China and the US clash at the UN over the Panama Canal, a focus of Trump's attention
The clash took place at a U.N. Security Council meeting where Panama's President José Raúl Mulino stressed the neutrality of the canal and his country's ownership of the waterway linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Panama holds the council presidency this month, and Mulino was chairing a meeting on challenges to maritime security. Interpol Secretary General Valdecy Urquiza told members these include piracy, armed robbery, transnational crime and cyber criminals weaponizing artificial intelligence to attack ports where there is 'minimal cyber security, maximum exposure.'
U.S. President Donald Trump thrust Panama into the spotlight even before winning election last November by suggesting that his country should consider retaking control of the Panama Canal and accusing Panama of ceding influence to China.
The U.S. built the canal in the early 1900s as it looked for ways to facilitate the transit of commercial and military vessels between its coasts. Control of the waterway transferred to Panama in 1999 under a treaty signed in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter.
China's U.N. Ambassador Fu Cong emphasized to the council that 'Panama has consistently and effectively managed the canal, making significant contributions to global shipping and trade.'
'China has always respected the permanent neutrality of the canal and firmly supports Panama in safeguarding its sovereignty over the canal to ensure its openness and smooth operation,' he said.
Acting U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Shea, who spoke afterward, went after China, expressing concern about its 'outsized influence over the Panama Canal area, especially over critical infrastructure and port operations.'
Alluding to its claims in the South China Sea, she said, 'China's expansive and unlawful maritime claims and aggressive actions demonstrate its threat to maritime security and commerce.' She said the U.S. rejects these claims and supports countries opposing them.
'China's influence in the canal area is not just a risk to Panama and the United States, but rather a potential threat to global trade and security,' Shea said.
The Trump administration has pressured China to have the Hong Kong-based operator of ports at either end of the canal sell those interests to a U.S. consortium that includes BlackRock Inc.
Panama has vehemently rejected a takeover of the canal, but in April, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited Panama and agreed with Mulino to step up security coordination. The agreement also gives U.S. troops access to strategic air and naval facilities in the Central American nation, which sparked large protests in Panama's capital.
China's Fu asked for the floor to respond to Shea's accusations after all council members spoke, this time lashing out at the Trump administration.
'The United States' fabrication of lies and groundless attacks against China are nothing but a pretext for seeking control of the canal,' he said.
The Chinese envoy called the U.S. and its deployment of offensive weapons in the South China Sea area 'the biggest disrupter of peace and stability' in the region, and he accused the administration of exacerbating risks to global maritime security.
'China firmly opposes economic coercion and bullying practices and urges the United States to stop fabricating rumors, lies and creating trouble,' Fu said.
Murillo then responded, saying he wanted to stress Panama's sovereignty 'in terms of the ownership of the canal' and the multilateral treaty governing its administration. He called the canal's neutrality 'the only and the best defense' to any specific or global threats.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
7 minutes ago
- CNN
Mexico says 26 alleged cartel figures sent to US were requested by Trump administration, not part of tariff talks
Mexico sent 26 alleged cartel figures to face justice in the United States because the Trump administration requested them and Mexico did not want them to continue running their illicit businesses from Mexican prisons, officials said Wednesday. The mass transfer was not, however, part of wider negotiations as Mexico seeks to avoid higher tariffs threatened by US President Donald Trump, the officials said. 'These transfers are not only a strategic measure to ensure public safety, but also reflect a firm determination to prevent these criminals from continuing to operate from within prisons and to break up their networks of influence,' Mexican Security Minister Omar García Harfuch said in a news conference on Wednesday. The 26 prisoners handed over to American authorities on Tuesday included figures aligned with the Jalisco New Generation Cartel and the Sinaloa Cartel among others. They were wanted by American authorities for their roles in drug trafficking and other crimes. It comes months after 29 other alleged cartel leaders were sent to the US in February. In the exchange, the US Justice Department promised it would not seek the death penalty against any of the 55 people included in the two transfers, which experts say may help avoid any violent outburst by the cartels in response. Authorities said the operation involved nearly a thousand law enforcement officers, 90 vehicles and a dozen military aircraft. Mexico President Claudia Sheinbaum said earlier Wednesday that the transfers were 'sovereign decisions,' but the move comes as the Mexican leader faces mounting pressure by the Trump administration to crack down on cartels and fentanyl production. García Harfuch also confirmed Wednesday that a US government drone – non-military – was flying over central Mexico, but at the request of Mexican authorities as part of an ongoing investigation. So far, Sheinbaum has tried to show the Trump administration a greater willingness to pursue the cartels than her predecessor – a change that has been acknowledged by US officials – and continued to slow migration to the US border, in an effort to avoid the worst of Trump's tariff threats. Two weeks ago, the two leaders spoke and agreed to give their teams another 90 days to negotiate to avoid threatened 30% tariffs on imports from Mexico. 