Ukraine has paid US$770 million for weapons it has not received yet
Ukraine has transferred US$770 million to foreign arms suppliers as an advance payment, but much of this weaponry and ammunition has not been delivered.
Source: Financial Times, citing documents from the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine and internal materials obtained
Details: One illustrative case was the story of 28-year-old American Tanner Cook from Arizona, the owner of a small gun shop on the outskirts of Tucson.
Cook's company, OTL, was awarded a €49 million contract in 2022 to supply ammunition to the Ukrainian army. Ukraine paid €17.1 million in advance, but the ammunition was never delivered. Although the Ukrainian side won the arbitration in Vienna, the money has not yet been returned.
Documents obtained by the Financial Times show that Ukraine has lost at least US$770 million in advance payments to foreign intermediaries for weapons that have never been delivered over the three years of the war.
Internal corruption scandals exacerbate the situation: several officials responsible for defence procurement have already been dismissed, and some face charges. Dozens of contracts are being investigated for suspected abuses.
A Ukrainian court found that the state-owned company Ukrspecexport purchased 120mm mortars in April 2022 from Sudanese sellers who, it turned out, had close ties to the Russian Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation and Yevgeny Prigozhin's Wagner Private Military Company.
Background: Ukraine became Europe's largest importer of arms between 2019 and 2023, while Russian arms exports decreased by 53% over the same period.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Musk takes Trump agenda bill criticism to next level
Evening Report is The Hill's PM newsletter. Sign up here or subscribe using the box below: Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here ELON MUSK UNLOADED on President Trump's agenda bill Tuesday, with fiscal hawks in the Senate digging in and promising to sink the legislation. Musk, whose time as a special government employee came to an end last week, received a stylish Oval Office send-off from Trump for his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to slash spending. The tech titan bit his tongue during the presidential salute last week when the issue of spending in the GOP's agenda bill came up. But he cut loose on Tuesday, and at a critical time for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which faces a tricky path through the Senate amid mounting concerns about spending and the deficit. 'I'm sorry but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted on his social media platform X. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk later threatened to oust lawmakers who fail to codify cuts made by DOGE, among other issues. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' he posted. Musk's remarks came as White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was in the middle of a press briefing. 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill,' Leavitt said. 'It doesn't change the president's opinion.' Musk had previously expressed frustration with House Republicans for the trillions in debt the bill is forecast to create. Those concerns are shared by several Republicans in the Senate, led by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who says he will not vote for the bill because it raises the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-Ky.) can only afford to lose three Republicans for the bill to pass, and Paul says there are at least four on his side. 'I want to see the tax cuts made permanent, but I also want to see the $5 trillion in new debt removed from the bill,' Paul posted this morning, one of several social media posts and media appearances he made to blast the bill. Paul and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) appeared energized by Musk speaking out, reposting his comments with their own words of opposition. 'These numbers are nothing short of stunning,' Lee said. 'Congress has hollowed out America's middle class through reckless deficit spending and the inflation it causes.' The fiscal hawks have pointed to wobbles in the bond market, where yields are on the rise amid concerns about U.S. debt and Trump's trade war. 'It's a big deal. It is a real problem,' JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said on 'Mornings with Maria' on Fox Business Network. 'The bond markets are going to have a tough time.' Trump fired back at Paul in a post on Truth Social. 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous growth that is coming,' Trump said, referring to his agenda bill. 'He loves voting 'no' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big winner!!!' For his part, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Musk is 'terribly wrong,' adding he spoke to the billionaire about it for 20 minutes on Monday. 