Pak urges India to honour IWT after Court of Arbitration ruling
Pakistan on Monday called on New Delhi to fully honour its obligations under the
Indus Waters Treaty
(IWT) following a Court of Arbitration supplemental ruling that reaffirmed its jurisdiction to hear Islamabad's objections over India's Kishanganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects.
The ruling, announced on June 27, upheld the Court's competence in the dispute and reiterated its responsibility to conduct proceedings in a "timely, efficient, and fair manner". The decision comes after India announced following the terror attack in Pahalgam that it would place the IWT "in abeyance" — a move Pakistan has strongly opposed as a violation of the agreement.
A statement issued by Pakistan's foreign office welcomed the ruling, describing it as a "vindication" of the country's position.
"The supplemental award confirms that the Indus Waters Treaty remains valid and operational," it said, adding that India had "no right to suspend or alter its obligations unilaterally".
Islamabad has urged New Delhi to immediately resume cooperation under the treaty framework and fulfil its obligations "wholly and faithfully". New Delhi has consistently argued the dispute should be settled through a neutral expert, as provided under the World Bank-brokered treaty, and questioned the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration.
India has refused to participate in the current arbitration process, maintaining that it was not binding.
The case centres on Pakistan's objections to design and flow management of India's Kishanganga and Ratle hydropower projects, which Islamabad claims violate the technical parameters of the treaty. Pakistan initiated arbitration in 2016, seeking international adjudication after bilateral efforts failed.
The IWT, signed in 1960, is widely regarded as a rare example of sustained India-Pakistan cooperation, even surviving several wars. However, the decades-old agreement has come under increasing strain in recent years amid competing infrastructure projects, rising water scarcity, and growing climate challenges in the region.
While the Court's latest decision does not resolve the core dispute, legal experts here say it strengthens the case for continued third-party oversight and signals that unilateral treaty suspensions are unlikely to stand up in international forums.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Nod' to divert forest land for J&K hydel unit
Setting aside key green provisions in view of national interest, an environment ministry panel has given "in-principle" approval to divert more than 847 hectares of reserved forest and 'jungle-jhari' land for construction of the 1,856MW Sawalkot Hydroelectric Project in Ramban district of Jammu & Kashmir. Final approval will be subject to grant of environment clearance by the J&K govt, but the urgent move signals the intent to harness the potential of Chenab river following suspension of Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: India could face trade and investment challenges
Hello and welcome to BS Views, our newsletter that is your window into today's opinion page. Our lead editorial today looks at the chaos that President Donald Trump's tariff threats have unleashed upon the global trade order, and how they might impact India's trade and investment. The Reserve Bank of India's 'Financial Stability Report' cautions that growing trade disruption and geopolitical tensions can negatively affect India's domestic growth outlook. India's trade deal could have consequences for multiple tradeable sectors' growth. US policies could also affect global capital flows, impacting investments and that could have a deleterious effect on India's current account standing. The good news is that domestic economic parameters are holding steady, even improving, but any more global shocks could constrain a revival of investment. India has made notable improvements in its logistics ecosystem, driven by advancements in port infrastructure, multimodal connectivity, digital integration, and a renewed emphasis on trade facilitation, notes our second editorial, reading from the World Bank's recent report on country-wise performance. Trade-facilitation reforms, including digitisation, pre-arrival processing, and the Authorised Economic Operator (Aeo) programme, are steadily reducing average release times (ARTs), especially for imports. Exports, though, face longer clearance times. Given that logistics costs in India are 14-18 per cent of gross domestic product, much higher than the global benchmark of 8 per cent, further reforms are needed for India to become a reliable export hub and an attractive destination for global manufacturing. Our first columnist Laveesh Bhandari ponders the use of artificial intelligence to cut through the Gordian knots of governance. He argues that given AI's speed, if used for research, many tasks can be completed in a few weeks or days, perhaps even less. Besides, considering the information and intellectual gap between the top and bottom levels of government, AI can empower