'Little by little, Mexico is following through with this demand by the Americans to deliver drug capos,' said Mexican security analyst David Saucedo. 'It's buying (the Mexican government) time.' Saucedo said the Mexican government has been able to avoid a burst of violence by cartels – a reaction often seen when capos are captured – in part, because Ovidio Guzmán, a son of infamous capo Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán, showed it's possible to negotiate with US prosecutors. Ovidio Guzmán pleaded guilty last month to drug trafficking and other charges and hopes for a lighter sentence in exchange for his cooperation. But Saucedo warned that if such mass prisoner transfers continue, the Latin American country is bound to see another outburst of violence in the future.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump has vowed to free Jimmy Lai. A Hong Kong court is about to decide the media mogul's fate
Asia China Donald Trump MediaFacebookTweetLink Follow Days before winning his second presidential term, Donald Trump made a bold promise: if he returned to the White House, he would free a pugnacious, self-made billionaire from a Hong Kong prison. '100% I'll get him out. He'll be easy to get out,' Trump declared in a podcast interview in October, radiating his trademark confidence. Nearly ten months later, that tycoon Jimmy Lai – a pro-democracy firebrand and persistent thorn in Beijing's side – remains behind bars. The 77-year-old media mogul has spent more than 1,600 days in a maximum-security prison, much of it in solitary confinement, staring down the possibility of spending the rest of his life there. Lai, the outspoken founder of the now-shuttered Apple Daily – a fiercely pro-democracy tabloid newspaper known for years of blistering broadsides against the Chinese Communist party until its forced closure – has become a symbol of Beijing's sweeping national security crackdown on the once-freewheeling financial hub. In his landmark trial, Lai stands accused of two counts of colluding with foreign forces – a crime punishable by life in prison under the 2020 national security law imposed by Beijing – and a separate sedition charge. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges. On Thursday, a Hong Kong court is set to hear closing arguments from both defense and prosecutors, paving the way for a verdict that will decide Lai's fate – and test Trump's resolve to make good on his pledge while trying to clinch a trade deal with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. In the October interview, Trump responded '100% yes' when asked by podcast host Hugh Hewitt whether he would speak to Xi to get Lai out of the country if he won the election. Then, as president, Trump pledged to raise Lai's case as part of US trade talks with China. 'I think talking about Jimmy Lai is a very good idea,' he told Hewitt in a subsequent radio interview in May, just days before officials met in Geneva for the first round of talks. 'We'll put it down, and we'll put it down as part of the negotiation.' Two people who are close to Lai and have been campaigning for his release said they were told that US officials did bring up Lai's case with their Chinese counterparts during the talks. 'We understand it was informally brought up at trade talks, but we don't know the context of it,' said Lai's top aide Mark Simon, referring to the negotiations in Geneva. Mark Clifford, president of the Washington-based Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation, said that before trade negotiators met again in London in June, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent 'had it as a mission' from Trump to ensure that Lai's release was part of the talks. 'I'm told that Bessent was tasked by the President and made it as part of his mission,' said Clifford, who has been lobbying the US Congress for Lai's release. 'Going into those talks, like immediately before those talks, Bessent told people that he was tasked by Trump with getting Jimmy out.' Responding to CNN's request for comment, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said: 'As President Trump said, Jimmy Lai should be released, and he wants to see that happen.' China's Foreign Affairs Ministry and Commerce Ministry did not respond to requests for comment. Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, said he was not aware of the 'specific details' when asked about whether Lai's case was brought up in the trade talks. 'We strongly oppose external forces using judicial cases as a pretext to interfere in China's internal affairs or to smear and undermine Hong Kong's rule of law,' Liu added. The Hong Kong government has also stood firm, urging 'any external forces' – without mentioning the US or Trump – to immediately stop interfering in the city's internal affairs and judicial process. 