'For him to come out and pan the whole bill is to me just very disappointing, very surprising in light of the conversation I had with him yesterday,' Johnson said. The White House sent its recissions package to Capitol Hill on Tuesday. It seeks to claw back just under $10 billion, much of it from funding for NPR, PBS and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Trump has been actively involved in discussions with GOP senators, already holding talks with Thune and Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) this week. Hawley is concerned about potential cuts to Medicaid, while Johnson is among the fiscal hawks opposing the bill over spending and debt. Hawley says Trump told him there would be no 'Medicaid benefit cuts,' as the Trump administration makes the case that cuts to the program will only affect those in the country illegally or people who are capable of working but choose not to. CRITICAL WEEK AHEAD It's a big week for Senate Republicans, who have a self-imposed deadline of July 4 to pass Trump's agenda bill. Thune said he won't overrule the Senate parliamentarian, who will decide soon whether the bill adheres to rules that would allow Republicans to bypass a Democratic filibuster. Some Senate Republicans argue that decision should be up to Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). And the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) will release its growth projections under the bill, which is expected to add $2.3 trillion to the debt over the next decade. The Trump administration argues that debt forecasts don't account for the growth the bill will unleash. The White House has taken to blasting the CBO, which it says has repeatedly been wrong with its forecasts. Leavitt on Tuesday said the nonpartisan CBO is run by Democrats, citing past campaign donations. 💡Perspectives: • Wall Street Journal: Don't just fix higher education, reconstitute it. • The Hill: Presidential health cover-ups are as American as apple pie. • The Hill: Why we left California. • The Liberal Patriot: Understanding America's communities. Read more: • Trump administration extends tariff pause on Chinese-made chips. • 'Donors' vs 'takers': SALT battle stirs debate between blue and red states. • Speaker Johnson launches sales mission for 'big, beautiful bill'. The Department of Justice is reviewing pardons doled out under former President Biden, citing concerns about whether Biden himself was making decisions about clemency power. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the Navy to rename an oil ship named after gay rights activist Harvey Milk, a move that comes at the start of Pride Month. The Food and Drug Administration upgraded its recall on tomatoes to the most severe level. © Greg Nash Democratic tensions over the party's aging leadership is set to play out in the midterm elections of 2026, with several top lawmakers pulling younger primary challengers. Among the Democratic lawmakers facing primaries from upstart candidates: Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), 85; former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), 85; and Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.), 70. Former Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), 81, announced her retirement earlier this year after pulling a 26-year old primary challenger. Age has been a growing topic of discussion among congressional Democrats, and three House Democrats have died in office this year. The Hill's Julia Muller writes: 'The trend comes amid renewed anxiety within the party over the issue of age, spurred by new revelations about former President Biden and the recent deaths of several older House members.' One key early test will come later this month in the battle to replace former Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) as the ranking member on the House Oversight Committee. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), 44, threw her hat in the ring on Tuesday. The other candidates vying for the position range in age from 47 to 76. Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R-Va.) set a September special election election to replace Connolly, who died of cancer last month. The seat has been blue since Connolly first won it in 2008. This comes as Democrats are seeking a new identity during President Trump's second term in office, after the 2024 election found the nation tilt to the right. Trump this week reiterated his support for Republican Jack Ciattarelli in the New Jersey governor's primary, saying the state is 'ready to pop out of that blue horror show' and elect a Republican. Trump lost New Jersey by 6 points in 2024, after losing it by 16 points in 2020. The state last went red in a presidential election in 1988. MEANWHILE… CNN's polling analyst Harry Enten underscored Democratic struggles with the middle class voters they once counted as a core constituency. '[Democrats] have traditionally been the party of the middle class. No more,' Enten said. 'Donald Trump and the Republican Party have taken that mantle away. And now a key advantage for Democrats historically has gone. Adios amigos. And now there is no party that is the party of the middle class. Republicans have completely closed the gap.' Democrats have turned their attacks on immigration, where Trump polls the strongest, making the case that the administration's overreach is imperiling American citizens. Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) are demanding an investigation after Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officers pushed their way into Nadler's office and handcuffed one of his staffers. The incident began after protesters at an immigration court were permitted entrance to Nadler's office, which is in the same building. The DHS accused Nadler's office of 'harboring rioters' and briefly detained one of his staffers. 'These types of intimidation tactics are completely unwarranted and cannot be tolerated,' Nadler and Raskin wrote. 