logo
French Gen Z turn noses up at pungent cheese

French Gen Z turn noses up at pungent cheese

Telegraph27-05-2025
France's youth are turning their noses up at cheese, with nine per cent of 18-to-24-year-olds saying they ate none of the dairy product, compared with five per cent of the French population as a whole.
This is according to a study by the OpinionWay Institute for the Académie Phormos, a Parisian association of eminent cheese lovers.
Véronique Richez-Lerouge, president of the Association Fromages de Terroir that promotes traditional unpasteurised cheese, said it was above all a question of 'education'.
'At school, young children are now given pasteurised, highly processed cheese that has no taste. And that's a big problem because taste is something you learn. It's like reading or anything else, you can't like something you don't know,' she told The Telegraph.
This was sad because 'when I have done tests with children, they actually love strong cheeses, indeed, they often prefer them. We're becoming increasingly sanitised, Americanised'.
She also blamed 'certain nutritionists who say cheese is too salty, that it's too bad for you, whereas it has many qualities and industrial cheeses are far worse than raw milk cheeses. But that's the dominant discourse.'
Thirdly, there is a trend among militant vegans 'who say we should stop making cheese altogether, and indeed drink milk, that the dairy industry is destroying the landscape and is bad for animal welfare.
'Young people are receptive to the idea that cheese without distinction is somehow bad for the planet.'
Comté, the cheese from eastern France, came first across the board, with 44 per cent of respondents citing it among their favourites. It was followed by Camembert on 31 per cent, Brie on 24 per cent and Roquefort on 23 per cent. Only French cheeses were included.
The findings were also bad news for producers of blue cheeses, which were roughly half as popular as soft and semi-hard ones. Their taste was too strong for modern diners accustomed to fast food.
In a country that Charles de Gaulle famously claimed was ungovernable given its number of cheeses, cheese consumption falls along political lines, according to the poll of 1,014 people, with Right-wingers more likely to eat more.
Just three per cent of president Emmanuel Macron's voters said they did not eat cheese, compared with four per cent of those who backed Marine Le Pen, the radical right National Rally candidate, in the 2022 election.
On the other hand, nine per cent of people who voted for Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the radical Left candidate, and 13 per cent of those who favoured Yannick Jadot, the ecologist, declared themselves to be non-cheese-eaters.
'It does seem clear the conservative Right is more in favour of savoir-faire, terroir, history and traditions,' said Ms Richez-Lerouge, who added that one shouldn't oversimplify too much. 'You can be a Green and eat cheese. You can protect nature and choose a farmhouse cheese, for example.'
The smelliest cheeses did not rank highly, with just 16 per cent of respondents naming Munster and 7 per cent Epoisses among their favourites.
Among the 18- to 24-year-olds, the disaffection was ever starker. Just 19 per cent named Camembert among their favourites, 13 per cent Roquefort, 10 per cent Munster, 5 per cent Fourme d'Ambert and 6 per cent Epoisses. By contrast, among over 65-year-olds, 43 per cent cited Camembert as a favourite, 34 per cent Roquefort, 17 per cent Munster, 9 per cent Fourme d'Ambert and 7 per cent Epoisses.
The fact that Comté came top was a source of hope, however.
'It's a very good example of an appellation cheese that has managed to maintain its quality. There are strict specifications requiring 100 per cent raw milk, and wherever you find this cheese, it remains quite good, even very good or exceptional, but never bad,' Ms Richez-Lerouge said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TAKEAWAYS Well-mannered White House welcome for Ukraine leaves many questions
TAKEAWAYS Well-mannered White House welcome for Ukraine leaves many questions

