MIKE POMPEO: Trump's renewed maximum pressure on Iran will reshape the Middle East
President Donald Trump achieved a vision of peace and prosperity in the Middle East none thought possible in his first term. Now, he has an incredible opportunity to reshape the future of the Middle East for years to come.
This week, he took the first step toward realizing this vision by doubling down on his maximum pressure campaign against Iran. His team can complement this sanctions approach by continuing the work of the first Trump administration and expanding the Abraham Accords.
As the past four years have shown, enriching and enabling the malign Iranian regime only leads to war and terror. As Trump demonstrated, the best way to avoid these outcomes is through massive and effective sanctions on Iranian oil exports, which allow the regime to prop up its dysfunctional economy, fund terrorist proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah, and inflict pain and suffering on the Iranian people.
This is why we in the first Trump administration, at the president's direction, successfully targeted Iran's oil exports with historic sanctions. At the end of our tenure, Iran's oil exports had fallen to just about 400,000 barrels a day. Like an animal caught in a trap, the regime thrashed and tried to break free by escalating tensions and instigating conflict.
President Trump met this escalation with steel resolve in the form of contained, lethal strikes – like that which claimed the life of Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani – that maintained deterrence while not putting American soldiers in harm's way.
By bankrupting the Iranian regime and building a coalition of partners and allies willing to contain Iran through the Abraham Accords, the first Trump administration laid the groundwork for a genuinely peaceful and prosperous Middle East. I was proud to have contributed to this historic effort as secretary of state.
Unfortunately, the Biden administration favored appeasement rather than deterrence. It failed to continue our sanctions program, made obscene ransom payments to the ayatollah, and revived the Obama-era falsehood that the regime would moderate – if only the right deal could be struck.
Led astray by fantasy, Obama's successors in Team Biden went right back to enriching the regime at the expense of America's security and that of our allies. At one point in the administration, Iran was exporting roughly 2 million barrels of oil per day – five times more than it had been just a few years prior – and Iran sold $144 billion worth of oil over Team Biden's first three years.
This infusion of wealth yielded predictable results. Iran resumed funding its proxies, Hamas perpetrated its grotesque attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, and the Houthis initiated a blockade of the Red Sea that lasted more than a year. Iranian-backed militias killed six American service members over the administration's last two years in office. Iran built and sold thousands of drones to Russia that bolstered Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine, and it sold more oil than ever to the People's Republic of China.
Abandoning our maximum pressure campaign was a disaster for America's foreign policy and national security.
President Trump's decision to reverse Biden's appeasement and bring back our maximum pressure campaign was necessary, and its timing is perfect: Israel's incapacitation of Hezbollah helped lead to the downfall of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, and Israel's campaign in Gaza to destroy Hamas is nearing victory.
These realities have left the regime in Tehran at its weakest point in years. Now is the time not only for maximum pressure to return with support for the organized opposition within Iran, but also for the White House to fully support our ally Israel in its mission to ensure Iran never reaches its goal of creating a nuclear weapon.
This will set the stage for the Iranian people to decide their own future instead of the tyrannical despots in Tehran, and it will give our partners and allies in the region the space and security they need to deepen their economic and security ties.
Whether within Iran, across the Middle East, or elsewhere, the return of President Trump's maximum pressure campaign is tremendous news for lovers of liberty – but his team should not stop there.
Iran is not our only vulnerable adversary: Putin's wartime economy is on life support, and the Chinese Communist Party's centrally-planned economy is under serious strain. Now is not the time to back off, relieve pressure or seek deals – now is the time to secure a better future for the United States and the world.