'The decision to enter a congressional office and detain a congressional staff member demonstrates a deeply troubling disregard for proper legal boundaries.' And Newark, N.J., Mayor Ras Baraka (D) on Tuesday sued interim U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey Alina Habba over his arrest last month outside a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility. The lawsuit alleges false arrest, malicious prosecution and defamation, and accuses Habba of acting as a 'political operative, outside of any function intimately related to the judicial process.' Baraka and three Democratic members of the New Jersey congressional delegation — Bonnie Watson Coleman, Rob Menendez and LaMonica McIver — were visiting the Delaney Hall ICE detention center in Newark last month when a scuffle broke out between them and several ICE officers. Baraka was charged with misdemeanor trespassing, although Habba's office later dismissed the charge and instead charged McIver with assaulting law enforcement. ELSEWHERE… The Trump administration is also keying in on immigration, emphasizing it after the anti-semitic attack in Boulder, Colo., over the weekend. The suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, is an Egyptian national who was granted asylum in 2022 but overstayed his visa in February 2023. 'This tragedy is a sobering reminder of the consequences of the Biden administration's failed policies,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. 'This is the predictable result of allowing anti-American radicals and illegal immigrants pour into our country,' she added. The family of the suspect is set to be taken into federal custody, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Tuesday. DHS is revamping its ICE tip line following the attack. Soliman allegedly shouted 'Free Palestine' as he used a flame thrower and threw Molotov cocktails at a group of people who were marching in support of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. Twelve victims between the ages of 52 and 88, including a survivor of the Holocaust, were badly burned. Three people remain hospitalized. 💡Perspectives: • The Hill: The Democrats' new campaign agenda: No more Mister Nice Guy. • The Hill: The missing middle class puts Democrats in a 'big beautiful' bind. • New York: Andrew Cuomo isn't strong. His opponents are weak. • Salon: Progressives paved the way for Trump's attack on judiciary. • Washington Monthly: Dems need a vision for reviving American dream. Read more: • Trump team emphasizes immigration in Boulder response. • Rubio leading negotiations with Bukele on returning migrants. • Cornyn trailing Paxton by 22 points in Texas Senate polling. • Cuomo says he shouldn't have resigned as governor. • New York lieutenant governor launches primary challenge against Hochul. © Rick Scuteri and Rich Pedroncelli, Associated Press President Trump says he'll impose 'large scale fines' after a transgender athlete won two high school track and field championships in California over the weekend. Trump had warned California not to allow Jurupa Valley junior AB Hernandez to compete, saying it violated his executive order banning transgender athletes from competing in girls and women's sports. California allowed Hernandez to compete in the finals, but also opened the competition to more female athletes who would otherwise have been eliminated. The New York Times reports that the Justice Department is threatening legal action against California schools, arguing the state violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution and discriminated against athletes on the basis of sex. Meanwhile, the FBI is asking citizens to report health care providers who may be assisting transgender minors with gender-affirming care, which has been outlawed in 27 states. 'We will protect our children and hold accountable those who mutilate them under the guise of gender-affirming care,' the FBI posted on its social media account. A judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from cutting off gender-affirming care for inmates. • Ukrainian officials said Tuesday they struck a bridge that connects Russia to Crimea with underwater explosives. The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) used 1,100 kilograms of explosives to hit the overpass, which is used as a supply route by Russian forces. 'Crimea is Ukraine, and any manifestations of occupation will receive our harsh response,' Lieutenant General Vasyl Maliuk, the chairman of the SBU, said in a statement. This comes after Ukraine stunned the world by pulling off 'Operation Spider Web,' using smuggled drones to bomb nuclear-armed air bases deep inside Russian territory. And it comes one day after Ukrainian and Russian officials met in Istanbul, where they failed to reach a ceasefire deal but agreed on a prisoner swap. Some Republican senators are agitating for a new round of sanctions on Russia, although they're waiting for the green light from Trump. 'He's willing to use sanctions if he needs them,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. MEANWHILE… Trump on Tuesday denied media reports that a proposed deal with Iran would allow the nation to continue enriching uranium. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Trump posted on social media. Axios reported that U.S. officials gave Iran a proposal for a nuclear agreement that would allow low-level uranium enrichment on Iranian soil for an undetermined amount of time. 💡Perspectives: • USA Today: Transgender athletes turn girls' track meets into a farce. • Responsible Statecraft: Ukraine, Russia show no interest in peace. • MSNBC: Ukraine's drone attack was a humiliating blow to Russia. • The Hill: Rubio declares war on global censors. • TK Read more: • Trump administration asks SCOTUS to lift judge's block on mass layoffs. • Trump pardons Florida divers who freed sharks. • Harvard moves to unfreeze $2.5B in federal funding. • Education Department pausing plan to garnish Social Security checks over defaulted loans. Someone forward this newsletter to you? Sign up to get your own copy: See you next time!
