Hungary's opposition leader accuses Russia of election meddling
Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Hungarian opposition leader Péter Magyar accuses Moscow of attempting to interfere in the country's 2026 parliamentary elections, warning that Russian operatives are using 'disinformation campaigns, cyber operations, or intimidation' to sway voters.
In an open letter published Sunday, Magyar demanded 'clear assurances' that Moscow would refrain from interfering in Hungary's domestic affairs, including through cyber operations or intimidation of politicians and citizens, Reuters reports.
Magyar, whose Respect and Freedom (Tisza) party is polling ahead of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Fidesz, made the remarks after Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) claimed the European Commission was plotting 'regime change in Budapest' with him as its preferred candidate.
In recent polls, Orbán is trailing Magyar's opposition party by around 10%.
'The last Soviet soldier left our country in June 1991. Now their operatives are back – sometimes working undercover, sometimes openly,' Magyar said in a Facebook post, calling on Russia's ambassador to explain the SVR's comments.
Orbán, who has maintained close ties with Moscow since 2010 and opposed EU military aid to Ukraine, has accused Brussels of seeking to install a 'puppet government' in Hungary himself.
The parliamentary election set for next spring is shaping up to be Orbán's toughest challenge in his nearly two decades as prime minister. (vib)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
2 hours ago
- Euractiv
Despite its name, doubts persist around the Ukraine reassurance force
Leaders are homing in on the concept of a so-called 'reassurance force' to be a central plank of security guarantees provided by Europe to a post-war Ukraine, but the devil is in the details and the details are mostly lacking. US President Donald Trump's summit with European leaders on Monday sparked a flurry of diplomatic activity to propose security guarantees ahead of a trilateral US-Russia-Ukraine meeting, potentially to take place in the next two weeks. The idea of a 'reassurance force' was first brought up by French President Emmanuel Macron in early 2024, which found support from his British counterpart Keir Starmer. That proposal argued for fewer than 30,000 troops, with a focus on air and maritime defence. Such a force would 'likely demand tens of thousands of soldiers on the ground at any one time, representing a significant commitment that European states would struggle to sustain alone,' military science expert at UK based think-tank RUSI, Natia Seskuria, told Euractiv. And it is clear that the helm of any such initiative would be left to Europe and its 'Coalition of the Willing'. Trump has already excluded the possibility of US troops in Ukraine. Instead, he expects Europeans to put boots on the ground and have the US 'help them – probably by air". A NATO or UN-led initiative does not look possible either, with membership consensus out of reach for the former, and Russia's veto power blocking the latter. 'Any steps that would be sufficient to reassure Ukraine would likely be seen as provocative and unacceptable to Russia,' Mark Cancain, from US-based think-tank CSIS, explained to Euractiv. No consensus on the numbers required Since small ceasefire monitoring units are likely insufficient for repelling renewed Russian aggression, European forces securing demilitarised zones and protecting critical infrastructure would be more credible, Seskuria explained. However, even the scenario of a relatively small brigade of around 10,000 soldiers could deter Russian forces by its mere presence, wrote British think-tank IISS in March. A working paper by Germany's Institute for International and Security studies, warns that such 'a 'bluff and pray' approach that deploys too few troops and relies essentially on the hope that Russia will not test it would be irresponsible and increase the likelihood of war in Europe.' Taking the US policing of South Korea's demilitarised zone with North Korea as a template, monitoring the 2,300km Russia-Ukraine border, or even just the 900km front line, would be a tremendous task requiring 40,000-150,000 people, according to the authors Claudia Mors and Arnold Kleemann. The US remains key Although Trump has ruled out American troops on the ground, the involvement and guarantee of the US are still a key factor. 'The most likely arrangement would involve reassurance forces deployed by a Coalition of the Willing, complemented by sustained intelligence sharing, air support, and military assistance' from the US, Seskuria said. For the Director of German Marshal Fund in Warsaw, Philip Bednarczyk, it is clear that 'the mandate on the forces will not just be a 'tripwire' but rather a complementary and integrated part of Ukraine's defence.' However, 'a reassurance force is only as reassuring as its underlying mandate and the overarching peace 'deal'.' (cp)
