
India First: What Owaisi's Diplomatic Role Means For Indian Muslims
Last Updated:
We all must learn to navigate our ideological differences without damaging the nation
There are moments in politics when actions speak louder than a thousand speeches. The recent participation of Hyderabad Member of Parliament Asaduddin Owaisi in the Government of India's international outreach delegation is one such moment.
Owaisi — often portrayed as the sharpest critic of the BJP, a staunch opponent of Prime Minister Narendra Modi — was seen representing India's national interests on foreign soil. He wasn't there to settle scores or raise domestic grievances. He was there to speak as an Indian, for India.
That alone deserves attention, not for its political optics, but for the deeper lesson it offers to every citizen, especially the youth and those caught in ideological bubbles.
From Parliament To The Gulf
The Modi government selected a group of MPs for diplomatic engagement in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) — Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Algeria. Alongside BJP MPs Dr. Nishikant Dubey and Baijayant Jay Panda was Asaduddin Owaisi, representing not just his constituency but India's pluralist democracy.
This isn't just a PR stunt. It's a strategic move that shows maturity from both sides. The government chose someone who doesn't toe its line, and Owaisi agreed to stand with them, not against them, on the world stage. And what better stage than the Gulf, where misinformation about India's internal politics often circulates unchecked, and where extremist voices backed by foreign lobbies seek to shape global perceptions?
By joining hands with the government delegation, Owaisi has communicated — without compromising his ideological beliefs — that when it comes to the image and security of the Indian state, national unity matters more than party rivalries.
Moreover, the delegation proves the farsightedness of BJP and Prime Minister Modi. Despite ideological differences with Owaisi, the BJP leadership offered him a position to represent India abroad.
This isn't the first time Owaisi has chosen national interest over sectarian narratives. He has been vocal against Pakistan's double standards for years.
During a diplomatic outreach visit to Kuwait this week, Owaisi launched a scathing critique of Pakistan's leadership.
Taking the stage abroad, Owaisi took direct aim at Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Army Chief Asim Munir, calling them 'stupid jokers" for circulating a doctored image from a Chinese military drill and falsely claiming it as a Pakistani victory over India.
'I am telling you a fact," he said. 'Yesterday (May 26), Pakistan's army chief gifted a photo to PM Sharif. The President of Pakistan, the Speaker of the National Assembly were all there. These stupid jokers want to compete with India. They gave a 2019 Chinese army drill photo, claiming it was a Pakistani victory over India. They can't even produce a proper photograph."
Switching into Urdu for effect, Owaisi mocked the apparent lack of intelligence behind the stunt, 'Nakal karne ke liye akal bhi chahiye. In naalayakon ko akal bhi nahin hai." ('You need brains to copy. These fools don't even have that.")
It was a bold stand — and it broke the false image that Owaisi blindly supports the so-called Ummah narrative pushed by Pakistan's deep state. He reminded us that being a proud Indian Muslim does not mean aligning with Islamabad's propaganda. That a critique of domestic policies does not equal sympathy for anti-India forces.
His sharp critique wasn't just limited to Pakistan. Owaisi used to refer to Turkish President Tayip Erdogan as 'Mard-e-Mujahid" (Courageous Warrior) during his political rallies. However, when Turkey's President Erdoğan backed Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, Owaisi minced no words. 'When Turkey itself bombs the Kurds, how can it question India's right to defend itself?" Owaisi's comment targets global hypocrisy while defending India's sovereignty and strategic response.
And coming from someone who is often accused of pandering to pan-Islamic sentiments, it demolishes the lazy narrative that Indian Muslims have divided loyalties. Owaisi has shown repeatedly that his loyalty is to India — and that his inhouse fight and criticism is within the Indian democratic framework, not for applause from foreign autocrats.
Criticism Is Healthy
This episode should be a lesson for all of us, especially Indian Muslims. It is okay — even essential — to question the government. That's how democracy grows. But there's a difference between questioning your government and weakening your nation or rallying along foreign lobbies. And often, the line is crossed by social media warriors, vulture activists, or even clueless youth who equate every Indian policy with injustice, without understanding the geopolitical complexities.
It's important to realize that when the Indian state reaches out to nations, especially the Islamic world, it's not just the ruling party's image on the line — it's the entire country's perception. In such moments, unity does not mean uniformity. It means being responsible.
Owaisi's participation signals that when it comes to protecting India's reputation abroad and exposing Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, we are on the same page. You can criticize the ruling party at home, and still work for the national interest abroad.
Role Of Indian Muslims In Diplomacy And Nationhood
For Indian Muslims who often feel politically disillusioned or targeted by identity politics, this moment offers clarity. Your leaders can be part of the state apparatus without losing their identity. In fact, their participation makes the state stronger, more inclusive, and more representative.
This is also a reply to those in the Gulf or Western nations who, based on orchestrated media campaigns, think India is becoming intolerant. When someone like Owaisi — who has fought at home — stands for India internationally, it sends a powerful message: This is my country, and I will not allow anyone to malign it from the outside.
