Texas plans to spend $51 billion on property tax cuts. It may not be sustainable
Property tax cuts aren't free. In fact, they're costing Texas a fortune.
The Texas House is considering a budget that would shell out $51 billion — 15% of the state's total two-year spending plan — to maintain and provide new property tax cuts. That number, more than the state allocates to transportation or higher education, is making even some Republicans nervous about the state's ability to afford the tax relief if there's an economic downturn.
If it were its own agency, Texas' property tax budget would be the third costliest agency in the state, more than double what the state spends on public safety and criminal justice. The allocation exceeds the operating budget to run Texas A&M System's 11 university campuses for two years. And it's more than enough money to cover the estimated cost of a high-speed rail line from Dallas to Houston.
Texans pay among the highest property taxes in the country. The state doesn't have an income tax and relies heavily on property taxes to pay for public services, especially public schools. For the last several years, lawmakers have sought to rein in those bills by sending billions of dollars to school districts to reduce how much in property taxes they collect from homeowners and businesses — a strategy they're keen on duplicating this year.
'It's something that we can afford to do now,' said Rahul Sreenivasan, director of government performance and fiscal policy at Texas 2036, a nonprofit public policy group. 'I don't know if it's something that we can afford to do on this scale every session.'
Lawmakers have drawn on massive state budget surpluses in recent years to pay for property tax cuts. A $33 billion surplus helped cover the $18 billion tax-cut package legislators greenlit two years ago. This time, lawmakers have eyed a $24 billion surplus to help pay for new cuts and maintain existing ones.
Budget analysts have warned that those surpluses were out of the ordinary — and will soon be a thing of the past. The injection of tens of billions of federal dollars into state coffers during the COVID-19 pandemic and higher-than-usual growth in sales taxes, driven by inflation, formed those surpluses, they said. Today, those COVID relief dollars are gone or spoken for. Sales tax collections, which make up more than half of the state budget, have slowed as higher housing costs and grocery bills — costs that don't generate sales tax revenue — have bitten into Texas households' budgets.
'Because of very specific, very unusual circumstances, we had a lot of money that we didn't expect to have,' said Shannon Halbrook, a fiscal policy expert at the left-leaning think tank Every Texan. 'My fear is we're assuming that that money is permanent, or that we're going to have that kind of money going forward to keep paying for these recurring tax cuts every budget, every session. And that's just simply not the case.'
The state's economy already had been projected to slow this year, and President Donald Trump's tariffs have introduced a fresh round of economic uncertainty. And on Thursday, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said it expects demand for oil to shrink and gasoline prices to fall through 2026 — both of which would affect the state's tax revenue collections from oil and gas production.
Meanwhile, it's unclear just how deeply the Trump administration's efforts to cut federal spending will hit the state budget going forward. Federal funds account for roughly 30% of Texas' upcoming two-year budget.
Of the $51 billion in the budget set aside for tax cuts, some $44.5 billion will go toward maintaining property tax cuts lawmakers have enacted since 2019. That includes billions of dollars sent to school districts to replace funds districts would have otherwise collected in property taxes, thus lowering tax rates — a tax-cut method known as 'compression.' It also includes billions of dollars lawmakers greenlit to raise the state's homestead exemption for public schools — or the amount of a home's value that can't be taxed to pay for public schools. Voters decided to raise that exemption to $100,000 in 2023.
Lawmakers plan to put another $3 billion toward compression. State law requires Texas to put more money toward compressing school districts' tax rates every two years as long as property values grow, so the $51 billion tax-cut tab is expected to grow in the future.
Legislators also have $3.5 billion set aside to pay for new cuts — expected in the form of another bump in the homestead exemption, more compression and tax cuts for businesses.
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said he favors further boosting the state's homestead exemption because it would be harder for lawmakers to claw back those cuts versus other methods, like compression. Senators passed a proposal earlier this year to raise the homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000, and to $150,000 for older Texans. Patrick said he and House Speaker Dustin Burrows have discussed raising the exemption even further for Texans age 65 and above, to $200,000.
'One of the many reasons I favor the homestead exemption over increasing compression is that the homestead exemption is codified in the Texas Constitution by voters so future legislatures can never take property tax cuts away from Texas homeowners,' Patrick said in a statement, alluding to the two-thirds vote required in both chambers to repeal a constitutional amendment.
In contrast, Patrick said, 'Future legislatures can decrease, or entirely eliminate, the amount of compression at any time,' as they are not baked into the constitution and could be rolled back with only a majority vote.
Cutting property taxes has been a major priority among Texas Republican lawmakers. But even some Republicans are sounding the alarm about how much tax cuts cost.
Senate lawmakers passed their proposal to raise the homestead exemption in February, with a unanimous vote and little fanfare. Still, some senators sounded a note of caution about the state's ability to continue paying for tax relief into perpetuity.
'We're building a large obligation, and it's going to detract from things we absolutely can't afford not to do, if we're not careful,' said Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock.
