logo
Thousands to receive compensation over force-fitting of prepaid energy meters

Thousands to receive compensation over force-fitting of prepaid energy meters

Independent28-05-2025
Thousands of energy customers who had prepayment energy meters (PPMs) force-fitted are to receive compensation or have their debts written off, Ofgem has said.
The regulator announced that eight companies will hand out compensation and support after a review into consumers struggling with energy bills who were forced to have pay-as-you-go meters installed.
Scottish Power, EDF, E.ON, Utility Warehouse, Good Energy, TruEnergy and Ecotricity have all agreed to the scheme.
Ofgem said suppliers have committed to pay both additional compensation where it is due, and in some cases write off some energy debt of customers who had an involuntary PPM installed during the assessment period of January 1 2022 to January 31 2023.
Suppliers will pay £5.6 million in compensation – using the guidelines set out by Ofgem – to 40,000 customers who had an involuntary PPM installed during the assessment period.
Suppliers will also write off a further £13 million of debt from customers who had an involuntary PPM during the assessment period.
This comes on top of £55 million of financial support provided directly to affected consumers by suppliers prior to the completion of the review in the form of hardship payments and debt write-off, the regulator said.
Customers identified as having had a PPM wrongly installed or where processes were not followed adequately between January 1 2022 and January 31 2023 will be contacted by their suppliers, and do not need to take action.
OVO has also confirmed it will pay compensation to customers in line with the guidelines developed by Ofgem.
Tim Jarvis, director-general of markets for Ofgem, said: 'This has been one of the most detailed reviews of supplier practices in Ofgem's history, looking at tens of thousands of cases. It has taken time, but our priority has been to put things right for those who weren't treated properly, and ensure we don't see bad practice repeated.
'While the number of cases where a prepayment meter was wrongfully installed is relatively low compared to the total number of PPM customers, one case is one too many.
'Our review also found wider issues with the processes suppliers had in place, which is why we've put in place clearer, tougher rules to protect customers in vulnerable situations, and I'm pleased that from today suppliers will be applying our compensation framework for those customers affected and have also committed to further support such as debt write-off.
'We have made our expectations clear to suppliers on how those customers who were treated poorly should be compensated. They have, and continue to, work closely and collaboratively with us to make sure their processes are robust and that their customers are properly supported.
'We know that PPMs can be an effective tool in helping customers manage their costs and debt. However, customers must always be treated fairly and compassionately, and we are confident that the changes we have made are a significant step to ensure that happens.'
Dhara Vyas, chief executive of Energy UK, which represents energy firms, said: 'Suppliers have worked hard to co-operate with this comprehensive review and taken further action to put things right in the cases where a prepayment meter (PPM) shouldn't have been installed – or where there was insufficient support for the customers concerned.
'Suppliers have been working closely with Ofgem to meet the requirements of its review and have signed up to the Code of Practice before they have been able to restart involuntary installations of PPMs and have carried out thorough testing of the new processes.
'Involuntary installations have been a last – but necessary – resort for cases where repeated attempts to address debt with the customer through other means have been unsuccessful. It's bad for customers to fall further and further into arrears, and bad debt ultimately drives up the prices that are paid by all customers.
'Since the pause on installations, customer debt has risen to a record £4 billion, and the industry remains keen to work with Ofgem on the proposed relief scheme to tackle this problem.'
The scandal first made headlines two years ago, at the peak of the cost-of-living crisis, when it came to light that energy companies were switching people on to prepayment methods.
This was done by entering properties to install a smart meter or remotely changing a smart meter to prepayment mode.
The energy regulator subsequently suspended all forced installations and launched a review of the process.
It comes weeks after Good Energy was made to pay £150,000 in compensation and redress after it failed to give final bills and refund credit to more than 2,000 prepayment meter customers.
Ofgem said 2,284 customers on prepayment meters were affected by an error with Good Energy's billing system between 2014 and October 2023.
It meant that prepayment customers who switched to another supplier or ended their contract with Good Energy did not get a final bill within six weeks, as required by the watchdog.
Good Energy paid out £150,067 as a result, with the average sum per customer standing at £66.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Country diary: You could tell a story of England in this church alone
Country diary: You could tell a story of England in this church alone

The Guardian

time28 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Country diary: You could tell a story of England in this church alone

