
Britain shouldn't put up with Donald Trump
If Donald Trump teaches us anything, it is how to ruin a great nation. Far more useful than parroting the US President's delusions would be telling the British people more than they are currently permitted to read about his manic conduct of office. The bullying of the Fed chair Jerome Powell, who is trying to maintain the integrity of the currency; the campaign against federal judges seeking to defend the rule of law; the cancellation of Voice of America and public broadcast funding which protect genuinely free speech; the attacks on independent universities who uphold free inquiry; the brutal removal of immigrants to foreign prisons devoid of human rights which tramples over the memory of Ellis Island welcoming the poor, huddled masses yearning to breathe free; the demolition of climate change research which weakens America's global leadership; the economic innumeracy of tariffs which shred the US's decades-long tradition of freer trade; the assault on science-based health policies which undermine the country's moral standing; and the indulgence of Israel's persecution of the Gazans which alienates old allies. It is not morning again in America, but the twilight of all that made it great.
Faced with this folly, what do our leaders do? We are not Greeks to their Romans, we just offer tribute to the barbarians. It was cringe-making to see Keir Starmer received by Trump as a supplicant, ascending the steps of the President's Scottish palace at Turnberry to be harangued about the shortcomings of Britain from wind turbines to migrant boats. As John of Gaunt said in Richard II, our country 'hath made a shameful conquest of itself'.
Back in the days when Boris Johnson was ascendant and Trump in his first term, Professor Sir Michael Howard OM, the wisest man I have ever known, said to me fiercely: 'We must never allow ourselves to suppose that all this is normal. Populism is a perversion of democracy, which will do incalculable harm.'
Michael is now nearly six years dead, and Trump's America has become an uglier place than he ever anticipated. Another fine historian, Margaret MacMillan, last week published a lacerating article in Foreign Affairs, cataloguing Trump's insults heaped upon countries around the world. She observes that it is hard to think of a precedent for such wilful destruction of alliances.
Here is a man who threatens to seize Greenland, has launched an economic assault on Canada and keeps Ukraine dangling by a thread because of his intermittent infatuation with Russia's Vladimir Putin. He is making America hated by its former friends, and he does not care. But we should.
This week's announcement of an EU-US trade deal represents a surrender by Brussels to Trump's bullying, the acceptance of 15 per cent tariffs not because such an outcome represents fair dealing, but for fear of much worse. Trump has far outdone Richard Nixon's 'Madman' gambit against Hanoi. Nixon failed because the North Vietnamese believed him rational. Trump succeeds because many governments, including our own, think him capable of anything if thwarted.
And so everywhere we look, those who should be safeguarding our independence make a virtue out of obeisance. The secretary–general of Nato in June sent a message to the US President such as the Emperor Caligula might have thought extravagant in its flattery. This grovel may have preserved the alliance and the precarious arms supply chain to Ukraine for now. But what was once an alliance built on shared values has become a protection racket, and one in which we collude. The King has been persuaded to invite Trump for a state visit that vanishingly few British people welcome. But, like a Sicilian family offering up its daughters, this is supposed to buy us the Don's goodwill.
Starmer may feel that is his, reluctant, responsibility. The rest of us, however, have a different duty – to the truth. Trump is the most disreputable US president in history. His arbitrary rule, indifference to legality or morality and institutionalised deceits shame the country of Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton, Lincoln, Roosevelt and Reagan. The nation which was once the arsenal of democracy is in danger of becoming its graveyard.
Turnberry should have been the occasion to hold Trump to account for all this, and so much more. But instead it was a festival of fawning. Why was almost nothing said about the financial corruption woven into this presidency? Here was Trump using his public office to advertise the expansion of his property empire. No previous incumbent has sought to enrich himself and his family while in office on the billion-dollar scale of Trump. Anne Applebaum in her book Auto-cracy Inc. observes that once upon a time dictators sought to explain or excuse their personal excesses. Now Trump makes them the purpose of his administration.
Those of us who study US history and have met many great American public servants respect the quality and seriousness of purpose that have characterised most. Today such people have been replaced by bunglers whose only virtue is loyalty to their employer.
Trump rules by menace and foul-mouthed abuse, reflected in deranged posts on his website Truth Social. It is frightening to behold the number of powerful interests, from media tycoons to banks and law firms, who roll over in his path and write their cheques, in fear of his wrath should they defy him.
