'Disrespectful' woman blasted for charging her mother for a simple household task
Laura Shahu, believed to be from the UK, has 29,000 followers on Instagram where she often posts videos about tips and tricks she's learnt on how to save cash over the years.
The mother-of-two recently shared a clip in which she revealed that her mother needed assistance with setting up her household bills and wanted to get her advice on the best rate possible.
Laura said: 'Am I greedy for charging my mum £40 for setting up her own bank account for her? I know what you're thinking - what kind of person charges their own mother to help them manage their bills? Well I kind of did and kind of didn't - let me explain.'
She said her mother was 'not very tech savvy' and wasn't 'confident' in finding the best value for money when it came to sorting out her bills.
She said the pair 'came to an agreement' that led to Laura helping her mother to find the cheapest bills - if she gave her the £40 cashback she earned as a 'thank you'.
But some social media users called her a 'joker' and said that she should be willing to help her mother out for free.
The content creator explained: 'In return, if I get that deal through a cashback website for her, she would give me the cashback that she otherwise would not have got if she had done it herself.
'In essence, she gets the best rate for her household bills without having to do the work to find it and if the best deal happens to be on a cashback website, I get the cashback that my mum would have otherwise gotten if she had done the work herself.
'We see it as a win-win because she gets confidence in knowing that she is getting the best rate for her bills but doesn't have to spend any time trying to search for it and I get the little bit of cashback to say thank you.'
Laura asked for people's opinions on whether they would ask their parents for money in return for helping them with admin tasks.
One person wrote: 'That's madness. £40 is hardly anything, your mum birthed you, you joker. Just help her.'
Another penned: 'No, no, no this is so wrong after all your mum has done for you.
'Now is the time you should be helping her and showing her how to do things. If she wants to treat you for your kindness that is up to her.'
A third said: 'I personally wouldn't, I'd help her and show her and let her keep the £40.'
A fourth commented: 'I think this is wrong, I help my mother as much as I can, I would never want anything in return.
'To me, it feels somewhat sad how money-focused you are. Losing values such as respect for elders, family importance and giving back to the parent(s) who raised us.
'Who provided for us for decades. If you feel this is fair and justified - I wonder what morals you have in terms of finances.'
But others agreed with Laura and said that she was very fair in asking her mother for the £40 cashback.
One said: 'The admin I do for my mum-in-law- I should claim a salary! I just take the hugs.'
Another penned: 'No, you are not, this is essentially a referral fee and you are the one referring her. This is no different to you going to a broker and they take the referral fee.
'She doesn't have to go with your choice, but if she does, you earned that cashback, if it's a large amount you may want to split it, but if you are both happy with the deal, nothing wrong with it.
'She's getting the best rate and you get compensation for your time and effort without it costing your mum anything.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Khan's housing pledge in crisis as new starts fall below 350 for quarter
Sir Sadiq Khan's plans for thousands of affordable homes in London have been plunged into crisis after figures showed just a few hundred new properties got off the ground last quarter. On Tuesday, new figures from the Greater London Authority showed 347 affordable homes had started construction between April and June this year – significantly below the number that the Mayor of London needs to meet his ambitious housebuilding targets. Sir Sadiq is aiming to build up to 19,000 affordable homes by March 2026. He is facing a significant shortfall if the pace of new building starts recorded in April to June continues. Lord Bailey, the housing spokesman for the City Hall Conservatives, said the Mayor was 'clearly failing'. 'London's housing crisis becomes more severe with every passing day, putting an increasing burden on Londoners and London councils with rising rents and mortgages,' he said. 'Struggling Londoners need the Government to succeed in tackling this issue but Khan is clearly failing, and we all pay the price. How will he ever meet his own targets, let alone the targets his own Government has set him? He's the weakest link in this chain.' Of the 19,000 affordable homes targeted, work has begun on just 5,500 – leaving the scheme 13,500 homes short. The latest figures are a further embarrassment after Angela Rayner's Ministry of Housing recently cut the target by 22pc to between 17,800 and 19,000 homes. Around 12,300 homes need to be started within the next nine months if he is to hit his objective. The Mayor of London's office has blamed the previous Conservative government's 'horrendous legacy' for making it 'harder and more expensive' to build homes. A spokesman for the Mayor said: 'Sadiq has made tackling this crisis a priority since he took office, and despite these challenges the highest number of affordable homes for social rent in a decade were completed last year. 'The Mayor is taking the hard decisions to improve housing supply of all tenures. He is actively exploring releasing parts of London's green belt for development and is working closely with the Government to resolve issues like delays from the Building Safety Regulator.' The figures come amid wider concerns that Britain's housing market is stalling, driven by fears that Rachel Reeves will raise taxes this autumn. Matt Pullen, the chief executive of building materials supplier Marshalls, said speculation around the Budget is creating uncertainty in the industry and 'weighing on individuals ... and business confidence'. He pointed to growing reluctance from homeowners to spend their savings on renovation projects, as well as a lack of confidence among first-time buyers and employers. Housebuilder Bellway also called for more focus on stimulating demand with greater support for first-time buyers. It has reported a 14pc uplift in home completions during the year ending July 2025. However, it flagged softer trading conditions as a result of 'demand-side constraints' for first-time buyers and 'delays to planning decisions' while local authorities adapt to the Government's planning reforms. The Prime Minister has vowed that the autumn Budget will focus on improving living standards. However, Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, face warnings that they could be forced to increase taxes by as much as £50bn to plug a gap in the public coffers. A government spokesman said: 'We are delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, and our landmark planning reforms will help to drive UK housebuilding to its highest level in over 40 years while growing the economy by £6.8bn. 