'Any attempt by any country, organization, or individual to interfere with the judicial proceedings in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region by means of political power, thereby resulting in a defendant not being able to have a fair trial that one should receive, is a reprehensible act undermining the rule of law of Hong Kong and should be condemned,' the city's Security Bureau said in a statement. Lai's Thursday court hearing comes just days after Trump extended a trade truce with China, giving both sides another 90 days to try to settle their trade and tech disputes. In recent weeks, Trump has eased his confrontational stance toward Beijing, and has spoken enthusiastically about visiting China at Xi's invitation in the 'not too distant future' if a deal is reached. As part of that push, he has rolled back certain export controls on China – including reversing a ban on sales of Nvidia's H20 chips. This week, he opened the door to sending China more advanced AI chips. Experts on US-China relations say it remains unclear whether Trump can deliver on his pledge to free Lai, a China-born British national, citing his transactional style and unpredictable policy shifts. 'Jimmy Lai is British, not American. Given the high profile of his case, I doubt that China will be willing to make a deal,' said Yun Sun, director of the China program at the Stimson Center think tank in Washington. 'But the trade talks are higher priority for Beijing. If Trump prioritizes Jimmy Lai's release, Beijing will be able to negotiate although it all depends on the terms.' Jean-Pierre Cabestan, a senior researcher at the Asia Centre think tank in Paris, said the uncertainty cuts both ways. 'How much pressure Trump will put on Xi to reach such a deal? Hard to say because the US administration has so many other priorities ahead of Jimmy Lai,' he said. 'But the big question is whether Xi will accept such a quid pro quo?' But Lai's family and supporters remain hopeful. 'We're incredibly grateful that the president knows about my father's case and has said that he will free him,' said Sebastien Lai, Jimmy Lai's son. 'The president has a tremendous track record in freeing prisoners around the world. So hearing this gives our family a lot of hope.' Others note the willingness of Trump administration officials to discussing Lai's case, as well as his broad backing in Washington and within the Catholic community. 'I know people in the Trump administration. We talk about it. They bring it up. The Catholic community has reached out to the White House and made their voice known. Various senators have reached out,' said Simon, the Lai aide. Lai's fortunes, both personal and financial, are inextricably tied to the transformation of Hong Kong. Born in mainland China, he arrived in the British-ruled city in the bottom of a fishing boat at age 12 and dirt poor. He worked his way up the factory floor of a textile company to become a clothing tycoon – a rags-to-riches story that echoed Hong Kong's own rise as a bustling commercial hub. But China's deadly 1989 crackdown on student protesters in Tiananmen Square politicized Lai and created something of a rarity in Hong Kong: a wealthy tycoon willing to openly criticize Beijing's leaders. He moved out of the clothing business and chose a new role – media baron. Lai founded Apple Daily in 1995, two years before Hong Kong was handed over to China. The outspoken publisher and his newspaper were at the forefront of the city's pro-democracy movement, including the sweeping anti-government protests in 2019. A known vocal supporter of Trump and a devout Catholic, Lai traveled to Washington at the height of the 2019 protests, where he met with then Vice President Mike Pence and other US politicians to discuss the political situation in the city. The media mogul had long held a conviction that Trump and the US government should not shy away from supporting Hong Kong's civil liberties, which are key for the city's status as a conduit between China and international markets. 'Mr. President, you're the only one who can save us,' Lai said in an interview with CNN in 2020 weeks before he was arrested. 'If you save us, you can stop China's aggressions. You can also save the world.' Prosecutors have argued that Lai's actions amounted to lobbying for sanctions against Beijing and Hong Kong, an act prohibited under the national security law that was imposed following 2019's huge and sometimes violent pro-democracy protests and has transformed the city. Lai's lawyers have countered that Lai had stopped those acts after the national security law came into effect on June 30, 2020. Taking the stand in his own defense in November, Lai said he had never spoken with Trump. 'I don't think he knew me. I think his aides knew me and briefed him about me,' he said. In Washington, efforts to call for Lai's release have continued through Joe Biden's presidency and into Trump's second term. In March, a bipartisan group of US House representatives introduced a bill to rename the street in front of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in Washington as '1 Jimmy Lai Way.' That same month, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio – a former top China hawk in the Senate – said in an interview that getting Lai out of jail was a 'priority.' 'We've raised it in every possible form and they know that it's important to us,' Rubio said, referring to Chinese officials. 'It's not something we've forgotten about and that it remains a priority, and I think other countries around the world are making the same point as well to the Chinese.' British Prime Minister Keir Starmer brought up the case of Lai in his first meeting with Xi, on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Brazil in November 2024. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy has also urged Lai's release, calling his imprisonment 'cruel and unusual punishment' and describing the case as 'a priority for the UK government' — remarks that drew a sharp rebuke from Beijing. So far all of Hong Kong's national security trials have been heard by a panel of specially selected judges, not juries – a departure from the city's common law tradition. The closing arguments are expected to take multiple days and it could be weeks, or even months, before the judges render their verdict. People campaigning for Lai's release argue that given his old age and frail health, it'll be more trouble for Beijing and Hong Kong authorities to keep him in prison than set him free. 