President Trump's maximum pressure campaign worked once against Iran, and it will work again; he should expand this strategy beyond the regime in Tehran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A familiar metric: White House says to expect Iran decision within ‘two weeks'
When it comes to a possible U.S. military strike in Iran, Donald Trump has raised more questions than he's answered. Last week, the president and his team went out of their way to say that the United States had 'nothing to do with' Israel's attack on Iran. This week, Trump declared, 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' before demanding the country's 'unconditional surrender.' No one seems able to say with confidence what the Republican intends to do, why he'd do it, or even when we might learn of his decision. I've found myself periodically checking his social media platform, looking for some kind of poorly written 'Bombs Away' message, followed by an unhealthy number of exclamation points. Evidently, I can stop hitting refresh — for two weeks. At her latest briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged the 'speculation' about the White House's policy, which led her to read a prepared statement from the president. It read, 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' It's difficult to say with confidence whether these negotiations exist or whether they'll succeed, but the fact that Trump and his team has rolled out another 'two week' timeline represents a remarkable failure of self-awareness. Last week for example, the president said U.S. trading partners should expect letters on unilateral tariff rates in 'two weeks.' Shortly before that, the president was asked about Vladimir Putin's alleged interest in 'peace.' He replied, 'I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks.' Last month, Trump was asked about tariff rates on pharmaceutical products. 'I'll know in the next two weeks,' he said. Alas, we can keep going. Where's Trump's health care plan? It'll be ready in 'two weeks.' What about a possible minimum-wage increase? That, too, will be unveiled in 'two weeks.' On everything from tax policy to infrastructure, immigration to reproductive health, the president's detailed solutions are always just 'two weeks' away. By now, most observers are probably familiar with how the game is played: The Republican is asked for his position on an issue; he dodges the question by saying he'll make an announcement 'in two weeks'; and then he waits for everyone to forget about his self-imposed deadline. Except, we don't forget. Instead, we shake our heads in exasperation because of the cynical assumptions at the heart of this unfortunate rhetorical trick, which no one falls for anymore. In this latest example, a reporter felt compelled to remind Leavitt of the familiarity of the administration's latest timeline. If recent history is any guide, she and Trump will keep using it anyway, indifferent to the embarrassment. This post updates our related earlier coverage. This article was originally published on
San Francisco Chronicle
23 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
A Ukrainian fled to Israel. An Iranian missile shattered her new life
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — When Tetiana Kurakova fled Ukraine weeks after Russia invaded in 2022, she thought she had left behind buildings with gaping holes, streets lined with rubble, and the fear felt while hiding from airstrikes. In Israel, friends helped the 40-year-old makeup artist relaunch her career, and she slowly built a life in the coastal city of Bat Yam. But early Sunday, an Iranian missile tore through the building next to hers, killing nine people, wounding dozens, and damaging or destroying hundreds of homes, including Kurakova's. It was the deadliest single strike from Iran in seven days of conflict, which began Friday when Israel launched airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites as well as top generals and nuclear scientists. Iran has fired some 450 missiles and hundreds of drones in retaliation. Days later, staying in a hotel in nearby Tel Aviv with 250 other evacuees from Bat Yam, Kurakova cried when she recalled the strike, which sheared the face off of a multistory apartment building and destroyed many buildings around it. 'It felt like a nightmare. I can't even describe how big it was,' she said. 'I had a panic attack. I just sat on the road, leaned on (my friend) Masha, and started to cry, to sob from all the misery that had happened.' Thousands of Ukrainians fled their country for Israel Kurakova is one of around 30,000 Ukrainians who have made Israel their home since Russia's war in Ukraine began, about half of whom have gained citizenship through their Jewish heritage, according to Israel's Ministry of Aliyah and Integration. Kurakova, who does not have citizenship, left home via Poland after about a month spent hiding from constant strikes in early 2022. She ended up in Israel, where she had a number of friends and some professional contacts. Five of the victims in the Bat Yam strike were Ukrainians from the same family who had come to Israel to escape the war and receive medical treatment for a 7-year-old girl who had blood cancer, Israeli media reported. The Ukrainian Embassy in Israel would not provide details on individuals, citing privacy concerns. It said it was working to repatriate the bodies, but faced challenges because Israel's airspace is closed due to ongoing attacks. Still fearing bombs and drones Bat Yam has a large population of residents from the former Soviet Union, many of whom emigrated in a wave in the early 1990s, and was a natural place for many newly arrived Ukrainians to settle. The working-class city is centrally located but the cost of living is lower than in Tel Aviv, next door. But older buildings in such cities — and in Arab towns and rural arras — often lack adequate shelters, though anything built since 1993 is required to have reinforced safe rooms. More than a year after Kurakova arrived in Israel, Hamas attacked the country's south, igniting a war in the Gaza Strip. She recalled being frightened in the early days after the militants' Oct. 7, 2023, attack. The fighting was just 60 kilometers (37 miles) to the south, and some nights, she could hear the booms from Gaza. But she wasn't prepared for it to hit so close to home. In the fighting between Israel and Iran, 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds injured. Missiles have struck 40 sites, including apartment buildings, offices and a hospital, according to Israeli authorities. Air raid sirens have repeatedly forced Israelis to run for shelter. Meanwhile, panicked residents of Iran's capital have spent restless nights in metro stations and thousands have fled. More than 600 people, including over 200 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 1,300 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group. Kurakova said the past few days have brought her right back to the early days of Russia's invasion. 