logo
Family of slain Gulfport teen sues Grindr

Family of slain Gulfport teen sues Grindr

Yahoo2 days ago

A family member of a Gulfport teen who police say was tortured, killed and dismembered by a man she met on Grindr is suing the owner of the platform, alleging that its features and lack of safeguards for minors contributed to the girl's death.
The lawsuit, filed last month in federal court against Grindr LLC by a representative of Miranda Corsette's estate, alleges that the 35-year-old man who killed the teen was able to target her through Grindr's app due to its 'lax age verification and hyper-precise geolocation.'
'The trauma inflicted upon M.C. (Miranda) and the irreparable harm to her family are direct consequences of Grindr's reckless disregard for the safety of minor children who are routinely preyed upon by adult predators who use Grindr's platform and design as a trap,' the suit states.
The plaintiff is identified in court filings by the initials D.W. and listed as an executor of Miranda's estate. Lorne Kaiser, a South Florida attorney for the plaintiff, declined in an interview to identify the plaintiff or the plaintiff's relationship to Miranda because he didn't have permission from his client to do so.
Grindr LLC has not yet filed a response to the suit. The West Hollywood-based company's press office did not respond to two emails from the Tampa Bay Times seeking comment for this story.
Launched in 2009, Grindr markets itself as the world's largest social networking apps for LGBTQ+ people, but it attracts a 'sexually diverse' userbase that include people looking to prey on minors, according to the lawsuit.
The complaint includes many of the details that have come to light about the investigation that led to the arrest of Steven Gress, 35, and Michelle Brandes, 37, on first-degree murder and other charges.
Authorities say that Miranda met Gress on Grindr on or about Feb. 14. Gress went to pick up the teen at or near the Gulfport home where she lived with her grandmother and brought her back to the apartment he shared with Brandes on 27th Avenue North in St. Petersburg. Gress told detectives that he was told she was 21 but later learned she was 16, according to an arrest affidavit.
Gress took Miranda back to Gulfport and at some point she returned to the St. Petersburg apartment. Gress said he became convinced Miranda had stolen his ring and, for the better part of a week, 'lumped her up,' the affidavit states. It ended Feb. 23. A witness said Brandes wrapped the girl's head in plastic. Gress told her not to cover her nose, but Brandes did, the witness said. Miranda suffocated.
Gress described Brandes shoving a billiard ball into Miranda's throat and covering her face in plastic wrap. He said he couldn't get to her quickly enough to poke holes in the plastic so she could breathe, according to the affidavit.
After Miranda died, they drove to Brandes' mother's house in Largo, where Gress used a chainsaw to dismember Miranda's body, according to police. They put the remains in trash bags and the next day left them in a dumpster in Ruskin. Police learned the contents of the dumpster likely went to the county's incinerator.
Police said there is no evidence Miranda took the ring, and Brandes later claimed to have found it in Gress's car.
Gress and Brandes have pleaded not guilty to murder and kidnapping charges. Prosecutors will seek the death penalty if they are convicted.
'Long before February 14, 2025, it was clear to Grindr that it was only a matter of time before its app, as Grindr marketed it and designed it, would cause the torture, rape, and murder of a child,' the lawsuit states.
The complaint says that the app requires only a self-reported birthdate to confirm users are at least 18, with no cross-checking against official documentation or third-party verification at sign-up.
Miranda's death 'exposes the platform's gross negligence in relying on a farcical self-reported age verification system,' the suit states. 'This performative gesture, as absurd as a bar or strip club asking teenagers to state their age without checking ID, allowed a minor to access an adult-oriented platform with foreseeable catastrophic consequences.'
The company could institute measures such as government-issued identification verification or facial age estimation system but has not done so, according to the complaint.
'The company had the means to keep minors off its platform, but it withheld them to preserve easy onboarding and avoid disrupting user growth, even when the cost is the safety of children,' the suit states.
The app's geolocation services 'deliver hyper-precise, real-time geolocation tracking — accurate to within a few feet — designed to facilitate immediate sexual encounters,' the suit states. 'As such, Grindr arranges user profiles based on their distance from other users for instant and spontaneous sexual hookups creating a uniquely hazardous environment for minors.'
The lawsuit, which notes that Miranda had a son, alleges nine counts including wrongful death, negligence, infliction of emotional distress, participating in a sex trafficking venture and deceptive and unfair trade practices. It seeks a jury trial and compensatory and punitive damages.
The complaint also asks the court to order Grindr to implement more robust age verification measures and to cease what the lawsuit alleges are misleading claims about the app's safety.
Kaiser said the lawsuit is meant to hold Grindr accountable for its role in Miranda's death just as prosecutors are holding Gress and Brandes accountable through the criminal justice process.
'Without Grindr, we believe that Miranda would have never met this Steven Gress character, and she'd still be alive,' Kaiser said. 'This was a completely foreseeable event. Grinder has been warned for years and years about children and minors getting on this platform, and it's obviously a dangerous platform for children.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rubio imposes sanctions on four ICC judges for ‘targeting' US and Israel
Rubio imposes sanctions on four ICC judges for ‘targeting' US and Israel