Euractiv
15 hours ago
- Euractiv
Russia says must be part of Ukraine security guarantees talks
Russia's foreign minister downplayed the meeting between Trump and European leaders, describing it as a 'clumsy' attempt to change the US president's position on Ukraine AFP Aug 20, 2025 16:43 3 min. read News Service Produced externally by an organization we trust to adhere to journalistic standards. Russia said on Wednesday it had to be part of any discussion on security guarantees for Ukraine and downplayed the likelihood of an imminent summit with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, tempering hopes for a quick peace deal. NATO military chiefs were meanwhile scheduled to hold a virtual summit on security guarantees for Ukraine, the latest in a flurry of global diplomacy aimed at brokering an end to the nearly three-and-a-half-year conflict. Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that "seriously discussing security guarantees without the Russian Federation is a utopia, a road to nowhere". Moscow signed the Budapest Memorandum in 1994, which was aimed at ensuring security for Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan in exchange for them giving up numerous nuclear weapons left from the Soviet era. But Russia violated that first by taking Crimea in 2014, and then by starting a full-scale offensive in 2022, which has killed tens of thousands of people and forced millions to flee their homes. On Tuesday, top US officer Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held talks with European military chiefs on the "best options for a potential Ukraine peace deal," a US defence official told AFP . In eastern Ukraine, far from the diplomatic deliberations, Russian forces claimed fresh advances on the ground and Ukrainian officials reported more deaths from Russian attacks. Donald Trump brought Zelenskyy and European leaders to the White House on Monday, three days after his landmark encounter with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Russia's long-serving foreign minister downplayed the meeting between Trump and European leaders at the White House, describing it as a "clumsy" attempt to change the US president's position on Ukraine. Trump, long a fierce critic of the billions of dollars in US support to Ukraine, earlier said European nations were "willing to put people on the ground" to secure any settlement. He ruled out sending US troops but suggested the country might provide air support. Russia has long said it will never tolerate the presence of any Western troops in Ukraine. While Trump said Putin had agreed to meet Zelenskyy and accept some Western security guarantees for Ukraine, Russia has not confirmed this. Lavrov also cast doubt on an imminent meeting between the sworn enemies, saying that any summit between Putin and Zelenskyy "must be prepared in the most meticulous way" so it does not lead to a "deterioration" of the situation surrounding the conflict. (mm) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project
Euractiv
a day ago
- Euractiv
‘Erroneous, abject and unacceptable': France rebukes Israel over antisemitism allegations
France, Israel trade barbs as Paris eyes Palestinian state recognition Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Elisa Braun Euractiv Aug 20, 2025 11:05 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Diplomatic tensions are mounting between France and Israel after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Paris of fuelling antisemitism by preparing to recognise Palestinian statehood, drawing a sharp rebuke from the President Emmanuel Macron's office on Tuesday. Netanyahu earlier warned French President Emmanuel Macron in a letter leaked to the press that Paris' stance risked encouraging attacks against Jews that he said were surging in France. 'Your call for a Palestinian state pours fuel on this antisemitic fire,' the Israeli Prime Minister wrote, adding it was rewarding Hamas terror. The French presidency dismissed the claim as 'erroneous, abject and unacceptable,' in a statement on Tuesday, stressing that violence against Jewish communities 'will not go unanswered' but insisting it cannot be linked to France's diplomatic position. 'The period requires seriousness and responsibility, not amalgams and manipulations,' they added. Macron will reply formally to Netanyahu in writing, the spokesperson added. France has signalled it could join other powers in supporting recognition of a Palestinian state at the United Nations in September, a move Israel opposes. The debate is expected to be one of the most contentious diplomatic battles since the October 2023 Hamas attacks and Israel's subsequent war in Gaza, which have strained Western unity on Middle East policy. Ahead of the UN General Assembly next month, Netanyahu has also written to Australia's prime minister on Monday after Canberra announced last week that it would join the UK, France and Canada in recognising a Palestinian state. (vib)
