‘Exodus' of US assets set to intensify, says strategist
GLOBAL investors are rotating out of US assets not because of uncertainty over tariffs, says strategist Marko Papic of BCA Research, but because non-US assets are more attractive, particularly as the US dollar is expected to weaken over time.
Papic wrote in a recent note: 'The big picture is that the market narrative of US exceptionalism is dead. So, it doesn't really matter what happens with the trade war. President Trump has catalysed what was always going to happen, which is the rotation of capital away from extremely expensive US.'
He maintains that the market story of 2025 is that 'global investors are using the catalyst and news flow of the trade war to lighten their exposure to US assets'. 'The trade war noise is providing cover for an absolute exodus out of the US.'
This is evident in the year-to-date underperformance of Nasdaq and S&P 500 relative to the rest of the world. The Nasdaq is down by 10 per cent and S&P 500 by 6 per cent. In contrast, MSCI ACWI ex-US is up by more than 7 per cent; MSCI Europe by 3 per cent; China by more than 9 per cent; and Asia ex-Japan by 1 per cent.
Papic is BCA Research chief strategist, whose analyses combine geopolitics and markets in a framework called GeoMacro. He was in Singapore last week for a conference by the Investment Management Association of Singapore, where he was on the podium to share his views on 'extracting geopolitical alpha'. He spoke to BT on the sidelines of the conference.
US dollar, assets to weaken
The US dollar is 'way too strong', he said, and could weaken by 30 to 50 per cent over the next five years. This would make US goods and services more attractive, and effectively rebalance trade for the US in a more 'gentlemanly' fashion than tariffs.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'Americans will be able to say – look, we're more attractive. Investment and factories will naturally move (to the US). Everything that Trump wants to do via threats and aggression will happen in a gentlemanly way, because currency depreciation is an across-the-board gentleman's tariff. The reason that rivals and partners are not going to be mad is because it's not permanent. Currencies go up and down.'
He expects the value of US assets to deflate over the next five years. 'This doesn't mean the S&P 500 doesn't end the year positive; it may go up 7 or 10 per cent. But if the dollar declines by 7 per cent, in currency-adjusted returns, someone in Japan, Singapore or Europe would do better in other equity markets.
'Most investors, whether they're individuals or family offices or long-term pension funds, are up to their necks in US assets and US dollars… If you take some of the proceeds over the last five to 10 years and invest in foreign assets in a very diversified way, that will be the smartest thing to do over the next five years.'
Singapore's future role
Singapore, he observed, is feeling 'a lot of consternation' with the onslaught of tariffs and the trade war. But that consternation, he argued, is 'built on two false narratives'.
The first narrative is the belief that globalisation is ending. This, he argued, is not so. 'Exports as a percentage of global GDP have been stable at 30 per cent for the past seven years. That's not going away. Trump's actions are causing other countries to start redoubling on globalisation. Singapore will be fine.'
The second is that Singapore has traditionally played the role of helping to 'grease the wheels of US-China cooperation'. But Singapore, he said, should position itself as the 'financial capital of a multi-polar world'. 'That's where Singapore's long-term relationship with the US could be a detriment. Singapore may have to take a stand, or take no stand.'
He believes the future lies in facilitating capital in a 'non-aligned Global South', and 'whoever gets there faster wins'. He sees other financial centres competing for leadership in this, including India, Abu Dhabi and Hong Kong. The Global South refers to countries mainly in Asia, Africa and Latin America. 'The next 30 years are going to be about South to South… not so much goods but capital flows and savings. I think that's where Singapore's future is.'
In his GeoMacro reports, Papic has written on what he sees as an exodus out of US assets, as well as over-valuation and false narratives by Big Tech companies. One of the drivers of the funds outflow is the realisation that the 'fiscal gravy train' is slowing. Until recently the US stock market, especially tech stocks, has been buoyed by expectations of a generous fiscal package under Trump.
But Trump, he wrote, will increasingly face the 'tightening noose of material constraints'. One constraint is the US bond market, which has not rallied as much given the rising odds of a recession. If bond yields remain elevated, then Trump may not be able to follow through with expected tax cuts, as fiscal spending may be opposed by conservatives in the House.