That is what true patriotism looks like. And that is the kind of leaders the younger generation should look up to as a yardstick — one that knows when to raise its voice and when to represent with dignity.
Parties Come And Go — The Nation Stays
Let's be honest. Governments change. Parties rise and fall. But India as a state, as a civilisation, and as a system remains. The courts, the civil services, the armed forces, and the diplomatic institutions — they continue regardless of who is in power.
This understanding is crucial. If political disagreements make us hate the country itself, we are playing into the hands of our enemies. The state is not your enemy — it is the structure that protects your freedom to speak, protest, and participate.
Owaisi has often clashed with the BJP, but he knows that opposing a party doesn't mean opposing the nation. This wisdom is what makes his role in the outreach program more meaningful than it may appear on the surface.
Final Thoughts
This is a moment for reflection — especially for those who blindly idolise political leaders or treat them as infallible religious representatives. If you admire Asaduddin Owaisi, then admire him for this: for knowing when to support the Indian state, for daring to speak against Pakistan's hypocrisy, and for showing that dissent and patriotism are not enemies — they are siblings in a democratic home.
We all must learn to navigate our ideological differences without damaging the nation. There's already too much negativity being amplified. India needs more truth, more balance, and more unity in action.
top videos
View all
And that starts with leaders like Owaisi taking a stand — not for a party, not for applause, but for the tricolour.
Zahack Tanvir is an Indian-origin activist and founder of The Milli Chronicle, a UK-based publication. With expertise in geopolitics and counter-extremism, he provides insights into global affairs. He holds certifications in Counterterrorism from the University of Leiden of Netherlands, and Georgetown University of Washington DC. He tweets under @ZahackTanvir. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
tags :
Asaduddin Owaisi Indian diplomacy Indian politics
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 31, 2025, 16:00 IST
News opinion Opinion | India First: What Owaisi's Diplomatic Role Means For Indian Muslims

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


United News of India
29 minutes ago
- United News of India
CJI Gavai champions cross-border legal synergy at ICA London conference
New Delhi / London, June 5 (UNI) Chief Justice of India Justice B R Gavai inaugurated the third International Conference on 'Arbitrating Indo-UK Commercial Disputes: Synergizing India–UK Arbitration Practices' in London on Thursday. The high-level event, hosted by the Indian Council of Arbitration (ICA) during London International Disputes Week, brought together legal luminaries, judges, policymakers, and commercial dispute resolution experts from both nations to strengthen ties in arbitration and mediation. Delivering the inaugural address, CJI Gavai remarked, 'India and the United Kingdom share a rich history, bound by the tradition of arbitration and mediation rooted in our common law heritage.' The conference was also addressed by Union Minister of Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal, Lord Michael Briggs, Judge of the UK Supreme Court, Justice Hima Kohli, Supreme Court of India, Vikram Doraiswami, High Commissioner of India to the UK, and eminent lawyers including Harish Salve KC and Geeta Luthra, Vice President of ICA. CJI Gavai reflected on India's arbitration journey, invoking Mahatma Gandhi's commitment to mediation as foundational. 'Disputes are inevitable. What defines a strong commercial relationship is our commitment to resolve them efficiently,' he stated. He emphasised India's progress through amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (notably 2019), the establishment of the Arbitration Council of India, and the 2024 Bill proposing emergency arbitration and appellate tribunals. He lauded the UK's 2025 reforms in its Arbitration Act, promoting summary disposal and legal clarity. Justice Gavai drew from key Indian rulings, including BALCO, Vijay Karia, Amazon versus Future Retail and Gayatri Balasamy, to emphasise judicial minimalism and finality in arbitration. He noted, 'When arbitral awards are upheld without unnecessary interference, it enhances predictability, business trust, and investor confidence.' The CJI praised the growth of Indian institutions like DIAC, MCIA, and IIAC, while commending LCIA's role as a global benchmark. He stressed the importance of collaboration between Indian and UK arbitration bodies to raise global standards. Justice Gavai applauded the adoption of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) and hybrid systems such as Arb-Med-Arb. He called the Bar Council of India's recent move to allow foreign lawyers to advise on arbitration in India a 'landmark reform' that balances global openness with domestic integrity. CJI Gavai humorously outlined four transformative reforms he would introduce with a "magical wand". 