'I don't even stop seeing dreams that I'm hiding somewhere, running from Shahed drones, bombs, and looking for shelter somewhere,' she said, referring to the Iranian-made drones used against both Israel and Ukraine. A choice between two conflicts In Bat Yam, the force of the blast blew out windows and damaged the walls of Kurakova's second-floor apartment. She was able to salvage a few belongings, but because of structural concerns, it isn't clear if she will be able to return home. Some 5,000 Israelis have been displaced across the country after missiles destroyed or damaged homes, according to the prime minister's office. Kurakova's mother, still living in the part of the Donetsk region of Ukraine under Russian occupation, has urged her daughter to leave Israel and move somewhere, anywhere else. Kurakova still hasn't decided what to do. 'I feel terrified inside and outside. I feel terrified by the hopelessness,' Kurakova said, adding that while she had previously taken comfort in Israel's air defense systems, now she wasn't so sure. 'That was the reason I left Ukraine," she said. "I didn't understand that it was possible here.' ___ Novikov reported from Kyiv, Ukraine.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Much a $1,000 Investment for a Newborn Could Grow to by the Time They Retire
Babies have a big advantage as investors: time. Over a period of 65 years, an investment could grow to around 500 times its original value, assuming the market produces average returns. A $1,000 investment for a newborn today could result in hundreds of thousands of dollars for them by the time they are 65. 10 stocks we like better than SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust › President Donald Trump is pushing legislation that would provide newborns with $1,000 in a savings accounts. It's an intriguing idea, and when you consider the effects of compounding and long-term investing, it's not hard to see how such an account could grow significantly in the long run if it's invested in the right way. The big benefit newborns have is time. Unlike most investors, who may have 20, 30, or even over 40 years until they retire, newborns have even longer. Below, I'll look at how much a $1,000 investment over a period of 50-plus years could grow. When you're looking at investing for the very long haul, an exchange-traded fund (ETF) makes a lot of sense. As great of an investment as a stock like Nvidia has been recently, it's impossible to forecast how it may perform over the next 50 years. The benefit of ETFs -- which owns shares in lots of stocks -- is that they will rebalance over time and adjust according to which stocks are doing well and which ones aren't. ETFs that track the S&P 500 stock index can be particularly attractive. The S&P 500 is a collection of the top 500 stocks that are listed on U.S. exchanges. The index has averaged an annual return of 10% over the long term, though that includes years when it went up and years when it went down, as well as lots of nerve-wracking volatility along the way. Yet investing is enticing. Consider that an investment today would grow to more than 490 times its original value after 65 years of compounding, assuming a 10% annual growth rate. That means investing just $2,041 today would be enough to end up with a portfolio worth at least $1 million after such a long time frame, in this optimal scenario. There are never guarantees when it comes to future returns, however. The growth rate may slow down, and your investment could be down when you need it. But oftentimes, investors are better off simply investing in the broad index than trying to pick individual stocks. It may not be as exciting as picking stocks yourself, but it's a simple way for you to grow your wealth. One fund that you can invest in that tracks the index is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: SPY). Investing $1,000 and just letting it sit in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF can be a no-nonsense way to grow your portfolio's value over the years. Since that is a small balance, it could, however, take a while for it to reach a significant value (e.g. six figures). But once it does, then the benefits of compounding become far greater. In the table below, you can see the significant change in a portfolio balance from year 50 to 65, which is a difference of hundreds of thousands of dollars -- simply from leaving the money invested for those years. Year 9% Growth 10% Growth 11% Growth 50 $74,358 $117,391 $184,565 55 $114,408 $189,059 $311,002 60 $176,031 $304,482 $524,057 65 $270,846 $490,371 $883,067 Calculations by author. The downside is that over the course of 50 years, inflation will also significantly chip away at the purchasing power of all this money. But it's a great example of how a modestly sized investment today could grow to be worth much more over the very long haul. And by putting the money into a low-risk ETF, you don't have to track any stocks or worry about making any changes along the way. It's an easy way to invest in the stock market and benefit from its long-term growth. Even if you're not planning for your child's retirement and the $1,000 from the government doesn't come through for your baby, investing in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF can be a great way to help them later on in life. Before you buy stock in SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,821!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $886,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 791% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Here's How Much a $1,000 Investment for a Newborn Could Grow to by the Time They Retire was originally published by The Motley Fool
