
Poland's election is a pivotal moment for Europe ... and beyond
Much of this reaction has no doubt been shaped in part by the fact that for years Poles used to flock abroad for work, leaving the lingering notion that things were far from good in their home country.
That Poland has had its economic woes in past decades is undeniable, but here's a few curious facts worth considering in taking stock of any fresh appraisal of this Central European nation.
For example, how many of us knew that Poland's manufacturing sector is booming and that since it joined the EU in 2004 it has never known recession apart from briefly at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic?
How many of us too realise that the evidence of such growth with income per person having trebled since 1995, is clearly visible to anyone visiting Poland?
Having journeyed through or stayed in the country many times these past few years since Russia's invasion of Poland's neighbour Ukraine, I, like other visitors, have always been struck by its burgeoning infrastructure projects often built with EU money.
This is a nation driven by strong private consumption and investment. It's one too as The Economist magazine recently pointed where 'living standards, adjusted for purchasing power, are about to eclipse Japan's.'
Detractors will doubtless quickly point out that the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD has just revised down its GDP growth forecast for Poland to 3.3 % cent for 2025, from a forecast of 3.4 % in February 2025, but even such sceptics would have to admit that this a country more than holding its own economically.
And on that very subject of holding its own, Poland, a country long wary of the threat from Russia, has also transformed itself into Europe's most overlooked military power with a bigger army than Britain, France or Germany and the third largest in NATO.
In short, Poland matters for Europe and indeed the wider geopolitical world right now and it's against such a backdrop that the country today – June 1st - faces a decisive run off-vote to elect its president.
Although the president's role is a largely ceremonial one, today's election outcome will still be extremely significant for how Poland is governed in the coming years.
Karol Nawrocki, a non-partisan Presidential candidate supported by the Law and Justice Party, greets supporters during a political rally as the Presidential campaign enters the last days ahead of the runoff on May 29, 2025
MAGA drive
Watching closely too are US and European conservatives who view the run-off vote as being potentially decisive not just for the EU but also for right wing populists aligned with US president Donald Trump's MAGA drive to dominate Europe.
Such is this level of importance, that the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the United States' premier conservative gathering, held its first meeting in Poland last Tuesday, just five days before today's tightly contested election.
'We need you to elect the right leader,' Kristi Noem, the US Homeland Security Secretary and a prominent Trump ally, said in a speech at the event. 'You will be the leaders that will turn Europe back to conservative values.'
Speaking about the two contenders in the run-off, who are Warsaw's liberal mayor Rafal Trzaskowski of the main centrist ruling party Civic Platform (PO) and national conservative historian Karol Nawrocki, of the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, Noem left no one in any doubt as to who Trump would like to see win.
Urging Poland's voters in her speech at the CPAC to elect Nawrocki as someone who would lead Poland in a style similar to Trump, Noem went on to describe his pro-EU rival Trzaskowski as 'an absolute train wreck of a leader'.
READ MORE:
Scotland's oldest international medical charity is bringing hope to Himalayas
Trump's sledgehammer politics are wreaking havoc in every sphere both home and away
Is it actually possible for Ukraine to ever secure a just peace?
Soldiers of fortune: Exposing the privatisation and profiteering of Palestinian pain
So just how did today's contest come about and what will be the significance of its outcome both for Poland, Europe and the wider geopolitical landscape?
The first thing to recognise is that after the first round in the election, Trzaskowski secured a narrow 31.4% to 29.5% lead and polls now suggest they are currently running neck-and-neck. Following today's second-round run-off the winner will succeed incumbent President Andrzej Duda when his second and final term in office expires in August.
While the powers of the president are largely symbolic it's not quite as simple as that. Whoever is in office for example has the power to veto bills passed by parliament, a power that the PiS-aligned Duda has used to stymie the agenda of the current government.
