
Pope Leo targeted Maga money in early days as pontiff, says Mary McAleese
has attempted to court Maga money from the
US
back into the
Catholic Church
while simultaneously contesting aspects of the political movement's thinking and actions, former president
Mary McAleese
has said.
In a critical article reflecting on the new pontiff, Ms McAleese took issue with various aspects of his
brief period in office
, seizing on same-sex marriage and his attitude toward women in particular.
Her views are set out in an article for the current UK Catholic Tablet magazine to mark the pope's first 100 days on Friday.
Leo, she wrote, had followed the agenda of his predecessor Francis in support of migrants and the poor, although with reduced volume, 'as he tries to court Maga (Make United States Great Again) money back into the Church while simultaneously contesting aspects of Maga governmental thinking and acting'.
READ MORE
One of the main subjects considered by the cardinals before Leo's election was the parlous state of Vatican finances where, according to accounts for 2024, there was an €83 million shortfall, while its pension fund shortfall was estimated at €631 million.
On May 16th last, in one of his first statements as pope, Leo affirmed Catholic teaching on marriage as founded on the 'stable union between a man and a woman,' and church teaching banning abortion.
Ms McAleese said such 'uncompromising comments' could have been made by previous conservative popes Benedict, John Paul II, Paul VI or Pius XI.
'That they also appeal to the constituency of US Catholic voters who distrusted Francis and whose financial support Leo is trying to restore, is noteworthy,' she wrote.
[
How a quiet American became pope
Opens in new window
]
She was also less than enthusiastic about the new pope's stance on women in the church, describing him as 'as bog-standard patriarchal, patronising and prone to tokenism'.
Meanwhile, his views on Church teaching where LGBTIQ+ issues are concerned were anything but 'forward thinking,' she said. Noting that Leo recently appointed Rev Thomas Hennen as Bishop of Baker, Oregon in the US, she said the new bishop supported Courage International.
[
Pope Leo XIV: what does he stand for?
Opens in new window
]
It 'advocates celibacy and caters for the spiritual needs of LGBTIQ+ Catholics within existing magisterial teaching which regards homosexuality as intrinsically disordered and homosexual acts as evil. This appointment and its accompanying spin is a worrying straw in the wind.'
Overall, she felt the last 100 days showed that 'Leo is more Benedict than Francis though in fairness the latter's reputation as a reformer was well over-egged'.
'We appear at least to have pivoted dramatically from a careless pope to a cautious pope, from a sometimes narky showman to a genial shy man, from an impulsive pope to a measured pope, from a Latin American pope to an American pope.'
The first American pope, Leo XIV's election on May 8th last took almost everyone by surprise, mainly due to his nationality. It tends to be Catholic Church tradition that conclaves rarely elect a pope from one of the world's major powers.
Pope Leo XIV delivers his Angelus blessing from the window of his studio overlooking St. Peter's Square on August 10th. Photograph: Elisabetta Trevisan - Vatican Media via by Vatican Pool/ Getty Images
As surprising was that he had been a member of the College of Cardinals, which elected him, for less than two years. He was on the Roman Curia, as prefect at the Dicastery for Bishops, for a little more than that, since January 2023.
Following his election, unlike his predecessor, Pope Leo appeared on the balcony at St Peter's wearing the traditional papal stole and mozzetta. Since when he has decided to reside at the Vatican's Apostolic Palace, unlike Francis, and has already been to the papal summer residence at Castel Gandolfo twice, a place Francis never visited.
Commenting on this, Ms McAleese said 'almost entirely gone from Pope Leo' papacy already are the early self-effacing elements of Francis' papacy which provoked much favourable comment about his perceived modesty'.
