UK's oldest white-tailed eagle dies aged 32
The UK's oldest wild white-tailed eagle has died in Scotland at the age of 32, RSPB Scotland has announced.
The eagle, a female named Frisa, hatched on Mull in 1992 and paired up with her long-term mate Skye in 1997.
The pair raised their first chick on the island in 1998, and went on to raise a total of 25 chicks in their 28 years of partnership.
Frisa was known to 'millions' thanks to appearances in a number of BBC programmes over the last two decades, beginning with the very first episode of Springwatch in 2005.
Her death was announced on the latest episode of the programme on June 2.
RSPB ambassador Dave Sexton, who spent 21 of his 36-year RSPB career working with white-tailed eagles on Mull, described Frisa as 'a very special bird who had touched the hearts of millions who saw her both on TV and in the wild'.
He added: 'As Frisa got on in years, I dreaded the day I would visit her territory and find her gone.
'Sadly, that day has come and I feel like I've lost a friend.
'But what a wonderful life she had with her mate Skye. Together they raised 25 chicks, many of which are now breeding far and wide across Scotland.
'She was a true icon for white-tailed eagles and she'll always hold a special place in my heart.'
RSPB Scotland said Frisa has not been seen since last year, leading experts to believe she has died either of natural causes, or following an altercation with another eagle.
It is with a heavy heart we announce the death of Frisa, the UK's oldest wild White-tailed Eagle.
This clip shows Frisa on the very first series of Springwatch in 2005, feeding some of the 25 chicks she raised during her lifetime.
Catch the full story on tonight's episode. pic.twitter.com/q4lSka7jbH
— RSPB Scotland (@RSPBScotland) June 2, 2025
Skye has also been spotted with another younger female eagle on Mull, which further suggests that Frisa has passed away as white-tailed eagles mate for life.
At 31 years of age, Skye now takes on the mantle as the UK's oldest wild white-tailed eagle.
Frisa's mother Blondie successfully raised the very first white-tailed eagle to fledge in Scotland following the reintroduction of the species in 1975.
The species previously became extinct in the UK in 1918 when the last known native wild bird was shot in Shetland.
A reintroduction project on the Isle of Rum using chicks donated from Norway has since seen the species re-establish a self-sustaining population in Scotland.
There are now estimated to be up to 200 pairs of white-tailed eagles in the UK.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Biden's post-presidency: From Social Security talk in Chicago to appearing on 'The View'
Joe Biden ended a half-century career in public office after a rough final year that saw him drop out of the 2024 presidential race amid questions about his age and fitness. Now, he has returned to the national spotlight after it was announced that he was diagnosed with prostate cancer earlier this month. A Biden spokesperson said on May 18 that the former president has been diagnosed with an "aggressive form" of prostate cancer that has spread to the bone. Biden was diagnosed after "experiencing urinary symptoms," and a "nodule" was discovered on his prostate, according to the statement. The former commander-in-chief, who left the White House and headed straight to California for vacation, has stayed low-key for months. The cancer diagnosis came as Biden, 82, was starting to grapple publicly with Donald Trump's presidency, which some Democrats blame on his decision to wait so long to exit the 2024 race. Biden began to reemerge publicly over the last month, giving a speech in Chicago, followed by an appearance on ABC's "The View," and then with an interview with the BBC. Biden said on "The View" that he was "trying to figure out what the most significant and consequential role I can play" post presidency. Now his plans are being upended by a significant health fight. Biden's first speech since leaving the White House came on April 15 in Chicago as Trump approached the 100-day mark of his presidency. The former president criticized his successor's opening policy blitz. "In fewer than 100 days, this new administration has done so much damage and so much destruction,' Biden said at a national conference of Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled in Chicago. "They've taken a hatchet to the Social Security Administration." The remarks came as Democrats were distraught about the opening days of Trump's presidency. Biden's role in the party has been unclear as Democrats look for new, younger voices to take on Trump. Biden finished his one term in the White House with low approval ratings and facing second-guessing from fellow Democrats. He sought to rehabilitate his image in the party, hiring a well-known Democratic operative to help. Biden began making the media rounds, attempting to rehabilitate his reputation, ahead of two highly anticipated books excavating his administration's efforts to downplay concerns about his age and acuity that many believe hobbled Democrats in 2024. Appearing on "The View", Biden rebuffed criticism that he waited too long to drop out of the 2024 race and maintained he would have defeated Trump in a rematch last fall. He also pushed back on those saying he experienced cognitive decline, adding: "They are wrong." And earlier this month, Biden told the BBC that ending his 2024 bid was "the right decision" but "just a difficult decision." "It was hard to say now I'm going to stop," he told the BBC. "Things moved so quickly that it made it difficult to walk away." His May 16 prostate cancer diagnosis came on the same day Axios released recordings of Biden's five-plus hours of interviews with Special Counsel Robert Hur. Hur ultimately decided not to prosecute Biden for improper possession of classified documents and