Mathura's Shahi Idgah Mosque Not Disputed Structure, Allahabad HC Rejects Hindu Sides Plea
The site where the Shahi Idgah mosque is currently standing was originally the location of a Hindu temple, the petitioner had said.
Krishna Janmabhoomi Case In Court
1- The petition in the court was filed by the President of the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi Mukti Nyas, Mahendra Pratap Singh.
2- The contentious case was heard by Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, who had reserved the verdict after arguments from both sides were presented.
3- The judgment was delivered as scheduled on Friday.
#BreakingNews: शाही ईदगाह विवाद में हिंदू पक्ष को लगा झटका, हाईकोर्ट ने खारिज की याचिका#Mathura #UttarPradesh | @ramm_sharma pic.twitter.com/L6G2poYfFb — Zee News (@ZeeNews) July 4, 2025
What Is Shri Krishna Janambhoomi Case?
The ongoing legal controversy is related to Mathura's Shahi Idgah mosque, reportedly built during the era of Aurangzeb. The Hindu side has alleged that the structure was established after demolishing a temple at the birthplace of Lord Krishna.
The petitioner also claimed in court that the mosque bears symbols of Hindu deities on its walls.
The petitioner has also argued that the Muslim side has not provided any documentary evidence to prove it to be a mosque. Furthermore, as per IANS, he stated that the structure is not listed in the official land records (Khasra-Khatauni), has no municipal records, and no taxes have been paid for it -- therefore, it should not be recognised as a mosque.
Muslim Side's Argument
The Muslim side presented its argument in the HC, strongly opposed the petition, and asserted that the Shahi Idgah has existed at the site for over 400 years. Additionally, they argued that the demand to declare the structure disputed is 'baseless' and must be dismissed.
HC On Shri Krishna Janambhoomi Case
The Allahabad HC agreed with the Muslim side's argument and rejected the petition, declining to classify the Mathura's Shahi Idgah as a disputed property.
This was one of the 18 petitions filed by the Hindu side with regard to the claims on the land around Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC dismisses Hindu side plea seeking use of ‘disputed structure' in place of Mathura's ‘Shahi Idgah mosque'
1 2 Prayagraj: The Allahabad high court on Friday dismissed an application moved by the Hindu side seeking court direction that in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah title dispute case, the word 'disputed structure' be used at the place of 'Shahi Idgah mosque'. Earlier, during the court proceedings, an application was moved in original suit no. 13 of 2023 with prayer to direct the stenographer concerned to use word 'disputed structure' in place of order 'Shahi Idgah Mosque' in the entire further proceedings of this original suit along with other connected matters. The application was supported by an affidavit of advocate Mahendra Pratap Singh. Subsequently, the written objection was filed on behalf of Muslim side, who are defendants in the suit. The Hindu side had submitted before the court that the Shahi Idgah mosque in Mathura was constructed on the exact site that is "historically recognized" as the original birthplace of Lord Krishna, one of the most revered deities in Hinduism. The site holds immense religious significance for Hindus, as it is widely believed to be the precise location where Lord Krishna was born. However, on the other hand, it was submitted on behalf of the Muslim side that the present application has been filed with an intent to abuse the process of law. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 안구건조 걱정 없이 안전하게 강남아이원스안과 지금 신청하기 Undo According to them, the mosque has been in existence for the last over 400 years and its existence is sought to be undermined by the present application, which is not permissible under law. The trial of the suit is yet to commence. Allowing the present application will amount to pre-determination that Shahi Masjid Idgah is not a mosque, at an early stage, in the suit. While dismissing the application on Friday, Justice Ram Manohar Narain Mishra observed, "A bare perusal of the pleading of the parties in the suit reveals that there is dispute between the parties with regard to the site where Shahi Masjid Idgah is existing. Parties have claimed their respective title over suit property. Therefore, it may be termed as property in dispute." "In pleadings of the parties also, the structure in question is referred as Shahi Masjid Idgah and at this stage, where hearing of the suits is yet to commence and even issues have not been framed, it is neither desirable nor expedient to issue any direction to stenographer, as prayed by the applicants, to refer Shahi Masjid Idgah in judgments and orders as 'disputed structure'. There is no dispute with regard to identity of property in suit, therefore, the prayer made in the application cannot be granted at this stage," the court further said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Mathura: HC rejects plea to refer ‘Shahi Idgah' as ‘disputed structure'
The Allahabad High Court on Thursday dismissed a petition that sought to replace the term 'Shahi Idgah Masjid' with 'disputed structure' in all future court proceedings in the ongoing cases related to the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute. The plea filed with prayer to direct the stenographer concerned to use the word 'disputed structure' in place of 'Shahi Idgah Mosque' in all further proceedings of the original suit and other related cases was supported with the affidavit of advocate Mahendra Pratap Singh who is plaintiff number 5. The prayer was opposed by the Muslim side, the court noted. 'A bare perusal of the pleading of the parties in the suit reveals that there is dispute between the parties with regard to the site where Shahi Masjid Idgah is existing. Parties have claimed their respective title over suit property. Therefore, it may be termed as property in dispute 15. In pleadings of the parties also, the structure in question is referred as Shahi Masjid Idgah and at this stage where hearing of the suits is yet to commence and even issues have not been framed, it is neither desirable nor expedient to issue any direction to stenographer, as prayed by the applicants, to refer Shahi Masjid Idgah in judgments and orders as 'disputed structure',' stated the bench of Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, in its order. 