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rubio imposes sanctions on four ICC judges for ‘targeting' US and Israel

The United States is placing sanctions on four judges from the international criminal court (ICC) for what it has called its 'illegitimate actions' targeting the United States and Israel. The secretary of state, Marco Rubio, announced the sanctions in a statement on Thursday. They target Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini-Gansou of Benin and Beti Hohler of Slovenia. Donald Trump ordered cabinet officials to draw up sanctions against the ICC after the court issued arrest warrants for the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and former defense minister Yoav Gallant. They were accused of overseeing an Israeli offensive during the Gaza conflict that caused famine and included the commission of war crimes. Two of the sanctioned judges authorised the arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, and two authorised an ICC investigation into abuses by US personnel in Afghanistan. 'As ICC judges, these four individuals have actively engaged in the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America or our close ally, Israel,' Rubio said. 'The ICC is politicized and falsely claims unfettered discretion to investigate, charge, and prosecute nationals of the United States and our allies. This dangerous assertion and abuse of power infringes upon the sovereignty and national security of the United States and our allies, including Israel.' The decision to move forward with the sanctions will escalate Trump's feud with the court and other international organisations, which he has broadly dismissed as politicised. The US has already sanctioned the ICC's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, because of his role in pursuing the arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. Those sanctions have led Khan to lose access to his email and his bank accounts have been frozen, the Associated Press reported earlier this month. Americans who work for The Hague-based court have been warned that they could be arrested if they set foot on American soil. In a statement, the ICC said it 'deplores' the new designations for sanctions. 'These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 states parties from all corners of the globe,' the ICC said. 'Targeting those working for accountability does nothing to help civilians trapped in conflict,' the statement continued. 'It only emboldens those who believe they can act with impunity. These sanctions are not only directed at designated individuals, they also target all those who support the court, including nationals and corporate entities of states parties. They are aimed against innocent victims in all situations before the court, as well as the rule of law, peace, security and the prevention of the gravest crimes that shock the conscience of humanity.' Danya Chaikel, the International Federation for Human Rights's representative to the ICC, said the types of sanctions imposed by the Trump administration were originally designed to 'disrupt terrorist networks like ISIS, weapons traffickers, and human rights abusers, not international justice institutions.' 'Using them against ICC officials represents a dangerous misuse of executive power and distorts their purpose … It sends the chilling message that enforcing accountability for mass atrocities can get you punished, while allegedly committing international crimes may get you protected. James Goldston, executive director of the Open Society's justice initiative and a former ICC prosecutor, said: 'As a court of last resort, the ICC is the one place victims of the most serious crimes can turn to when other avenues have failed them in their search for truth and justice. These new designations of ICC judges threaten their hopes and embolden the perpetrators. Sanctions against ICC officials are a betrayal of America's proud commitment to the rule of law and international justice.'

St. Louis advocates warn of ICE texts urging ‘case reviews'
St. Louis advocates warn of ICE texts urging ‘case reviews'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

St. Louis advocates warn of ICE texts urging ‘case reviews'

