Zelenskiy says deputy PM Stefanishyna to become new envoy to US
Zelenskiy wrote on Telegram that he had appointed her as the special presidential representative to the U.S. so that she could develop relations with Washington while the procedures necessary for her appointment took place.
Ukraine is seeking to mend frayed ties with the U.S. after Zelenskiy and U.S. President Donald Trump clashed publicly at the White House in February.
Stefanishyna has served as Ukraine's minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration since 2020, during which time Ukraine began its accession process to the EU.
Ukraine's current ambassador to the U.S., Oksana Markarova, incurred the wrath of Trump's incoming administration during the 2024 election battle with his predecessor Joe Biden.
Markarova was accused by Republicans of helping Biden's Democratic Party by organising Zelenskiy's visit to a Pennsylvania ammunition factory in autumn 2024, which was attended by Democratic politicians but not by Republicans.
The incident was brought up by Vice President J.D. Vance during his spat with Zelenskiy in the disastrous Oval Office meeting, at which Markarova was present.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ali Velshi: The jobs numbers aren't ‘rigged.' Trump owns this economy.
This is an adapted excerpt from the Aug. 2 episode of 'Velshi.' On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released an alarming monthly employment report, exposing that the United States' job market is much more fragile than many had expected. Only 73,000 net new jobs — that's new jobs created, minus jobs lost — were added in July. But worse were the revisions to the two previous job reports. May's jobs report was revised from 144,000 jobs to only 19,000. June's 147,000 jobs were mostly a mirage, too; it turns out only 14,000 jobs were added that month. That's 258,000 fewer jobs than previously thought. The average for the last three months is 35,000, far fewer than the 150,000 or more needed for job growth to keep up with population growth in this country. Now, revisions to government statistics are normal in subsequent months. It's the nature of large numbers. They happen regularly, but they almost never show this dramatic a shift. It was a bad report, no doubt about it. It was particularly bad for a president who, in political terms, owns this job market and this economy, which has been roiled by the chaos of his tariffs and trade wars. But instead of addressing the numbers and the challenge they present, Donald Trump said they were fake and fired the head of the department that collects them. The president baselessly claimed the jobs numbers were 'rigged' and accused the fired commissioner of inflating numbers for the Biden administration and sabotaging them under his own administration. Trump baselessly claimed that jobs reports were overstated during the previous presidency to prop up Joe Biden and are now being underestimated to hurt Trump. The president has zeroed in on the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner, labeling her a 'Biden appointee' and ignoring the fact that she was confirmed in the Senate by a bipartisan vote of 86-8, with six senators not voting. Among the 86 yeas was now-Vice President JD Vance. This is becoming a common refrain for Trump. He has also accused Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, of being a Biden appointee. But Trump is the one who elevated him to the position in 2017. Friday also marked the president's self-imposed, but often delayed, deadline for reaching trade deals with countries across the world. Back in April, Trump claimed he had already struck 200 deals, despite the fact that there aren't even 200 countries in the world. The number of deals before the Aug. 1 deadline was closer to eight, though you could arguably consider the European Union, which is a single trading bloc, as 27 countries. Deals were struck with the European Union, Indonesia, Japan, Pakistan, the Philippines, South Korea, the United Kingdom and Vietnam, and talks are ongoing with Mexico and China. Nowhere close to 200. That was just a lie. An executive order signed by Trump late Thursday outlined tariff rates for 69 countries, including several changes from the rates announced on 'Liberation Day' in April. Smaller countries like Lesotho and Guyana were originally hit with massive tariffs, simply because they are poor countries that sell more to America than they buy and as a result have large trade deficits with America, but those rates have since been cut. The day before, Trump also jacked up tariffs on Brazil to 50% for what he views as the political persecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is on trial for attempting a coup in 2022. Trump has called that trial a 'witch hunt.' Forget a deal with one of the U.S.' oldest and biggest trading partners, Canada. The White House is upping the ante on our neighbor to the north, announcing a 35% tariff on Canadian goods, up from 25%. That's on goods not included in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. Plus, on Wednesday, the Commerce Department said gross domestic product, or GDP, which is the largest measure of economic activity we have, increased at a 3% annual rate in the second quarter. Some journalists jumped on that exciting top-line number, one that seems far more impressive than the first quarter's GDP increase of just 0.5%. But if some of those journalists had taken about 45 seconds to look under that shiny hood, they'd have found a far less impressive rebound than it initially seemed. Here's why: That upward swing in GDP growth came from a massive and fully expected decline in imports, after a massive and fully expected increase in imports in the first quarter in anticipation of tariffs. Lots of money left our economy to bring goods in before the first tariff deadlines in April, so when imports sharply dropped, the smaller resulting trade deficit boosted the GDP growth figure. But that's not so much evidence of economic prosperity as it is the result of a math equation and how GDP is calculated. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
HBCUs Are Doing The Work—Without The Wallet
Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) are producing a disproportionate share of America's Black doctors, judges, and engineers—yet they remain chronically underfunded and politically undervalued. There remain roughly 100 HBCUs across the United States, enrolling only 1.6% of all college students (and only 9% of Black college students) but produce 16% of Black bachelor's degrees. They've long been engines of workforce mobility—graduating 40% of Black engineers, 70% of Black doctors and dentists, and 80% of Black judges. Nearly 70% of low-income students that graduate from HBCUs rise to the middle class or beyond by age 30. That's an extraordinary return on investment—especially considering how little they receive in public and private support. HBCUs were founded out of necessity—as pathways for Black Americans to access higher education at a time when they were systematically excluded from white institutions due to segregation. The Second Morrill Act of 1890 required states to establish land-grant colleges for Black students if they refused them admission elsewhere, leading to the creation of many public HBCUs across the South. Institutions like Delaware State University, Bethune-Cookman University, Jackson State University and many others were born from this mandate, and have since become pillars of educational opportunity and community advancement. HBCUs have educated some of the most influential leaders in American history across every sector. Civil rights icons like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks, Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, global media leader Oprah Winfrey, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris, and literary legend Langston Hughes all graduated from HBCUs. Leadership Brainery founders, Derrick Young Jr and Jonathan Allen, created our organization while they were students at Grambling State University. These collective stories demonstrate what HBCUs have long made possible: producing visionary leaders who drive change and shape culture on a global scale. HBCUs are not just educational institutions—they are economic anchors in their communities. In 2024 alone, they generated $16.5 billion in economic impact and supported over 136,000 jobs nationwide. These outcomes come despite systemic underfunding. As of 2023, 84% of land-grant HBCUs had been underfunded by an estimated $13 billion. These colleges also operate with far smaller endowments and less philanthropic support than their peers, limiting their ability to offer graduate programs, research initiatives, and competitive financial aid. Under the last few Administrations, HBCUs have received billions of dollars in federal support, including critical funding for research and financial aid programs like Pell Grants, Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (SEOG), and Federal Work-Study. Because HBCUs enroll a significantly higher proportion of low-income students than non-HBCUs, they rely heavily on these federal resources to ensure access and affordability. While the current Administration has pledged its support for HBCUs—most recently through the April Executive Order—many HBCUs have nonetheless experienced substantial losses in federal agency grant funding and continued budget cuts. Compounding this, the Administration has proposed eliminating SEOG entirely and reducing Work-Study funding in its next fiscal year budget proposal—two programs that are essential for helping low-income students attend and complete college, and whose elimination would disproportionately harm students at HBCUs. Recent legislation signed into law also includes cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, which are likely to trigger reductions in state-level higher education funding as states shift resources to cover those gaps. Since HBCUs already receive less public funding than their non-HBCU counterparts, these additional pressures risk compounding the inequities they face. As of 2023, more than 3.5 million college students relied on Medicaid; cutting this lifeline could mean many HBCU students will lose access to basic healthcare. For students pursuing graduate education, many HBCUs offer advanced degree programs—often at lower tuition rates than their non-HBCU counterparts. However, these institutions have fewer financial aid resources to support graduate students, which means many rely heavily on federal loans to finance their education. The recent passage of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' significantly reduced access to federal Graduate PLUS loans and imposed strict borrowing caps for graduate students. While many HBCU graduate programs remain more affordable than those at peer institutions, the total cost of attendance for certain programs—particularly in professional fields like medicine—still exceeds these new federal loan limits. For example, the estimated cost of attendance for medical school at Howard University, one of the most prominent HBCUs, is approximately $400,000. Under the new loan policy, students in professional programs such as medicine and law are limited to borrowing $200,000 in federal loans. This leaves students responsible for covering the remaining $200,000 either out of pocket or through private loans, which often carry higher interest rates and require strong credit or a co-signer—barriers that disproportionately impact students from low-income backgrounds. While the current Administration signals support for HBCUs, recent federal policy decisions—from grant reductions to loan caps—paint a different picture. In the absence of consistent public investment, it's time for the private sector to step up. Leading companies, including companies like PwC and Booz Allen Hamilton, have already begun building the future workforce by investing in HBCU students. Corporations, foundations, and individuals can also amplify their impact by supporting nonprofits like the Leadership Brainery, Thurgood Marshall College Fund, UNCF, and Xceleader, which provide targeted programs and funds supporting HBCUs and their students. HBCUs have uplifted generations of leaders, professionals, and change agents—often with a fraction of the resources afforded to other institutions. Imagine what they could accomplish with real, sustained support. HBCUs have long been architects of possibility—if corporate America invests not just in their promise, but in their potential, the returns will echo across boardrooms, communities, and generations to come. Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today! Interested in engaging with us or have an idea for a future topic? Submit this brief form.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Finland's president discusses Ukraine ceasefire, icebreaker deal with Trump
(Reuters) -Finland's President Alexander Stubb said on Monday he held a phone call with U.S. President Donald Trump to discuss Russia's war in Ukraine, expressing support for all efforts toward an immediate ceasefire. Trump has threatened to impose new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its oil, including India and China, unless President Vladimir Putin agrees by Friday to end the 3-1/2-year war in Ukraine. "President Trump's deadline for a ceasefire is approaching. Finland supports all efforts towards an immediate ceasefire. Longterm negotiations must lead to a lasting and just peace," Stubb said in a post on X. Stubb added that his call with Trump also covered ongoing discussions about icebreakers. In June, Trump mentioned the U.S. is negotiating the purchase of 15 icebreakers from Finland. "Finland has built 60 percent of the world's icebreakers. We have the capacity to build them reliably and fast," Stubb said on Monday. Trump has consistently advocated for the U.S. to acquire as many as 40 new icebreakers to enhance national security in the Arctic. Those icebreakers could help companies with logistics and keep open supply lines for potential oil and gas and mineral development in the rugged and frigid region.
