
Opinion: What do you think of how Trump's handling our economy?
On a bonus episode (first released on March 24, 2025) of The Excerpt podcast: Trump and Republicans campaigned aggressively in 2024 on the economy. So now that he's in office, we asked: do you think that President Trump is doing enough to fix the economy? Do you think grocery prices will rise or go down? Forum is a new series from USA TODAY's Opinion team, dedicated to showcasing views from across the political spectrum on issues that Americans are starkly divided on. Today you'll hear from a few folks detailing their opinions on the economy. If you'd like to weigh in on a different topic, you can find more questions at usatoday.com/forum. And if your submission is selected for print, we might invite you to add your voice to a future special bonus episode like this one. Let us know what you think of this episode by sending an email to podcasts@usatoday.com.
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Michael McCarter:
Hello and welcome to the Excerpt. I'm Michael McCarter, Vice President and Group Editor of the Opinion Sections of Gannett, the parent company of USA TODAY. This is a bonus episode of the Excerpt highlighting the new series from USA TODAY's opinion team that we're calling Forum. It's a weekly space dedicated to showcasing views from across the political spectrum on issues that Americans are starkly divided on. Today we're hearing from people about how they feel the economy is being handled by President Donald Trump.
Trump and Republicans campaigned aggressively in 2024 on the economy. So now that he's in office, do you think that President Trump is doing enough to fix the economy? Do you think that grocery prices will rise or go down? Here's what some readers told us.
Allen Maricle:
Actually, they're getting lower. I just bought a dozen eggs for 2.89. It was almost $6 or something like that, close to that, about not more than a little over a month ago.
Michael McCarter:
Allen Maricle is 62 and lives in Shepherdsville, Kentucky.
Allen Maricle:
And I see it getting lower. I guess when you get outside of an urban area. I live close to Louisville, but I live in Shepherdsville, which is about 25 miles, something like that, south of Louisville, and everything's much cheaper. Gas, everything.
Jobs are coming back, around here especially, we've got some pretty big companies that's moved in. The only problem that I've seen that when it comes to layoffs is the bourbon industry, which I'm right in the middle of it. Okay. I think the terrorists has hurt them really bad, and you've noticed that they've laid off some people in Louisville, not where I'm at, but in Louisville, I think that's going to be tough on the industry. Economies go up and down. It doesn't matter who is president. You just got to understand how the situations are going. Are the terrorists going to hurt us down the road?
Could be. It's just going to depend. Truly going to depend on how things go in the next six months. I've always said this, give a president one year and we'll see how it goes. I feel that we need to get, and I'm thinking of my grandchildren. I'm thinking of my great-grandchildren. We got to get our house in order because we keep doing this, borrowing money and everything like that. It's going to hit us. It's going to hit hard. But I always tell my television folks, if you really want to hear what the people think, go to the bars, go to the restaurants, go to places where people, park or whatever, and ask them the questions they're going to tell you.
Michael McCarter:
54-year-old Jennifer Miller has a different opinion. She lives in St. Cloud, Minnesota.
Jennifer Miller:
Well, the one that I've paid attention to is the cost of eggs over the last several weeks. They used to be under $3. Now the cheapest I've found them is six. Costco even didn't have any eggs the last time I went to Costco, which is just, when is Costco out of stuff? Not since the pandemic. So they've kind of fluctuated. Every time I see it go down a little bit, that's when I'll buy my next dozen eggs.
I expect them to rise further with the tariffs. A lot of our produce here, especially in the winter months, we get from Mexico, and I don't see how the tariff costs are going to not trickle down to consumers.
It feels a lot like the pandemic in a lot of respects for me. I worry that costs are going to go up. I worry that there's going to be supply chain issues. I worry that our products are going to be boycotted. I don't feel great about how he's handling the economy. It feels very contradictory and in the sense that why cut 6,000 IRS employees during tax season? I would really like President Trump to focus on what the majority of us would like him to do. I wish he would listen to advisors who advise him that tariffs are not tax breaks. Tariffs do not save money. They cost money. They're going to cost us money. They are a tax. Given how contradictory his behavior is I have to believe that the purpose isn't cost-cutting. It's something else, and I suspect that it's serving him and his own greed and his oligarch's greed, and it's just going to screw most of us every day Americans.
Brenda Wilson:
Some things are high, some things aren't.
Michael McCarter:
That's Brenda Wilson, who's 67 and lives in Bluffton, South Carolina. She told us it's just too early to see a difference in the economy.
