse." Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar said Trump was "hellbent on inflaming" the situation. "Individual governors look at their states and make decisions, but in this case the president time and time again has shown this willingness to, one, violate the laws, as we've seen across the country in many different situations outside of the immigration context, and, two, inflame situations," Klobuchar told "Face the Nation."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store