logo
People Think This Elon Musk Tweet Could Signal The End Of His Bromance With Trump

People Think This Elon Musk Tweet Could Signal The End Of His Bromance With Trump

Yahoo4 days ago

Elon Musk ended his 130-day stunt with DOGE last week.
He gave an interview with CBS Sunday Morning, and he really, really didn't want to talk about politics.
Musk's interview went great: Reporter: What is your thought on the ban of foreign students, you were one of those kids, right? Musk: 'I think we want to stick to talking about spaceships.' Reporter: I was told that any topic is good. Musk: 'Well no.' pic.twitter.com/0rDg8ahxAO
— CALL TO ACTIVISM (@CalltoActivism) June 1, 2025
CalltoActivism/sTwitter: @CalltoActivism
"I'm wondering what your thought is on the ban of foreign students — I mean, you were one of those kids, right?" the reporter asked. "Yeah, I think we want to stick to the subject of the day, which is spaceships, as opposed to presidential policy," Elon replied. "Well, I was told anything was good," the reporter said back. "Well, uh, no," Elon replied.
Soooo, the man who only wants to talk about spaceships couldn't help himself and tweeted out his feelings about Trump's "big beautiful" bill.
For those who don't know, the "Big Beautiful Bill" is basically a huge law that keeps the Trump tax cuts going, raises how much people can deduct for state and local taxes, cuts back on Medicaid and food stamps, increases military/defense spending, gives families (temporarily) a bigger child tax credit, rolls back a bunch of clean energy incentives, and blocks states from making their own AI rules for ten years. It also adds A LOT to the national debt. Rand Paul said it could increase the debt ceiling by $5 trillion.
Related: 15 Times Someone Bravely Took A Photo Of The Very Worst Design This World Has Ever Seen
Elon Musk hates it.
He tweeted this:
Related: People In HR Revealed Truly Unhinged Reasons Employees Got Fired, And My Jaw Is On The Floor
The replies are gold.
"I think this officially signals the end of the trump-elon bromance," one person said.
Another person said this "feels like a moment."
And this person welcomed Elon to "the resistance."
We have people saying there's "trouble in paradise."
A bunch of people are saying this is the most Elon has made sense in years.
And a bunch of Democratic politicians are like "Yep."
Let's see what happens next!
Also in Internet Finds: 23 People Who Tried Their Best, But Crapped The Bed So Bad
Also in Internet Finds: Tattoo Artists Are Sharing The Tattoos They Felt REALLY Uncomfortable Doing, And I Have No Words
Also in Internet Finds: "I've Worked In Various Prisons. I Will Take A Men's Over Women's Any Day Of The Week. Shit Is Scary": Former Female Inmates Are Sharing Their Most Disturbing Prison Experiences, And My Jaw Is Literally On The Floor

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Uses Epstein's Lawyer as Human Shield Against Musk's ‘Really Big Bomb'
Trump Uses Epstein's Lawyer as Human Shield Against Musk's ‘Really Big Bomb'

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Uses Epstein's Lawyer as Human Shield Against Musk's ‘Really Big Bomb'

President Donald Trump's previously long-standing relationship with New York financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has been brought under sharp scrutiny following the president's spectacular fallout with Elon Musk. During the once-tight pair's highly public bust-up on Thursday, Musk alleged on X that the reason the Epstein files have not been released as promised is because Trump is in them, describing it as 'the really big bomb.' In the first direct response to the allegation, Trump shared a post to Truth Social on Friday to reiterate his claim that there is nothing salacious about him in Epstein's law enforcement records. 'I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that [Epstein] had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!' wrote attorney David Schoen, who was hired to lead Epstein's defense shortly before his death in 2019. Trump shared the message to his followers on Truth Social. The White House has already responded to Musk's incendiary statement, describing the outburst as 'an unfortunate episode for Elon' and attributing the sudden vitriol to a clash over the policies contained within Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' The Trump administration has previously said that records relating to Epstein, including flight logs and other information, would be declassified, but that has yet to happen. Trump had a long, documented relationship with Epstein through the late 1980s to the early 2000s and appears in numerous photographs alongside him and his convicted partner, Ghislaine Maxwell. In a 2002 interview, Trump even praised Epstein as a 'terrific guy.' In 2017, Epstein described himself to author Michael Wolff as Trump's 'closest friend for 10 years,' although the pair appear to have had a falling out in the early 2000s. 'He's a horrible human being,' Epstein later said of the president in the same interview. When asked in 2024 if he would release a number of classified records relating to 9/11, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, and Epstein, Trump quickly agreed, before hedging over the Epstein files. 'I guess I would. I think that less so because, you don't know, you don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there, because it's a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would,' Trump said in a Fox News interview, this section of which was cut from the broadcast. Off the back of Musk's outburst, Democrats are now calling on Attorney General Pam Bondi to clarify the accusation and provide a timeline in which to declassify and release all records relating to Epstein. Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in relation to Epstein.