'Thanks to measures taken at the Budget, there will also be an additional 130,000 transactions over the next five years by first-time buyers and others buying a primary residence.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Total cost of private school to almost double to £380,000
The cost of sending children to private school will almost double after the introduction of VAT on fees, analysis suggests. The parents of a privately educated child leaving school this year after A-levels are likely to have spent an average of £204,622 on fees, according to Weatherbys Private Bank. The cost of putting a child of the same age through boarding school is estimated to have been £413,471. However, costs vary widely with the Good Schools Guide putting the highest annual fees at £75,000. Weatherbys says that for a child starting in reception at a private school this September the cost could ultimately reach £377,000 — £763,000 if they were boarding. This assumed annual inflation of 3 per cent, which accounts for two thirds of the increase, with VAT responsible for the rest. Last September private schools put up fees by an average 6.7 per cent. When 20 per cent VAT was imposed in January, many schools initially cut fees by 5 per cent to cushion parents from the immediate impact, but overall, the average fee rose by about 22 per cent. Oliver Barnett from Weatherbys said: 'I'm sure sending out invoices with VAT on was a nailbiting moment for some heads, nervous about losing pupils. We expect that schools will attempt to recover some of the discount they gave in January. Historically, schools increase fees above inflation, so our 85 per cent growth estimate is conservative.' Barnett said there were other pressures on schools. Some years had a 5 per cent drop in pupil numbers, while schools have lost their eligibility for business rates charitable relief and are dealing with higher employer national insurance contributions. Although many schools are expected to manage these pressures, others may struggle to remain financially viable. Barnett said parents should consider the long-term stability of a school to avoid disruption during their child's education. Fiona Fernie from the accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg said: 'Labour's intention to target wealthier families with VAT on school fees overlooks that many families making sacrifices to afford private education are not necessarily very wealthy. 'Some send their children to private schools because local state schools are inadequate or cannot provide necessary specialist services. These families will be hit hardest, with many likely to be priced out over the coming years. 'While the revenue from VAT on school fees is intended to fund state schools and hire 6,500 new teachers, there is little evidence that this teacher pool exists or that funding will cover additional classrooms needed for increased pupil numbers. More pupils in state schools with fewer resources will create challenges.' Rathbones Asset Management has estimated that parents will pay up to £111,300 more per child over their school life because of VAT. Richard Cook from Rathbones said: 'The earlier parents start saving and investing for private school fees the easier it is to spread the cost and manage finances. Investments may help beat inflation and compound returns over time, unlike cash savings. A qualified financial adviser can help families plan cashflow and investments aligned to their risk appetite, ensuring education goals don't compromise broader financial resilience.' Julie Robinson, the chief executive of the Independent Schools Council (ISC), said: 'Schools will always do all they can to keep fees affordable for parents. A third of pupils at ISC schools receive some sort of fee assistance, and the amount spent on bursaries is at an all-time high. However, the government's decision to tax education will inevitably have an impact on cost, with a cumulative effect over several years.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Affordable homes pilot scheme starts in Wolverhampton
Wolverhampton has been selected to pilot a programme of 200 affordable homes being built in the of Wolverhampton Council will get access to a share of almost £20m in government funding to build at 11 sites over the next two will include one to four bedroom houses, flats and bungalows for affordable and social scheme will see council houses built on new sites and existing homes that have poor thermal efficiency and are of poor quality or non-traditional construction will be replaced. The city is the first local authority in the country to trial the scheme which sees Homes England, the government's housing and regeneration agency, working collaboratively with the council, the authority Islam, director of affordable housing grants at Homes England, said: "This new way of working is another example of how the agency works collaboratively with local authorities to achieve our mission to build much-needed new communities that people can be proud to call home."Steve Evans, deputy leader and cabinet member for city housing, said the "additional financial certainty" enabled the council to speed up delivery of housing provision."One of our key priorities is to build new and better homes for local people in well-connected neighbourhoods across the city," he said."This pilot will deliver new homes that will mean residents and the wider community benefit from improved health outcomes, lifestyle and sustainability." Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
