Nvidia's pitch for sovereign AI resonates with EU leaders
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has been pitching the idea of "
sovereign AI
" since 2023. Europe is now starting to listen and act.
The concept is based on the idea that the language, knowledge, history and culture of each region are different, and every nation needs to develop and own its AI. Last week, the CEO of the artificial-intelligence chipmaker toured Europe's major capitals - London, Paris and Berlin - announcing a slew of projects and partnerships, while highlighting the lack of AI infrastructure in the region. In a place where leaders are increasingly wary of the continent's dependency on a handful of U.S. tech companies and after drawing ire from the U.S. President Donald Trump, his vision has started to gain traction.
"We are going to invest billions in here ... but Europe needs to move into AI quickly," Huang said on Wednesday in Paris. On Monday of last week, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced 1 billion pounds ($1.35 billion) in funding to scale up computing power in a global race "to be an AI maker and not an AI taker."
French President Emmanuel Macron called building AI infrastructure "our fight for sovereignty" at VivaTech, one of the largest global tech conferences. After Nvidia laid out plans to build an AI cloud platform in Germany with Deutsche Telekom, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called it an "important step" for the digital sovereignty and economic future of Europe's top economy.
Europe lags behind both the U.S. and China as its cloud infrastructure is mostly run by Microsoft, Amazon and Alphabet's Google, and it has only a few smaller AI companies such as Mistral to rival the U.S. ones.
"There's no reason why Europe shouldn't have tech champions," said 31-year-old Mistral CEO Arthur Mensch, sitting beside Huang, who has led Nvidia for more than three decades, at a panel at VivaTech.
"This is a gigantic dream."
Gigafactory plans unleashed
In France, Mistral has partnered with Nvidia to build a data centre to power the AI needs of European companies with a homegrown alternative.
It will use 18,000 of the latest
Nvidia AI
chips in the first phase, with plans to expand across multiple sites in 2026. In February, the European Union announced plans to build four "AI gigafactories" at a cost of $20 billion to lower dependence on U.S. firms.
The European Commission has been in touch with Huang and he had told the EU executive that he was going to allocate some chip production to Europe for these factories, an EU official told Reuters.
Nvidia's chips known as Graphics Processing Units or GPUs are crucial for building AI data centres from the U.S. to Japan and India to the Middle East.
In Europe, a push for sovereign AI could reshape the tech landscape with domestic cloud providers, AI startups, and chipmakers standing to gain from new government funding and a shift toward in-region data infrastructure.
Nvidia also wants to cement demand for its AI chips, ensuring that even as countries seek independence, they still rely on its technology to get there.
Power costs
The push is not without challenges. High electricity costs and rising demand could strain sourcing of electricity for data centres. Data centres account for 3% of EU electricity demand, but their consumption is expected to increase rapidly this decade due to AI.
Mistral, which has raised just over $1 billion, is trying to become a European homegrown champion with a fraction of the money U.S. hyperscalers or large data-centre operators spend in a month.
"Hyperscalers are spending $10 billion to $15 billion per quarter in their infrastructure. Who in Europe can afford that exactly?" said Pascal Brier, chief innovation officer at Capgemini, a partner of both Nvidia and Mistral.
"It doesn't mean we shouldn't do anything, but we have to be cognizant about the fact that there will always be a gap."
Mistral has launched several AI models which are used by businesses but companies tend to mix them with models from other companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta Platforms.