'If I Had a Wand…,' CJI said, "I would make four reforms for India's Arbitration Regime." Finality of Arbitral Awards – Arbitration must be the final word, not an invitation for years of litigation. Mainstream Institutional Arbitration -- The Arbitration centres should be the norm, not an exception. Elimination of Delays -- Procedural fairness should not become a tool for tactical stalling. Diversity in Arbitrators -- The arbitrator pool must reflect varied perspectives and backgrounds for better outcomes. Chief Justice Gavai concluded by affirming India's unwavering commitment to becoming a preferred global seat for arbitration. He said, 'As India and the UK grow increasingly interconnected in commerce and law, our shared democratic values and legal traditions provide a strong foundation for a unified, efficient, and trustworthy dispute resolution system.' The conference echoed a resounding call for legal harmonisation, technology-driven arbitration, and cross-border cooperation with the shared goal of easing court pendency and bolstering investor confidence through strong alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. The event brought together senior dignitaries and legal experts from both India and the UK, including Chief Justice of India B R Gavai (inaugural address), Lord Briggs of Westbourne, Judge of the UK Supreme Court (keynote address), Vikram Doraiswami, High Commissioner of India to the UK (special address), Justice Hima Kohli, Supreme Court of India, Harish Salve KC, Senior Advocate and International Arbitrator, Sujit Ghosh, Deputy High Commissioner of India to the UK, Arun Chawla, Director General, ICA, Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate and Vice President, ICA, Dr N G Khaitan, President of ICA and Senior Partner at Khaitan and Co, and Karishma Vora, Barrister at 39 Essex Chambers, London and Member of the ICA International Advisory Committee. UNI SNG SS
&w=3840&q=100)

India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
How Does Pakistan Keep Getting Loans? Unpacking The Dirty Secrets Behind The Global Funding That Shields A Failing State
New Delhi: Pakistan is broke. Its economy is shattered. Foreign reserves are vanishing. Yet it keeps getting blank cheques. Weeks after the International Monetry Fund (IMF) handed it over $1 billion in emergency funds plus an additional $1.3 billion in loans, the nuclear-armed state got another $800 million from the Asian Development Bank (ADB). India protested. The world ignored. And it is not the first time. Why does a nation with internal chaos and globally infamous for harboring terrorists keeps getting rewarded? Despite global acknowledgment of Pakistan's double-faced policies – begging for aid while exporting 'jihad' – the money keeps flowing. So what makes Pakistan the global community's 'spoiled child with a nuclear button'? The answer is not economic. It is political, strategic and dangerously hypocritical. Let's get this straight: Pakistan is not getting loans because it deserves them. It is getting them because the world is afraid of what will happen if it collapses. Its economy is in tatters. Pakistan's forex reserves dipped in 2023 below $3 billion – barely enough for three weeks of imports. The 2022 floods cost the country more than $30 billion in damages. 1. Too Nuclear to Fail: Pakistan's debt has ballooned to over $130 billion. If it defaults, global banks lose billions. It is financial blackmail that is working. 2. Location: Sitting between China, Afghanistan and Iran, the country holds strategic real estate. The West, especially the United States, does not want it slipping entirely into China's orbit. 3. A Loan with Strings: These are not freebies. IMF and ADB loans come with demands – raise taxes, cut subsidies and sell public assets. Western companies often swoop in to buy the leftovers. Global lending institutions like the IMF and the ADB may present themselves as neutral bodies, but their actions suggest otherwise. They claim to operate on technical grounds, but do not blink twice when handing over billions to a country that fuels terrorism in Kashmir and harbors global fugitives. And where is India in this equation? Despite protests after attacks like Pahalgam, New Delhi's influence is minimal. India's voting share in the IMF is small compared to the United States and Europe. Meanwhile, Pakistan's removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in 2022 made getting loans even easier. The United States sees Pakistan as a pawn in its Afghanistan endgame. China, through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), is turning it into a client state. Loans are just the leash – a way to pull Pakistan closer when needed and push it when not. Who Really Benefits? Not the people of Pakistan. Experts like Sushant Sareen argue these loans fatten the Pakistani military, not fuel reforms. Former diplomat Kanwal Sibal warns that the IMF funding indirectly supports terror. Even former Pakistani envoy Husain Haqqani admits that the IMF is an ICU for Pakistan, not a cure. These loans do not save Pakistan. They sustain it just enough to remain a useful mess. A mess that is allowed to fester because it serves the interests of those who pretend to fix it. Pakistan is not only playing the victim, it is gaming the system and the system is letting it.

Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Politics Over Dead Bodies': Cong Slams BJP's Resignation Clamour Karnataka CM
/ Jun 05, 2025, 10:12PM IST A political storm has erupted after 11 people were killed in a stampede during RCB's IPL victory parade in Bengaluru. BJP has accused the Karnataka government of criminal negligence and demanded the resignation of CM Siddaramaiah and Dy CM DK Shivakumar. DK Shivakumar, in an emotional press meet, broke down while defending the government's response, accusing BJP and JDS of doing politics over dead bodies. Sambit Patra questioned if Siddaramaiah would face the same action as actor Allu Arjun once did in a similar case. Watch the explosive exchanges and reactions.#bengaluruhorror #rcbstampede #dkshivakumar #siddaramaiah #bjpcongressclash #karnatakapolitics #sambitpatra #tejasvisurya #iplcelebrationtragedy #bjpdemandsresignation #bengalurunews #rcbwin #politicsoverdeaths #alluarjunreference #bjpvscongress #toi #toibharat #bharat #breakingnews #indianews