
'Disrespectful' woman blasted for charging her mother for a simple household task
A woman has received backlash after revealing that she charged her mother £40 to help set up her household bills.
Laura Shahu, believed to be from the UK, has 29,000 followers on Instagram where she often posts videos about tips and tricks she's learnt on how to save cash over the years.
The mother-of-two recently shared a clip in which she revealed that her mother needed assistance with setting up her household bills and wanted to get her advice on the best rate possible.
Laura said: 'Am I greedy for charging my mum £40 for setting up her own bank account for her? I know what you're thinking - what kind of person charges their own mother to help them manage their bills? Well I kind of did and kind of didn't - let me explain.'
She said her mother was 'not very tech savvy' and wasn't 'confident' in finding the best value for money when it came to sorting out her bills.
She said the pair 'came to an agreement' that led to Laura helping her mother to find the cheapest bills - if she gave her the £40 cashback she earned as a 'thank you'.
But some social media users called her a 'joker' and said that she should be willing to help her mother out for free.
The content creator explained: 'In return, if I get that deal through a cashback website for her, she would give me the cashback that she otherwise would not have got if she had done it herself.
'In essence, she gets the best rate for her household bills without having to do the work to find it and if the best deal happens to be on a cashback website, I get the cashback that my mum would have otherwise gotten if she had done the work herself.
'We see it as a win-win because she gets confidence in knowing that she is getting the best rate for her bills but doesn't have to spend any time trying to search for it and I get the little bit of cashback to say thank you.'
Laura asked for people's opinions on whether they would ask their parents for money in return for helping them with admin tasks.
One person wrote: 'That's madness. £40 is hardly anything, your mum birthed you, you joker. Just help her.'
Another penned: 'No, no, no this is so wrong after all your mum has done for you.
'Now is the time you should be helping her and showing her how to do things. If she wants to treat you for your kindness that is up to her.'
A third said: 'I personally wouldn't, I'd help her and show her and let her keep the £40.'
A fourth commented: 'I think this is wrong, I help my mother as much as I can, I would never want anything in return.
'To me, it feels somewhat sad how money-focused you are. Losing values such as respect for elders, family importance and giving back to the parent(s) who raised us.
'Who provided for us for decades. If you feel this is fair and justified - I wonder what morals you have in terms of finances.'
But others agreed with Laura and said that she was very fair in asking her mother for the £40 cashback.
One said: 'The admin I do for my mum-in-law- I should claim a salary! I just take the hugs.'
Another penned: 'No, you are not, this is essentially a referral fee and you are the one referring her. This is no different to you going to a broker and they take the referral fee.
'She doesn't have to go with your choice, but if she does, you earned that cashback, if it's a large amount you may want to split it, but if you are both happy with the deal, nothing wrong with it.
'She's getting the best rate and you get compensation for your time and effort without it costing your mum anything.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Jersey Opera House gets third interim chairperson of 2025
Jersey Opera House has appointed a new interim chairperson, in the latest chapter of a story which has seen multiple resignations since the start of Robertson, a lawyer, has stepped into the position having already served as part of the board of decision comes after Cyril Whelan announced on Wednesday he was to resign having only just succeeded another outgoing interim chairperson in Opera House's Grade II listed building in St Helier reopened after five years in May following a major £13m refurbishment scheme.


BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Minister says Victorian marine lake repairs 'uneconomical'
The future of a marine lake built to mark the diamond jubilee of Queen Victoria is in doubt after the minister responsible labelled it a "diminishing requirement".Victoria Marine Lake on St Helier's waterfront was marked as needing "comprehensive work" after an inspection last year, a decade on from a £300k repair in 2014. A written question was submitted earlier this month by Deputy Inna Gardiner, who asked for details on how the pool would be maintained and kept safe in the response, Constable Andy Jehan, minister for infrastructure, said plans to improve sea defences in the area meant it would be "uneconomical to repair the marine lake". "Given the exciting plans under development for the waterfront and the need to improve shoreline management and coastal defence, it is anticipated that there will be a diminishing requirement for this feature," he well as highlighting repairs made to the lake's retaining wall in January, Constable Jehan referenced the £356,000 work done at Havre des Pas."It should be noted that there has been a considerable investment in the Havre des Pas pool wall and sluices to provide the facility for sea swimming at low tide, the function originally conceived for the marine lake."


Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Environment Secretary steps up plans to nationalise Thames Water
The Environment Secretary has said the Government is stepping up plans to temporarily nationalise Thames Water after a US rescue bid collapsed. Steve Reed confirmed to Parliament on Thursday that ministers were ready to save the struggling utility giant if necessary. A rescue would be in the form of a taxpayer-backed special administration scheme. He said: 'The company remains financially stable, but we've stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, as I've said before, including a special administration regime if that were to become necessary.' A government intervention appears increasingly likely after US private equity giant KKR abandoned a bid for the company. Thames's creditors have proposed an alternative £17bn rescue plan but it is contingent on regulators agreeing to waive historical fines. They have been pushing for ministers to intervene on the matter. Mr Reed signalled this would not happen, casting doubt over hopes of a private sector-led solution. He said: 'Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to their customers and to the environment. It is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company.' Taking control of Thames would pile further strain on the Government's stretched finances. A previous report estimated that a state bailout would cost the taxpayer up to £4.1bn. Thames, which has 16m customers across London and the South East, has been pushed to the brink of collapse as it struggles under the weight of £16bn in debts. Creditors have said that a 'regulatory reset' is needed to ensure the company is financially viable. A source close to the lenders said they were urging regulators 'not to reach back into history' and instead focus on Thames Water's turnaround efforts moving forward. A senior figure involved in the talks told The Telegraph last week: 'I think what it takes is the Government and the regulator coming together – it needs the Environment Department, the Treasury, and even No 10 to say, 'What's the least worst outcome here?'' Thames Water was handed a record fine of £123m in May and the company could be on the hook for more than £1bn in pollution and environmental failing penalties in future, according to creditors. The £17bn support package proposed by creditors includes writing off several billion pounds of debt and an immediate £3bn cash injection. If their deal falls apart, special administration is the most likely outcome for Thames. A spokesman for the creditors said: 'This investor group is committed to working with the Government and regulators to agree a pragmatic plan that recognises what Thames Water can realistically deliver and they expect to be held accountable for an ambitious trajectory for the company's return to compliance. 'More than £10bn would be written off to get the company back to investment grade, expected to be the largest financial loss on an infrastructure asset in British history.'