New York, San Francisco and other cities cap Pride month with a mix of party and protest
NEW YORK — The monthlong celebration of LGBTQ+ Pride reached its crescendo as New York and other major cities in the U.S. and around the world hosted parades and marches Sunday.
Pride celebrations are typically a daylong mix of jubilant street parties and political protest, but this year's iterations took a more defiant stance as Republicans, led by President Trump, have sought to roll back LGBTQ+ rights.
The theme of the festivities in Manhattan was 'Rise Up: Pride in Protest.' San Francisco's Pride theme was 'Queer Joy Is Resistance,' while Seattle's was simply 'Louder.'
Lance Brammer, a 56-year-old teacher from Ohio attending his first Pride parade in New York, said he felt 'validated' as he marveled at the size of the city's celebration, the nation's oldest and largest.
'With the climate that we have politically, it just seems like they're trying to do away with the whole LGBTQ community, especially the trans community,' he said, wearing a vivid, multicolored shirt. 'And it just shows that they've got a fight ahead of them if they think that they're going to do that with all of these people here and all of the support.'
Doriana Feliciano, who described herself as an LGBTQ+ ally, held up a sign saying, 'Please don't lose hope,' in support of friends she said couldn't attend Sunday.
'We're in a very progressive time, but there's still hate out there, and I feel like this is a great way to raise awareness,' she said.
Manhattan's parade wound its way down Fifth Avenue with more than 700 participating groups greeted by huge crowds. The rolling celebration will pass the Stonewall Inn, the famed Greenwich Village gay bar where a 1969 police raid triggered protests and energized the LGBTQ+ rights movement.
The site is now a national monument. The first Pride march was held in New York City in 1970 to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Stonewall uprising.
Later Sunday, marchers in San Francisco, host to another of the world's largest Pride events, planned to head down Market Street to concert stages set up at the Civic Center Plaza. San Francisco's mammoth City Hall is among the venues hosting a post-march party.
Denver, Chicago, Seattle, Minneapolis and Toronto were among the other major North American cities hosting Pride parades on Sunday.
Several global cities including Tokyo, Paris and São Paulo held their events earlier this month, and others come later in the year, including London in July and Rio de Janeiro in November.
Since taking office in January, Trump has issued orders and implemented policies targeting transgender people, removing them from the military, preventing federal insurance programs from paying for gender-affirmation surgeries for young people and attempting to keep transgender athletes out of girls' and women's sports.
Peter McLaughlin said he's lived in New York for years but had never attended the Pride parade. The 34-year-old Brooklyn resident said he felt compelled this year as a transgender man.
'A lot of people just don't understand that letting people live doesn't take away from their own experience, and right now it's just important to show that we're just people,' McLaughlin said.
Gabrielle Meighan, 23, of New Jersey, said she felt it was important to come out to this year's celebrations because they come days after the 10th anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark June 26, 2015, ruling in Obergefell vs. Hodges that recognized same-sex marriage nationwide.
'It's really important to vocalize our rights and state why it's important for us to be included,' she said.
Manhattan on Sunday also hosted the Queer Liberation March, an activism-centered event launched in recent years amid criticism that the more mainstream parade had become too corporate.
Marchers holding signs that included 'Gender affirming care saves lives' and 'No Pride in apartheid' headed north from the city's AIDS Memorial to Columbus Circle near Central Park.
Among the other headwinds faced by gay rights groups this year is the loss of corporate sponsorship. American companies have pulled back support of Pride events, reflecting a broader walking back of diversity and inclusion efforts amid shifting public sentiment.
NYC Pride said this month that about 20% of its corporate sponsors dropped or reduced support, including PepsiCo and Nissan. Organizers of San Francisco Pride said they lost the support of five major corporate donors, including Comcast and Anheuser-Busch.
Marcelo and Shaffrey write for the Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
4 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate kicks off marathon voting session on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
The Senate has kicked off its marathon voting session on President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill after a weekend of negotiations and delays. As Senate Majority Leader John Thune went to the floor Monday morning, he told reporters that 'hopefully we'll know soon enough' if Republicans' have the votes to pass the bill. 'This may take a little while,' he noted. The vote-a-rama – an open-ended, hourslong series of votes on amendments, some political, some substantive – provides an opportunity for Republicans to make any eleventh-hour adjustments to the package and Democrats to push on GOP weak points in the bill and put their colleagues on the spot. Those politically tough votes are likely to provide fodder for campaign ads down the line. Trump's multitrillion-dollar bill would lower federal taxes and infuse more money into the Pentagon and border security agencies, while downsizing government safety-net programs including Medicaid. Democrats are expected to zero in on Medicaid and other safety-net programs as they message against the president's agenda. Monday's exercise in stamina comes after Senate Democrats employed a major delay tactic over the weekend that forced clerks to spend more than a dozen hours reading aloud the entire bill. Senators then debated the bill into the early hours Monday before adjourning and returning to the chamber at 9 a.m. ET to begin offering amendments. Lawmakers are up against an extremely tight timeline to pass the legislation. The president has demanded Congress deliver the bill to his desk by the Fourth of July, but the measure must still go back to the House if it passes the Senate. A number of Republicans are closely watching any changes made to Medicaid provisions in the bill. The Senate version of the megabill would leave 11.8 million more people without health insurance in 2034, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis released over the weekend. That's more than the 10.9 million more people projected to be left uninsured by the House-passed version of the bill. Both chambers are calling for historic spending cuts to Medicaid, which provides coverage to more than 71 million low-income Americans, including children, senior citizens, people with disabilities and other adults. The package would also enact changes to the Affordable Care Act that are projected to reduce enrollment in the landmark health reform law that Trump and Republicans have long sought to dismantle. But the Senate version calls for even deeper cuts to the Medicaid, leading to the larger estimate. It would slash federal support for Medicaid by $930 billion over a decade, Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said over the weekend, citing a CBO estimate. The House version is projected to reduce federal spending on the program by about $800 billion, according to the CBO. Both chambers would require certain able-bodied adults ages 19-64 to work to maintain their Medicaid benefits for the first time in the program's 60-year history. But the Senate version would impose the work requirement on parents of children ages 14 and older, while the House version would exempt parents of dependent children. The Senate version would also lower the cap on the taxes that states levy on health care providers to help fund the program and increase reimbursement rates for providers. However, that provision would apply only to the 40 states and the District of Columbia that have expanded Medicaid to low-income adults. The House bill would put a moratorium on the states' existing provider taxes. The first vote taken by senators Monday dealt with a procedural argument over the so-called current policy baseline and how to calculate the costs of the bill. While it may seem dry, Republicans' use of current policy baseline in their calculations will set a precedent allowing both parties to be much more generous when calculating costs of tax bills going forward. Trump and some GOP leaders, including Senate Finance Chairman Mike Crapo, pushed the alternative 'current policy baseline' scoring method, which seemingly greatly minimizes the deficit impact of the bill because it would not include the cost of extending the expiring 2017 tax provisions. The CBO, however, calculated the cost of the bill using its traditional scoring method, known as 'current law baseline,' which assumed the expiring provisions of the 2017 Trump tax cuts lapse as scheduled at the end of the year. It projected the Senate's bill would also cost far more than the House-approved bill, adding nearly $3.3 trillion to the deficit over a decade. The Senate version is costlier in large part because it contains bigger tax cuts, while shrinking some of the spending cuts and revenue raisers, said Marc Goldwein, senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a watchdog group. For instance, the Senate bill would make permanent three corporate tax breaks that were part of the 2017 law and would lessen the cuts to the food stamp program. 'They expand the giveaways and shrink the takeaways,' Goldwein told CNN. Using the current policy baseline, the Senate version would cost roughly $508 billion over the next decade, according to a separate CBO estimate released Saturday night.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says He Has a US Buyer for TikTok
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. Checking in on the U.S. TikTok saga, on the 162nd day since the app was banned in the U.S. by federal law. Of course, TikTok hasn't actually been banned despite this, because U.S. President Donald Trump has 'a warm spot' in his heart for the app, and keeps delaying enforcement of the law via executive orders. But technically, TikTok should not be available to Americans, as it hasn't established a deal with a U.S. partner, in line with legislation. So are we any closer to reaching a new agreement on this front? Well, that depends on which reports you choose to believe. According to Trump himself, a deal is all but finalized, with 'a group of very wealthy people' ready to sign on to partner with TikTok's parent company ByteDance on a new regional agreement. President Trump told Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' program that: 'We have a buyer for TikTok by the way. I think I'll need probably China approval, and I think President Xi will probably do it, you know?' Trump said that he'll have more to share on the deal in 'about two weeks,' with, again, a group of very wealthy partners ready to invest in the U.S. operations of the app. Which, given the various names floated as potential U.S. buyers for the platform makes sense, as everyone from Oracle's Larry Ellison, to Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary, to YouTube celebrity MrBeast has reportedly put in a bid for the American stake of the app. Who, exactly, Trump is referring to, however, we can only speculate, but Oracle has long seemed like the most logical partner for the platform, given its past relationship with TikTok U.S. Back in April, The Information reported that a new entity called 'TikTok America' would be formed to meet the app's legal ownership requirements, which would be 50% owned by a consortium made up of Oracle, Blackrock, and Andreesen Horowitz, among others. Trump's latest statements seemingly point to this being the likely make-up of the final deal, which would also see ByteDance retain a 19.9% stake in the app. So it does seem like a U.S. TikTok deal is close, but then again… Last week, Axios reported that TikTok sales negotiations had stalled, with some potential suitors, including billionaire Frank McCourt, saying that things had gone very quiet in the lead-up to the latest ban extension. As per Axios: 'Negotiations between potential bidders and the White House were being led by the vice president's office, but talks slowed ahead of the third ban delay […] U.S. bidders remain eager to strike a deal, but getting the Chinese government's sign-off will require intervention from the U.S. government, which is currently distracted by several other foreign policy obstacles.' Of course, both of these reports may well be true. It could be that the White House is already closing in on one deal, which is freezing out other bidders, which would make it appear as though things had stalled, when actually an agreement is closer than ever. But we don't know, and no one outside of the U.S. officials arranging the sale, and the Chinese government executives negotiating the same, can actually provide any direct insight into what's happening. And aside from President Trump, there's nothing else to go on at this stage. So maybe we're closer to the end, but it does ultimately seem to hinge on broader foreign policy developments, and the progression of U.S.-China trade talks leading into the next TikTok sale deadline. Which is now set to come into effect on September 17th. So maybe we get an update before then, though I wouldn't be expecting anything much for a while yet, given the extended timeline, and the negotiations still to come with Chinese officials. They haven't been rushed to make a deal thus far, and I don't see why they will be now, given the knowledge that Trump will likely just extend the negotiation period once again if things can't be worked out. Which, despite some legal and regulatory concerns, he can do, by submitting further executive orders to withhold enforcement of the TikTok ban. So maybe we hear something in the next two weeks, but probably not, and the only real deadline we have is still some time away. Recommended Reading Trump Says He May Extend TikTok Sell-off Deadline Once Again


CNBC
10 minutes ago
- CNBC
NEC Director Hassett: We're on track for the 'big beautiful bill' to pass the Senate
Kevin Hassett, National Economic Council director, joins CNBC's 'Squawk on the Street' to discuss expectations for the Senate passage of President Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' whether the bill could increase the U.S. budget deficit, and more.