
Could phonics solve California's reading crisis? Inside the push for sweeping changes
To look inside Julie Celestial's kindergarten classroom in Long Beach is to peer into the future of reading in California.
During a recent lesson, 25 kindergartners gazed at the whiteboard, trying to sound out the word 'bee.' They're learning the long 'e' sound, blending words such as 'Pete' and 'cheek' — words that they'll soon be able to read in this lesson's accompanying book.
Celestial was teaching something new for Long Beach Unified: phonics.
'It's pretty cool to watch,' she said. 'I'm really anticipating that there's going to be a lot less reluctant readers and struggling readers now that the district has made this shift.'
These phonics-based lessons are on the fast track to become law in California under a sweeping bill moving through the Legislature that will mandate how schools teach reading, a rare action in a state that generally emphasizes local school district control over dictating instruction.
The bill is the capstone to decades of debate and controversy in California on how best to teach reading amid stubbornly low test scores. Gov. Gavin Newsom has pledged his support, setting aside $200 million to fund teacher training on the new approach in the May revise of his 2025-26 budget proposal.
'It's a big deal for kids, and it's a big step forward — a very big one,' said Marshall Tuck, chief executive of EdVoice, an education advocacy nonprofit that has championed the change.
California has long struggled with reading scores below the national average. In 2024, only 29% of California's fourth-graders scored 'proficient' or better in reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP.
The proposed law, which would take effect in phases beginning in 2026, would require districts to adopt instructional materials based on the 'science of reading,' a systemic approach to literacy instruction supported by decades of research about the way young children learn to read, from about transitional kindergarten through third grade.
The science of reading consists of five pillars: phonemic awareness (the sounds that letters make), phonics, reading fluency, vocabulary and comprehension.
'It's finite. There's only 26 letters and 44 sounds,' said Leslie Zoroya, who leads an initiative at the Los Angeles County Office of Education that helps districts transition to a science-of-reading approach. 'Phonics isn't forever.'
After a failed effort last year, the bill gained the support this year of the influential California teachers unions and at least one advocacy group for English-language learners. In a compromise, school districts would have more flexibility to select which instructional materials are best for their students and the option to decline teacher training paid for by the state.
For decades, most school districts in California have been devoted to a different approach called 'whole language' or 'balanced literacy,' built on the belief that children naturally learn to read without being taught how to sound out words. Teachers focus on surrounding children with books intended to foster a love of reading and encourage them to look for clues that help them guess unknown words — such as predicting the next word based on the context of the story, or looking at the pictures — rather than sounding them out.
'The majority of students require a more intentional, explicit and systematic approach,' Zoroya said. 'Thousands of kids across California in 10th grade are struggling in content-area classes because they missed phonics.'
California embraced the whole language approach to literacy, which took hold in the 1970s and 1980s, said Susan Neuman, a New York University professor who served as assistant secretary of elementary and secondary education under former President George W. Bush. The state became a national leader in what was considered a progressive and holistic approach to teaching literacy, with a focus on discovering the joy of reading, rather than learning specific skills, she said.
Bush then incorporated a phonics-heavy approach in an initiative that was part of his 2002 launch of No Child Left Behind, which increased the federal role in holding schools accountable for academic progress and required standardized testing. States, including California, received grants to teach a science-of-reading approach in high-poverty schools.
But many teachers in the state disliked the more regimented approach, and when the funding ended, districts largely transitioned back to the whole language approach. In the years since, science of reading continues to draw opposition from teachers unions and advocates for dual-language learners.
Many California teachers are passionate about the methods they already use and have chafed at a state-mandated approach to literacy education. Some don't like what they describe as 'drill and kill' phonics lessons that teach letter sounds and decoding.
Advocates for multiple-language learners, meanwhile, vociferously opposed adopting the most structured approach, worried that children who were still learning to speak English would not receive adequate support in language development and comprehension.
A 2022 study of 300 school districts in California found that less than 2% of districts were using curricula viewed as following the science of reading.