Want Buffett-Style Returns From Artificial Intelligence (AI)? These 2 Stocks Might Deliver.
Want Buffett-Style Returns From Artificial Intelligence (AI)? These 2 Stocks Might Deliver.

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Want Buffett-Style Returns From Artificial Intelligence (AI)? These 2 Stocks Might Deliver.

Nvidia remains a must-own stock for AI investors. SoundHound AI could provide even bigger gains. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Warren Buffett's conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway is famous for its long-term performance. Since he took over the company almost six decades ago, shares have produced annualized gains of more than 20%. Few investment vehicles in history have been able to provide this level of returns for such a long stretch of time. While it won't be easy for investors to achieve similar returns, the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution should provide some compelling opportunities. According to forecasts by Grand View Research, the AI market could grow by 30% or more per year over the next decade and beyond. By investing in the right AI stocks today, you could generate Buffett-style returns over time -- and the two look like your best bets right now. While it has gotten a ton of press and attention already, Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) remains a must-own stock for every investor looking to capitalize on the rise of AI. The story here is simple. AI spending has been skyrocketing in recent years, with most forecasts calling for double-digit percentage growth throughout the next decade and beyond. Nearly all of this growth will depend on GPUs and other specialized AI accelerator chips: high-powered parallel processors that provide the specific types of computational muscle to make training and running complex AI models possible. Because it already held the leading position in the GPU space when the AI revolution took off, Nvidia now controls roughly 90% of the market for GPUs destined to support AI applications. So at least right now, if AI innovation and spending continue to rise, Nvidia will directly benefit due to rising demand for its GPUs. Nvidia's dominance in GPUs is no joke. When it unveiled its latest GPU architecture, dubbed Blackwell, last year, the next-gen chips quickly sold out for the next 12 months. According to one report from October, "Customers who have not yet placed an order with the company won't receive any Blackwell products until late 2025." Just to make it clear, Nvidia is by no means competing on price. In fact, it has the highest gross margin by far in the industry, reflecting both its superior offerings and its strong pricing power. There are some long-term concerns. Nvidia may not be able to maintain its high market share, technological superiority, or high gross margins forever. But even if it does cede some market share and profitability, there's a good chance the company can continue to grow at double-digit percentage rates for far longer than its current valuation of 44 times earnings suggests. Nvidia is now worth more than $3.4 trillion -- in the past week, it has been neck and neck with Microsoft for the title of world's largest company. As such, its long-term growth from here may be limited to a degree by its sheer size. If you're looking to maximize your upside potential in exchange for a little more risk, take a look at SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN). Most investors haven't heard of this company. Even many AI investors aren't aware of it. That's because SoundHound's market cap is just $4 billion. But if you're looking for big gains, relatively small players like this can deliver, even if the investments carry more risk. As its name suggests, SoundHound AI's business involves AI technologies within the audio arena. Think drive-thru windows where your order is taken by an AI agent, customer support lines operated by AI agents, or even in-vehicle AI assistants that can chat with you about the weather or your car's upcoming maintenance needs. SoundHound already has customers piloting its technology in all of these areas. And similar to the rest of the AI industry, the voice AI segment of the market is expected to grow by 30% to 40% per year over the long term. SoundHound faces heavy long-term competition from big tech competitors that have much deeper pockets from which to fund their research and development budgets. But the potential is there. You'll have to get comfortable with the stock's premium valuation though: Shares trade at nearly 40 times sales. And you'll have to monitor customer growth and competitive pressures. But if you're looking for a company that can deliver 20% annual returns over the next decade and beyond, SoundHound certainly has all the right pieces in place. Just know that shares are for risk-tolerant, long-term investors only. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Want Buffett-Style Returns From Artificial Intelligence (AI)? These 2 Stocks Might Deliver. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's big bill also seeks to undo the big bills of Biden and Obama
Trump's big bill also seeks to undo the big bills of Biden and Obama

Hamilton Spectator

time35 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Trump's big bill also seeks to undo the big bills of Biden and Obama