The tax cuts have provided some relief for homeowners: a Texas Tribune analysis of more than 50 property tax bills from 2023 found that those homeowners saw their bills fall nearly 28% from the year before. When adjusted for inflation, most homeowners' tax bills were lower in 2023 than in 2018, the year before GOP legislators passed the first major round of relief.
But growth in property values in 2024 has eaten into those gains, with some areas seeing the typical homeowner's bill increase by more than it fell the year before. After falling by more than 10% in 2023, schools' property tax collections grew by more than 6% last year, according to estimates from the Texas Comptroller's office.
As they were taking up their main tax-cut measures earlier this year, Senate lawmakers griped that, even after billions of dollars in relief, many of their constituents feel as though they are not getting tangible relief as local tax increases and rising insurance costs bite into progress made by the Legislature.
At the same time, lawmakers have effectively boxed themselves in. Voters would have to sign off on reducing the state's homestead exemption, which would require a constitutional amendment. State lawmakers could theoretically reduce how much they spend on compression, but doing so would prove difficult if not impossible to sell politically.
That means lawmakers would have to make cuts elsewhere in the budget to sustain tax cuts should the economy hit a rough patch. For Halbrook, the fear is those cuts would come out of programs that serve low-income families.
'The sad fact of the matter is there's not a lot of money spent on programs like that,' Halbrook said.
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/04/10/texas-property-tax-cuts-budget/.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.
This article originally appeared on Wichita Falls Times Record News: Texas plans to spend $51 billion on property tax cuts
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
32 minutes ago
- The Hill
Speaker Johnson teases follow-ups to the ‘one big, beautiful bill'
The 'one big, beautiful bill' may not be so singular, after all. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is teasing follow-up legislation to the megabill of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities that Republicans can push though using the same special budget reconciliation process that requires only GOP votes. That tool can be used once per fiscal year, with the current fiscal year ending on Sept. 30. So after Republicans are done with the 'big, beautiful bill,' the GOP trifecta has, in theory, two more shots to muscle through party-line legislation before the next Congress comes into power after the midterms. Johnson floated plans for a second reconciliation bill while rebutting concerns from deficit hawks on the budget impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which includes an extension of tax cuts and boosts to border and defense funding, with costs offset in part by new requirements on low-income assistance programs like Medicaid and food aid. 'Everyone here wants to reduce spending,' Johnson said Friday morning on CNBC. 'But you have to do that in a sequence of events. We have a plan, OK? This is the first of a multistep process.' 'We're going to have another reconciliation bill that follows this one, possibly a third one before this Congress is up, because you can have a reconciliation bill for each budget year, each fiscal year. So that's ahead of us,' Johnson continued, also pointing to separate plans to claw back money based on recommendations from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'We're also doing rescissions packages. We got the first one delivered this week from the White House, and that will codify many of the DOGE cuts.' The promise of another reconciliation bill is somewhat surprising given the crux of the debate that dominated the early weeks of the year: Should Republicans divide up their agenda into two bills, passing the first quickly to give Trump an early win on boosting funding for border enforcement and deportations? Or would putting all of Trump's priorities into one bill — which would contain both bitter pills and sweeteners for different factions of the razor-thin majority — be a better political strategy? Trump eventually said he preferred 'one big, beautiful bill,' a moniker that became the legislation's official title in the House last month. It's not clear what would be in a second piece of legislation. Multiple House Republicans who spoke with The Hill were unaware of plans for more reconciliation bills and were not sure what could be included in them. 'I think we need to see what's left on the table after the first one,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said. And to muster through multiple reconciliation bills is a delicate prospect. If members know more reconciliation bills are coming, that complicates the argument that everything in the current package — even policies some factions dislike that others love — need to stay in one megabill. The Speaker declined to elaborate on what might be in such a package when asked in a press conference last week. 'I'm not going to tell you that,' Johnson said. 'Let's get the first one done.' 'Look, I say this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing of us identifying waste, fraud, abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity. So we have lots of ideas of things that might be in that package.' Republicans had started planning for the current legislative behemoth months before the 2024 election so they would be prepared to quickly execute on their policy wish list if they won the majority. 'This isn't something we just drew up overnight. So, we'll go through that same laborious process,' Johnson said. But some members have ideas of what else they'd like to see. Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) said that he'd hope a second bill would do more to tackle rolling back green energy tax credits and make further spending cuts. Ultimately, though, it will be Trump's call, Norman said: 'I know when the president gets involved, it adds a lot of value.' And Rep. August Pfluger (R-Texas) speculated that passing the 'big, beautiful bill' would inspire members to keep going with another bill. 'People like the feeling of winning,' Pfluger said.


