Trump, NATO tariff threat on Russia's crude oil: India not worried about sanctions, says Hardeep Puri; ‘if something happens, we'll…'
Oil Minister
Hardeep Singh Puri
is confident that if crude oil imports from Russia face sanctions or secondary tariffs by NATO and the US, India is capable of meeting its energy requirements.
Since February 2022, Indian refineries have actively purchased Russian oil at reduced prices, whilst other nations avoided these supplies due to Western-imposed sanctions on Moscow following its military action in Ukraine.
US President Donald Trump has recently warned about potential sanctions on countries buying Russian exports, should Moscow not agree to a peace deal with Ukraine within 50 days.
Trump & NATO Warning
Trump announced on Monday a 100% tariff on Russian exports, including oil, alongside equivalent secondary charges for nations importing Russian goods, to be enforced after a 50-day ultimatum for Moscow to conclude its conflict with Ukraine.
The specifics and implementation strategy of Trump's announcement remain unclear.
Also Read |
India-US trade deal: Donald Trump says 'another deal coming up, maybe with India'
NATO's new Secretary General Mark Rutte issued warnings on Wednesday to India, China, and Brazil regarding potential secondary sanctions due to their ongoing commercial relations with Russia.
During his meeting with US Congress senators, Rutte called upon the three countries to engage with Russian President Vladimir Putin and convince him to seriously consider the peace agreement with Ukraine.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
"My encouragement to these three countries, particularly, is: if you live now in Beijing, or in Delhi, or you are the president of Brazil, you might want to take a look into this because this might hit you very hard," Rutte told reporters.
"So please make the phone call to Vladimir Putin and tell him that he has to get serious about peace talks, because otherwise, this will slam back on Brazil, on India, and on China in a massive way," Rutte added.
Why India Is Not Worried
Puri indicated that India is prepared to manage any disruption in Russian imports by accessing supplies from emerging producers like Guyana and established ones such as Brazil and Canada. Also, India continues to expand its exploration and production initiatives.
"I'm not worried at all. If something happens, we'll deal with it," Puri said at an industry event in New Delhi according to a Reuters report.
Also Read |
India-US trade deal: India wants Donald Trump administration to offer tariff rate lower than Indonesia; eyes competitive advantage
"India has diversified the sources of supply and we have gone, I think, from about 27 countries that we used to buy from to about 40 countries now," he added.
Indian Oil Corp has a contingency plan in place. Chairman A.S. Sahney informed reporters at the event that if Russian supplies face disruption, the company would "go back to the same template (of supplies) as was used pre-Ukraine crisis when Russian supplies to India were below 2%."
India's Love For Russian Oil
Russia maintained its position as India's main oil supplier, contributing approximately 35% of the nation's total imports, with Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates following in sequence.
During the first six months of this year, India's petroleum imports from Russia showed a slight increase, with private sector refineries Reliance Industries Ltd and Nayara Energy accounting for approximately 50% of the total Russian purchases.
According to a TOI report, the potential US penalty tariffs on nations purchasing Russian oil could impact India's preference for these discounted barrels, as the advantages of lower prices might not compensate for the impact on its exports to America, particularly during ongoing trade negotiations between the two countries.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
5 minutes ago
- Hans India
RTC workers threaten hunger strike over unmet demands
Hyderabad: TheTelangana State Road Transport Corporation (TGSRTC) Workers Union has issued a warning to the state government, threatening to launch a mass hunger strike at Indira Park if long-pending workers' demands are not immediately addressed. The union's General Secretary, K Rajireddy, highlighted several critical concerns that have prompted this decision to call for a hunger strike. Among the key unresolved demands are wage revision, denied union recognition, and unpaid dues. Rajireddy stated, 'Despite Congress's 2023 election promise, the 2021 wage revision remains unimplemented. The previous BRS regime abolished welfare committees and banned unions—a policy the Congress government has yet to reverse. The government claims to have sanctioned 3,038 posts yet continues outsourcing drivers and conductors—a first in RTC's history.' Workers are also seeking a 100 per cent increase in the 2017 wage revision allowances. They demand immediae payment of 11 pending Dearness Allowances (DAs) from 2019 to 2024. Additionally, they seek arrears in bonds with five-year interest. There is also increased pressure on employees without job security or the regularisation of temporary staff. The Union demands immediate action on several fronts. These include forming a committee with union representation to draft RTC merger rules, withdrawing false police cases from the 2019 strike, ceasing outsourcing and commencing regular recruitment, compensating families of deceased/medically unfit workers, reviewing wrongful terminations under the Mahalakshmi scheme and breath analyser disputes, and holding elections for RTC's Credit Cooperative Society (CCS).
Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Today in Politics: All eyes on Parliament as Monsoon Session set to commence
The government on Sunday told an all-party meeting that it is ready to discuss all issues raised by the Opposition in the Monsoon session of Parliament, which will commence on Monday, while asserting that it will respond appropriately to demands for a response on US President Donald Trump's claims on Operation Sindoor. At the customary meeting ahead of the session beginning Monday, the opposition raised various issues, including voter roll revision in Bihar, the Pahalgam terror attack and Trump's 'ceasefire' claims. The government sought coordination with the opposition in the smooth running of the month-long session. There should be govt-opposition coordination in running Parliament smoothly, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju told reporters after the meeting. He said the government will respond appropriately in Parliament on opposition raising the issue of Trump's claims on Operation Sindoor. The government, he emphasised, is open to discussing all issues in Parliament in line with rules and traditions and asserted that the government was very much open to discussing important issues like Operation Sindoor. Talking to reporters after the meeting, Congress leader Gaurav Gogoi said his party sought Prime Minister Narendra Modi's statement on Trump's claims, 'lapses' which led to the Pahalgam attack and Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of poll rolls in Bihar. The Monsoon Session of Parliament will also see the introduction of eight new bills by the central government. The Income-Tax Bill, 2025 is the government's top priority and was presented to the Lok Sabha on February 13 during the Budget Session of Parliament. TMC's Martyrs' Day rally With an eye on the Assembly polls next year, the TMC is gearing up to turn its annual Martyrs' Day rally into a powerful platform to sharpen its Bengali pride narrative and hit out at the BJP over the alleged harassment of Bengali-speaking migrants. Monday's rally in Kolkata's Esplanade is expected to see Trinamool Congress supremo and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee issue a clarion call to her party workers, reiterating her message that 'Bengalis are not second-class citizens in their own country'. 'Time and again, poor Bengali-speaking workers are being picked up, harassed, and branded as illegal infiltrators. The BJP is criminalising poverty and weaponising identity to harass the marginalised,' a senior TMC leader told PTI. The TMC has accused the BJP of resorting to 'linguistic othering' and has sought to reignite the emotional chord of regional identity that helped it counter the BJP's Hindutva wave during the 2021 assembly polls. 'Dignity, identity, and survival are at stake. BJP is out to erase Bengali self-respect under the garb of nationalism. Our fight is not just electoral-it's existential,' said a TMC MP. The BJP, on the other hand, has pushed back strongly. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, during his recent rally in Durgapur, accused the TMC of promoting infiltration and endangering national security for vote-bank politics. 'It is the BJP that truly protects Bengali 'ashmita',' Modi had said, as he projected the BJP as the only credible alternative in Bengal. Ashim Ghosh to take oath as Haryana Governor Haryana's Governor-designate Ashim Ghosh will take oath of office in a ceremony at the Raj Bhavan here on Monday. He will succeed Bandaru Dattatraya. The new Governor will be administered the oath of office by the Punjab and Haryana High Court's Chief Justice Sheel Nagu. According to an official communique, the appointment will take effect from the date he assumes charge of office. Once a towering yet soft-spoken presence in Bengal BJP's formative years, Ghosh (81), a scholar with a sharp political mind, has made a surprise return to national relevance, over two decades after retreating from the daily bustle of active politics. 'It's a matter of great honour for me, and I would try to perform my duties with utmost sincerity. I will work with dedication to serve the people of Haryana,' the 81-year-old had told reporters in Kolkata on July 14. His elevation as governor is being seen as both an acknowledgement of his long political journey and a gesture of respect toward the older generation of BJP leaders who built the party's foundations in West Bengal, where it long remained marginal. – With PTI inputs
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Harvard faculty who fear school's destruction seeks deal with Trump admin