Reuters

time5 minutes ago

  • Reuters

TAKEAWAYS Well-mannered White House welcome for Ukraine leaves many questions

WASHINGTON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump gathered European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy for a hastily arranged White House meeting on Monday to discuss a path to ending Russia's war in Ukraine. Here are takeaways from the talks: Seven European leaders, the Ukrainian president, their motorcades, dozens of Trump administration staff and more than 100 journalists swarmed the White House campus on Monday in anticipation of the unusual meeting. Would Trump and Zelenskiy agree on a path to peace? Or would their latest Oval Office session devolve into a bitter squabble as in February? Neither scenario occurred. Zelenskiy, chided for his appearance and manner in February, adjusted both. Wearing more formal clothing and repeatedly expressing his gratitude to Trump, he was greeted by a far more complimentary U.S. president than in the past. But, despite Trump's vow to assist in Ukraine's security after a hypothetical peace deal, there was no immediate sign that any party had substantially changed position on land swaps, security guarantees or sanctions. Instead, Trump ended with promises to host a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to address the many remaining issues. "Have you said 'thank you' once?" U.S. Vice President JD Vance asked Zelenskiy in February, accusing him of failing to show sufficient gratitude for U.S. support. On Monday, Zelenskiy made sure that was not an issue. His opening remarks in the Oval Office included eight thank-yous, mostly for Trump. "Thank you so much, Mr. President ... thank you for your attention. Thank you very much for your efforts, personal efforts to stop killings and stop this war. Thank you," Zelenskiy said. He included the U.S. first lady, who sent a letter to Putin about abducted children in Ukraine. "Using this opportunity, my thanks to your wife," the Ukrainian president said. "And thanks to all our partners and that you supported this format. And after our meeting, we're going to have leaders who are around us, the UK and France, Germany... all partners around Ukraine supporting us. Thanks (to) them. Thank you very much for your invitation." Unlike in February, Vance this time sat largely silent. The stakes of the meeting could not have been higher. But one of the most-asked questions among diplomats in D.C. could not have been more frivolous: Would the Ukrainian president wear a suit? The answer: kind of. Zelenskiy showed up to the White House in what one European diplomat described as "almost a suit." His black jacket had tiny lapels and jetted chest pockets. He did not wear a tie. His attire, which split the difference between the battlefield and the boardroom, could be described as combat formal. Those sartorial details matter when it comes to dealing with the U.S. president, who was upset that Zelenskiy did not wear a suit for their February meeting. Zelenskiy passed the fashion test this time, however. When one journalist in the Oval Office said Zelenskiy looked "fabulous," Trump chimed in to agree. "I said the same thing," Trump told reporters. The assembled European leaders, Zelenskiy included, were careful to paper over policy disagreements with Trump, keeping their comments vague and showering the U.S. president with compliments. But one point of disagreement did bubble to the surface. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told the assembled leaders and media that he wanted to see Putin agree to a ceasefire. Trump had long pushed for a ceasefire in Ukraine. But he largely jettisoned that goal after meeting with Putin last week in Alaska, a shift that was widely seen as a diplomatic defeat for Ukraine. The U.S. president now says he is fine trying to move directly to a peace deal. "To be honest, we all would like to see a ceasefire," Merz said. "I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire, so let's work on that." Trump pushed back, arguing he has solved many conflicts without first reaching a ceasefire. One of the great mysteries that hung over the summit was what support the U.S. would give to secure any Russia-Ukraine deal long term. Trump hasn't offered U.S. troops' "boots on the ground" to guarantee Ukraine's security from Russia, reflecting American reticence to commit to military entanglements or a head-to-head confrontation with a nuclear power. Instead, he has offered weapons sales and promised that Americans will do business in Ukraine, assurances that Ukrainians see as far less than a security guarantee. Europeans are preparing for a peacekeeping mission backed by their forces. Yet, asked explicitly whether U.S. security guarantees for Ukraine could include U.S. troops in the country, Trump did not rule it out. Instead, he teased an announcement as soon as Monday on the topic. "We'll let you know that, maybe, later today," Trump said. He said Europe was the "first line of defense" but that "we'll be involved." Trump said he would call Putin and set up a trilateral meeting with Ukraine at a time and place to be determined. Despite some private misgivings, the assembled leaders agreed that such a meeting was a logical next step. Still, the path forward is more complex than Trump and his allies are letting on. For one, Russia has delayed and obstructed high-level meetings with Ukraine in the past, and it was not immediately clear that Putin would actually sit down with Zelenskiy, who he frequently describes as an illegitimate leader. Additionally, it is unclear how much a principal-level meeting would actually advance the cause of peace. The gulf between the Russian and Ukrainian positions is vast. The Kremlin said on Monday the presence of NATO troops in Ukraine is a non-starter, a stance that would be hard for Ukraine to swallow. Russia is also calling for Ukraine to fork over significant chunks of territory that Kyiv controls, another proposal that Ukraine's leaders are not entertaining.