The Hill
32 minutes ago
- The Hill
DNC chair on leaked call says Hogg ‘essentially destroyed' shot at success
Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin said in a recent party meeting that Vice Chair David Hogg has 'essentially destroyed' his chances of leading the DNC successfully, according to leaked audio obtained by Politico. Martin seemed to get choked up as he addressed Hogg, who rose to national prominence as a gun control activist and has pledged to primary Democrats he sees as ineffective in pushing back against President Trump and the GOP. 'No one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to, to put ourselves in a position to win,' Martin told other DNC leaders on the call. 'And again, I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. It's really frustrating,' Martin said. Politico reported that the conversation took place on a Zoom meeting of DNC officers on May 15, a few days after the DNC recommended new elections on procedural grounds for seats held by Hogg and one other vice chair. Members will decide on Monday whether to hold new elections. In the recording, Martin told Hogg that he respected the progressive activist, but said the intraparty drama has led him to question whether it's worth continuing in the post. 'I'll say, look, it has plenty of warts, and we're all trying to change those, for sure, but the longer we continue this fight, the harder it is for us to actually do what we all want to do, which is make a difference in this country again,' Martin said in the meeting. 'So I deeply respect you, David. I, too, was looking forward to working with you, but this has created a situation, and I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job… the other night, I said to myself, for the first time, I don't know if I want to do this anymore.' The Hill has reached out to the DNC for comment. In a statement to Politico, provided by a spokesperson, Martin said, 'I'm not going anywhere.' 'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats,' he added. 'As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda. That's the work that I will continue to do every day.' Symone Sanders Townsend, an MSNBC host and former Democratic adviser, came to Martin's defense in a post on X on Sunday. 'Ken Martin had a vulnerable moment w/his vice chairs & other leaders on a call. Someone recorded it + shared it. Seems to me THAT anonymous person has no business anywhere near the DNC,' she wrote. 'As a former DNC member, it's quite clear there are too many people currently in roles for the wrong reasons. From the outside looking in, I don't think Ken Martin is one of them.'

Business Insider
42 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Artists who got almost $1,500 a month under a basic income pilot say their work improved
For about 2,000 artists and creative arts workers in Ireland, a weekly stipend provided through a basic income program has been a lifeline for years. Now, it's almost over. The pilot program began in 2022 under Catherine Martin, Ireland's former minister for tourism and culture. Martin allocated about $28 million to the arts sector following the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were randomly chosen and given an unconditional stipend of €325, or about $370, weekly for three years. During that time, participants met periodically via Zoom to discuss how the additional income had affected their livelihoods, careers, and ability to meet basic needs. The final session was held this month before the program's conclusion in August. Artists and cultural workers who attended the session grappled with what their lives would look like after August, but they hoped government officials would extend the program. "We need no further pilots. People need a UBI now to face and deal with the many social, economic, and ecological crises of our world," Reinhard Huss, the organizer of UBI Lab Leeds, which sponsored the event alongside Basic Income Ireland, UBI Lab Arts, and UBI Lab Network, told Business Insider. New developments in AI are reshaping the job market, replacing some entry-level positions. Tech industry leaders like Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have said implementing a universal basic income will be essential in the near future when AI supplants jobs in most industries. A universal basic income offers an entire population recurring, unconditional payments regardless of an individual's socioeconomic status. Ireland's program, like many others in the United States, is a guaranteed basic income, which targets certain segments of the population for a set period of time. Impact of Ireland's basic income program for artists Jenny Dagg, a sociologist lecturing at Ireland's Maynooth University, authored a new report that provides insights into participants' reactions to the program. She gathered data from over 50 of the 2,000 recipients. Although the report outlined nearly a dozen key impacts reported by program recipients, Dagg highlighted five major takeaways during the Zoom session. Dagg said that recipients who received money from the program reported more stability and "significantly reduced" financial stress. It relieved their anxiety about fulfilling their basic needs. Participating in the pilot program also allowed artists to re-prioritize how they spend their time and what they choose to focus on. "The opportunity to focus more on their specific creative interests opened new possibilities and career trajectories," the report said. Artists said the added income allowed them to spend more time "researching, experimenting, taking risks, and failing," which has improved the quality of their work. Artists, the report said, also felt more confident in themselves and their work during the program. "Many recipients talk of feeling empowered, of being in control of the choices within their lives, and envisioning a viable career path longer-term," the report said. Recipients even reported better mental health, which led to improved sleep quality and lowered stress levels. What's next for Ireland's basic income program With the end of the program fast approaching, recipients of the weekly payment are reckoning with what how their lives might change. "Across art forms, recipients report concerns about financial stability and sustaining the momentum of their careers when, or if, the basic income scheme ends," Dagg's report said. This month, Basic Income Ireland called on the government to immediately implement a universal and unconditional basic income for the country. A spokesperson for the UBI Lab Network said the pilot program's success shows that basic income is a viable option. The campaign group shared a proposal for introducing a universal basic income to Ireland. "As the pilot shows, basic income works and people need a UBI now to face and deal with the many social, economic, and ecological crises of our world. The Network will continue to help demonstrate basic income within communities and show how it is a sustainable policy," the statement said. Patrick O'Donovan, Ireland's minister for arts and culture, said he would evaluate the data collected throughout the pilot program and create proposals for the government regarding the next steps. "I am heartened by the responses of the Basic Income recipients in this paper," O'Donovan said in the May report. "This research will add to the evaluation being conducted by my department, which to date clearly shows that the Basic Income Pilot has been an effective support for the artists in receipt of it."