
Trump calls on Federal Reserve official to resign after ally accuses her of mortgage fraud
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The allegation represents another front in the Trump administration's attack on the Fed, which has yet to cut its key interest rate as Trump has demanded. If Cook were to step down, then the White House could nominate a replacement. And Trump has said he would only appoint people who would support lower rates.
Advertisement
The more members of the Fed's governing board that Trump can appoint, the more control he will be able to assert over the Fed, which has long been considered independent from day-to-day politics.
Trump will be able to replace Chair Jerome Powell in May 2026, when Powell's term expires. Yet 12 members of the Fed's interest-rate setting committee have a vote on whether to raise or lower interest rates, so even replacing the Chair doesn't guarantee that Fed policy will shift the way Trump wants.
Advertisement
All seven members of the Fed's governing board, however, are able to vote on rate decisions. The other five voters include the president of the Fed's New York branch and a rotating group of four of the presidents of the Fed's other 11 regional branches.
Trump appointed two members of the Fed's board in his first term, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman. Both dissented July 30 from the central bank's decision to keep its rate unchanged in favor of a rate cut.
Another Fed governor, Adriana Kugler, stepped down unexpectedly Aug. 1, and Trump has appointed one of his economic advisers, Stephen Miran, to fill out the remainder of her term until January.
If Trump is able to replace Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's board, as well as Kugler and Powell, that would give him a clear majority on the board of governors. Powell, however, could stay on the board after finishing his term as chair next May.
The Federal Reserve declined to comment on the accusation.
Trump has for months demanded that the Federal Reserve reduce the short-term interest rate it controls, which currently stands at about 4.3%. He has also repeatedly insulted Powell, who has said that the Fed would like to see more evidence of how the economy evolves in response to Trump's sweeping tariffs before making any moves. Powell has also said the duties threaten to raise inflation and slow growth.
Advertisement
Trump says that a lower rate would reduce the government's borrowing costs on $37 trillion in debt and boost the housing market by reducing mortgage rates. Yet mortgage borrowing costs do not always follow the Fed's rate decisions.
The Trump administration has made similar claims of mortgage fraud against Democrats that Trump has attacked, including California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Social Security is run like a Ponzi scheme. My generation has to end it.
This is why you shouldn't run government programs like Ponzi schemes. Some poor group inevitably gets the rug of benefits pulled out from under them. "A government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth,' Ronald Reagan once quipped, and nowhere is that better demonstrated than in the Social Security Administration. Social Security is in dire financial straits. The administration's expenses have already exceeded revenue for years, and the program's cash reserves are quickly depleting. The program has outlived its viability and should be reformed or dissolved. However, action remains unlikely. Our politicians have no interest in ripping benefits away from baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, at everyone else's expense. Generation Z, born between 1997 to 2012, is held hostage in a program that won't work for them because our politicians refuse to reduce benefits for America's boomers. The Social Security rug will be pulled out from Gen Z If Social Security is my money, then why can't I withdraw from it? While I obviously understand why and am asking that question with snark, the answer serves as a good reminder of why the program needs to be cut. The reality is that my Social Security benefits are not my money. There is no account with my name on it accumulating interest annually, or even just holding my contributions at a static total. Instead, my contributions to the system are only being made for the promise that one day a younger generation will pay into the system on my behalf. However, recent issues have made that structure unsustainable. Due to a collapse of the American birth rate, the program is expected to be unable to pay the full promised benefits to retirees within the decade. This will manifest in a 24% across-the-board reduction in benefits. Still, our politicians have done nothing to resolve the problems with the program out of fear that they will need to make cuts that are unpopular among older Americans. Social Security is a hostage situation in which nobody is willing to kill the program because of the political blowback. The most frustrating part is that it is America's wealthiest generation that has Gen Z in a bind over government benefits. Opinion: Trump accounts give newborns $1,000. It could transform generational wealth in US. Gen Z is held hostage by Social Security The collective thinking on Social Security is a twofold problem. One is a problem of information, and the other is a problem of sunk-cost fallacy. Social Security reform is an admittedly in-the-weeds topic, and I can't expect the majority of Americans to be particularly well-versed on the details. Many Americans don't even understand the basics, such as how Social Security is funded. Nearly 1 in 4 believe Social Security is a personal retirement savings account, in which their contributions are the same dollars they withdraw later in life. The result is that most people clutch their pearls at the suggestion that the program has run its course. Roughly 8 in 10 Americans oppose making cuts to the program. The second part of the issue, however, is that there are more people subscribing to their own sunk cost in the program than are not. As people have invested more of their paychecks into Social Security, with benefits simultaneously becoming closer by the day, their cost-benefit changes. The generational divide on this issue is staggering. Roughly 52% of baby boomers would prefer to raise taxes, compared with just 13% who would rather cut benefits. Gen Z is the opposite, with 49% preferring to cut benefits and just 20% favoring a tax increase. A third of both generations (the fiscally illiterate third) would opt to borrow money to pay for Social Security. Opinion: Gen Z has become lonely and antisocial. We have only ourselves to blame. Young people are overwhelmingly more favorable toward killing the program because the total contributions we have made are so little and our prospects of benefits are so far into the future. Boomers are met with the opposite dynamic. However, even we are likely to fall victim to the sunk cost of the program after a certain point. By the time we are in our 40s, Gen Z's eagerness to end Social Security will probably recede. This is why you shouldn't run government programs like Ponzi schemes, because some poor group inevitably gets the rug of benefits pulled out from under them, or the program has to continue on forever. Neither option is a good one, but it's the choice in front of America as we near Social Security's insolvency. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 Russell 2000 Stocks with Competitive Advantages and 1 Facing Headwinds
The Russell 2000 (^RUT) is home to many small-cap stocks, offering investors the chance to uncover hidden gems before the broader market catches on. However, these companies often come with higher volatility and risk, as their smaller size makes them more vulnerable to economic downturns. The high-risk, high-reward nature of the Russell 2000 makes stock selection critical, and we're here to guide you toward the right ones. That said, here are two Russell 2000 stocks that could deliver strong gains and one best left off your watchlist. One Stock to Sell: Inspired (INSE) Market Cap: $225.9 million Specializing in digital casino gaming, Inspired (NASDAQ:INSE) is a provider of gaming hardware, virtual sports platforms, and server-based gaming systems. Why Are We Cautious About INSE? 1.1% annual revenue growth over the last two years was slower than its consumer discretionary peers Projected sales are flat for the next 12 months, implying demand will slow from its two-year trend Poor free cash flow margin of 1.8% for the last two years limits its freedom to invest in growth initiatives, execute share buybacks, or pay dividends Inspired's stock price of $8.39 implies a valuation ratio of 2.2x forward EV-to-EBITDA. If you're considering INSE for your portfolio, see our FREE research report to learn more. Two Stocks to Watch: Urban Outfitters (URBN) Market Cap: $6.58 billion Founded as a purveyor of vintage items, Urban Outfitters (NASDAQ:URBN) now largely sells new apparel and accessories to teens and young adults seeking on-trend fashion. Why Are We Positive On URBN? Same-store sales growth averaged 4.2% over the past two years, showing it's bringing new and repeat shoppers into its stores Demand will likely accelerate over the next 12 months as its forecasted revenue growth of 8.1% is above its six-year trend Earnings per share grew by 46.7% annually over the last five years and trumped its peers Urban Outfitters is trading at $72.86 per share, or 16.4x forward P/E. Is now the time to initiate a position? Find out in our full research report, it's free. Graham Corporation (GHM) Market Cap: $527 million Founded when its founder patented a unique design for a vacuum system used in the sugar refining process, Graham (NYSE:GHM) provides vacuum and heat transfer equipment for the energy, petrochemical, refining, and chemical sectors. Why Will GHM Beat the Market? Sales pipeline is in good shape as its backlog averaged 21.7% growth over the past two years Operating margin expanded by 4.4 percentage points over the last five years as it scaled and became more efficient Additional sales over the last two years increased its profitability as the 145% annual growth in its earnings per share outpaced its revenue At $48.01 per share, Graham Corporation trades at 27.6x forward EV-to-EBITDA. Is now a good time to buy? See for yourself in our full research report, it's free. High-Quality Stocks for All Market Conditions When Trump unveiled his aggressive tariff plan in April 2025, markets tanked as investors feared a full-blown trade war. But those who panicked and sold missed the subsequent rebound that's already erased most losses. Don't let fear keep you from great opportunities and take a look at Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Tecnoglass (+1,754% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today for free. Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Find your next big winner with StockStory today StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Polaris Forge 2: Applied Digital's (APLD) $3B Bet on AI Data Center Growth
Applied Digital Corporation (NASDAQ:APLD) is one of the On August 18, the company announced that it plans to start building its next AI data center —the Polaris Forge 2—near Harwood, North Dakota, in September 2025. The $3 billion, 280-megawatt (MW) AI Factory is expected to begin operations in 2026 and reach full capacity in 2027. Following the success of Applied Digital's Polaris Forge 1 Ellendale campus, the facility will begin with 280MW initial capacity with the ability to scale beyond. The said project has emerged due to the increasing demand for AI computing capacity, particularly fueled by the growing interest from hyperscalers, enterprises, and research organizations. A group of engineers in a data center, ensuring IT resiliency. 'We believe Polaris Forge 2 represents the next stage in Applied Digital's rapid growth and our position as a leader in delivering high-performance AI infrastructure. The demand for AI capacity continues to accelerate, and North Dakota continues to be one of the most strategic locations in the country to meet that need. We have strong interest from multiple parties and are in advanced negotiations with a U.S. based investment-grade hyperscaler for this campus, making it both timely and prudent to proceed with groundbreaking and site development. We believe this new campus will strengthen our operations, increase our ability to scale, and create lasting value for both our customers and the communities we serve.' -Wes Cummins, CEO of Applied Digital. Applied Digital Corporation (NASDAQ:APLD) is a technology company engaged in designing, developing, and operating digital infrastructure solutions and cloud services in high-performance computing (HPC) and artificial intelligence. While we acknowledge the potential of APLD as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