But the research has become clear: Looking at the pictures or context of a story to guess a word — as is encouraged in whole language or balanced literacy instruction, leads to struggles with reading. Children best learn to read by starting with foundational skills such as sounding out and decoding words.
'Anything that takes your eyes off the text when a kid is trying to figure out a word activates the wrong side of the brain,' Zoroya said.
In the last few years, several larger districts in California have started to embrace more structured phonics learning, including Los Angeles Unified, Long Beach Unified and Oakland Unified.
Recently, these districts have started to see improvement in their reading test scores.
At Long Beach Unified, for example, the district's in-house assessment shows significant gains among kindergarten students. In 2023-24, 78% of them met reading standards, up 13 percentage points from the previous school year. Proficiency rates across first and second grade were above 70%, and transitional kindergarten was at 48%. The district's goal is to hit 85% proficiency across grades by the end of each school year.
In 2019, LAUSD introduced a pilot science-of-reading based curriculum, and adopted it across all schools for the 2023-24 academic year. After the first year, LAUSD reading scores improved in every grade level and across every demographic, chief academic officer Frances Baez said.
From the 2022-23 to the 2023-24 school years, LAUSD's English Language Arts scores improved by 1.9 percentage points — five times more than the state as a whole, which improved by 0.3, she said.
Teresa Cole, a kindergarten instructor in the Lancaster School District, has been teaching for 25 years. So when Lancaster asked her to try out a new way of teaching her students to read three years ago, she wasn't thrilled.
'I was hesitant and apprehensive to try it,' she said, but decided to throw herself into a new method that promised results.
Teaching kindergarten is a challenge, she said, because children come in at vastly different stages. Many are just learning to hold a pencil; others can already read. She was seeing many children under 'balanced literacy' lessons slip through the cracks — especially those with limited vocabularies. When she asked them to read words they didn't know, 'it almost felt like they were guessing.'
But as she began to teach a phonics lesson each morning and have them read decodable books — which have children practice the new sound they've learned — she noticed that her students were putting together the information much faster and starting to sound out words. 'The results were immediate,' she said. 'We were blown away.'
She was so impressed with the new curriculum that she started training other teachers in the district to use it as well.
Looking back at her old method of teaching reading, 'I feel bad. I feel like maybe I wasn't the best teacher back then,' Cole said. Part of the change, she said, was learning about the science behind how children learn to read. 'I would never say to guess [a word] anymore,' she said.
This kind of buy-in and enthusiasm from teachers has been key to making the new curriculum work, said Krista Thomsen, Lancaster's director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Department. In schools where the teachers are implementing the program well, scores have started to rise. 'But it's a steep learning curve,' she said, especially for teachers who have long taught a balanced literacy approach.
'We are stumbling through this process trying to get it right and making sure that every one of our kids has equitable access to learning how to read,'Thomsen said. 'But we have every faith and every intention, and the plan is in place to get it where it should be going.'
A bill introduced by Assemblymember Blanca E. Rubio (D-Baldwin Park) last year requiring a science-of-reading approach in California public schools did not even get a first hearing. This year, Rubio introduced another version — Assembly Bill 1121 — that would have required teachers to be trained in a science-of-reading approach.
Opponents included the California Teachers Assn. and English-language learner advocates, who said in a joint letter that the bill would put a 'disproportionate emphasis on phonics,' and would not focus on the skills needed by students learning English as a second language.
The groups also voiced concern that the bill would cut teachers out of the curriculum-selection process and that mandated training 'undermines educators' professional expertise and autonomy to respond to the specific learning needs of their students.'
Martha Hernandez, executive director of Californians Together, said the group opposed both bills because they were too narrow in their focus on skills such as phonics. 'They're essential. But English learners need more, right?' she said. 'They don't understand the language that they're learning to read.'
Rubio said she was shocked by the pushback. 'I was thinking it was a no-brainer. It's about kids. This is evidence-based.' Rubio, a longtime teacher, was born in Mexico, and was herself an English-language learner in California public schools.
In 2024, just 19% of Latino students and 7% of Black students scored at or above 'proficient' on the fourth-grade NAEP reading test.