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chael Sonnen marvels at the Jon Jones vs. Tom Aspinall saga: 'This fight is getting smaller, not bigger'
Every day that passes, Jon Jones vs. Tom Aspinall is feeling like more of a "what if." The UFC heavyweight division's two champions are existing in entirely different types of breaks as 2025 reached its halfway mark. Jones has been living it up in Thailand after recently filming a Russian reality show, while Aspinall continues to train and hope for his long-awaited unification bout against Jones. Advertisement While Jones' future in the Octagon remains uncertain, what is certain is that Aspinall has plenty of fights left in him at age 32. The interim champion spoke to Chael Sonnen earlier this week and gave Sonnen further indications of how this saga may play out, which Sonnen shared Monday on Uncrowned's "The Ariel Helwani Show." "Tom's going to fight, and he will get his request that the undisputed belt will be up," Sonnen said. "I have a hard time believing that Jon's done anything wrong. I don't believe that Jon did hold up the company. I don't believe that Jon did tell them $40 million over the phone and put a gun in their face. I don't believe that. I cannot believe that if Jon Jones picks up a phone and [the UFC] goes, 'Here's the date and venue, you already know the rules and the weight class,' I struggle as a person to believe Jon says no and puts the phone down. "I have a very hard time imagining that Jon is going to walk away from [$40 million]. I know publicly he likes to have some fun. I know that you can hurt his feelings on Twitter, and he'll change his whole outlook just for those 10 people that did it. But the real guy in there, that's a dirty, grimy competitor. That's the same guy who busted his toe against yours truly. That's the same guy who had his arm extended against Vitor [Belfort]. He finds a way, and I just don't think that fire has burned out." Jones' heavyweight run has been anticlimactic compared to expectation upon his light heavyweight departure in 2020. The former two-time champion took three years off to build mass for his new division. Advertisement At the time, a mega-fight with lineal UFC heavyweight champion Francis Ngannou was the target that had the entire combat world salivating. But the relationship between the UFC and Ngannou broke down, which led to the latter moving on to boxing and the PFL while Jones made his heavyweight debut against top contender Ciryl Gane in March 2023, winning with a first-round guillotine choke. Jones, 37, has made it clear he's looking only for legacy fights to close out his career. His most recent appearance — a third-round stoppage of retired former champion Stipe Miocic — fit that bill. "When you're Jon, you jump in this business and you're like Roy Jones," Sonnen said. "You're looking around like, 'How come I don't have the big fights? How come I'm not the big money fight. I'm the best guy here.' Well, [it's] because you were so dominant. But you do it anyway ... you make the walk. You do it over and over again, hoping to get that one night — the highest paid, biggest check ever written by WME. "Jon took three years off to put on some size, and he's going to move to heavyweight and spot an opponent 30 or 40 pounds. Right then, he thought that was going to be Francis. He was building his body for Francis. He knew, 'I can spot this guy 30, 40 pounds, and I can finally create an idea in the audience's mind that the guy has an advantage.' That's what we've got." Jon Jones doesn't appear close to fighting again. (Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC) (Jeff Bottari via Getty Images) Nearly flawless across his 30-fight in-cage career, Jones fought all comers throughout the majority of his 205-pound run, including Sonnen. However, he's found himself fending off accusations of ducking Aspinall in 2025 — and has played into the sentiment since each of their respective last fights. Advertisement Sonnen's not buying it though. "Jon Jones is in the position — everything he's ever said he wanted, everything he's proved to us, shown us in sincerity, set out to do," Sonnen said, "it's all right in front of him. And so many times this will happen in greatness. So many times, these guys will feel the pressure. So many times, guys will go and have an opportunity to have everything they've ever said they wanted, and right when it's there at the doorstep, they start to realize, 'I don't want it.' I just don't think Jon's that kind of guy. I think Jon is as advertised. I think Jon's a badass, and I do not think Jon Jones is walking away from anything." UFC CEO Dana White immediately labeled the heavyweight bout as the biggest the UFC can make after Jones' win over Miocic. Since then, White has maintained the promotion will get a deal done. Yet as time goes on, interest may be fading — and Sonnen says he's seen it through his own YouTube numbers. "I've never in my life seen something like this, it's going the other way. This fight isn't getting headlines anymore," he said. Advertisement "I don't think that's anything with the UFC and their ability. I think they could flip that script real quick. ... I have my own hypothesis, which is the audience is not convinced they're going to get it. They