'If he dies in prison, he's going to be trouble forever. He'll be a martyr. He'll be a symbol of resistance. He'll be a symbol of the cruelty of the Chinese Communist regime. And why would (Beijing) want that?' said Clifford, who wrote a biography of Lai titled 'The Troublemaker.' Simon, the top aide, said Lai has to be convicted first, before things can start moving forward to get him out of prison. While Washington has used diplomacy to secure the release of political prisoners in mainland China in the past, such interventions would be rare — if not unprecedented — in Hong Kong, which has its own separate legal system, experts say. Paul Harris, former chairman of Hong Kong's Bar Association, said the fact that Lai is in Hong Kong does not create an obstacle to his release. Under Hong Kong's mini-constitution, the Basic Law, the chief executive has the power – and the duty – in appropriate cases to pardon convicted prisoners or commute their sentences, he explained. 'So that power is there, and it's a matter for the Chief Executive's decision whether he wants to use it, and one can safely assume that if the President of China wants him to use it, he will use it,' Harris said, referencing Xi. 'Jimmy Lai is in the second half of his 70s. He has certain health problems. It is totally consistent with the rule of law, as it has always operated, to release elderly prisoners with health problems. And so if the will is there, it can be done.' But for supporters of Lai, the campaign to free him is a race against time. Sebastien Lai said he's deeply concerned about his father's deteriorating health. 'He's 77 this year, turning 78 at the end of the year, any type of incarceration is incredibly worrying for his health, never mind the solitary confinement and the diabetes,' he said, calling his father's prolonged solitary confinement 'a form of torture.' 'And during the summer, Hong Kong goes up to 30, almost 40 degrees, and he's in a little concrete cell, so he bakes in there. We're incredibly worried about him.' The Hong Kong government said it strongly condemns what it calls 'misleading statements' about the treatment of Jimmy Lai in custody. 'The remarks by Sebastien Lai regarding Lai Chee-ying's solitary confinement are completely fact-twisting, reflecting a malicious intention to smear and attack the HKSAR Government,' it said in a statement, adding Lai had requested his removal from general prison population. Sebastien Lai said his concern for his father is also layered with pride. 'I'm very proud that someone like my father has decided to do what he did – campaigning for democracy for the last 30 years, staying in Hong Kong when it mattered, when the national security law was coming down…and almost acting like a lightning rod.' 'On a personal level, it's devastating. But on a grander, historical level, it's important to keep watch.' CNN's Kristie Lu Stout, Manveena Suri and Alejandra Jaramillo contributed reporting.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
South Jersey Food Bank warns $1 billion in federal funding cuts will hurt local families
Food banks in the United States are facing tough times after the federal government cut a billion dollars in funding that would help stock food for people in need. At the Food Bank of South Jersey, volunteers were busy Wednesday filling boxes with food for its 300 community partners. One of those partners is the Cherry Hill Seventh-Day Adventist Church. Doors opened Wednesday for the monthly food pantry, and officials said the need is steadily growing. "A week ago, we had a call from a person who needed food right away, so we were able to allow him to come in and get the food at that particular time," said Calvin Lester. The Food Bank of South Jersey said it distributed a record 23 million pounds of food in 2024, and it's on track to surpass that number this year. "Right now, one in nine people in South Jersey are food insecure, and one in seven children; that's unacceptable," said Fred Wasiak, CEO of the Food Bank of South Jersey. U.S. Congressman Donald Norcross, a Democrat, met with food bank volunteers and sounded the alarm, saying the president's Big Beautiful Bill, signed in July, significantly cuts SNAP benefits and food programs. Norcross said the need in the community will only grow larger. "For a child not to have a meal is not who we are in America," Norcross said. According to Norcross, 42 million Americans are at risk of losing food assistance, which includes 97,000 people in his district, including Camden County and parts of Burlington and Gloucester counties. "The idea of taking food literally off the table so we can give tax breaks to billionaires, it just doesn't make sense to the average American," Norcross said. U.S. Congressman Jeff Van Drew, a Republican, painted a different picture. In a statement, he told CBS News Philadelphia: "The COVID-19 Pandemic is over, and has been for several years now, so it should come as no surprise to anyone that the temporary programs — largely intended to address supply chain disruptions during the early days of the pandemic — are sunsetting the way they were always intended to." "Let's stop scaring people by playing the same old partisan political games and tell the truth," Van Drew continued. "The Emergency Food Assistance Program remains intact and fully funded, as does the National School Lunch Program and all of the other food distribution and assistance programs that have always been there to help everyone from school children to low-income seniors and everyone in between." The food bank said South Jersey will see major impacts in the weeks and months to come.