asserted that jurors would have viewed Biden as "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." Biden dropped out of the 2024 race and turned the Democratic nomination over to former Vice President Kamala Harris after a disastrous debate performance against Trump. The debate heightened concerns about Biden's mental acuity. Since his cancer diagnosis, Biden has received an outpouring of support from across the political spectrum. Trump, Harris, former President Barack Obama, and former President Bill Clinton have all wished Biden well on social media. "Joe is a fighter - and I know he will face this challenge with the same strength, resilience, and optimism that have always defined his life and leadership," Harris wrote. Contributing: Joey Garrison, Phillip Bailey, and Sarah D. Wire, USA TODAY; Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Joe Biden retreated from the spotlight after leaving the White House
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meghan Markle Is 'Very Business' About Royal Rift as Prince Harry is 'Left Out of the Details' in England (Exclusive)
Meghan Markle is looking ahead while Prince Harry remains emotionally tethered to his royal past, a source tells PEOPLE A source close to the couple says they're being left out of royal conversations entirely, despite being aware of what's happening in England Amid King Charles' cancer diagnosis and Harry's recent public plea, insiders say reconciliation remains stalled by a lack of trustMeghan Markle and Prince Harry are united in their support of each other, but they view the deep divide with the royal family from different perspectives. "They're aware of everything going on in England, but they're being left out of the details — there's clearly no trust," a source close to the couple tells PEOPLE in this week's exclusive cover story. Meghan, who is focused on the future, while Harry has one foot in the past, "is very business about it," the source says. Through it all, Meghan stands firmly by Harry's side — supporting him through his ongoing lawsuits and the painful rift with his family, but an insider says Meghan wishes her husband could feel less burdened by the past and more present in the life they've built together. The rift between Prince Harry and his father King Charles is five years deep and remains one of the most painful fractures in Charles' reign. Amid the King's cancer diagnosis and Harry's increasingly candid public pleas, the silence between them speaks volumes. "I don't know how much longer my father has," Harry told the BBC on May 2 after losing a legal appeal to restore his automatic police protection in the U.K. But it was a more personal admission that landed harder: "He won't speak to me." The father and son were briefly on the same continent in late May, when King Charles, 76, traveled to Canada to attend the State Opening of Parliament, but emotionally remain worlds apart. The man the King once called his "darling boy" was meant to be "one of his reliable lieutenants he could call on to support the monarchy" says royal historian Dr. Ed Owens, author of After Elizabeth: Can the Monarchy Save Itself?, but that vision never came to fruition. Harry and Meghan stepped back from royal duties and moved to Montecito, California in 2020 amid mounting tensions that became public. The rift deepened with bombshell interviews, their Netflix docuseries and Harry's best-selling memoir Spare, which alleged a physical altercation with his brother, Prince William. While William remains estranged from Harry and Meghan, some royal observers believe it's King Charles, as head of the Church of England and a longtime advocate for unity, who should make the first move. But inside palace walls, hesitation reigns. At times, there has been a desire to reconnect — but "the underlying issue is trust," says royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith. "The King and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Insiders add that the King isn't surrounded by voices encouraging reconciliation. Prince William, 42, has shown no interest in extending an olive branch, while Queen Camilla — sharply criticized in Spare — "stays out of it," says a source. Even senior aides including Clive Alderton, who was also named in Harry's memoir, are unlikely to encourage outreach. "There is not a good angel in his ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,' " says Valentine Low, author of the upcoming book Power and the Harry's plea for peace, his BBC comments were widely seen as another blow. "It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one," says Low. "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." The King's weekly cancer treatments add further urgency to the idea of healing the relationship before it's too late. "It's been difficult for him to even get proper updates about his dad," the source says, underscoring just how deep the divide has become. "If you have that level of breach in a family, and you are estranged, you run that risk every day of having something unfathomable to deal with," says Catherine Mayer, author of Charles: The Heart of a King. Even before recent events, Charles and Harry's bond was complicated. Harry, the son of a broken marriage, lost his mother, Princess Diana, in tragic and public circumstances when he was 12. Amid the rift with his father, Harry spoke with his uncle Charles Spencer about changing his family's last name to Princess Diana's surname, Spencer, but was told the legal challenges would be insurmountable. That decision would directly affect the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children, Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 4. Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more! "There is so much baggage there that the idea that one meeting would resolve everything is ridiculous," Mayer tells PEOPLE. "But having some contact would seem better than none." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Held at gunpoint: BBC team detained by Israeli forces in southern Syria