Brenda Wilson:
They're just normal to me in the sense of nothing's so exorbitant that you couldn't buy them. Eggs still a big deal. I know they're on their way down, but they'll get there. I believe grocery prices will start to come down. With the economy, I feel like I think we have to be patient. There are a lot of changes going on, and I think that we have to let some of those changes play out, in a new administration two months is hardly enough time for any type of policy to really take effect. So I am patient. I'm waiting, but I just want to give some of the benefit of the doubt and more time to see where everything goes.
President Trump is a force of nature. He's an interesting person because he's a businessman. I think he's handling it the Trump way. His strong suit as a businessman is that he has tough skin and he's just going to plow through there and say, let's get it done. Just like any businessman, person, woman, or man, wouldn't matter, if you're in a business and you've got to see how to get something done you've got to get it done. So I'm okay with how he's doing it. I just feel like we have to, again, wait and see. For me, getting the debt down, getting the spending and stuff in order, I think that impacts everyone, and I think that would be what I really, I think he's trying to focus on that, and that's what I'd like to see improve.
Michael McCarter:
Larry Mays, who lives in Erie, Pennsylvania, said that he wants to see more support for small businesses. He's 75.
Larry Mays:
The grocery prices here seem to be doing what I think typically happens in most economic periods where inflation is in place, which is they simply go up because they can, and they rise substantially more than makes sense. So in other words, if a product is $6, it doesn't go up 4% to 6.24, it goes up to 6.75 because the manufacturer of the product can, and they want to get the whole bite of the increase up all at the same time. So I'm actually stunned personally by how much grocery prices have increased. I'm glad that I'm not raising our family of three children anymore because I don't know how people can afford it. I'm not feeling good about the economy at all. There are way too many indicators that are coming to me as a small business owner that tell me as it has been for the last couple of years in particular, things are not improving or they're not as good as people think they are.
There's no way to feel good about the economy based on the evidence I deal with every day. And then the second component is the chaos that has been unleashed on the American economy by the change in the administration. We hear the President and everybody in the administration saying that they're trying to root out waste, fraud, and abuse, and the approach that's being taken is to simply tear down everything. Simply eliminate bodies like it's a body count is all that matters. So I asked the following question, what's the plan for after we tear down and destroy the American system of government? What's next? I don't think there's a possibility on God's green earth that the current administration has any interest whatsoever in actually fixing any of the problems that the small business owners of America face. Unadulterated non-stop chaos is not an environment in which a small business can be successful, and we're seeing the results of that already, and I personally expect them to get worse.
Michael McCarter:
That's all we have for today's episode. This is a co-production with the Forum team at USA TODAY, where we invite our readers to weigh in writing on a national topic of interest. If your submission is selected for print, we might invite you to add your voice to a future special bonus episode like this one. There's a link to forum in the show description. Let us know what you think about this episode by sending an email to podcasts@usatoday.com. Thanks for listening. I'm Michael McCarter, Vice President of the Gannett Opinion Group. Taylor Wilson will be back tomorrow morning with another episode of the Excerpt.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pete Buttigieg Has A Name For What Trump Does When He's Desperate, And It's Spot On
Donald Trump's efforts to shift the nation's conversations away from files concerning the crimes of convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein don't seem to be working. Instead, Trump's base has begun turning on him over his administration's flip-flopping about whether an Epstein "client list" does or does not exist... Related: And they're burning their hats to be heard. Twitter: @krassenstein Amid the backlash, Trump used this time to bolster the unsupported claims of National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, who says she has evidence of an 'Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert Trump's 2016 Victory and Presidency.' (The Obama administration has denied this, and former CIA director John Brennan told NBC News, 'There is no factual basis for the allegations that Tulsi Gabbard is making.") But, of course, that didn't stop Trump from sharing a fake, AI-generated video of Obama being arrested on his Truth Social account. Related: Well, when asked about the chaos during his appearance on The Breakfast Club, former secretary of transportation Pete Buttigieg called Trump's actions exactly as he saw them. "So, Trump says, 'We're going to release the files, we're going to release the files, we're going to release the files.' And then he says, 'We're not going to release the files,'" Buttigieg told hosts. Related: "And people are mad, including MAGA, saying, 'Wait a minute, you said you were going to release this information and you're not.'" "And what does he do?" Buttigieg posed. "He's like, 'Uh, we're going to arrest Obama.'" As hosts laugh, Buttigieg concludes, "That has nothing to do with anything," before adding a term for Trump's behavior anytime he's cornered, "It's the distraction machine." Related: Viewers appear to resonate with the interview as a whole, which you can watch in full here. What are your thoughts on his take? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Americans think Paramount is canceling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve
More favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." More Americans disapprove (40%) than approve (33%) of Paramount's controversial decision earlier this month to cancel CBS's long-running late-night program with host Stephen Colbert, according to a new Yahoo/YouGov poll. And while CBS has claimed the decision was 'purely … financial' — adding that it was 'not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount' — more Americans believe that politics rather than money was the real reason behind it. The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults was conducted in the immediate aftermath of Paramount's Late Show announcement, from July 24 to July 28 — a period that coincided with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally agreeing to sign off on the company's proposed $8 billion mega-merger with the Hollywood studio Skydance. Colbert is a sharp critic of President Trump, and skeptics have accused Paramount of canceling the Late Show not because late-night talk shows are losing money but because the company wanted to appease the Trump administration and get its Skydance deal over the line. Last October, Trump sued Paramount for the way CBS's 60 Minutes program edited an interview with his Democratic rival, Kamala Harris — and earlier this month, Paramount decided to settle with Trump and pay $16 million to his future presidential library, even though several legal experts said the case was frivolous. Colbert — who is scheduled to keep hosting the Late Show until it goes dark next May — mocked the settlement on-air, calling it a 'big fat bribe.' 'As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I'm offended, and I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company,' Colbert told his audience. 'But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.' The new Yahoo/YouGov poll shows that more Americans agree with Colbert's theory of why his show was canceled than agree with other, more 'purely financial' explanations. When asked why CBS and Paramount are canceling the Late Show — and instructed to select all the reasons that apply — the share who select 'Paramount is trying to curry favor with the Trump administration' (37%) and 'Stephen Colbert is too critical of Donald Trump' (36%) is greater than the share who select 'the Late Show is losing money (32%), 'the Late Show is losing viewers' (30%) and 'the late-night format is losing relevance' (26%). Partisan preferences are clearly playing a role in the reaction to the Late Show's demise. Far more Americans think Colbert is liberal (53%) than think he's moderate (10%) or conservative (3%), and Democrats (72%) are six times more likely to disapprove of the decision than Republicans (12%). Still, there is no consensus that Colbert has gone overboard politically. In fact, more Americans (35%) say he is "about right" politically than say he's "too political" (28%). And more also favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." That might help explain why a majority of Americans still say they watch Colbert's content — either 'always' (5%), 'occasionally' (21%) or when they 'see clips online' (27%). The rest (47%) say they never watch Colbert. Finally, when Americans are asked to select up to three of their favorite late-night talk show hosts, Colbert (25%) ties Jimmy Fallon (25%) for first place, with Jimmy Kimmel (22%), Jon Stewart (19%), John Oliver (11%) Seth Meyers (7%), Bill Maher (7%), Andy Cohen (3%) and Taylor Tomlinson (2%) trailing behind them. __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Now The First GOP Member Of Congress To Call The Crisis In Gaza A "Genocide"
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) became the first congressional Republican to label the worsening humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip a 'genocide' on Monday, after President Donald Trump acknowledged that Palestinians are starving. Greene's comment came within a larger criticism of a colleague, Rep. Randy Fine (R-Fla.), who spoke approvingly of the deteriorating situation in Gaza. Related: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away,' Fine wrote on social media last week, adding that he considers the increasing evidence of widespread famine in the region to be 'a lie.' Even Trump was moved to say there is 'real starvation' occurring in Gaza as a result of Israel's nearly two-year war in retaliation for the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on civilians that was instigated by fighters from the Palestinian militant group Hamas, who took hostages back to Gaza. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Related: 'But a Jewish U.S. Representative calling for the continued starvation of innocent people and children is disgraceful,' she said. 'His awful statement will actually cause more antisemitism.' Greene has also fueled antisemitic tropes in the past, most notably in a now-deleted 2018 Facebook post that suggested a link between the wealthy Jewish Rothschild family and wildfires in California — prompting ridicule for what her critics called her 'Jewish space lasers' theory. Her choice of words, however, makes her unique among congressional Republicans. Trump said during his visit to Scotland on Monday that he had been disturbed by images and reporting he had seen on television of the worsening situation in Gaza. Related: Israel, which controls entry to Gaza and patrols its coastline, has for months been blocking aid from reaching over 2 million Palestinians there. Photos of exhausted, skeletal children have begun to surface on front pages around the world. One child reportedly weighed less upon her death than when she was born. 'You can't fake that,' Trump said of the images. Related: Like Fine, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has flat-out denied that Palestinian civilians are starving to death. Israel has for months claimed that Hamas, which controls Gaza, is misusing shipments of food and supplies, although the New York Times reported over the weekend that Israeli officials know there is no evidence to support that assertion. Asked Monday if he agreed with Netanyahu, Trump responded, 'I don't know.' 'I mean, based on television, I would say not particularly,' he went on. 'Because those children look very hungry.'This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Solve the daily Crossword