Crunching the numbers behind Labour's pledge to build 180,000 new social homes
Angela Rayner is set to announce plans to build 180,000 new social homes in the next decade, as the government seeks to "turn the tide on the housing crisis".
It would be six times greater than the number of social homes built in the 10 years up to 2024 - and forms part of a drive to build 300,000 new social and affordable properties by 2035.
The plan is backed by a £39bn investment announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in last month's spending review.
2:29
The deputy prime minister called on the social housing sector to "work together to turn the tide of the housing crisis", and said the investment was "the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation".
"We are seizing this golden opportunity with both hands to transform this country by building the social and affordable homes we need, so we create a brighter future where families aren't trapped in temporary accommodation and young people are no longer locked out of a secure home," she said.
Ms Rayner's target for social and affordable housing is part of a wider long-term plan - also due to be published on Wednesday - setting out how the government will build both more houses and improve housing standards.
Here, Sky News looks at what the plan will mean for the country, how it compares to previous programmes, and how it could be affected by the increased cost of construction.
3:17
Crunching the numbers
The £39bn 10-year Affordable Homes Programme is an ambitious investment in affordable housing, representing a real terms increase from the previous programme of over £1bn annually.
However, claims of the "biggest boost in a generation" may be slightly overblown. When factoring in inflation, the annual investment of £3.9bn falls short of the equivalent £4.5bn annually from 2008 to 2011 under the previous Labour government.
This was however a notably short-term uplift, and the sector will welcome the stability of the new settlement which secures funding for 10 years - compared with five years or fewer under previous programmes.
The programme sets out to deliver 30,000 affordable homes per year on average, with at least 18,000 of those being for social rent, rather than other tenures such as shared ownership.
This would be more than twice the number under the previous programme, which is estimated to have delivered about 8,000 homes annually for social rent by its completion.
Similarly, however, it is fewer than were delivered by the previous Labour Affordable Homes Programme, which was over 30,000 a year from 2008 to 2011.
A further challenge to the government's goal of a "generational" uplift is the increasing cost of building, meaning they may face diminishing returns on their investment.
The previous Affordable Homes Programme initially aimed to deliver 180,000 homes, which was revised down significantly to between 110,000 and 130,000 due to increasing costs and delays.
This government can expect to face a similarly challenging economic landscape, particularly with their ambition to deliver a greater share of socially rented homes - the most expensive type of affordable housing to build.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Entain cashes in on online betting surge as Club World Cup reels in players
Coral and Ladbrokes owner Entain has revealed a surge in online gaming as popular sporting events such as Wimbledon and the men's football Club World Cup reeled in punters. The sports betting giant reported total net gaming revenues – the amount of money the company pockets after paying out winnings to customers – of £2.6 billion for the first six months of the year, excluding its operations in the US. This was 6% higher than the same period a year ago, at constant currency rates. The increase jumped to 8% in the UK and Ireland, the company's biggest market, while online sales in the region surged by a fifth year-on-year. Both the volume of players and the value of sales increased, which Entain said reflected an improved experience for customers as well as previous changes to gambling rules starting to level out. The company had previously warned about the impact from regulatory changes in the UK which were designed to make betting safer for consumers. The FIFA Club World Cup final, which saw Chelsea beat PSG, was the most bet-on football match of 2025 for Entain's brands, with strong engagement coming from Brazil, Spain and the US. Interest in horse racing surged with the Royal Ascot and the Epsom Derby Festival both among the most bet-on competitions, while Wimbledon Tennis and the Women's Euro football tournament were also drawing in bets. Entain nonetheless reported a pre-tax loss of £96 million for the first half, swinging from a £13.7 million profit the prior year which the firm said was driven by one-off costs. On an underlying basis, earnings before tax, interest and other costs came in at £583.4 million for the period – 11% higher than last year. The company said it was now expecting higher sales growth for the year than its previous outlook, with online net gaming revenues forecast to rise by 7%. Annual underlying earnings are estimated to be between £1.1 billion and £1.15 billion.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The demonisation of white working class boys is the real ‘national disgrace'
I was a little surprised to read Bridget Phillipson's description of the underperformance of white working class children at A-level as a 'national disgrace'. Is this the same Education Secretary who pulled the plug on a joint project by Eton and Star Academies to open a chain of free school sixth forms in some of our most deprived Northern cities to address precisely this issue? I'm afraid it is. To be fair to Phillipson, this is a problem she inherited, even if she has frustrated efforts to solve it. The Institute of Fiscal Studies drew attention to it 10 years ago, pointing out that white British pupils in the lowest socio-economic quintile were less likely to go to university than any other ethnic group. According to the Department for Education's latest figures, a lower percentage of white British pupils eligible for free school meals passed English and Maths GCSE at grade 4 or above than any other demographic group, save for 'Gypsy/Roma' and 'Irish traveller'. The causes of this are complex, but poverty isn't the whole of the story. After all, the IFS also found that Chinese pupils in the lowest socio-economic quintile are, on average, more than 10 per cent more likely to go to university than White British pupils in the highest socio-economic quintile. Another factor, as Miriam Cates has pointed out, is that the