logo
Meghan Markle Is 'Very Business' About Royal Rift as Prince Harry is 'Left Out of the Details' in England (Exclusive)

Meghan Markle Is 'Very Business' About Royal Rift as Prince Harry is 'Left Out of the Details' in England (Exclusive)

Yahoo2 days ago

Meghan Markle is looking ahead while Prince Harry remains emotionally tethered to his royal past, a source tells PEOPLE
A source close to the couple says they're being left out of royal conversations entirely, despite being aware of what's happening in England
Amid King Charles' cancer diagnosis and Harry's recent public plea, insiders say reconciliation remains stalled by a lack of trustMeghan Markle and Prince Harry are united in their support of each other, but they view the deep divide with the royal family from different perspectives.
"They're aware of everything going on in England, but they're being left out of the details — there's clearly no trust," a source close to the couple tells PEOPLE in this week's exclusive cover story.
Meghan, who is focused on the future, while Harry has one foot in the past, "is very business about it," the source says.
Through it all, Meghan stands firmly by Harry's side — supporting him through his ongoing lawsuits and the painful rift with his family, but an insider says Meghan wishes her husband could feel less burdened by the past and more present in the life they've built together.
The rift between Prince Harry and his father King Charles is five years deep and remains one of the most painful fractures in Charles' reign. Amid the King's cancer diagnosis and Harry's increasingly candid public pleas, the silence between them speaks volumes.
"I don't know how much longer my father has," Harry told the BBC on May 2 after losing a legal appeal to restore his automatic police protection in the U.K.
But it was a more personal admission that landed harder: "He won't speak to me."
The father and son were briefly on the same continent in late May, when King Charles, 76, traveled to Canada to attend the State Opening of Parliament, but emotionally remain worlds apart.
The man the King once called his "darling boy" was meant to be "one of his reliable lieutenants he could call on to support the monarchy" says royal historian Dr. Ed Owens, author of After Elizabeth: Can the Monarchy Save Itself?, but that vision never came to fruition.
Harry and Meghan stepped back from royal duties and moved to Montecito, California in 2020 amid mounting tensions that became public. The rift deepened with bombshell interviews, their Netflix docuseries and Harry's best-selling memoir Spare, which alleged a physical altercation with his brother, Prince William.
While William remains estranged from Harry and Meghan, some royal observers believe it's King Charles, as head of the Church of England and a longtime advocate for unity, who should make the first move.
But inside palace walls, hesitation reigns.
At times, there has been a desire to reconnect — but "the underlying issue is trust," says royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith. "The King and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation."
Insiders add that the King isn't surrounded by voices encouraging reconciliation. Prince William, 42, has shown no interest in extending an olive branch, while Queen Camilla — sharply criticized in Spare — "stays out of it," says a source.
Even senior aides including Clive Alderton, who was also named in Harry's memoir, are unlikely to encourage outreach.
"There is not a good angel in his ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,' " says Valentine Low, author of the upcoming book Power and the Palace.Despite Harry's plea for peace, his BBC comments were widely seen as another blow. "It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one," says Low. "It makes Charles reaching out even harder."
The King's weekly cancer treatments add further urgency to the idea of healing the relationship before it's too late.
"It's been difficult for him to even get proper updates about his dad," the source says, underscoring just how deep the divide has become.
"If you have that level of breach in a family, and you are estranged, you run that risk every day of having something unfathomable to deal with," says Catherine Mayer, author of Charles: The Heart of a King.
Even before recent events, Charles and Harry's bond was complicated. Harry, the son of a broken marriage, lost his mother, Princess Diana, in tragic and public circumstances when he was 12.
Amid the rift with his father, Harry spoke with his uncle Charles Spencer about changing his family's last name to Princess Diana's surname, Spencer, but was told the legal challenges would be insurmountable. That decision would directly affect the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children, Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 4.
Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!
"There is so much baggage there that the idea that one meeting would resolve everything is ridiculous," Mayer tells PEOPLE. "But having some contact would seem better than none."
Read the original article on People

