‘Learning is never wasted'
By the time I got to my final year, after all levels of Covid lockdown and a year out as a student union (SU) officer, I knew that it probably wasn't Zoology that I wanted to pursue. However, the analytical and problem-solving skills I learned through my degree opened the door for me to explore further new interests. Specifically, my degree exposed me to urban ecology and the intersection of nature and society.
When I finished my undergraduate degree, I was lucky enough to be awarded a George Moore Scholarship to explore these interests further. It took me to London to do a Master's of Public Administration focused on Urban Innovation and Policy at UCL.
Here, I learned the foundations of how our public institutions work and I got the opportunity to develop my policymaking skills, both generally and related to the development of science policy.
READ MORE
What stood out to me most about this experience was realising how the foundational knowledge I developed in my undergraduate degree benefited me in navigating this new academic and professional landscape. I would use the scientific knowledge, problem-solving and analytical skills from my undergrad far more frequently than I had initially expected.
One of the most useful aspects of my Master's was getting to work in industry with a partner organisation on the thesis component. Here, I worked with a London-based urban design firm on a project which explored the use of unconventional policy tools to create 'feminist cities' – safer, equitable and more inclusive cities for women, girls and gender minorities.
It was really important to me to be able to directly apply my learnings in the real world while still studying, and to build professional connections across diverse, innovative and creative teams working on salient, real-world challenges. It was a great privilege to have been able to do a fully funded Master's degree and tackle these challenges at a time when it is becoming increasingly difficult to be a student, especially when the cost of living and housing crises are considered.
My post-graduation pathway is somewhat unconventional when the title of my undergraduate degree is considered. I'm back reviving my old passions for SU politics as I work on developing and increasing democratic participation at one of London's largest SUs. Even here, I regularly use the communication, administration and technical skills from both degrees.
My biggest takeaway, I guess, is that the learning is never wasted. My time at university was worth so much more to me than what was written on my degree in the end – from skills, to personal and professional development, I know that wherever I end up in my career, that these opportunities to learn so much, pivot and change my interests, and to work with so many diverse and interesting groups of people, are going to stand to me massively.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Pope Leo targeted Maga money in early days as pontiff, says Mary McAleese
Pope Leo XIV has attempted to court Maga money from the US back into the Catholic Church while simultaneously contesting aspects of the political movement's thinking and actions, former president Mary McAleese has said. In a critical article reflecting on the new pontiff, Ms McAleese took issue with various aspects of his brief period in office , seizing on same-sex marriage and his attitude toward women in particular. Her views are set out in an article for the current UK Catholic Tablet magazine to mark the pope's first 100 days on Friday. Leo, she wrote, had followed the agenda of his predecessor Francis in support of migrants and the poor, although with reduced volume, 'as he tries to court Maga (Make United States Great Again) money back into the Church while simultaneously contesting aspects of Maga governmental thinking and acting'. READ MORE One of the main subjects considered by the cardinals before Leo's election was the parlous state of Vatican finances where, according to accounts for 2024, there was an €83 million shortfall, while its pension fund shortfall was estimated at €631 million. On May 16th last, in one of his first statements as pope, Leo affirmed Catholic teaching on marriage as founded on the 'stable union between a man and a woman,' and church teaching banning abortion. Ms McAleese said such 'uncompromising comments' could have been made by previous conservative popes Benedict, John Paul II, Paul VI or Pius XI. 