'There is no dispute with regard to identity of property in suit, therefore, the prayer made in the application A-44 cannot be granted at this stage. The Court in its direction may refer to the property in dispute by appropriate words in further proceedings. application A- 44 is dismissed with above observations,' the bench added. The court also said the applicant (plaintiff number 5) had submitted that the Shahi Idgah mosque was constructed on the exact site historically recognised as the original birthplace of Lord Krishna, one of the most revered deities in Hinduism. The defendants, on the other hand, maintained that there is no provision that allows the plaintiff to dictate a stenographer of the court to refer Shahi Masjid Idgah as a 'disputed property', especially when such words are an attempt to retract from admission made by him and could also amount to an adverse inference against the defence in the suit. The application has been filed with an intent to abuse the process of law, they alleged, adding that the mosque has existed for over 400 years, a fact which has been sought to be undermined by the petition. Allowing the present application amounts to 'pre-determination' at an early stage in the suit that the Shahi Idgah Masjid is not a mosque, the court said. It is also cited the defendant's contention that the plaintiff is trying to introduce a new case 'through backdoor' to negate the admitted fact that Shahi Masjid Idgah is a mosque. Even the existence of the mosque is admitted by plaintiff number 5 in his affidavit and at this stage he will not be permitted to convert the existing mosque into a 'disputed structure' for an ulterior motive, it added. '…A decree of mandatory injunction has also been sought in present suit, with a prayer to get so called structure Shahi Masjid Idgah demolished within period prescribed by the Court and control thereof be handed over to authority prescribed by the Court. A decree of prohibitory injunction has also been sought against defendant no. 1 and 2 with regard to suit property of Katra Keshav Dev. The defendants have controverted plaint's allegations in the written statement and had admitted that Shahi Masjid Idgah was constructed in the year 1669 but denied the allegation that this is an unauthorized construction. The compromise dated 12.10.1968 was rightly filed by the parties in O.S. 43 of 1967 (Shri Krishan Janamsthan Seva Sangh vs. Shahi Masjid Idgah and others). The Shahi Masjid Idgah is a waqf property and has existed in the same state for 400-500 years. The suit is barred by the Places of Worship (Special Provision) Act ,1991, Section 92 C.P.C, under Order VII Rule 3 C.P.C and Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C,' the court said in its order. The bench fixed July 18 as the next date of hearing In January last year, the court had consolidated 15 suits related to the dispute on an application filed by the Hindu plaintiffs. The petitions seek removal of the mosque from the 13.37-acre complex, which it shares with the Katra Keshav Dev temple. Later, an application was moved to recall the order that consolidated all 15 suits filed by the Hindu petitioners. In October last year, the court rejected the application and said the cases have been consolidated 'in the interest of justice'.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NGT: Better river flow mgmt required to prevent fish kills
Kochi: The (NGT) has stated that preventing future fish kills requires better management of river flow, strict industrial waste regulation and control of any kind of pollution from industrial sources. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Disposing of a batch of petitions, including three suo motu cases filed by the principal bench and the southern bench on the mass fish kill that occurred downstream of the Periyar River on May 21-22, 2024, it directed the Kerala state pollution control board (KSPCB) to submit all the detailed reports filed before the bench to the Kerala High Court. "Since the High Court of Kerala is already seized of the matter, which addresses the same issues involved in the Original Applications (OA) pending before us, it would be appropriate to leave it to the decision of the HC to pass appropriate orders," the bench said. The PCB, in its report to the NGT, stated that a HC-appointed committee of officials, comprising (i) the secretary, Directorate of Environment and Climate Change, (ii) the regional director, Central Pollution Control Board, Bangalore, and (iii) the chairman, PCB, along with the amicus curiae, visited all the affected places and the petitioners and submitted a report. The committee's report before the NGT recommended curbing the Periyar pollution in two folds. One set of recommendations was directed to the departments concerned, namely the industries department, irrigation department and PCB. Remediation of Kuzhikandam Thodu has to be initiated as per the detailed project report (DPR) prepared and recommended for administrative sanction, the bench said. The NGT noted that the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (Kufos), which is a party respondent in all the above petitions, constituted an expert committee to prepare a report on the fish kill incident in the Periyar River and downstream of Pathalam regulator bridge. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The expert committee also provided a report with recommendations, including an AI-assisted system for displaying and alerting stakeholders downstream before opening the shutters. These are also to be submitted before the HC along with all the other reports filed in the case. The tribunal stated that since the HC is already seized of the matter and further orders are awaited, based on the recommendations given by the committee to the industries situated in the Eloor–Edayar Industrial area and the various departments, the bench was disposing of the petitions.