"Most of the time it's not Mistral or the rest, it's Mistral and the rest," Brier said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
FPIs push for extended license tenure and CAS in India
For instance, offshore funds that are not directly registered with their domestic regulators but are deemed to be regulated through their registered advisors/managers, should be allowed exemption from additional disclosure norms." Foreign portfolio investors are requesting Sebi to extend their license tenure to five years and introduce a closing auction session for more accurate closing prices. They also seek exemptions from granular disclosures for large private funds and a review of the threshold for revealing the identities of ultimate beneficial owners. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Mumbai: Several foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) have urged the Indian capital market regulator to increase the tenure of their licence from 3 to 5 years, introduce closing auction session (CAS) which exists in some of the leading markets, spare large private funds from granular disclosures, and review the threshold that triggers the rule to reveal the identities of the last natural persons behind the entities that invest in the three years offshore funds have to pay a fee and share necessary details to renew their registration with the Securities & Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and trade on the Indian stock exchanges. Given the stricter disclosure regime and the requirement to quickly inform the regulator of all material changes, fund managers and administrators feel that the renewal period should be increased to at least 5 funds have also put across their views to bring in CAS, which is held after the regular trading hours, to arrive at more representative closing prices for actively traded securities and thus reduce the tracking error for passive funds whose portfolios mirror the not fool-proof, CAS is generally considered a more accurate mechanism than the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) for calculating the closing prices based on the last 30-minute trades. CAS exists in the US, Japan, Hong Kong, and some of the European markets. Last year, Sebi released a consultation paper on VWAP, an odd trade in the last 30 minutes can cause a mismatch between the performance of a fund (whose net asset value or NAV is calculated based on the trade price) and the market's performance based on the closing price (which may end up higher due to a large single trade). Compared with VWAP, the price at which the maximum number of shares of a scrip is traded during CAS is taken as the closing price. The latter, considered less volatile, is not influenced by some large freak trade shortly before the closing the Sebi disclosure norms, FPIs holding more than 50% of their Indian equity assets under management (AUM) in a single Indian corporate group, or funds that individually, or along with their investor group, hold more than ₹50,000 crore of equity AUM in the Indian markets, are required to disclose the last natural persons of all investors in the funds. However, FPIs such as sovereign wealth funds, public retail funds, and certain pooled investment vehicles among a few others are exempted from additional of the FPIs in the meeting had said that large private funds should also be freed from extra disclosures. According to Rajesh Gandhi, partner at Deloitte India, "An exemption from providing granular details could be considered for non-retail funds which have a wide investor base similar to the erstwhile broad-based fund concept."Sharing the view, Richie Sancheti, founder of the law firm Richie Sancheti Associates, said, "If a fund is under credible regulatory supervision and has a wide investor pool, the risk of it being a front for one entity is low. Sebi's own SOP (standard operating procedure) acknowledges this by exempting certain regulated pooled vehicles. Extending this logic, a well-regulated, broadly held private fund could justifiably be given leeway, too. These funds share many characteristics with exempt public funds (wide investor base, regulated status of the fund manager)."About the other ask from FPIs for a longer validity in renewal cycle, he said the core information that funds must provide at renewal (ownership structure, jurisdiction, etc.,) doesn't typically change drastically in three years-and if it does, regulations require prompt updating of material changes. The savings on regulatory bandwidth and ease-of-doing-business could also help reinforce the image as a well-regulated yet investor-friendly market, said advisors and intermediaries believe that while the regulator would probably be reluctant in relaxing the 50% threshold criteria for extra disclosures, allowing a longer renewal cycle could be more feasible. According to Prakhar Dua, principal (funds, asset management and regulatory practice) at IC Universal Legal, "While Sebi's objective to prevent violation of the minimum public shareholding is well appreciated, it should provide some flexibility on the concentration criterion. For instance, offshore funds that are not directly registered with their domestic regulators but are deemed to be regulated through their registered advisors/managers, should be allowed exemption from additional disclosure norms."
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
FPIs push for extended license tenure and CAS in India
Mumbai: Several foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) have urged the Indian capital market regulator to increase the tenure of their licence from 3 to 5 years, introduce closing auction session (CAS) which exists in some of the leading markets, spare large private funds from granular disclosures, and review the threshold that triggers the rule to reveal the identities of the last natural persons behind the entities that invest in the funds. Disclosure Regime by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Access all TV channels anywhere, anytime Techno Mag Learn More Undo Every three years offshore funds have to pay a fee and share necessary details to renew their registration with the Securities & Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and trade on the Indian stock exchanges. Given the stricter disclosure regime and the requirement to quickly inform the regulator of all material changes, fund managers and administrators feel that the renewal period should be increased to at least 5 years. The funds have also put across their views to bring in CAS, which is held after the regular trading hours, to arrive at