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

East of England news quiz of the week
East of England news quiz of the week

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

East of England news quiz of the week

From unusual food bank donations to angry parents after a school rule change, how much East of England news can you remember from the past seven days? Follow East of England news on X, Instagram and Facebook: BBC Beds, Herts & Bucks, BBC Cambridgeshire, BBC Essex, BBC Norfolk, BBC Northamptonshire or BBC Suffolk. East of England news quiz of the week 24 - 30 May East of England news quiz of the week 17 - 23 May East of England news quiz of the week 10-16 May East of England news quiz of the week 3-9 May East of England news quiz of the week 26 April-2 May East of England news quiz of the week 19-25 April East of England news quiz of the week 12-18 April East of England news quiz of the week 5-11 April East of England news quiz of the week 29 March-4 April East of England news quiz of the week 22-28 March East of England news quiz of the week 15-21 March East of England news quiz of the week 8-14 March East of England news quiz of the week 1-7 March East of England news quiz of the week 22-28 February East of England news quiz of the week 15-21 February East of England news quiz of the week 8-14 February East of England news quiz of the week 1-7 February East of England news quiz of the week 25-31 January East of England news quiz of the week 18-24 January East of England news quiz of the week 11-17 January East of England news quiz of the week 4-10 January

King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert
King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert

As King Charles prepares to put on a united front with his family at this year's Trooping the Colour, the monarch and estranged son Prince Harry are nowhere near ending their rift. "There is no turning back," British royals expert Hilary Fordwich claimed to Fox News Digital. "King Charles remains tender towards his son but can't risk communication," she shared. "Prince William now has absolutely no interest in mending fences. Those close to the king say he [shouldn't] make peace with Harry in a way that would burden Prince William's future reign. The animosity is so deep that William has shut the door on Harry. Charles is not willing to go against his heir's wishes." King Charles, Prince Harry's Painful Feud 'Damaging' Monarch's Reign As Gutted Son Remains Furious: Expert "Everything comes down to trust and the lack of it," Fordwich added. Fordwich's comments came shortly after insiders told People magazine that the monarch, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, is hesitant to reconnect with his son. Many royal observers believe it's the monarch who should take the first step in igniting a royal reconciliation. Read On The Fox News App "The underlying issue is trust," royal biographer Sally Bedell Smith told the outlet. "The king and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Insiders told the outlet that the king, 76, isn't surrounded by palace aides urging him to reconcile with his son. Meanwhile, William is said to have "no interest" in extending an olive branch. "There is not a good angel in [the king's] ear to say, 'Be a good dad and make the first move,'" royal author Valentine Low told the outlet. Fox News Digital reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment. WATCH: PRINCE HARRY LOOKING TO RECONCILE WITH KING CHARLES, ROYAL FAMILY Fordwich claimed that Harry has crossed such a deep line in Charles's eyes that it's been difficult for the king to forgive his son. Sources close to Harry previously claimed to People magazine that Charles won't respond to his letters or phone calls. "It's Harry's criticisms of Queen Camilla [in his memoir, 'Spare'], as well as his broader attacks on the family and institution, which have seriously crossed a line for the king and those closest to him," Fordwich claimed. "The king is now so puzzled by Harry's constant revelations. It's now beyond sensitive to discuss, so he avoids all interaction regarding the subject. He is so kind but overwhelmed and has quite enough on his plate to deal with, without all this from his son." Harry's troubled relationship with his family and the U.K. establishment has played out in public for years – in books, interviews, TV programs and the courts. Harry and his wife, Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, stepped back as senior royals in 2020, citing the unbearable intrusions of the British press and a lack of support from the palace. That same year, they moved to California. Since the couple's royal exit, they have aired their grievances and made blistering allegations against the royal family. Harry's explosive 2023 memoir, "Spare," was stuffed with private details and embarrassing revelations. Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter Harry's rift with his family burst into the open once more with a raw interview he gave to the BBC in May after losing a court case over his security. In a long and at times emotional conversation, Harry said he wanted reconciliation. He admitted that his father, who is battling an undisclosed form of cancer, won't speak to him. "Harry's ill-timed recent interview on the BBC highlighted the lack of trust between them publicly," royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital. "He seemed to believe his father could and should solve the issue of security, which he insists he and his family should have." "The rift, sadly, seems likely to remain toxic as there is no mutual trust between them," said Fitzwilliams. "Hopefully, it will not worsen as the Sussexes could give further interviews or possibly write more about the feud, something that is invariably remunerative for them." Low told People magazine that despite Harry's call for peace on the BBC, his comments were seen as another blow to the royals. During the interview, Harry, who has met his father only once, briefly, since his diagnosis early last year, said, "I don't know how much longer my father has." "It wasn't meant to be an attack, but it would be seen as one," said Low. "It makes Charles reaching out even harder." Royal expert Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital that the royals take great pride in protecting their public image. They've maintained the late Queen Elizabeth II's motto of keep calm and carry on. Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News "The royals play a positive role to the cameras," he explained. "[But] behind the scenes, they allegedly are constantly bickering with each other… King Charles has a past reputation for not making advances on difficult decisions." A source recently claimed to Us Weekly that William was "absolutely appalled" by Harry's comments to the BBC about their father's health. The insider claimed that the 42-year-old feels like Harry stooped "so low." Royal experts previously told Fox News Digital that William is fiercely protective of Charles. The source also told the outlet that it's unlikely that the feuding brothers will reunite while their father is still alive. "The funeral of Charles would be the first time that courtiers would imagine [them reuniting]," said the insider. "I can't imagine William would invite Harry to his coronation." Despite infrequent updates from the palace about his health, Charles has returned to a full slate of public duties. During his sit-down with the BBC, Harry held out little hope of another meeting with his father. "The only time I come back to the U.K. is, sadly, for funerals or court cases," he said. Fitzwilliams said that Charles must address his ongoing rift with Harry, 40, as it remains a dark cloud over his reign. "We are now less than a fortnight away from Trooping the Colour, which celebrates the monarch's birthday," he said. "King Charles can surely congratulate himself on negotiating a year where he has worked so hard and achieved a great deal despite battling cancer." "The one area that remains problematic is the rift with the Sussexes. He has only seen Prince Harry once after his diagnosis and then fleetingly." Back in 2024, Christopher Andersen, author of "The King," claimed to Fox News Digital that the king is still unable to forgive his son for casting Camilla as the villain in "Spare." "I think people have to realize that the one thing that Charles finds unforgivable is criticism of Camilla," said Andersen at the time. "There's no criticism of Camilla," Andersen claimed. "And unfortunately for Harry… Harry said some pretty devastating things about her. He made it clear that he felt she was… the villain in the piece. I think that still bothers the king, and I don't know that it will be easy for him to [forgive]. I don't think they'll ever forgive Harry for that." WATCH: PRINCE HARRY'S JABS AT QUEEN CAMILLA UNFORGIVABLE FOR KING CHARLES: EXPERT "[He's] on his own," Andersen added, referring to the Duke of Sussex. In televised interviews to promote the book, Harry accused his stepmother, 77, of leaking private conversations to the media to burnish her own reputation. He accused members of the royal family of getting "into bed with the devil" to gain favorable tabloid coverage, singling out Camilla's efforts to rehabilitate her image with the public after her longtime affair with his father. "That made her dangerous because of the connections that she was forging within the British press," Harry told CBS ahead of his book launch. "There was open willingness on both sides to trade information. And with a family built on hierarchy, and with her on the way to being queen consort, there was going to be people or bodies left in the street." The Duke and Duchess of Sussex reside in the wealthy coastal city of Montecito with their two young article source: King Charles, Prince Harry at point of 'no turning back' as monarch refuses reconciliation: expert

The decades-old intrigue over an Indian guest house in Mecca
The decades-old intrigue over an Indian guest house in Mecca

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The decades-old intrigue over an Indian guest house in Mecca

