logo
Organizations push back on new charging pilot program in letter to State's Attorney Burke

Organizations push back on new charging pilot program in letter to State's Attorney Burke

Chicago Tribune16-05-2025
Dozens of people and organizations on Friday sent a letter to Cook County State's Attorney Eileen O'Neill Burke opposing a pilot program that allows Chicago police officers to bypass prosecutors and directly file charges in some low-level felony gun cases, arguing the initiative 'removes critical oversight from the charging process.'
The 136 signers of the letter, which include the ACLU of Illinois, Chicago Appleseed Center for Fair Courts and the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, as well as Chicago Police district councilors, professors and academics and other individuals, ask Burke to halt the policy and reinstate felony review for all gun cases.
'It undermines fundamental principles of equal justice and due process, erodes public trust, and poses serious risks to communities who are already overpoliced,' the letter said, arguing the pilot program disproportionately impacts Black neighborhoods.
In Cook County, local police submit many felony cases to assistant state's attorneys who decide whether to approve charges. The office's Felony Review Unit is nearly unique, with few other similar models nationwide, though not all felony charges go through that process. Most felony narcotics cases are directly filed by police.
Matt McGrath, spokesman for the state's attorney's office, said in a statement that all 54 cases that have gone before a judge or grand jury have 'withstood scrutiny and advanced.' Another 12 cases are still pending. The office plans to continuing expanding the program, he said.
'The felony review bypass program is a collaborative effort between the State's Attorney's office and CPD designed to get police officers back on the beat sooner while allowing prosecutors to focus time and resources on violent and victim-centric crimes,' McGrath said. 'It's important to note felony review bypass is not prosecutorial review bypass, and the pilot is working due to extensive training of district personnel by CCSAO felony review supervisors and clearly defined evidence requirements, among other factors.'
The state's attorney's office launched the pilot program in January in the department's Englewood District on the South Side and later expanded to the Far South Side's Calumet District while the office reviews data with an eye on continuing to grow the program. Officials have said the effort frees up police and prosecutors for higher level work by allowing police to directly file charges in matters where felony review prosecutors were already approving charges in around 90% of cases and generally handling them by phone.
Still, the move was criticized by Cook County Public Defender Sharone Mitchell Jr. and some aldermen and community members, who pointed out that the stakes can be high for an individual if police get charges wrong, as people can be detained until the case goes before a judge. But the program got a nod of support from Mayor Brandon Johnson who told WTTW last month that the effort would 'give us an opportunity to see if we can expedite the process that one, solves crime, but it doesn't impede officers from returning back to the people.'
Friday's letter marked an effort to push back on a larger scale, and it argued that prosecutors, rather than police, have the legal training to assess the legitimacy of criminal charges. It contended that the districts chosen for the pilot program are majority Black and have a history of abuse at the hands of police, including torture and excessive force.
Among other objections, the letter also said the move was made without community input and could put a strain on court resources.
'Lack of independent review at this stage increases the risk of unconstitutional arrests being taken to court and shaky legal cases proceeding to prosecution, and it undermines accountability and trust within the legal system,' the letter said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown
Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown

Deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller on Wednesday railed against what he called 'stupid white hippies' who were protesting the federal crackdown on crime in the nation's capital and argued they did not represent the citizens of Washington, D.C. Miller, Vice President Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited Union Station on Wednesday, where National Guard troops have been stationed outside for days in a show of force near the transportation hub. 'We are not going to let the communists destroy a great American city, let alone the nation's capital,' Miller told the crowd near Shake Shack inside Union Station. 'And let's just also address another thing. All these demonstrators you've seen out here in recent days, all these elderly white hippies, they're not part of the city and never have been. And by the way, most of the citizens who live in Washington, D.C., are Black.' 'So we're going to ignore these stupid white hippies that all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old,' he added. 'And we're going to get back to the business of protecting the American people and the citizens of Washington, D.C.' The Trump administration earlier this month began surging federal law enforcement across parts of the district to crack down on what the White House said was an unacceptable level of crime, despite statistics showing violent crime has declined in the city. Last week, Trump took federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department and deployed hundreds of National Guard troops across the city to further the crack down on crime. The White House has said officers across the district have made more than 550 arrests since the surge in federal resources began on Aug. 7. But local residents have largely expressed disapproval with the aggressive moves from the federal government. A Washington Post-Schar School poll of 604 D.C. residents published Wednesday found 65 percent do not think Trump's actions will make the city safer. Roughly 80 percent of residents said they opposed Trump's executive order to federalize the city's police department.