more representative closing prices for actively traded securities and thus reduce the tracking error for passive funds whose portfolios mirror the indices. Although not fool-proof, CAS is generally considered a more accurate mechanism than the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) for calculating the closing prices based on the last 30-minute trades. CAS exists in the US, Japan, Hong Kong, and some of the European markets. Last year, Sebi released a consultation paper on CAS. Live Events In VWAP, an odd trade in the last 30 minutes can cause a mismatch between the performance of a fund (whose net asset value or NAV is calculated based on the trade price) and the market's performance based on the closing price (which may end up higher due to a large single trade). Compared with VWAP, the price at which the maximum number of shares of a scrip is traded during CAS is taken as the closing price. The latter, considered less volatile, is not influenced by some large freak trade shortly before the closing bell. Agencies Under the Sebi disclosure norms, FPIs holding more than 50% of their Indian equity assets under management (AUM) in a single Indian corporate group, or funds that individually, or along with their investor group, hold more than ₹50,000 crore of equity AUM in the Indian markets, are required to disclose the last natural persons of all investors in the funds. However, FPIs such as sovereign wealth funds, public retail funds, and certain pooled investment vehicles among a few others are exempted from additional disclosures. Some of the FPIs in the meeting had said that large private funds should also be freed from extra disclosures. According to Rajesh Gandhi, partner at Deloitte India, "An exemption from providing granular details could be considered for non-retail funds which have a wide investor base similar to the erstwhile broad-based fund concept." Sharing the view, Richie Sancheti, founder of the law firm Richie Sancheti Associates, said, "If a fund is under credible regulatory supervision and has a wide investor pool, the risk of it being a front for one entity is low. Sebi's own SOP (standard operating procedure) acknowledges this by exempting certain regulated pooled vehicles. Extending this logic, a well-regulated, broadly held private fund could justifiably be given leeway, too. These funds share many characteristics with exempt public funds (wide investor base, regulated status of the fund manager)." Other Requests About the other ask from FPIs for a longer validity in renewal cycle, he said the core information that funds must provide at renewal (ownership structure, jurisdiction, etc.,) doesn't typically change drastically in three years-and if it does, regulations require prompt updating of material changes. The savings on regulatory bandwidth and ease-of-doing-business could also help reinforce the image as a well-regulated yet investor-friendly market, said Sancheti. Fund advisors and intermediaries believe that while the regulator would probably be reluctant in relaxing the 50% threshold criteria for extra disclosures, allowing a longer renewal cycle could be more feasible. According to Prakhar Dua, principal (funds, asset management and regulatory practice) at IC Universal Legal, "While Sebi's objective to prevent violation of the minimum public shareholding is well appreciated, it should provide some flexibility on the concentration criterion. For instance, offshore funds that are not directly registered with their domestic regulators but are deemed to be regulated through their registered advisors/managers, should be allowed exemption from additional disclosure norms."
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Hedge Fund Up 42% Last Year Offloads Its Biggest Winner Nvidia
(Bloomberg) -- Hedge fund founder Jonah Cheng calls Nvidia Corp. the best pick of his career. But he has now sold the last of his shares in the company, expressing doubts about the outlook for the $3.5 trillion chipmaker. The former UBS Group AG analyst, whose tech-focused fund generated returns of 42% last year, was among the investors who rode Nvidia's breakneck rise over the past decade. It was one of the first stocks he bought when he set up the Captain Global Fund in 2016, and he has reinvested multiple times since then. Cheng sold his Nvidia shares in the first quarter, based on worries about delays connected to its GB200 racks. He points to inventory risks, a lack of upward revisions to earnings forecasts, competition from custom-designed chips and wider questions about the pace of spending from cloud computing companies as reasons he is avoiding the stock. 'I really like Nvidia, which is the stock that helped me make the most money in my life,' said Cheng, whose fund has around $100 million of assets under management. 'But when I need to sell, I need to sell. You can't fall in love with a stock.' Nvidia's shares have jumped more than 1,400% over the past five years, and it remains overwhelmingly favored by analysts. But a few skeptics are emerging. Seaport Global Securities gave the stock a rare sell rating on April 30, pointing to the odds of slowing AI budgets in 2026. Michael Burry, famous for his 'big short' against the US housing market, loaded up on bearish options on Nvidia earlier this year, although that may have been a hedge. Read: Can Nvidia Keep Growing? Markets Don't Care: John Authers Still, the Santa Clara, California-based chipmaker is a hard stock to bet against. Although Nvidia tumbled in the first quarter as surprising progress from China's DeepSeek roiled tech stocks, it has now recouped all of its losses to trade up around 6% this year, based on Friday's close. Signs of a detente between China and the US have helped, easing one of the biggest headaches for global chipmakers. Cheng, a star chip sector analyst at UBS before he become a hedge fund manager, said he hasn't become a long-term bear on Nvidia. He would still buy the stock if the company revised its earnings outlook higher, and says he hasn't taken a short position on Nvidia. Cheng also sold his shares in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., the world's largest contract chipmaker, in late 2024. He cited geopolitical risks, as well as the lack of visibility about spending plans from cloud service providers. He currently favors smaller companies that supply to the tech giants. Among his top picks: AI server makers Celestica Inc. and Wiwynn Corp., cooling product manufacturer Asia Vital Components Co. and cable maker Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. More stories like this are available on