WASHINGTON (AP) — Chiseling away at President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act . Rolling back the green energy tax breaks from President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act . At its core, the Republican 'big, beautiful bill' is more than just an extension of tax breaks approved during President Donald Trump's first term at the White House. The package is an attempt by Republicans to undo, little by little, the signature domestic achievements of the past two Democratic presidents. 'We're going to do what we said we were going to do,' Speaker Mike Johnson said after House passage last month. While the aim of the sprawling 1,000-page plus bill is to preserve an estimated $4.5 trillion in tax cuts that would otherwise expire at year's end if Congress fails to act — and add some new ones, including no taxes on tips — the spending cuts pointed at the Democratic-led programs are causing the most political turmoil. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said this week that 10.9 million fewer people would have health insurance under the GOP bill, including 1.4 million immigrants in the U.S. without legal status who are in state-funded programs. At the same time, lawmakers are being hounded by businesses in states across the nation who rely on the green energy tax breaks for their projects. As the package moves from the House to the Senate, the simmering unrest over curbing the Obama and Biden policies shows just how politically difficult it can be to slash government programs once they become part of civic life. 'When he asked me, what do you think the prospects are for passage in the Senate? I said, good — if we don't cut Medicaid,' said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., recounting his conversation last week with Trump. 'And he said, I'm 100% supportive of that.' Health care worries Not a single Republican in Congress voted for the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, in 2010, or Biden's inflation act in 2022. Both were approved using the same budget reconciliation process now being employed by Republicans to steamroll Trump's bill past the opposition. Even still, sizable coalitions of GOP lawmakers are forming to protect aspects of both of those programs as they ripple into the lives of millions of Americans. Hawley, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and others are wary of changes to Medicaid and other provisions in the bill that would result in fewer people being able to access health care programs. At the same time, crossover groupings of House and Senate Republicans have launched an aggressive campaign to preserve, at least for some time, the green energy tax breaks that business interests in their states are relying on to develop solar, wind and other types of energy production. Murkowski said one area she's 'worried about' is the House bill's provision that any project not under construction within 60 days of the bill becoming law may no longer be eligible for those credits. 'These are some of the things we're working on,' she said. The concerns are running in sometimes opposite directions and complicating the work of GOP leaders who have almost no votes to spare in the House and Senate as they try to hoist the package over Democratic opposition and onto the president's desk by the Fourth of July. While some Republicans are working to preserve the programs from cuts, the budget hawks want steeper reductions to stem the nation's debt load. The CBO said the package would add $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. After a robust private meeting with Trump at the White House this week, Republican senators said they were working to keep the bill on track as they amend it for their own priorities. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the president 'made the pitch and the argument for why we need to get the bill done.' The disconnect is reminiscent of Trump's first term, when Republicans promised to repeal and replace Obamacare, only to see their effort collapse in dramatic fashion when the late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, voted thumbs down for the bill on the House floor. Battle over Medicaid In the 15 years since Obamacare became law, access to health care has grown substantially. Some 80 million people are now enrolled in Medicaid, and the Kaiser Family Foundation reports 41 states have opted to expand their coverage. The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid to all adults with incomes up to about $21,500 for an individual, or almost $29,000 for a two-person household. While Republicans no longer campaign on ending Obamacare , advocates warn that the changes proposed in the big bill will trim back at access to health care. The bill proposes new 80 hours of monthly work or community service requirements for able-bodied Medicaid recipients, age 18 to 64, with some exceptions. It also imposes twice-a-year eligibility verification checks and other changes. Republicans argue that they want to right-size Medicaid to root out waste, fraud and abuse and ensure it's there for those who need it most, often citing women and children. 'Medicaid was built to be a temporary safety net for people who genuinely need it — young, pregnant women, single mothers, the disabled, the elderly,' Johnson told The Associated Press. 'But when when they expanded under Obamacare, it not only thwarted the purpose of the program, it started draining resources.' Initially, the House bill proposed starting the work requirements in January 2029, as Trump's term in the White House would be coming to a close. But conservatives from the House Freedom Caucus negotiated for a quicker start date, in December 2026, to start the spending reductions sooner. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has said the changes are an Obamacare rollback by another name. 'It decimates our health care system, decimates our clean energy system,' Schumer of New York said in an interview with the AP. The green energy tax breaks involve not only those used by buyers of electric vehicles, like Elon Musk's Tesla line, but also the production and investment tax credits for developers of renewables and other energy sources. The House bill had initially proposed a phaseout of those credits over the next several years. But again the conservative Freedom Caucus engineered the faster wind-down — within 60 days of the bill's passage. 'Not a single Republican voted for the Green New Scam subsidies,' wrote Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, on social media. 'Not a single Republican should vote to keep them.' 'REPEAL THE GREEN NEW SCAM!' reposted Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, a Freedom Caucus leader. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store