Trump calls on Federal Reserve official to resign after ally accuses her of mortgage fraud
Trump calls on Federal Reserve official to resign after ally accuses her of mortgage fraud

Boston Globe

time15 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump calls on Federal Reserve official to resign after ally accuses her of mortgage fraud

Pulte also charged in his letter that Cook has listed her condo in Atlanta, Georgia, for rent. Mortgages for homes used as principal residences typically carry lower interest rates than properties that are purchased to rent, Pulte's letter said. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The allegation represents another front in the Trump administration's attack on the Fed, which has yet to cut its key interest rate as Trump has demanded. If Cook were to step down, then the White House could nominate a replacement. And Trump has said he would only appoint people who would support lower rates. Advertisement The more members of the Fed's governing board that Trump can appoint, the more control he will be able to assert over the Fed, which has long been considered independent from day-to-day politics. Trump will be able to replace Chair Jerome Powell in May 2026, when Powell's term expires. Yet 12 members of the Fed's interest-rate setting committee have a vote on whether to raise or lower interest rates, so even replacing the Chair doesn't guarantee that Fed policy will shift the way Trump wants. Advertisement All seven members of the Fed's governing board, however, are able to vote on rate decisions. The other five voters include the president of the Fed's New York branch and a rotating group of four of the presidents of the Fed's other 11 regional branches. Trump appointed two members of the Fed's board in his first term, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman. Both dissented July 30 from the central bank's decision to keep its rate unchanged in favor of a rate cut. Another Fed governor, Adriana Kugler, stepped down unexpectedly Aug. 1, and Trump has appointed one of his economic advisers, Stephen Miran, to fill out the remainder of her term until January. If Trump is able to replace Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's board, as well as Kugler and Powell, that would give him a clear majority on the board of governors. Powell, however, could stay on the board after finishing his term as chair next May. The Federal Reserve declined to comment on the accusation. Trump has for months demanded that the Federal Reserve reduce the short-term interest rate it controls, which currently stands at about 4.3%. He has also repeatedly insulted Powell, who has said that the Fed would like to see more evidence of how the economy evolves in response to Trump's sweeping tariffs before making any moves. Powell has also said the duties threaten to raise inflation and slow growth. Advertisement Trump says that a lower rate would reduce the government's borrowing costs on $37 trillion in debt and boost the housing market by reducing mortgage rates. Yet mortgage borrowing costs do not always follow the Fed's rate decisions. The Trump administration has made similar claims of mortgage fraud against Democrats that Trump has attacked, including California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Mississippi Supreme Court map violates Voting Rights Act, judge rules
Mississippi Supreme Court map violates Voting Rights Act, judge rules

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mississippi Supreme Court map violates Voting Rights Act, judge rules

JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — A federal judge has ordered Mississippi to redraw its Supreme Court electoral map, after finding the map dilutes the power of Black voters. U.S. District Judge Sharion Aycock ruled the map, which was enacted in 1987, violates the Voting Rights Act and cannot be used in future elections. The Mississippi branch of the American Civil Liberties Union helped litigate the lawsuit, arguing the map cut Mississippi's Delta region — a historically Black area — in half. 'This win corrects a historic injustice," said Ari Savitzky, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU Voting Rights Project. "All Mississippians will benefit from fair district lines that give Black voters an equal voice — and new generations of Black leaders an equal chance to help shape the state's future by serving on the state's highest court.' The lawsuit, which was filed on April 25, 2022, argued the map diminished the Black vote in the Central District. Aycock's ruling notes that only four Black people have served on the Mississippi Supreme Court. All of them held the same seat in the Central District and were first appointed to the position by a sitting governor. Aycock wrote that she will impose a deadline for the Mississippi Legislature to create a new map. The Mississippi Secretary of State's office said it is reviewing the 105-page order and will consider appealing the decision. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store