As the annual Hajj pilgrimage draws to a close, a long-settled corner of Mecca is stirring up a storm thousands of miles away in India - not for its spiritual significance, but for a 50-year-old inheritance dispute. At the heart of the controversy is Keyi Rubath, a 19th-Century guest house built in the 1870s by Mayankutty Keyi, a wealthy Indian merchant from Malabar (modern-day Kerala), whose trading empire stretched from Mumbai to Paris. Located near Islam's holiest site, Masjid al-Haram, the building was demolished in 1971 to make way for Mecca's expansion. Saudi authorities deposited 1.4 million riyals (about $373,000 today) in the kingdom's treasury as compensation, but said no rightful heir could be identified at the time. Decades later, that sum - still held in Saudi Arabia's treasury - has sparked a bitter tussle between two sprawling branches of the Keyi family, each trying to prove its lineage and claim what they see as their rightful inheritance. Neither side has succeeded so far. For decades, successive Indian governments - both at the Centre and in Kerala - have tried and failed to resolve the deadlock. It remains unclear if Saudi authorities are even willing to release the compensation, let alone adjust it for inflation as some family members now demand - with some claiming it could be worth over $1bn today. Followers of the case note the property was a waqf - an Islamic charitable endowment - meaning descendants can manage but not own it. The Saudi department that handles Awqaf (endowed properties) did not respond to the BBC's request for comment, and the government has made no public statement on the matter. That hasn't stopped speculation - about both the money and who it rightfully belongs to. Little is known about the guest house itself, but descendants claim it stood just steps from the Masjid al-Haram, with 22 rooms and several halls spread over 1.5 acres. According to family lore, Keyi shipped wood from Malabar to build it and appointed a Malabari manager to run it - an ambitious gesture, though not unusual for the time. Saudi Arabia was a relatively poor country back then - the discovery of its massive oil fields still a few decades away. The Hajj pilgrimage and the city's importance in Islam meant that Indian Muslims often donated money or built infrastructure for Indian pilgrims there. In his 2014 book, Mecca: The Sacred City, historian Ziauddin Sardar notes that during the second half of the 18th Century, the city had acquired a distinctively Indian character with its economy and financial well-being dependent on Indian Muslims. "Almost 20% of the city's inhabitants, the largest single majority, were now of Indian origins – people from Gujarat, Punjab, Kashmir and Deccan, all collectively known locally as the Hindis," Sardar wrote. As Saudi Arabia's oil wealth surged in the 20th century, sweeping development projects reshaped Mecca. Keyi Rubath was demolished three times, the final time in the early 1970s. That's when the confusion around compensation appears to have started. According to BM Jamal, former secretary of India's Central Waqf Council, the Indian consulate in Jeddah wrote to the government back then, seeking details of Mayankutty Keyi's legal heir. "In my understanding, authorities were looking for the descendants to appoint a manager for the property, not to distribute the compensation money," Mr Jamal said. Nonetheless, two factions stepped forward: the Keyis - Mayankutty's paternal family - and the Arakkals, a royal family from Kerala into which he had married. Both families traditionally followed a matrilineal inheritance system - a custom not recognized under Saudi law, adding further complexity. The Keyis claim that Mayankutty died childless, making his sister's children his rightful heirs under matrilineal tradition. But the Arakkals claim he had a son and a daughter, and therefore, under Indian law, his children would be the legal inheritors. As the dispute dragged on, the story took on a life of its own. In 2011, after rumours swirled that the compensation could be worth millions, more than 2,500 people flooded a district office in Kannur, claiming to be Keyi's descendants. "There were people who claimed that their forefathers had taught Mayankutty in his childhood. Others claimed that their forefathers had provided timber for the guest house," a senior Keyi family member, who wanted to stay anonymous, told the BBC. Scams followed. State officials say in 2017 fraudsters posing as Keyi descendants duped locals into handing over money, promising a share of the compensation. Today, the case remains unresolved. Some descendants propose the best way to end the dispute would be to ask the Saudi government to use the compensation money to build another guest house for Hajj pilgrims, as Myankutti Keyi had intended. But others reject this, arguing that the guest house was privately owned, and so any compensation rightfully belongs to the family. Some argue that even if the family proves lineage to Mayankutty Keyi, without ownership documents, they're unlikely to gain anything. For Muhammed Shihad, a Kannur resident who has co-authored a book on the history of the Keyi and Arakkal families, though, the dispute is not just about the money - but about honouring the family's roots. "If they don't get the compensation, it would be worth openly recognising the family's and the region's connection to this noble act."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store