don't want to get excited. They don't want to hear about it anymore. They just don't believe we can get that fight to the ring. "This fight is getting smaller, not bigger." Jones infamously demanded "f*** you money" when asked what it'd take for him to fight Aspinall after Miocic. Aspinall joked in his chat with Sonnen that Jones is retired and wished him the best, though nothing official has been announced just yet. Advertisement Considering the situation, Sonnen believes what makes the numbers so tricky is whether or not Jones actually does fight beyond Aspinall. Because at heavyweight, that's about all there is right now. "No fighter ever — and there's not an exception, you can go through all their numbers — coming off a victory, fights for less in their next fight than they did in that fight, coming off a victory. Never," Sonnen said. "So you get a champion, it can be a very tough spot. Jon doesn't have two fights out there. He doesn't have three fights that people would be excited about. But Jon doesn't hold any of the records. He's got no pay-per-view, no live gate — he has zero records. And it wasn't a matter of Conor [McGregor] came in and beat him. Jon never had them. Jon was so good and so dominant, we would have lots of people dressed up in empty seats to come to a Jon Jones fight. "If you come to the table with $12 million for this one fight, you're not going to get him again. Who's his next fight? With Curtis Blaydes? It's with Derrick Lewis? ... It's a much smaller match, but you have to pay him the same thing. No fighter could ever look at him objectively and go, 'OK, that night was a big night. This one's less big. We've failed at our job promoting.' They don't look at it like that, man. They put that thing right on the promoter. That's where it becomes a problem. "You could justify $12 million to Jones for Aspinall plus back-end points, which is going to bring it to almost $20 million," he continued. " ... But you can't give him that against Ciryl [Gane]. You can't give him that against [Alexander] Volkov. That becomes the problem. If you are going to do that as a promoter, you better be goddamn sure that guy is going to get beat."
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
DOD civilians can now aid DHS with ‘internal immigration enforcement,' per memo
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized Defense Department (DOD) civilian employees to aid Department of Homeland Security (DHS) operations at the southern border and with 'internal immigration enforcement,' in some cases for no pay, according to a new memo released Monday. DOD civilians can now travel to support DHS with the Trump administration's immigration enforcement, though it is unclear whether they would volunteer for such roles or be assigned to DHS activities. The memo did not specify what types of jobs they would be doing. But Hegseth made clear that some individuals might not be paid for their work, noting that assignments 'may be either reimbursable or non-reimbursable.' The document, dated June 1, noted that the under secretary of Defense for personnel and readiness would provide further guidance. 'Protecting our homeland from bad actors and illegal substances has been a focus of the President and of the Secretary of Defense since Day One of this Administration,' chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement accompanying the memo. 'Whether on the border or in our communities, allowing qualified DoD civilian employees to support DHS will accelerate the progress already made by Service members in achieving our national security goals.' The Pentagon did not respond to requests for comment from The Hill. The memo comes amid the Trump administration's increasing use of the military to aid in combatting illegal immigration and removing immigrants in the United States without legal status. Last month, DHS requested 20,000 National Guard troops'to help carry out the President's mandate from the American people to arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens,' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia told The Hill at the time. And just 11 days ago the Pentagon announced it was sending 1,115 additional active-duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border, bringing the number of service members there close to 10,000. But with Hegseth's latest memo, it appears DOD civilians for the first time would be actively assisting in DHS immigration crackdown efforts, and possibly on their own accord. He notes that in the case of a non-reimbursable detail assignment, it could be authorized 'where the expected benefit of a detail would be comparable to training or development programs that otherwise would be conducted' at the Pentagon's expense. He instructs defense leaders to consider factors 'such as whether the tasks to be carried out by employees during the detail are of a similar nature to the tasks those employees execute in the course of their normal duties; whether the detail would otherwise enhance the skills and further develop the employees professionally;' and the duration of the considered detail, which could impact to Pentagon is the employee is gone too long. DHS reportedly requested DOD civilians be authorized to assist with its immigration enforcement mission.