'That they also appeal to the constituency of US Catholic voters who distrusted Francis and whose financial support Leo is trying to restore, is noteworthy,' she wrote. [ How a quiet American became pope Opens in new window ] She was also less than enthusiastic about the new pope's stance on women in the church, describing him as 'as bog-standard patriarchal, patronising and prone to tokenism'. Meanwhile, his views on Church teaching where LGBTIQ+ issues are concerned were anything but 'forward thinking,' she said. Noting that Leo recently appointed Rev Thomas Hennen as Bishop of Baker, Oregon in the US, she said the new bishop supported Courage International. [ Pope Leo XIV: what does he stand for? Opens in new window ] It 'advocates celibacy and caters for the spiritual needs of LGBTIQ+ Catholics within existing magisterial teaching which regards homosexuality as intrinsically disordered and homosexual acts as evil. This appointment and its accompanying spin is a worrying straw in the wind.' Overall, she felt the last 100 days showed that 'Leo is more Benedict than Francis though in fairness the latter's reputation as a reformer was well over-egged'. 'We appear at least to have pivoted dramatically from a careless pope to a cautious pope, from a sometimes narky showman to a genial shy man, from an impulsive pope to a measured pope, from a Latin American pope to an American pope.' The first American pope, Leo XIV's election on May 8th last took almost everyone by surprise, mainly due to his nationality. It tends to be Catholic Church tradition that conclaves rarely elect a pope from one of the world's major powers. Pope Leo XIV delivers his Angelus blessing from the window of his studio overlooking St. Peter's Square on August 10th. Photograph: Elisabetta Trevisan - Vatican Media via by Vatican Pool/ Getty Images As surprising was that he had been a member of the College of Cardinals, which elected him, for less than two years. He was on the Roman Curia, as prefect at the Dicastery for Bishops, for a little more than that, since January 2023. Following his election, unlike his predecessor, Pope Leo appeared on the balcony at St Peter's wearing the traditional papal stole and mozzetta. Since when he has decided to reside at the Vatican's Apostolic Palace, unlike Francis, and has already been to the papal summer residence at Castel Gandolfo twice, a place Francis never visited. Commenting on this, Ms McAleese said 'almost entirely gone from Pope Leo' papacy already are the early self-effacing elements of Francis' papacy which provoked much favourable comment about his perceived modesty'. She asked whether Leo will 'have the courage and faith to be an agent of change or are we already looking at another filibuster pope like Francis, just different in personality not outcome?'
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
France, Germany and UK call on Iran to resume nuclear discussions with US
France , Germany and the UK have told the UN they are prepared to trigger the reimposition of sanctions on Iran unless it resumes negotiations with the US over its nuclear programme. The foreign ministers of the three countries – known collectively as the E3 – wrote to the UN on Tuesday to raise the spectre of implementing a 'snapback' mechanism unless Iran takes action. But they said they had offered to extend a deadline to start the process if Tehran returned to the negotiating table. 'We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, [the E3] are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism,' the ministers said in the letter, which was obtained by the Financial Times. The European powers have to decide whether to invoke snapback a month before crucial clauses of a 2015 nuclear deal Iran signed with the E3, the Obama administration, Russia and China, expire in October. READ MORE The accord, under which Iran agreed to strict limits on its nuclear activity in return for sanctions relief, has been in a state of collapse since US president Donald Trump unilaterally abandoned it during his first term. Iran responded by aggressively expanding its nuclear activity and was enriching uranium at levels close to weapons grade before Israel launched its 12-day war against the Islamic republic in June . Before the conflict, the Trump administration and Iran had been holding indirect talks in an effort to resolve the long-running stand-off over its nuclear programme. But Israel's attack, which was launched 48 hours before Tehran and Washington were to hold a sixth round of talks, upended the diplomatic process. The US briefly joined Israel in bombing Iran's main nuclear facilities. The E3 told Iran at talks in Turkey last month that they could extend the snapback deadline if Tehran agreed to resume talks with the US and co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. One western diplomat said the talks had been 'difficult'. On Tuesday, the E3 said their offer of an extension 'remained unanswered by Iran'. The ministers said a 'limited extension' would provide more time for talks aimed at concluding a new nuclear agreement, while maintaining the ability to reimpose sanctions to prevent nuclear proliferation. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi. Photograph: Sergei Karpukhin /AFP via Getty Images Following the Istanbul meeting in July, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi told the FT that the E3 had no 'legal or moral grounds' to implement the snapback. He warned that Iran would exclude the European powers from future nuclear talks if they went through with the process. Mr Araghchi accused the E3 of failing to meet their commitments under the 2015 deal and said the snapback mechanism was 'not that important any more'. 