logo
Bill seeking P1,200 national minimum wage refiled in House

Bill seeking P1,200 national minimum wage refiled in House

GMA Network30-07-2025
A bill mandating a P1,200 national daily minimum wage was refiled in the House of Representatives Wednesday.
In filing House Bill 2599, Makabayan bloc lawmakers Antonio Tinio of ACT Teachers party-list and Renee Co of Kabataan party-list said the regional wage board system in the last 30 years only resulted in poverty-level wages for workers.
They proposed the abolition of the Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board by amending Article 99 of the Labor Code and replace it the National Wages and Productivity Board.
'Filipino workers have weighed in on the regionalized wage regime through 36-year history and found it a big failure. They are now demanding that it be scrapped and for the Philippines to return to the regime of uniform national minimum wage that is based on the family living wage,' the lawmakers said in their explanatory note.
The authors then cited an IBON Foundation study showing that the amount needed to raise the current minimum wage to P1,200 living wage only requires 29.7% to 49.1% of the profits amassed by private employers, making it feasible if only employers are willing to cut down on profits.
'The surge in the prices of oil and other basic goods and services in the last several years likewise has devoured, according to some estimates, the wages of our workers by 25-30%. Workers are now groaning under the crushing effect of heavy taxes and high prices on their wages and income,' the lawmakers said.
'It is therefore imperative for the State to ensure that what the Constitution-the workers' just share in the fruits of production and the workers' right to living wage-is fulfilled in pursuit of the equitable distribution of income and wealth towards economic and social development. The State must recognize its justice and necessity given the workers' contribution to society and the economy amid all the hardships,' they added.
Violators will face several penalties, including a fine of 100% of the total wage increment due their employees multiplied by the number of unpaid working days, plus P50,000 moral damages to each employee, and suspension of business permit.—with a report from Tina Panganiban Perez/AOL, GMA Integrated News
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Romualdez matapos ilagay sa ‘baul' ng Senado ang impeachment complaint vs VP Sara: ‘Tuloy ang laban'
Romualdez matapos ilagay sa ‘baul' ng Senado ang impeachment complaint vs VP Sara: ‘Tuloy ang laban'

GMA Network

time35 minutes ago

  • GMA Network

Romualdez matapos ilagay sa ‘baul' ng Senado ang impeachment complaint vs VP Sara: ‘Tuloy ang laban'

Iginiit ni Speaker at Leyte Rep. Martin Romualdez na hindi 'power play' ang dahilan sa likod ng pagsasampa ng impeachment complaint ng Kamara de Representantes laban kay Vice President Sara Duterte, na inilagay na ng Senado sa 'archive' o isinangtabi. Pero deklara ng lider ng mga kongresista, hindi pa tapos ang laban. Nitong Huwebes, sinabi ni Romualdez na ginawa lang ng mga kongresista ang kanilang tungkulin na papanagutin ang mga opisyal na nang-aabuso umano sa kapangyarihan. Kabilang sa inaakusa laban kay Duterte ay ang mali umano nitong paggamit ng pondo, partikular sa usapin ng confidential funds, na itinatanggi ng pangalawang pangulo. Hindi rin umano minadali ng mga kongresista ang paghahanda sa kaso. Sa halip, ang Senado umano ang nagmadali na ilibing ito. 'Let's be clear: The filing of the complaint was not rushed. What was rushed—remarkably—was its burial,' ani Romualdez. Nitong Miyerkules, nagbotohan ang mga senador at mayorya ang sumang-ayon na i-archive ito. Kasunod ito ng pagdeklara ng Korte Suprema na labag sa Konstitusyon ang articles of impeachment. Gayunman, tumutol ang apat na senador na mistulang ilagay sa baul ang reklamo laban sa pangalawang pangulo dahil mayroon pang mosyon ang Kamara na didinggin ng SC. 'Why the rush? [to archive]? The Constitution is clear: only the House has the exclusive power to initiate impeachment. That power is final within its sphere. We exercised that power lawfully, transparently, and in good faith—not out of spite but out of duty. Not to attack but to ask for answers—answers the Vice President never gave,' tanong ni Romualdez. 'To archive is, in effect, to bury the Articles of Impeachment. Yet, the ruling of the Supreme Court is not final. On August 5, the House filed a Motion for Reconsideration. The Court found our arguments serious enough to require the respondents, including the Vice President, to submit their comment. The case is active,' dagdag ng Speaker. Ayon pa kay Romualdez, isang abogado, sinunod nila ang isinasaad sa Konstitusyon sa paghahanda ng articles of impeachment laban kay Duterte para panagutin ang opisyal. Giit niya, hindi ito dahil sa 'power play.' 'More than one-third of House Members signed the verified complaint. Under the Constitution, that triggered the automatic transmittal of the Articles of Impeachment. No referral to the committee was needed. No further plenary action was required. The process was complete,' pahayag ni Romualdez. Nitong Miyerkules, sinabi ni Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero na hindi dapat gamitin ng Kamara ang Senado bilang 'playground to run after your political enemies.' 'To the House of Representatives I say, do not allow yourselves to be used for the blind hatred and ambition of a few who did things haphazardly, gravely abused their discretion, and violated due process, rights under the Constitution as found by the High Court itself,' ani Escudero. "To these people, I say this: the Senate is not your playground to run after your political enemies. We are not an accomplice in any grand scheme,' dagdag niya. Pero ayon kay Romualdez, hindi 'political maneuvering" ang dahilan ng pagsasampa nila ng reklamo laban kay Duterte. "It was about accountability anchored on verified facts and sworn documents. Yet we have been met with personal attacks, sweeping accusations, and a narrative that seeks to reduce a solemn constitutional duty into mere power play. That's not just unfair—it is dangerous. It undermines public trust in the very tools of democratic checks and balances,' pahayag niya. Sa kabila ng nangyari sa Senado, sabi ni Romualdez, 'Tuloy ang laban: For the Constitution, for the rule of law, and for the enduring truth that no public office is ever beyond the reach of accountability.' — mula sa ulat ni Llanesca T. Panti/FRJ GMA Integrated News