There may appear to be nothing that we or any other nation can do to control this extraordinary man who is bereft of compassion, decency and dignity. But we can at least keep our own dignity and defend our own democracy by rehearsing to each other what Trump is and does. When others fall into line as Trump marches through the ruins, we can, and should, conscientiously object.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ukraine war briefing: Zelenskyy – don't let Russia ‘deceive us in the details'
Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russia seemed 'more inclined to a ceasefire' after a visit to Moscow on Wednesday by a US envoy. 'The pressure on them works. But the main thing is that they do not deceive us in the details – neither us nor the US,' Ukraine's president said in his nightly address. Despite the engagement, sanctions targeting Russian oil 'are still expected to be implemented on Friday', a senior Trump administration official said on Wednesday, according to Reuters. Separately, Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said he did not want to exaggerate the progress made during Steve Witkoff's talks with Putin. Many 'impediments' remained, especially Russia's territorial claims, and there was no concrete proposal for a ceasefire. There have been unconfirmed reports that the Kremlin could propose a halt to long-range strikes by both sides. Donald Trump could meet Vladimir Putin as soon as next week to discuss the war, White House officials have said, although senior administration officials warned that serious 'impediments' remain to achieving a ceasefire. Trump has claimed 'great progress was made' when Witkoff, a real estate dealer, met the Russian ruler at the Kremlin on Wednesday. Trump-Putin meetings about Ukraine have been raised as a possibility in the past but not eventuated. Trump has promised to introduce secondary tariffs on countries that import Russian oil if no progress is made towards a peace deal by Friday. On Wednesday, he issued an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing India's continuing imports of Russian oil. Russian artillery shelling killed three people and injured four on Wednesday in the south-eastern Ukrainian town of Nikopol, the regional governor said. Serhiy Lysak, governor of Dnipropetrovsk region, said two men and a woman died. Nikopol is on the Ukrainian-held north side of the Dnipro River. The RBK-Ukraine media outlet said the strike hit a car belonging to the state emergency services and one of those killed was an emergency worker. A US army soldier has been arrested for trying to provide classified information about America's M1A2 Abrams main battle tank to Russia, the justice department said. Taylor Adam Lee, 22, of El Paso, Texas, is accused of seeking to 'provide classified military information on US tank vulnerabilities to a person he believed to be a Russian intelligence officer in exchange for Russian citizenship', said Roman Rozhavsky, assistant director of FBI counterintelligence. Lee handed over an SD card containing documents and information to an individual he believed to be a Russian agent, it is alleged. A majority of Ukrainian's still trust Zelenskyy but their number fell to 58% of the population after an abortive move to curb the power of anti-corruption watchdogs led to protests, according to polling. The Kyiv International Institute of Sociology said on Wednesday that its poll, which began a day after the shock vote on 22 July, found trust was down from an 18-month high of 74% in May and 67% in February-March. Zelenskyy on Wednesday said he had visited troops near the frontline in the Sumy region. Ukraine on Wednesday appointed a new director of an economic crimes investigation unit. The prime minister, Yulia Svyrydenko, said Oleksandr Tsyvinsky, a renowned anti-graft detective, would head the economic security bureau. The director is chosen by a panel including international experts and then confirmed by the government. The government had for weeks held back his appointment, citing family ties to Russia. Svyrydenko said Tsyvinsky took a polygraph test as part of the appointment process. Marta Kos, the EU's enlargement commissioner, welcomed the appointment as a 'crucial reform strongly encouraged by the EU'.


Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
Stanford student newspaper sues Trump administration for alleged free speech violations
Aug 6 (Reuters) - Stanford University's student newspaper sued the Trump Administration on Wednesday, arguing it has violated the free-speech rights of foreign students by threatening to deport them for writing stories that it considers "anti-American or anti-Israel." The Stanford Daily and two unidentified students said in the lawsuit, opens new tab, filed in federal court in California against Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, that foreign students at the Palo Alto, California, school have refused to write about the conflict in the Middle East for fear they could be arrested, detained and deported. "This pall of fear is incompatible with American liberty," the lawsuit said. "Our First Amendment stands as a bulwark against the government infringing the inalienable human right to think and speak for yourself." Spokespeople for the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. "In the United States of America, no one should fear a midnight knock on the door for voicing the wrong opinion,' Stanford Daily attorney Conor Fitzpatrick said in a statement. A spokesperson for Stanford University said the newspaper is an independent organization and that the school is not part of the lawsuit. The Trump administration has attempted to deport students who have expressed pro-Palestinian views, calling them antisemitic and extremist sympathizers whose presence in the country was adverse to U.S. foreign policy. Protesters say that the government wrongly conflates their criticism of Israeli actions in Gaza and advocacy for Palestinian rights with antisemitism and extremism. Judges have ordered the release of some students who the administration arrested and detained without being charged with a crime. The Stanford Daily said in its lawsuit that the administration has caused its foreign writers to self-censor to avoid being targeted. It argued that the administration's threats prevent them from "engaging in protected expression like attending protests, using certain slogans, and publicly voicing their true views about American foreign policy, Israel, and Palestine." The newspaper asked the court to rule that the U.S. Constitution prevents the government from deporting non-citizens for engaging in free speech.