But with the support of Democratic Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister), the groups reached a compromise that not all teachers would be required to participate in the teacher training.
Hernandez said she was pleased that the compromise included more of an emphasis on oral language development and comprehension, which is vital for multi-language learners to succeed.
AB1454 requires the State Board of Education to come up with a new list of recommended materials that all follow science of reading principles. If a district chooses materials not on the list, they have to vouch that it also complies. The state will provide funds for professional development, though districts can choose whether to accept it.
This article is part of The Times' early childhood education initiative, focusing on the learning and development of California children from birth to age 5. For more information about the initiative and its philanthropic funders, go to latimes.com/earlyed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Son gets call showing duct-taped dad before he's killed in Baltimore, feds say
A Baltimore man lured a father from California to Maryland to discuss their marijuana business, then called the father's son, showing him bound to a chair with duct tape covering his mouth before he was shot to death, federal prosecutors said. Over the FaceTime call, Ziyon Thompson filmed Miguel Soto-Diaz from inside a Baltimore row home and demanded '200 pounds of marijuana and $50,000' from his son in exchange for his father's 'safe return' on May 8, 2022, according to prosecutors. Soto-Diaz was tortured, and when his 'kidnappers' demands were not met, (he) was shot five times,' court documents say. His body was found by Baltimore firefighters, who were called to the home as it burned in a fire, according to prosecutors. Investigators with the city's fire department believe the blaze was 'intentionally set,' court filings say. Now, Thompson, 21, has been sentenced to 22 years and one month in prison over aiding and abetting the killing of Soto-Diaz, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland said in a June 3 news release. 'Murder is widely accepted as the most egregious crime,' prosecutors wrote in a sentencing memo ahead of Thompson's June 3 hearing. 'Here, we have a family that lost a father, husband, and caregiver.' Thompson previously pleaded guilty to use of a firearm resulting in death during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, court records show. Federal public defenders appointed to represent him, Katherine Tang Newberger and Sasha Garcon, didn't immediately return McClatchy News' request for comment June 4. In court documents, his legal counsel argued Thompson wasn't there when Soto-Diaz was killed and that he did not want him to die. 'Nonetheless, he knows he is morally and legally responsible for a death that deprived a loving wife of her husband and a child of his father, and he tears up when discussing Mr. Soto-Diaz, his wife and child,' his public defenders wrote in a sentencing memo. The filing mentions Soto-Diaz's wife was pregnant when he was held for ransom in Baltimore. Others involved in his killing weren't identified by prosecutors. The month before Thompson was accused of luring Soto-Diaz to his death, he visited Soto-Diaz and his family at their California home in late April 2022, according to prosecutors. Thompson stayed with Soto-Diaz to see 'the family's marijuana 'farm,'' then 'agreed to sell Soto-Diaz's marijuana in Maryland,' court filings say. In charging documents, a special agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives described Soto-Diaz as a 'marijuana trafficker.' Soto-Diaz's son regularly communicated with Thompson for his father because Soto-Diaz didn't speak English, according to prosecutors, who said his son would translate their texts and calls. After Thompson's California visit, he had an issue with 'the quality' of Soto-Diaz's marijuana and came up with a 'ruse' to have the father visit Maryland, according to court documents. Soto-Diaz went to Maryland while believing he and Thompson were going to discuss marijuana sales on May 8, 2022, when he was picked up by Thompson at a Baltimore hotel, prosecutors said. Thompson took him to the Baltimore row home, where Soto-Diaz was tied to a chair, with duct tape covering his mouth and zip-ties binding his hands and ankles, according to prosecutors. After Thompson demanded a ransom payment, he texted Soto-Diaz's son, according to prosecutors, writing: 'Pap said send the bags and money so he can be ok and he said don't call the police or he want (sic) be coming home.' An autopsy revealed Soto-Diaz died from being shot in the Baltimore row home, not the fire that burned the residence afterward, according to prosecutors. In seeking a 25-year sentence for Thompson, before he was handed a 22-year and one-month sentence, prosecutors wrote in the sentencing memo that Thompson agreed it was 'reasonably foreseeable that Soto-Diaz would be killed during the extortion.' Thompson's sentence is to be followed by five years of supervised release, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
PM reveals ousting of top officials to advance controversial haredi military service bill