'The material constraints against Trump are coming fast and hard. Bond yields are too high, fiscal conservatives in the House are revolting and negotiating trade with the entire world at the same time seems folly.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump says Musk to face ‘very serious consequences' if he funds Democrats
US President Donald Trump (left) told NBC News he had no desire to repair his relationship with billionaire Elon Musk. PHOTO: AFP Trump says Musk to face 'very serious consequences' if he funds Democrats BEDMINSTER, New Jersey - Donald Trump said on June 7 there would be 'serious consequences' if Elon Musk funds US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the president's sweeping tax-cut and spending Bill and said his relationship with his billionaire donor is over. In a telephone interview with NBC News, Mr Trump declined to say what those consequences would be, and went on to add that he had not had discussions about whether to investigate Mr Musk. Asked if he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive officer was over, Mr Trump said, 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'No,' Mr Trump told NBC when asked if he had any desire to repair his relationship with Mr Musk. Mr Musk and Mr Trump began exchanging insults this week, as Mr Musk denounced Mr Trump's Bill as a 'disgusting abomination.' Mr Musk's opposition to the measure is complicating efforts to pass the Bill in Congress, where Republicans hold a slim majority in the House of Representatives and Senate. The Bill narrowly passed the House in May and is now before the Senate, where Mr Trump's fellow Republicans are considering making changes. Nonpartisan analysts estimate the measure would add US$2.4 trillion (S$3 trillion) to the US debt over 10 years. Mr Trump said on June 7 he was confident the Bill would get passed by the US July 4 Independence Day holiday. 'In fact, yeah, people that were, were going to vote for it are now enthusiastically going to vote for it, and we expect it to pass,' Mr Trump told NBC. Mr Musk had deleted some social media posts critical of Mr Trump, including one that signalled support for impeaching the president, appearing to seek a de-escalation of their public feud, which exploded on June 5. Mr Trump late on June 6 suggested a review of federal government contracts held by Mr Musk. People who have spoken to Mr Musk said his anger has begun to recede and they think he will want to repair his relationship with Mr Trump. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
13 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump has options to punish Musk even if his federal contracts continue
The relationship between US President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk exploded into warfare on June 5. PHOTO: HAIYUN JIANG/NYTIMES WASHINGTON - After the relationship between President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk exploded into warfare on June 5, Mr Trump suggested that he might eliminate the tech titan's federal contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it,' Mr Trump posted on his social media platform. That's not as easy as Mr Trump implies. The Pentagon and Nasa remain intensely reliant on SpaceX, Mr Musk's rocket launch and space-based communications company, to get to orbit and move government data across the world. But there are options available to the president that could make Mr Musk's relationship with the federal government much more difficult than it has been so far in Mr Trump's second administration. Mr Trump's most accessible weapon to punish Mr Musk is the ability to instruct federal regulators to intensify oversight of his business operations, reversing a slowdown in regulatory actions that benefited Mr Musk's businesses after Mr Trump was elected. 'In an administration that has defined itself by reducing regulation and oversight, it would not be difficult to selectively ramp up oversight again,' said Mr Steven Schooner, a former White House contracts lawyer who is now a professor at George Washington University. With a decree, Mr Trump could suspend Mr Musk's security clearance, a step that the Trump administration has also taken against some of its Biden-era critics. That move would make it harder for Mr Musk to continue in his role as CEO of SpaceX, given its billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts. Pentagon investigators had been examining whether Mr Musk has violated federal security clearance requirements for disclosing contacts with foreign government leaders, The New York Times reported in 2024. The Trump administration could also slow down new contracts going to SpaceX in the years to come, perhaps by looking for ways to drive more work to its rivals, such as Mr Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin or the Boeing and Lockheed partnership called United Launch Alliance. But billions of dollars in financial commitments have been made to SpaceX for launches that will be spread out over the rest of Mr Trump's term to deliver astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station and even the moon, as well as to send military and spy satellites into orbit. Moreover, the services SpaceX provides are vital to some of Mr Trump's top agenda items, such as building a new space-based missile defence programme that the Pentagon is calling Golden Dome. That programme will require dozens of launches to orbit as well as space-based observation and data transmission systems to track and help intercept missile threats. SpaceX is by far the dominant global player in these launches. While Blue Origin and other companies like Rocket Lab and Relativity