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Letters: What Trump has got right
Trumped up charges Sir: I am a huge admirer of Max Hastings, whose contribution to our knowledge and understanding of global conflict is unparalleled. However, his passionate condemnation of Donald Trump is typical of the one-eyed liberal Weltanschauung that will continue to drive people both here and further afield into the arms of populist administrations ('The indignity of Trump', 2 August). Yes, Trump is horribly flawed, personally, politically and economically. However, he was democratically elected by voters who felt ignored and let down by the ruling liberal elite. For balance, we might remember that he is delivering upon his manifesto promises, unlike our government: illegal immigrants are being removed wholesale; the global economy is being rebalanced to fairer levels; stock markets are at or near record highs, the left-wing mainstream media is being reined in; huge government waste is being slashed; virtue-signalling chat-show hosts are being cancelled; and Canada is being targeted largely because it has failed to halt the flow of deadly fentanyl across the border. I have been in the States a lot recently and, far from it having become 'an uglier place', it still seems full of polite, respectful, energetic and optimistic go-getters. If only our limp, directionless government listened and delivered to such a degree, we might regain some of our national pride and positivity. David Edwards Norton-sub-Hamdon, Somerset Business experience Sir: It was interesting to read about Varun Chandra, the most important business adviser to Sir Keir Starmer ('Starmer's business whisperer', 2 August). He clearly has huge charm and a sound networking skill set, but disappointingly it appears he too has never actually run a business. If he had, surely he would have advised the PM before the last Budget that SMEs, the heartbeat of the economy, are particularly susceptible to economic shockwaves. The sudden and unexpected significant increase in business taxes last October in a fragile economy can perhaps be viewed as the Starmer government's biggest mistake so far, underpinning many of the economic woes that we all face. The latest Institute of Directors business survey indicates that business confidence is on the floor and, with the Employment Rights Bill yet to have an impact and with another Budget fast approaching, surely the PM and the Chancellor must ensure they have sound advice from someone who has actually run a business, before policy is announced? Networking ability has its place, but the government and the UK cannot afford any more economic missteps. Andrew Haynes London SW6 Bestselling smut Sir: As an English teacher, I have followed the decline in undergraduate English literature enrolment in recent years with dismay. It is unsurprising, though, when my pupils' idea of literature consists of bestselling smut ('Losing the plot', 2 August). I imagine university modules covering the satirical genius of Eliot or Austen seem unappealing to prospective students who are hooked on grotesquely eroticised Narnia. In the classroom, out of desperation, I am often tempted to endorse the fifth 'right' in Daniel Pennac's creed: 'to read anything'. However, Lara Brown is right to label romantasy as 'literature taken to its lowest form'. I ought to condemn rather than condone recommendations of Cloisters of Carnality or Lust in His Lair. Sam Finniear Guildford, Surrey Christian England Sir: Mary Wakefield's brilliant article last week was sincere and heartwarming, and I hope that Danny Kruger's address in the Commons is seen by Conservatives countrywide ('The prophet Daniel', 2 August). Christianity has defined the spiritual life, identity and culture of England. It retains all that is good, worthwhile and honourable. Alan M. Varley Crowborough, East Sussex God's wonderful railways Sir: The priestly blessing of a signal box described by Matthew Parris ('A glimpse of the essence of Englishness', 2 August) illustrates the long affinity between the Church of England and the nation's railways. This is exemplified in the career of Eric Treacy, Bishop of Wakefield from 1968 to 1976 and for more than 40 years one of Britain's leading photographers of steam locomotives. He is famous particularly for his stirring studies of Sir William Stanier's streamlined Pacifics as they emerged in the 1930s. He died of a heart attack in May 1978 on Appleby station while awaiting the arrival of Evening Star, the last steam engine built for British Railways. A plaque pays tribute to a 'railway photographer, pastor to railwaymen, lover of life and railways'. Christopher Gray Oxford Birder he wrote Sir: Birding and bird-watching are different activities (Real Life, 26 July). Bird-watching is passive and is about enjoying birds wherever they may show up. Birding is active and involves going out to look for them, particularly the less-often-seen ones. The next step on this path is 'twitching', where a tick for one's life-list might involve frantic effort and expense. Bird-watchers might enjoy the sights and sounds of birds in their gardens or local park; birders make specific trips to special sites carrying expensive optics. Far from being a lefty invention, 'birding' is the preferred term of the more dedicated, optically endowed and knowledgeable individuals, to distinguish themselves both from the everyday punters and the demented twitchers. Martin Skinner Tunbridge Wells, Kent Write to us letters@