She asked whether Leo will 'have the courage and faith to be an agent of change or are we already looking at another filibuster pope like Francis, just different in personality not outcome?'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
27 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Serbian leader vows tough response against protesters after riots
Serbian president Aleksandar Vucic has announced tough measures against anti-government protesters following days of riots in the streets of Serbia that have challenged his increasingly autocratic rule in the Balkan country. In one of his frequent TV addresses to the public, Mr Vucic accused the anti-government demonstrators of 'pure terrorism' and reiterated his claims that months of persistent protests against his rule have been orchestrated in the West and aimed at destroying Serbia . 'Our country is in grave danger, they have jeopardised all our values, normal life, each individual,' said Mr Vucic, alleging an elaborate scheme that would eventually install 'anarcho-leftist' authorities in the future. He did not offer any concrete evidence for his claims. Supporters of Serbian president Aleksandar Vucic hurl flares at protesters during an anti-government protest. Photograph: Darko Vojinovic/AP 'Unless we undertake tougher steps, it is a question of days when they [protesters] will kill someone,' said Mr Vucic. 'I am saying this for history.' The stern warnings came after five consecutive nights of clashes between the protesters on one side and police and Vucic loyalists on the other. Angry demonstrators on Saturday evening torched Mr Vucic's governing Serbian Progressive Party offices in a town in western Serbia, and those of other ruling coalition allies. The demonstrators also clashed with police in Belgrade, the capital, and in the northern city of Novi Sad. Riot officers used tear gas against protesters who hurled stun grenades, flares and bottles at them. [ Serbian protesters and president trade 'civil war' warnings after street clashes Opens in new window ] Mr Vucic did not specify the state response that he said would come within a week. But he stressed that a state of emergency is not imminent. Scores of people have already been detained and injured in the past days, while police have faced accusations of excessive force and arbitrary detentions of protesters. 'You will witness the determination of the state of Serbia,' said Mr Vucic. 'We will use everything at our disposal to restore peace and order in the country.' The clashes last week marked a significant escalation following more than nine months of largely peaceful demonstrations that started after a concrete canopy collapsed at a train station in Serbia's north, killing 16 people. Many in Serbia blamed the incident on alleged widespread corruption in state-run infrastructure projects that they say fuelled poor renovation work. The Serbian president has faced accusations of stifling democratic freedoms while allowing organised crime and corruption to flourish. He has denied this. Serbia is formally seeking EU membership, but Mr Vucic has maintained strong ties with Russia and China. On Sunday, he praised Russia's backing for his government against what he called a 'coloured revolution' against his government.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Ukraine has right to make decisions on its territory, says Taoiseach after Trump comments
Ukraine has the right to make decisions on its territory and international borders 'must not be changed by force', Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said. Mr Martin on Sunday repeated his call for a ceasefire after US president Donald Trump said he backed a 'peace deal' that would put pressure on Ukraine to cede more land to Russia . Mr Trump's pivot away from calling for an immediate ceasefire followed a meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin on Friday in Alaska and put him at odds with the view of Ukraine and the EU. His latest comments have caused some concern among European leaders as an outright peace deal could put pressure on Ukraine to cede more territory to Russia. Mr Martin was speaking as a number of European leaders, including European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen , took the unprecedented step of agreeing to accompany Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy to Washington for his meeting with Mr Trump on Monday. READ MORE Leaders at a meeting of the so-called 'coalition of the willing' on Sunday agreed Russia would face more sanctions and wider economic measures if it does not stop its bombardment of Ukraine. Speaking after the video call meeting, Mr Martin said it is 'essential that Ukraine is a full participant in any discussions regarding its future'. He said he welcomed the fact Mr Zelenskiy would meet Mr Trump in Washington, together with other European leaders. [ Trump pressing Ukraine for a quick deal after failed summit is a clear triumph for Putin Opens in new window ] 'At today's meeting, I stressed the need to recommit ourselves to the primacy of the UN Charter,' he said. 'For all our security, there must be respect for international law, including the principles of independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force.' The Taoiseach said Ukraine needs 'strong, credible, long-term security guarantees', which means sustained support from Europe and the United States as well as EU membership. 'Our joint efforts for peace should be combined with firm and co-ordinated pressure on Russia to agree to a ceasefire and engage seriously with negotiations on a just and lasting peace,' he said. 'We agreed today that sanctions and wider economic measures will be reinforced if Russia does not stop the killing.' The Taoiseach also called for Russia to 'urgently return Ukrainian children who they have abducted as well as prisoners of war and civilians being held unlawfully'. The coalition of the willing is a group of more than 30 countries that have pledged to support Ukraine. Sunday's meeting was the coalition's second in four days. The video call followed conversations between European leaders and Mr Trump after his meeting with Mr Putin. The meeting was kicked off by French president Emmanuel Macron, UK prime minister Keir Starmer, German chancellor Friedrich Merz and Mr Zelenskiy. Leaders discussed the US-Russia summit in Alaska on Friday as well as Mr Zelenskiy's upcoming meeting with Mr Trump. The coalition is also understood to have discussed ways to progress security guarantees and lasting peace for Ukraine.