Space are building or have recently built their own new rockets, none has the kind of launch record and reliability that SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket has. Overall, the federal government has awarded nearly US$18 billion (S$23 billion) in contracts to SpaceX over the past decade, including US$3.8 billion just in the 2024 fiscal year, according to a tally by the Times. That makes SpaceX one of the largest federal contractors, with most of that money coming from Nasa and the Pentagon. Terminating SpaceX's contracts 'would end the US capability to launch astronauts to orbit for the foreseeable future,' said Ms Laura Seward Forczyk, founder of the space consulting firm Astralytical. It would also significantly delay the US effort to return humans to the moon, she said. Ms Bethany Stevens, Nasa's press secretary, hinted on Mr Musk's X social platform late on June 5 afternoon – as the verbal war between Mr Musk and Mr Trump continued to play out – that the deals with SpaceX are in fact not going to be cancelled anytime soon. 'Nasa will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space,' Ms Stevens said, without mentioning Musk or SpaceX by name. 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met.' But Mr Trump has more flexibility when it comes to the alphabet soup of federal agencies that regulate SpaceX as well as Tesla, Mr Musk's car company; X; the Boring Co., his underground drilling outfit; and Neuralink, his computer chip brain implant startup. The federal government, by most historical and ethical norms, is not supposed to be used as a retaliatory machine to punish political enemies. And that practice by Mr Trump would be abnormal and inappropriate, Schooner said. But the Trump administration, including the Justice Department, has shown itself willing to take up investigations that target Mr Trump's enemies or organisations that he dislikes, like Harvard University or even his former aides who have become critics, like Mr Chris Krebs, his former top cybersecurity official. Before Mr Trump was elected, at least 11 federal agencies had ongoing investigations or lawsuits targeting Mr Musk's companies. These included the Federal Aviation Administration's scrutiny of launch safety issues, the Environmental Protection Agency's inquiry into potential water pollution at SpaceX's Texas launch site and transportation regulators' questions about fatal accidents involving Tesla cars using autopilot. Several of those inquiries were put on hold. In other instances, fines that Mr Musk's companies had been assessed were being reconsidered, including one that the FAA announced in September for what it said were safety violations during launches in Florida. Mr Trump's top transportation official vowed at his confirmation hearing to 'review' that fine. As of last week, it had still not been paid, an agency official said. The Fish and Wildlife Service also has slowed down its oversight of SpaceX's Texas launch site, where the company for years has been accused of damaging adjacent state park and National Wildlife Refuge lands. That enforcement effort could be turned back on almost overnight if Mr Trump ordered it. But no other US company can currently do what Nasa needs. Boeing, the other company Nasa hired to take astronauts to orbit, has yet to complete fixes for its Starliner capsule after a test mission left two Nasa astronauts, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, in orbit for nine months before they finally returned to Earth in a SpaceX Crew Dragon. Aerospace company Northrop Grumman also has a contract to take cargo to the space station with its Cygnus spacecraft, but the most recent Cygnus had to be scrapped after it was damaged during shipment to Florida for launch. Mr Musk appears to recognise this leverage he has over Nasa. He initially threatened on June 5, as the war of words with Mr Trump played out, to stop future flights to deliver astronauts to the space station, but he appeared to walk back that threat later in the day. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
13 hours ago
- Business Times
Indonesia expects to conclude free trade talks with EU by end of June
[JAKARTA] Indonesia said on Saturday that free trade negotiations with the European Union, which have been going on for nine years, are expected to finish by the end of June. Airlangga Hartarto, the chief economic minister for South-east Asia's biggest economy, met with EU Commissioner for Trade Maros Sefcovic in Brussels on Friday. 'Indonesia and the European Union have agreed to conclude outstanding issues and we are ready to announce a conclusion of substantial negotiations by the end of June 2025,' Airlangga Hartarto said in a statement. He did not disclose details about what agreements may have been reached. Representatives for the EU in Jakarta did not respond to a request for comment. The EU is Indonesia's fifth biggest trade partner, with total trade between the two reaching US$30.1 billion last year. Indonesia had a US$4.5 billion trade surplus, Airlangga said. Indonesia and the EU have previously disagreed on the EU's trade rules for products with potential links to deforestation which could affect Indonesian palm oil, as well as Jakarta's ban on exports of raw minerals. Indonesian officials have been motivated to accelerate talks on free trade agreements, keen to diversify the country's export destinations as they deal with US tariff challenges. Seeking to end US trade deficits worldwide, US President Donald Trump announced sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs that have since been paused until July. Indonesia is facing a 32 per cent tariff rate. REUTERS