A sign in the layby boldly declares: 'The world's oldest wooden church, open today.' Just beyond, beneath an arching yew, is St Andrew's Church in Greensted, its architecture a historical mosaic, a seemingly mismatched patchwork that forms a striking whole. People have been worshipping here for at least 1,300 years. In the 1960s, archaeologists uncovered the impression of two wooden buildings, potentially built in the late sixth or early seventh century, when Christianity was taking root in the region. But it is the palisade nave that has earned the church its remarkable claim. A copse of 51 split oaks forms the central body of the church, constructed around 1060 during the reign of Edward the Confessor, and at one time adorned with nothing but a thatched roof. An eag-thyrel, an eye hole, which allowed the priest to see outside activity – vital during the ninth-century Danish invasions – and a niche, potentially to hold holy water, would have cast the only thin beams of natural light across the soil floor. All other illumination would have been provided by lamps, torch marks scarring the timbers. Over time, transformative restorations took place, giving it the patchwork look: flint remains indicate a chancel built by the Normans; the current brick one was built by the Tudors, along with a tiled roof. The Stuarts added the white tower in Essex clapboard style, while the Victorians rejuvenated rotting timbers and preserved the building for future generations. And the stories continue in the details: the beam etched with the face of Saint Edmund, king of East Anglia, whose body briefly rested here on route to Bury St Edmunds; the 12th-century crusader's grave whose stone tomb hints at a heroic status; the 1839 entry in the marriage register of one of the Tolpuddle Martyrs, who held tenancies here before emigrating to Canada. The church is still in use today; services are held every Sunday, as well as marriages and baptisms. While it and its grounds are beautiful, it is the oaks that capture the attention. Each is individual in size and character, time-weathered and aged to black. They have witnessed Viking raids, the decline of paganism, medieval pilgrimages, war, the Reformation and the plague. Centuries held in knot and burr, they remain rooted in Essex's past and present. Under the Changing Skies: The Best of the Guardian's Country Diary, 2018-2024 is published by Guardian Faber; order at and get a 15% discount

Thorpeness residents face 'bureaucracy' in fight to save homes
Thorpeness residents face 'bureaucracy' in fight to save homes

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Thorpeness residents face 'bureaucracy' in fight to save homes

Residents of a coastal village say they are willing to pay for defences to protect their homes from the sea but are being thwarted by bureaucracy and home in Thorpeness, Suffolk, was demolished in 2022 after it was left perilously close to the cliff edge, and villagers fear two more could be lost this Jones, chair of Aldringham-cum-Thorpe Parish Council, said residents were willing to invest money in defending their homes but had been met with Suffolk Council told the BBC that getting the necessary permission for such defences took time. Defences, including rocks, gabions and geobags, have been installed to manage the effects of coastal erosion, but last year up to 23ft (7m) of coast was lost to the residents want to install more defences"Residents in Thorpeness are prepared to put in money and they have put in for planning but unfortunately at the moment they are coming up against a brick wall because there's about 10 agencies concerned in getting planning through," said Marple, who bought her home in Thorpeness about 20 years ago, describes it as her "happy place". In 2010, after the area was hit with a "big surge" and more defences were installed, she decided to invest and rebuild the property. "It gave us a feeling of security. There was a thought if they maintained, we would have a life of at least 25 years," she said. However, over the past winter there have been "constant" northerly winds which have stripped back shingle on the beach and left defences exposed. She said she had received a warning from East Suffolk Council that once the erosion reached a certain point, she would be told to demolish her home."We are going to fight to do something. One of the things this does do is bring the people together who are most affected," she said. Lucy Ansbro has already spent £450,000 on rock defences to protect her and others have applied for permission to install more, but have been told this would require a full environmental impact assessment, which could take months. The council has launched a survey, asking villagers what they think should be said the latest erosion had outpaced plans to install more rocks and it was doing all it could to support Packard, Liberal Democrat cabinet member for planning and coastal management, said: "It does take time and you have to have specialists doing that."That's going to slow things up tremendously, and then you have to get all these permissions from Natural England, from the Environment Agency, from the Crown Estates - all sorts of people - and they take their time." Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Plans lodged for battery firm near A47 on outskirts of Norwich
Plans lodged for battery firm near A47 on outskirts of Norwich

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Plans lodged for battery firm near A47 on outskirts of Norwich

New plans have emerged for a battery farm despite concerns about fire County Council has written to energy secretary Ed Miliband asking for training and equipment for fire services to be funded in areas where large battery farms are objections were received to a battery energy storage system (Bess) in the south of the county, near Diss, leading to plans being a new application has been lodged for a Bess to be built on 18 acres (seven hectares) of farmland, the equivalent of about 12 football pitches, on the southern outskirts of Norwich. Greenfield Energy Developments has lodged the plans with South Norfolk Council for the site close to the A47, between the village of Keswick and the Harford Park and Bess, on land east of Mulbarton Road, would hold up to 400MW of electricity in 166 could become the biggest solar energy producer in the country if a handful of major schemes go ahead and it is expected that new battery storage sites will be required to support Bess proposals have also promted worries about potential fire risks because of the lithium within the batteries, which can cause an explosion when councillors voted overwhelmingly in favour of writing to Mr Miliband about the fire safety concerns, although the Green group warned about "scaremongering".A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokeswoman told the BBC: "Battery fires at storage sites are rare in the UK and we already have high safety standards in place to ensure batteries are safe throughout their lifespan."The Keswick plans would include a cooling and fire protection system and a fire suppression system. The plans state that the energy storage units will be almost 2.9m (9.5ft) in height due to having noise reducing units on top of the scheme remains in the early stages and its developers are seeking guidance from South Norfolk Council about the potential environment Fire and Rescue Service has already responded to the plans advising that a series of conditions are put in place, including safe distances between units and the need for an access route for fire project has emerged after plans for a similar scheme in Rushall, near Diss, were withdrawn without explanation last month amid a host of project was for a site five times the size, about 92 acres (37.5 hectares), for 1,035 units which could store up to 900 megawatts of electricity. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store