ST. LOUIS – As U.S. President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown efforts continue, some immigrants are receiving text messages from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) asking them to report to local offices for a 'case review'—messages' some attorneys say may be misleading or deceptive. The Migrant and Immigration Community Action Project, a St. Louis-based immigrant advocacy group known as MICA, addressed the issue during a news conference on Wednesday. MICA says these messages are not just limited to St. Louis or Missouri. The group says similar texts have been reported in at least 14 other U.S. cities. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now One alleged text message, which MICA sent to FOX 2 as a screenshot, reads, 'Your ICE officer has requested that you report to the office for a case review this week… Please arrive either on Tuesday, June 3rd, or Wednesday, June 4th.' According to MICA, some individuals who received the texts were allowed to check in like normal and leave, while others are being detained by ICE officers inside courtrooms. When asked if this kind of courtroom presence is standard, St. Louis immigration attorney David Cox said, Not typically. 'They wouldn't be there as a witness,' said St. Louis immigration attorney David Cox. 'They're just members of the public, because the courts are open to the public. They're just showing up, they're standing in corners, some of them in plain clothes, some of them are wearing their official uniforms, so it's across the spectrum what we're seeing.' Attorneys are urging everyone who receives ICE 'case review' text messages, regardless of their current home state, to bring legal representation with them. According to NBC News, ICE made the most immigrant arrests in a single day in the agency's history on Tuesday, reportedly detaining more than 2,200 individuals. Attorneys told NBC News that at least some of those arrests appear to be tied to the mass text messages. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

California man arrested on child porn allegations sues county after charges dropped
California man arrested on child porn allegations sues county after charges dropped

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

California man arrested on child porn allegations sues county after charges dropped

A man arrested last year on allegations of child pornography has filed a lawsuit against San Bernardino County, accusing authorities of uprooting his life, damaging his reputation and potentially targeting him over his sexuality. Nicholas Diaz was arrested last November after his home in Grand Terrace was raided by authorities. Diaz was a longtime foster parent, and as a result of the raid and ensuing charges, lost custody of one of his two adopted children. But the attorneys representing Diaz say those charges were eventually dropped, and his arrest was the result of, at best, misidentification, or, at worst, deliberate targeting of a single gay parent. According to Ontario-based McCune Law Group, Diaz became the subject of a law enforcement investigation after the discovery of his OnlyFans account, an online subscription service typically used for homemade production of adult content. Authorities viewing this account allegedly found a video that they believed featured a minor—an allegation that Diaz's attorneys say was not true, and not sufficient probable cause to warrant a raid at his home and charges. In reality, the lawsuit states, the person depicted in the video was a 'consenting adult male in his 30s.' The lawsuit alleges that warrants were drafted for his arrest through a process of shoddy or biased detective work, ultimately leading to Diaz being taken into custody at his workplace, 'causing him public humiliation and embarrassment in front of his colleagues.' He was eventually taken to his home, where authorities began an extensive search. 'Mr. Diaz offered to voluntarily provide the Sheriff's Department with any information to clear up what he knew was a mistake,' the suit reads. His attorneys also allege that Diaz informed authorities that his children were inside, and that he had requested the 'opportunity to reassure' them. That request was denied, they said, and deputies approached with guns drawn and forcibly entered the home. Diaz's attorneys claim one of his sons was pinned down on his stomach by several law enforcement officers, and had his diabetes monitoring device 'ripped out of the pump, causing the child to go into diabetic shock after he was placed in handcuffs.' The raid, and the detaining of one son, happened in front of Diaz's second adopted son. He was also eventually handcuffed and taken outside alongside his brother, where they were 'made to sit on the curb, exposed to their neighbors.' At the time of his arrest, the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department said no foster children were at home at the time of the search; there was no mention of Diaz's adopted children. Diaz was eventually booked into jail and held on $80,000 bail, while his photo was disseminated to the public and local media, including KTLA, after authorities stated there may be additional victims who've yet to come forward. The release of his name and photo led to Diaz losing his job, as well as receiving threats of violence against his family, his attorneys said. Diaz also lost custody of his youngest son and was granted only limited visitation rights. The charges were eventually dropped, and last month, three separate claims were filed against San Bernardino County on behalf of him and his two adopted sons. The lawsuits allege physical injury to one of the sons, emotional trauma caused by the raid and the arrest, as well as significant and irreparable damage to Diaz's reputation, career and the family's overall well-being. 'Mr. Diaz's case tells the story of a loving father, gay man, and proud member of the San Bernardino community, who found himself arrested and publicly humiliated for crimes he did not commit,' McCune Law Group wrote in a statement provided to KTLA. 'Mr. Diaz saw his family torn apart by false and biased accusations. His children were physically and mentally harmed by the raid, and by the pain of ongoing separation from their parent. They are owed peace of mind.' But his attorneys say that peace of mind can't be obtained without setting the record straight. 'To protect this family, it is crucial that we tell their true story,' the statement concludes. KTLA has reached out for comment from San Bernardino County and the District Attorney's Office. The D.A.'s Office did not respond to a request for clarification regarding charges against Diaz; a County spokesperson said it would not be appropriate to comment on the ongoing legal matter. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store