'With the Europeans, there is no reason right now to negotiate because they cannot lift sanctions, they cannot do anything,' Mr Araghchi said. 'If they do snapback, that means that this is the end of the road for them.' In their letter, the E3 ministers said they were 'clearly and unambiguously' legally justified in reimposing sanctions on Iran because since 2019 – a year after Mr Trump withdrew from the nuclear accord – Tehran had 'wilfully' departed from its commitments under the deal. Tehran has said it remains open to talks with the Trump administration. But its stance hardened after Israel's assault. Mr Araghchi has said Iran wants assurances from the US that it will not be attacked during future talks, and wants 'confidence-building measures', including the US agreeing to compensate Iran for war damage. Iran announced after Israel's attack that it was suspending co-operation with the IAEA, which has had inspectors in the country. A senior IAEA official met with Iranian officials in Tehran on Monday, Iran's foreign ministry said, but the UN nuclear watchdog has not commented on the trip. The letter to UN secretary general António Guterres and the UN Security Council was signed by French foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot, German foreign minister Johann Wadephul, and UK foreign minister David Lammy. It comes two months after the US and Israel struck nuclear sites in Iran. The Iranian mission to the UN did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the letter.- Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Appeal Court overturns requirement for councils to get members' consent before defending legal actions
Local authorities do not have to seek the approval of councillors before deciding to enter a defence to a court challenge to council decisions, the Court of Appeal has held. The three-judge court's decision overturns a High Court ruling from June last year that found councils must take the 'positive step' of securing express authorisation from elected members before defending a case. The question of whether authorisation from councillors is required has been raised in several High Court challenges related to decisions of elected members, such as votes on local development plans. Every local authority must have a development plan, a document with maps that guides how certain areas should be zoned and developed. READ MORE It is used to guide planning decisions in those areas, but is sometimes the subject of litigation by interested parties who could be affected by any changes. In this case, developer Oceanscape Unlimited Company brought a legal challenge over the Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council development plan and the decision to rezone its lands at Stillorgan Business Park for educational facilities. Oceanscape contended the rezoning amounted to a 'sterilisation' of its site and would cause the company 'serious and irreparable' harm as well as costing it millions of euro. The council filed legal documents opposing the developer's claim, but Oceanscape argued the local authority had no power to do this as it had not sought prior authorisation from elected members, which it argued was required under the Local Government Act, 2001. It asked the court to strike out the council's opposition statement on these grounds. Section 153(2) of the Act states that where a legal action relates to the performance of functions reserved to the elected members, the chief executive 'shall' act with the 'express authorisation of the elected council'. It provides that such authorisation 'shall be deemed to have been given unless or until the contrary is shown'. The council asked the court to interpret the section which, it said, relies on an assumption that the chief executive has a 'deemed authorisation' that is lost only where elected members actively direct him not to do something in a case. It said no formal resolution was passed by elected members, but they were aware of the proceedings and were formally briefed on them in March 2023. The High Court had ruled in Oceanscape's favour, finding the required authorisation was not secured in this case. Soon afterwards, the High Court introduced new practice rules requiring local authorities to inform the court early on whether councillors had given express authorisation to defend a challenge to their decision. However, the Court of Appeal has now overturned the High Court decision and has ruled in favour of the council in a recently published judgment. Explaining the appeal judges' rationale, Ms Justice Nuala Butler said entering into litigation was an 'executive function' and could be taken by the chief executive without requiring a vote of elected councillors. 'In these circumstances, the appeal taken by the local authority will be allowed and the order striking out its statement of opposition will be set aside,' she said.