"Everyone must serve: Secular, religious, and haredim," Gallant said in response. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted former defense minister Yoav Gallant and former IDF chief-of-staff Herzi Halevi were "obstacles" to reaching a bill to grant ultra-Orthodox Jews exemption from military service, leaked recordings of the prime minister published by Channel 13 on Wednesday revealed. In a recording of an English-language conversation with an unnamed senior rabbi, the prime minister appeared to admit his firing of Gallant in November of last year, and Halevi's resignation earlier this year, amounted to "enormous obstacles that we advance" a draft bill acceptable to the haredi factions in the coalition. "You know, when the defense minister's against you, and the chief-of-staff is against you, you cannot move - now we can move," Netanyahu is heard saying in the recording. "I have also talked personally about 20 times [with] Yuli Edelstein, who runs the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, and I said: 'Look, I'm personally taking charge of this.'" In a later statement, the Prime Minister's Office asserted that it stood by its decision to remove Halevi and Gallant. "As is clearly heard in the recordings — without the distorted interpretation of Channel 13's 'analysts' — the Prime Minister notes that it was the previous Chief of Staff and Defense Minister who prevented the establishment of the dedicated units for Haredi service," the Wednesday statement reads. "In contrast, the current Defense Minister and Chief of Staff are advancing the issue rapidly and professionally — and we are proud of that." In the recording, Netanyahu further implied that Gallant and Halevi interfered in the IDF's ability to acceptharedi men into military service. "Look, there are people who are trying to undermine us. I came from the army now. The army is doing exactly what we asked them to do now, they're creating the ability to receive haredim and hold a haredi lifestyle in the army." Gallant commented on Channel 13's report on Wednesday evening, stressing that he is "proud to have stood by the principle by which everyone must take part in the mission of defending our nation. The need to enlist every young man of military age is essential to maintaining Israel's security," he wrote on X/Twitter. "Everyone must serve: Secular, religious, and haredim," Gallant added. Opposition leader Yair Lapid slammed Netanyahu and said that the prime minister was willing to sacrifice the country for his political gain. "A question that should trouble the sleep of every Israeli tonight: What else is Netanyahu willing to do for the sake of evasion and politics while the State of Israel is fighting for its life?"
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas public schools are set to get an $8.5 billion funding boost. Here's the plan.
Gov. Greg Abbott on Wednesday is expected to sign into law a bill providing roughly $8.5 billion in new funding for Texas public schools, offering relief to districts for teacher and support staff pay, operational expenses, special education, educator preparation, early childhood learning and campus safety. The new dollars in House Bill 2, which lawmakers have dubbed 'historic' because it marks the largest one-time public education investment in recent memory, will arrive after years of stagnant funding. That includes 2023, when the state gave schools targeted money in areas like school security but left billions more on the table due to the political fallout over private school vouchers. Abbott signed a $1 billion voucher program into law last month. The Legislature granted final approval to the 231-page public school funding bill in the last days of the 2025 legislative session, which concluded on Monday. HB 2 will largely go into effect on Sept. 1. Certain parts of the bill will take effect next year. School officials and public education advocates have praised the new funding while warning that the new dollars are a long way from catching districts up with inflation, which has ballooned their costs since the COVID-19 pandemic. HB 2, they say, also will not cure every hardship staring public education in the face, including multimillion-dollar budget deficits and school closures. While the legislation does not give schools as much spending flexibility as they had hoped for, it makes targeted investments in areas lawmakers believe will leave the Texas' public education system better off. Here's a breakdown of some key provisions. Teachers will receive long-term pay raises based on their years of experience and the size of their school district, using the following criteria: Educators with three to four years of experience in districts with 5,000 or fewer students will get a $4,000 raise, while those with five or more years of teaching on their resume will earn $8,000. For districts with more than 5,000 students, teachers with three to four years of experience will earn a $2,500 raise, while those with five or more years of experience will receive $5,000. First- and second-year teachers are not eligible for raises under the new system, known as the Teacher Retention Allotment. The raises for more experienced teachers are permanent, not one-time bonuses. The new law also gives districts $45 per student that they can only use to increase the salaries of school counselors, librarians, nurses and other non-administrative support staff, as well as the teachers who do not qualify for raises under