Manny Villar is only Filipino in top 100 of Bloomberg Billionaires Index
Manny Villar is only Filipino in top 100 of Bloomberg Billionaires Index

GMA Network

time35 minutes ago

  • GMA Network

Manny Villar is only Filipino in top 100 of Bloomberg Billionaires Index

Manny Villar speaks at an event in Brittany Hotel Villar City in Bacoor, Cavite on August 4, 2025. Photo from his official Facebook account Real estate magnate Manuel Villar Jr. has landed as the only Filipino in the top 100 of Bloomberg's Billionaires Index—a list of the world's 500 richest people based on their total net worth. Villar ranked 99th in the index with a net worth of $23.1 billion, up by $617 million or 2.7% from a year ago on the back his real estate holdings and property development business. The only other Filipino on the list of the world's 500 richest is ports and casino tycoon Enrique Razon Jr., ranked 239th with a total net worth of $12.3 billion, up by $2.96 billion from a year earlier. Villar founded of Vista Land & Lifescapes, mall operator Vistamalls, home-improvement chain AllHome Corporation and supermarket operator AllDay Marts. Villar, a former Senate president, is married to former senator Cynthia Villar and is father to current Senators Mark and Camille Villar. — Ted Cordero/BM, GMA Integrated News

VP Sara, legal team celebrate archival of articles of impeachment
VP Sara, legal team celebrate archival of articles of impeachment

GMA Network

time2 hours ago

  • GMA Network

VP Sara, legal team celebrate archival of articles of impeachment

Vice President Sara Duterte celebrated with her legal team and the petitioners who pushed for the dismissal of the impeachment case after the Senate voted to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment. In photos posted on social media, Duterte can be seen h with the legal team and the petitioners. 'Thanksgiving celebration with VP Sara Duterte, the legal team and the petitioners who pushed for the dismissal of the impeachment against VP Sara. Ngiting tagumpay (Smile of victory)!' said Davao City councilor Luna Acosta in a Facebook post Thursday. Acosta added their camp is confident in their legal arguments as they will still file a comment to the motion for reconsideration filed by the House of Representatives. 'We still have to file a comment to the Motion for Reconsideration filed by the House of Representatives, but we are confident in our legal arguments and believe that due process and the rule of law remain supreme above all. Para sa bayan (For the nation)!' she added in her post. With 19 votes for, four against, and one abstention, the Senate on Wednesday archived the impeachment complaint. Senator Rodante Marcoleta initially moved for the dismissal of the articles of impeachment, but agreed to Senator Joel Villanueva's amendment that the complaint be archived instead. Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Sen. Vicente Sotto III and some members of the minority argued that the Senate should wait for the decision of the Supreme Court on the motion for reconsideration that the Office of the Solicitor General filed on behalf of the House of Representatives. The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. Duterte entered a 'not guilty' plea in the verified impeachment complaint filed against her by the House of Representatives, which she called a 'scrap of paper.' The Supreme Court earlier declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unconstitutional, noting that it was barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violated her right to due process. The lower chamber then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. It argued that it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case. — Vince Angelo Ferreras/RF, GMA Integrated News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store