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump pressing Ukraine for a quick deal after failed summit is a clear triumph for Putin
If there was a sense of relief in Ukraine that Friday's US - Russia summit at an Alaskan airbase did not end with Donald Trump waving a piece of paper and proclaiming 'peace in our time', then it did not last for long. Ukraine's biggest pre-summit fear was that Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin would clinch a swift and sweeping agreement behind closed doors and present Kyiv and the world with a done deal to end the invasion on the Kremlin's terms. For a very brief moment, the obvious failure of the summit to deliver a breakthrough would have raised Ukraine's hopes that, finally, Trump might make good on repeated threats to get tough on Putin for refusing to agree to an immediate ceasefire. Instead, having looked weary, dispirited and even deferential to Putin as he traipsed out of a brief press conference behind him without answering questions, Trump set about trying to mask his failure by pressing Ukraine to accept a potentially catastrophic deal that would, if nothing else, help America's self-declared 'president of peace' save some face. READ MORE Trump not only backed down, yet again, from a pledge to impose 'severe' sanctions on Russia and key trading partners such as China if Putin defied him, but told Ukraine and European capitals that he now favoured the Kremlin's proposed solution – not a ceasefire but a rapid, overarching deal on Ukraine's future, with broader implications for European security, that should be concluded while Russia's invasion force continues to pound its neighbour. The change of approach by the US is a clear triumph for Putin, the war crimes accused whom Trump welcomed with such warmth on the red carpet in Alaska, and threatens to place Ukraine in a double bind that could be crushing. [ European leaders to join Zelenskiy in Washington for meeting with Trump over Ukraine Opens in new window ] If Putin and Trump get their way, Ukraine would have to negotiate a peace deal to the Kremlin's satisfaction while enduring intensified Russian attacks on the eastern battlefield, where Moscow enjoys a big quantitative advantage in terms of troops and weaponry. At the same time, it would face pressure from the White House to do a deal as quickly as possible or face the wrath of Trump, whose desire for the Nobel Peace Prize is as notorious as his campaign-trail claim to be able to end Europe's biggest war since 1945 in a single day. Trump has publicly urged Ukraine to make a deal, and reportedly told its president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy , that Putin wants full and permanent control the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions in exchange for freezing the front line in other areas. The Kremlin also wants Ukraine to accept other limits on its sovereignty, including a ban on ever joining Nato. Yet any serious peace talks would have to tackle not only questions of territory, but also the return of all prisoners of war and thousands of Ukrainian children abducted by Russia, the fate of millions of displaced Ukrainians, reparations to be paid by the aggressor and a legal process to address war crimes committed by Russia's invasion force. [ Nauseating charade as Putin comes out of international purgatory on Trump's red carpet Opens in new window ] [ Russian politicians hail Trump-Putin summit as a victory for Moscow and its narrative on Ukraine war Opens in new window ] These are issues of vital importance not only to Ukraine but for international law and relations between states. But they are complex and could take a very long time to resolve. Putin wants such matters to be brushed aside and knows that Trump is impatient. The upshot is that resistance from Ukraine and Europe to a quick and dirty deal will be portrayed by the Kremlin as obstructionism, and probably taken as such by Trump, who has paused US arms supplies to Ukraine and intelligence sharing before, and could end them completely to get his way.