Kit Parker is used to being an anomaly on Harvard University's campus. The physicist — an Army Reserve colonel who served in Afghanistan — is a long-time critic of the school's hiring practices and what he sees as liberal biases. For months, he's urged the university to address criticisms from the White House, even as the vast majority of his colleagues applauded Harvard's decision to resist President Donald Trump's efforts to reshape higher education. These days, in Parker's telling, he finds himself less isolated as Harvard confronts the harsh realities of a sustained fight with the US government. Faculty such as Parker and Eric Maskin, an economics and mathematics professor who won a Nobel Prize in 2007, want Harvard to resolve the clash with Trump before punishing financial penalties cause irreparable damage to the school and the US. They and other faculty agree that reform is needed to address issues including antisemitism, political bias and academic rigor. Harvard declined to comment on negotiations with the Trump administration. The stakes for Harvard will be in focus on Monday, when a federal judge in Boston will hear arguments on whether the Trump administration illegally froze more than $2 billion in research funding, as the university claims. In a sign that the Trump administration isn't running out of ways to challenge the school, government agencies in July threatened Harvard's accreditation and subpoenaed data on its international students. Just last week, Garber warned the combined impact of the federal government's actions could cost the school as much as $1 billion annually — a figure that takes into account federal research cuts, a higher endowment tax and the government's continuing attempt to ban it from enrolling foreign students. Garber said that the school will continue to slash expenditures and that a hiring freeze will remain in place. 'There's a point at which the grant cuts destroy Harvard as a leading university,' said law professor Mark Ramseyer. 'That point is far below $1 billion. So we were already fully in the disaster zone.' Faculty members like Parker, Maskin and Ramseyer – all members of the Council on Academic Freedom at Harvard, a campus group that says it supports free inquiry, intellectual diversity and civil discourse – remain a minority in the wider Harvard community. In a survey of professors in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, 71% said they believed Harvard shouldn't try to reach an agreement with the Trump administration. The poll was conducted by the student newspaper in April and May, and less than a third of some 1,400 professors it was distributed to responded, meaning it might not be a representative sample of views overall. FAS houses 40 academic departments. An alumni group called Crimson Courage continues to urge Garber to fight, and many students would find a settlement unpalatable. 'Standing strong is not merely an operational exercise: it is a moral imperative,' Crimson Courage said last month in a letter to Garber and the board that oversees the university. 'The world is watching and needs Harvard's leadership and courage now.' The splits hint at the delicate position Harvard's leadership is in after months of standing up to the Trump administration, including by suing the government for cutting off federal funding and to prevent a ban on international students. In the hearing Monday in the federal funding case, Harvard is poised to argue the administration's freeze violated its First Amendment rights and failed to follow proper procedures under civil rights law. But the administration argues that Harvard failed to address antisemitism, and the US acted properly under federal law in terminating funding. Harvard has said it is working to combat antisemitism with steps like updating its rules on use of campus spaces, reviewing its disciplinary processes and funding projects aimed at bridging campus divisions. For Garber and the Harvard Corp., the powerful governing body led by Penny Pritzker, striking a deal quickly would offer significant benefits. Students are set to start returning to campus in a matter of weeks, so reaching a settlement before then would potentially allow the school to provide a measure of clarity to international students before the start of the academic year. If funding were restored as part of an agreement, it could also end months of uncertainty for researchers. David Bergeron, a former acting assistant secretary at the Department of Education in Barack Obama's administration, pointed to another advantage for Harvard of arriving at an agreement soon. 'There are fewer faculty and students around in the summer to object,' Bergeron said. Now that the school has become an avatar for resistance to Trump's efforts to transform higher education, a settlement will be perceived by some key constituencies as a capitulation. Bertha Madras, a professor at Harvard Medical School since 1986, said that she thinks some of the changes that could stem from an agreement would benefit the university – even if she thought Trump's tactics for achieving them were aggressive. 'This new reality calls for institutional pride to yield to negotiations,' said Madras, a professor of psychobiology, adding that she sees 'an opportunity for timely self-examination and fast-track reforms.' Maskin, who is one of seven co-presidents of the Council on Academic Freedom, holds a similar view. 'There are plenty of things that Harvard could be doing and should be doing. To go ahead and do them is not caving. It's making the university better,' Maskin said. Still, it's not clear how much progress Harvard and the Trump administration have made toward a deal. While President Trump said last month that Harvard was close to a 'mindbogglingly' historic deal, Bloomberg News later reported that talks between the administration and the school had stalled. Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in July that the administration was 'negotiating hard' with both Harvard and Columbia University. 'I think we're getting close to having that happen. It's not wrapped up as fast as I wanted to, but we're getting there,' she added.