lower-level officials to enhance the ability of the higher-ups. India also has a unique opportunity that many others do not in the form of Digital Public Infrastructure, which has access to granular data and thus can be used for decision-making. However, challenges exist in the form of AI's hallucination, inherent reasoning biases, and unevolved ethical and moral core. And given that many governmental decisions only have smaller impacts individually, the human-AI interface needs to be different depending upon the scale of the potential impact. Thus, frequency and impact should be two key dimensions to assess AI, he says, and that by unpacking the problem we can better identify how AI should be used and derive the consequent benefits. The world, and India, is facing a demographic time-bomb in more ways than one. Not only will there be hundreds of millions looking for active work, there will also be millions more who will need caregiving as they exit the workforce but continue to live for many more years without paying work. Arun Maira points out that the care of these seniors will fall upon the young, but with limited earnings and ever-rising private healthcare costs, instead of societal assets, they are likely to be seen as economic liabilities. Worse, there is no solution in sight. The writer argues that it may be time to reimagine society as a 'caring' enterprise instead of a 'paying' one. We should not damage the quality of a society to grow the economy. Instead, the economy must be redesigned to improve the quality of society. Sanjeev Ahluwalia unpacks what he calls the 'Das Principles' in his review of Abhijit Das' Strategies in GATT and WTO negotiations. The book defends the benefits of trade multilateralism at a time that United States has been damaging the basic framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) with its (read Trump's) unilateral tariffs against all and sundry. Das also points out that China played the game well by not trying to change developed nations' rules but by taking advantage of them. On the other hand, he says, India's WTO negotiators brilliantly defended 'perceived' national interest, but did they even read the national interest correctly? In our aversion to political risk, India successfully resisted externally driven trade and investment reform, even at the risk of scoring long-term self-goals.
The Hindu
9 hours ago
- The Hindu
Committed to addressing all humanitarian matters on priority: India to Pakistan
Against the backdrop of tense Indo-Pakistan relations, India expressed its commitment to prioritise 'all humanitarian matters' and urged Pakistan to expedite the nationality verification process of 80 'believed-to-be-Pakistani' civilian prisoners in India's custody. This was conveyed to Islamabad on Tuesday (July 1, 2025), when the two sides exchanged lists of civilian prisoners and fishermen in each other's custody through diplomatic channels. India also urged Pakistan to release Indian defence personnel believed to be in Pakistan's custody. 'India remains committed to addressing, on priority, all humanitarian matters, including those pertaining to prisoners and fishermen in each other's country. In this context, India has urged Pakistan to expedite the nationality verification process of 80 believed-to-be-Pakistani civilian prisoners and fishermen in India's custody, whose repatriation is pending for want of nationality confirmation from Pakistan,' the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said in a statement after lists of prisoners were exchanged between the two sides. The Indian side sent the names of 382 civilian prisoners and 81 fishermen in its custody, 'who are Pakistani, or are believed-to-be-Pakistani'. Reciprocating, Pakistan has sent the names of 53 civilian prisoners and 193 fishermen 'who are Indian or are believed-to-be-Indian'. The Indian side asked Pakistan to release Indian fishermen in that country's custody 'along with their boats', and reminded Pakistan of the urgency to release Indian defence personnel, who are believed to be in Pakistan's military and civilian jails. Pakistan was asked to expedite the release and repatriation of 159 Indian fishermen and civilian prisoners who have completed their sentence. 'In addition, Pakistan has been asked to provide immediate consular access to the 26 civilian prisoners and fishermen in Pakistan's custody, who are believed-to-be-Indian and have not been provided consular access so far,' the MEA said, adding that in the past decade, 2,661 Indian fishermen and 71 Indian civilian prisoners have been repatriated from Pakistan. Under the bilateral agreement on Consular Access 2008, such lists are exchanged every year on January 1 and July 1. This agreement was not suspended, as the Indus Waters Treaty has been, and ordinary and medical visas, and trade links after the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam. India and Pakistan carried out a tit-for-tat expulsion of diplomats during the period that was marked by the terror strike, and Operation Sindoor, but both have maintained diplomatic missions in each other's capitals.