the new retention allotment. Lawmakers expanded Texas' Teacher Incentive Allotment, a state program that awards raises over a five-year period to classroom instructors who demonstrate that they have improved their students' academic performance. HB 2 will allow more teachers in a district to qualify for raises, which will range from as low as $3,000 annually to as high as $36,000. Higher dollar amounts will go to the program's highest performing teachers working in rural or high-poverty communities. School districts can also decide to open up the incentive pay system to include principals and assistant principals. But doing so would mean the district can only offer salary increases to classroom teachers based on performance — not across the board — except for when adjusting for inflation. Educators who have obtained their national teaching certification will continue to automatically qualify for raises through the Teacher Incentive Allotment under the new law, though the State Board for Educator Certification can now revoke their participation if it concludes that the requirements for the national designation do not comply with state law. The board will conduct an initial review of the national certifications no later than Dec. 31, 2026. School districts will not see a significant increase to their base funding per student, known as the basic allotment, which grants them flexibility to tackle their campuses' particular needs, from building maintenance to fine arts programs. That pot of money will only go up by $55 per student. Instead, districts will get more targeted funding — $106 per student — to pay the costs of transportation, insurance, utilities, employee benefits and hiring retired educators, which has become more common as schools struggle to fill teacher vacancies. Texas is moving away from the long-scrutinized special education funding system that gives money to districts based on the classroom setting where a child with a disability receives instruction. Now, schools will receive dollars based on the individual needs of that student — an approach educators, lawmakers and public education advocates consider more equitable. The new system, which Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath will design, will take effect at the beginning of the 2026-27 school year. The education chief must consider the nature of services provided to students, the technology and equipment required and the professional needs of educators. When HB 2 takes effect later this year, districts will also start receiving $1,000 for each assessment they conduct evaluating kids for disabilities. School districts must finalize plans to ensure that no educators without formal classroom training teach children in reading, math, science and social studies — and they have until the 2029-30 school year to transition the uncertified teachers out of those classrooms. The Texas education commissioner may allow districts to delay implementation of the new requirement until Sept. 1, 2030. None of the certification rules will apply to charter schools, which receive public funds but are privately managed. To incentivize untrained teachers hired in the last three years to earn their certification, the state will provide a one-time payment of $1,000 to educators who get formal training by the end of 2026-27 school year. The law also provides a salary of $10,000 to aspiring educators who participate in teacher residencies — training programs that provide them direct classroom experience under the guidance of seasoned instructors — while those who go through a traditional university or alternative certification route will get $3,000. For districts to qualify for the funding, their programs must meet several state requirements, including ensuring candidates spend time in a classroom for at least a full academic year. The education commissioner will establish a list of brief assessments, known as screeners, that districts will use throughout the school year to evaluate foundational reading and math skills among students in kindergarten through third grade. Superintendents are required to publicly report the results at a school board meeting and make them available to parents, who also have the option to opt their kids out of taking the assessments. Lawmakers hope the screeners will help schools provide targeted support before it becomes too difficult for children to catch up. Students who are falling behind will receive additional tutoring. HB 2 also tries to help districts close Texas' prekindergarten funding gap. The state currently requires that districts provide full-day pre-K to eligible children for free, but it only funds those services at a half-day level. Though the way pre-K is funded remains the same, the new law makes changes to the state's funding system for early learning that could help some schools pay for the other half day. Meanwhile, the bill expands free pre-K eligibility to include the children of teachers. Additional funding will go toward helping districts fulfill safety mandates enacted by the Legislature after the Uvalde mass school shooting in 2022, a list that included hiring one armed security officer at each campus. Districts will receive $20 per student and $33,540 for each campus, up from the current allocation of $10 per student and $15,000 per campus. First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!