vast majority of white British children in the bottom socio-economic quintile are being brought up in single-parent households, with only 12 per cent of their parents married and nine per cent cohabiting. But that, too, is an incomplete explanation. According to the Office of National Statistics, a higher percentage of African-Caribbean households in England and Wales are made up of lone parents with dependent children than white British households. Yet black Caribbean children eligible for free school meals outperform their white British counterparts. Perhaps the reason poor white students are struggling is because schools don't celebrate their identity, unlike almost every other ethnic group. Schools plaster the walls with pictures of high-achieving black Britons during Black History Month and bend over backwards to recognise the religious festivals of Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs. But most schools don't do anything to mark St George's Day. Indeed, when a school in Warwickshire invited pupils to wear 'traditional cultural dress' to celebrate the 'rich diversity of our community', it was so appalled when a 12 year-old white girl turned up in a Union Jack dress it sent her home. Insofar as schools do acknowledge the ethnicity of white British children, it's to lecture them about 'privilege' and the shameful role their ancestors played in the transatlantic slave trade. The stark figures about the under-achievement of white children in the bottom socio-economic quintile obscure an even bleaker story about the gap between male and female students in this demographic. In England, 40 per cent of white British girls eligible for free school meals got grade 4 or above in maths and English last year, compared to 38 per cent of boys. When it comes to university, just 14.5 per cent of poor white boys started higher education in 2021-22, compared to 24.4 per cent of poor white girls. No doubt that's partly due to the demonisation of white working class boys in schools, with the Netflix series Adolescence being the latest salvo in this constant assault on 'toxic masculinity'. But Bridget Phillipson is part of the problem, not the solution. Last month, the Education Secretary unveiled new Relationship, Sex and Health Education guidance designed to counter 'the scourge of misogyny'. 'Before I was elected to Parliament, I managed a refuge for women and children fleeing domestic violence, so I have seen first-hand the devastating impact when we don't foster healthy attitudes from the youngest age,' she said. For 'healthy attitudes' read finger-wagging condemnation of white working class male culture, from football fandom to boxing. So, what's the solution? It isn't the introduction of bursaries for poor white boys. When a former pupil of Winchester and Dulwich College offered them a million pounds to fund scholarships for this demographic, both said no. Apparently, it's perfectly acceptable for Stormzy to set up a bursary for black students to attend Cambridge, but the equivalent for white boys is 'racist'. Perhaps the answer is to de-wokify our schools and – to paraphrase Martin Luther King – judge all children by the content of their character rather than the colour of their skin or the nature of their genitalia. Looking at the data, it's hard not to conclude that white working class boys are victims of the racial and sexual politics that have infected our entire education sector. Its capture by radical progressive ideology is the real 'national disgrace', but don't expect this Government to do anything about that.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
British watch dealers hit by Trump's trade war with Switzerland
British watch dealers have been caught in the crossfire of Donald Trump's trade war after US tariffs on Switzerland wiped out demand for luxury timepieces. Sellers of second-hand Swiss watches said American customers were no longer buying from them after Mr Trump imposed a 39pc tariff on goods imported from Switzerland. Tom Bolt, who runs the watch dealership Watch Guru, said demand from US customers had been 'killed', adding: 'I have offered approximately £2.5m of watches in the last three weeks. Not one sale.' Mr Bolt warned that customers were 'just saying that until this whole tariff thing gets sorted out, they can't be doing it'. The tariffs, which rose from a previous rate of 10pc to 39pc earlier this month, apply to Swiss-made products, meaning buyers of used watches still have to pay them even if they order them from the UK or other countries. Adrian Hailwood, a watch industry expert and founder of The Watch Scholar, said: 'Even if I'm sending it from the UK, I have to say the origin of the goods is from Switzerland, and therefore they accrue a tariff. 'It doesn't matter where it's coming from in the world and this is why it really hits the pre-owned market. Once they're sold out of Switzerland, they could go to Australia, Japan, the UK – but if they're then being bought by US dealers or consumers, they have to pay tariffs because they're Swiss goods. 'The whole watch industry has been scratching its head as to what possibly can be done.' With a reputation for high-quality craftsmanship, Swiss-made watches have long been coveted by wealthy people across the world, with brands including Rolex, Omega and TAG Heuer. Manufacturers can only call their goods 'Swiss-made' if 60pc of the value of the final product was made in Switzerland. Americans are the biggest global customers of Swiss watches, making up about 17pc of Switzerland's total watch exports by value, according to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. However, Mr Trump has cited Switzerland's high trade deficit with the US as the reason why he has imposed such steep tariffs on the country. Jordan Beer, who runs the watch dealer Watches of Henley St, added: 'We've not exported one [watch] in the last two or three weeks to the US, which is relatively unusual for this time of year. 'I would say in general it's down from the US since all the tariffs started being floated around, regardless of whether it was 10pc on UK exports or [the recent higher tariffs on Swiss goods].' He added that Mr Trump's trade war was slowing the speed at which items make it through customs in the US and that he had been forced to warn customers of delays. Mr Bolt said he believed the high tariffs on Swiss watches could lead to an increase in goods being smuggled into the US. He said: 'What [customers will] do is, they'll say, 'Listen, send the watch to Hong Kong' because there's no import duties in Hong Kong. And the next time they're there, they'll pick it up and then they'll smuggle it back to their country.'