On the morning of 9 May, I was part of a BBC Arabic team which left the Syrian capital, Damascus, for the southern province of Deraa. From there we planned to go to the frontier with the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. We wanted to get close to the Syrian territory that has been seized by the Israeli military since December, when Israel's prime minister said it was taking control indefinitely of a demilitarised buffer zone and neighbouring areas following the fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime. We were a team of seven - myself (a British citizen), two Iraqi BBC staff, and four Syrians - three freelancers and one BBC cameraman. Israel says it struck near Syria palace over violence in Druze areas First Druze crossing in 50 years as Israel courts allies in Syria Israeli strikes in Syria a challenge to Turkey We were filming near one of the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) observation posts, close to the town of al-Rafeed, when an official from the UN told us that the Israeli side had inquired about our identity and had been informed that we were a BBC crew. We next drove north towards Quneitra city, which has been located inside the buffer zone since a 1974 disengagement agreement between Syria and Israel, which captured the Golan during the 1967 Middle East war. About 200m (660ft) away from the city, an unguarded checkpoint blocked the road. To the side of the checkpoint we spotted Merkava tanks, one of which was flying an Israeli flag. From a nearby tower, two Israeli soldiers were watching us - one of them through binoculars - and my colleague held his BBC ID up for them to see. The BBC has complained to the Israeli military about what happened next to my team, but it has not yet received a response. A minute after we started filming in the area, a white car approached from the other side of the checkpoint. Four Israeli soldiers got out of the car and surrounded us. They pointed their rifles at our heads and ordered us to place the camera on the side of the road. I tried to explain that we were a BBC crew, but things escalated unexpectedly quickly. I was able to send a message to my BBC colleagues in London saying that we had been stopped by the Israeli military before our phones and all equipment were confiscated, more Israeli soldiers arrived in a Humvee military vehicle, and our car was thoroughly searched. The soldiers escorted us through a barrier into the city of Quneitra and stopped at the crossing point that separates Quneitra from the occupied Golan. There, the soldiers began reviewing the footage as we sat in our car, while one pointed his rifle at my head from metres away. After more than two hours, one of the soldiers asked me to step out of the car and speak on a mobile phone. I didn't know who the person on the line was. He spoke broken Arabic. He asked why we were filming Israeli military positions. I told him I was a British BBC journalist and explained to him the nature of our work. I returned to my car, and the rifle was again aimed at my head. After another hour of waiting, one more vehicle arrived. A group of security personnel got out of the car carrying blindfolds and plastic zip ties and asked me to step out first. The lead officer, who spoke fluent Palestinian Arabic dialect, took me by the hand towards one of the rooms at the crossing point which were previously used by the Syrian army. The floor was strewn with broken glass and rubbish. He told me that they would treat me differently - no handcuffs, nor blindfold - unlike the rest of my team. I was in shock. I asked why they were doing this when they knew we were a BBC crew. He said he wanted to help get us out quickly and that we had to comply with their instructions. Moments later, another officer entered and told me to take off all my clothes except my underwear. I initially refused, but they insisted, and threatened me, so I complied. He inspected even inside my underwear, both front and back, searched my clothes, then told me to put them back on and started interrogating me - including personal questions about my children and their ages. When they eventually let me out of the room, I witnessed the horrific scene of my team members, tied up and blindfolded. I pleaded to the officer to release them, and he promised to do so after the interrogations. They were taken one by one to the same room for strip search and questioning. They returned with their hands still bound but not blindfolded. The team's interrogation lasted more than two hours, during which all our phones and laptops were examined, and many photos - including personal ones - were deleted. The officer threatened us with worse consequences if we approached the frontier from the Syrian side again, and said that they know everything about us and would track us down if any hidden or un-deleted photo was ever published. About seven hours after our detention - it was past 21:00 - we were taken by two vehicles, one in front of our car and the other behind us, to a rural area about 2km (1.2 miles) outside Quneitra. There, the vehicles stopped and a bag containing our phones was thrown towards us before the vehicles left. Lost in the dark with no signal, no internet and no idea where we were, we kept driving until we reached a small village. A group of children pointed us to the highway, warning that a wrong turn could draw Israeli fire. Ten tense minutes later, we found the road. Forty-five minutes after that, we were in Damascus. Israel demands complete demilitarisation of southern Syria 'We just need peace': BBC speaks to Syrians watching Israel's incursion Israel seizes Golan buffer zone after Syrian troops leave positions