Urgent warning as parents told to bin brand of kids' health gummies that contain prescription only drug
Urgent warning as parents told to bin brand of kids' health gummies that contain prescription only drug

The Sun

time5 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Urgent warning as parents told to bin brand of kids' health gummies that contain prescription only drug

PARENTS have been told to bin a brand of kids' health gummies that contain a prescription-only drug. Regulators issued an alert after tests found Nutrition Ignition Kids Magnesium Glycinate Gummies have synthetic melatonin, with too much causing headaches and nausea. Magnesium glycinate is a supplement used to combat anxiety and improve sleep. However, tests of this specific brand showed between 1.5 and 1.7mg of melatonin in each gummy. Melatonin, the hormone that helps regulate the sleep-wake cycle, is naturally produced in the body. However, a synthetic version is authorised for use on prescription in the UK for adults and children over six with sleep disorders such as insomnia. If prescribed, the recommended starting dose is 1mg for children. According to the MHRA, melatonin is not listed anywhere on the packaging of Nutrition Ignition Kids Magnesium Glycinate Gummies. The packaging advises a dose of one to two gummies daily. Taking too much can cause headaches, drowsiness and nausea. Dr Alison Cave, chief safety officer at MHRA, said: "We advise any parent or caregiver to stop use of this product and safely dispose of it. "Side effects such as headache, hyperactivity, a feeling of dizziness and abdominal pain have been reported in children when melatonin is prescribed and used for its licensed indications. No serious side effects were observed in studies in children. "Anyone who suspects that their child, or a child in their care, is having a side effect from this product is advised to stop taking it and speak to a healthcare professional and report it directly to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme." Viral 'Dubai-style' chocolate is pulled from UK supermarket shelves over dangerous health risk 2

Dollar gains as Trump hosts Ukraine talks
Dollar gains as Trump hosts Ukraine talks

Reuters

time11 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Dollar gains as Trump hosts Ukraine talks

NEW YORK, Aug 18 (Reuters) - The dollar gained on Monday as U.S. President Donald Trump hosted talks on ending Russia's war in Ukraine, and traders pared bets on a September rate cut before a speech on Friday by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Trump met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Monday before holding talks with the leaders of Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Finland, the European Union and NATO. Trump said that the United States would "help out" Europe in providing security for Ukraine as part of any deal to end the war in Ukraine and expressed hope that Monday's summit could eventually lead to a trilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, adding that he believes Putin wants the war to end. Traders are also focused on Powell's appearance later this week at the U.S. central bank's annual economic policy symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, for any new indications on whether a rate cut is likely next month. Powell has said he is reluctant to cut rates on expectations that Trump's tariff policies will lead to higher inflation this summer. Traders pared bets on a cut at the Fed's September 16-17 meeting after producer price inflation was hotter than expected in July. They had ramped up bets on a cut after consumer price inflation data for last month showed limited pass through from the trade levies. Fed fund futures traders are now pricing in a 83% probability of a September rate cut, after last week briefly fully pricing in a move. Powell is unlikely to lock himself into a monetary path before seeing August's round of data. 'I don't think that he can be definitive after being so cautious for so long. But I do think he has a clear opening on the labor market,' said Lou Brien, strategist at DRW Trading in Chicago. 'If the labor market weakens, he can move on that without having to wait for inflation, and that has historically been the way the Fed goes. They talk tough on inflation. They react to the labor market. The last jobs number was weaker than expected, the revisions were weaker than expected, and that makes it more than one report,' Brien said. A gauge of U.S. homebuilder sentiment fell unexpectedly in August, slipping back to its lowest level in more than two-and-a-half years, data on Monday showed. The euro was last down 0.31% on the day at $1.1661. Against the Japanese yen , the dollar strengthened 0.41% to 147.79. Citigroup said on Monday that its U.S. dollar positioning indicator has moved from showing a small short to zero, "pointing to no notable current net investor positioning in the currency." "Conflicting leveraged and real money USD positions have led to unusually low conviction levels this August. At face value this is consistent with low realized and declining implied FX volatilities in a market that has seen no clear USD direction for nearly two months," Citi analyst Kristjan Kasikov said in a report. Sterling weakened 0.35% to $1.3504. In cryptocurrencies, bitcoin fell 0.95% to $116,598.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store