To put this another way, Donald Tusk, the liberal Polish prime minister elected at the head of a coalition in late 2023, quite simply has had to 'cohabit' with Duda, and lacks the three-fifths parliamentary majority required to overturn his legislative veto.
For precisely that reason Tusk needs Trzaskowski to become president so he can pursue the judicial overhaul and other reforms that are blocked by the outgoing Duda.
But other things are also at stake in terms of whoever takes the office of president.
For example, as Aleks Szczerbiak, Professor of Politics at the University of Sussex and contributor to the news portal 'Notes From Poland', recently pointed out, the president does have other competencies that relate to foreign affairs.
Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk arrives for an EU Summit at the European Council building in Brussels, Thursday, March 6 (AP Photo/Omar Havana)
Security policy
The most important of these is that the president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces so can influence debates on security policy. Ambassadorial appointments also have to be approved by the president which explains why Poland does not currently have a full time ambassador to Washington because Duda refuses accept the Tusk government's nominee.
As today's contest reaches its height a total of 13 candidates are vying for the presidency but it is the battle between Trzaskowski and Nawrocki on which all eyes are focused.
Trzaskowski, 53, is an Oxford-educated son of a jazz musician who champions a liberal agenda that stresses the importance of women's rights and strong ties with the European Union and NATO. One of his campaign promises includes strengthening Poland's position in the EU.
Another one of his pledges is to relax abortion laws, however, he has been quiet on this issue during the run-up to the election. He has also been supportive of the LGBTQ community and has attended pride parades. This could alienate some more conservative voters who live outside urban centres.
Nawrocki, 42, a historian, has positioned himself as a newcomer with no political baggage. He wants Poland to follow a path inspired by Trump and regards Washington as Warsaw's key ally, not Brussels.
Nawrocki opposes abortion and aims to keep coal mines operating until Poland develops its own nuclear energy. He opposes EU migration policies.
Nawrocki by and large has dominated public debate - be it over questions about his contorversial acquisition of a flat from a pensioner or an admission that he took part in orchestrated brawls.
'All my sports activities were based on the strength of my heart, the strength of my muscles, my fists,' Nawrocki, an amateur boxer, told a debate when confronted over reports he had been involved in mass organised fights between football hooligans.
'It was a fair competition, regardless of the form,' he insisted.
For both contenders though one of the key issues dominating the election is the Russia- Ukraine war. When the war first broke out in February 2022, Poland threw its full support behind Ukraine, welcoming more than one million Ukrainian refugees who crossed the border without documents.
Earlier this month, Tusk, alongside Britain, France and Germany's leaders, visited Kyiv while giving Russian President Vladimir Putin an ultimatum to enact an unconditional 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine. Tusk was determined to help stress that Europe is ready to stand by Ukraine even as America's commitment has weakened. It was a measure of Poland's importance and standing among the allies that Tusk was in attendance.
By contrast though - as The Economist magazine recently highlighted - Poland's stance is in sharp distinction to the rest of the 'Visegrad Four'.
'Hungary under Viktor Orban and Slovakia under Robert Fico have both taken the side of Russia rather than Ukraine; and the Czech Republic is expected to tilt in that direction after elections in October,' the magazine noted.
Warsaw's Mayor and presidential candidate Rafal Trzaskowski celebrates exit poll results during the presidential election night in Sandomierz, Poland, Sunday, May 18 (AP Photo/ Aleksander Kalka)
Tense relations
In terms of today's vote though the fact that relations between Poland and Ukraine have grown tense despite Tusk's support are sure to have an impact on the ballot.
Earlier this year, Polish farmers led protests, arguing the market had been flooded with cheap agricultural products from Ukraine.
There are emerging reports too of Ukrainian refugees facing discrimination in Poland, as well as resentment about welfare provided to them.
There have also been growing fears of a spillover of Russian aggression to Poland due to its proximity to Ukraine.
On May 12, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Warsaw said an investigation had revealed that Moscow's intelligence agencies had orchestrated a massive fire at a shopping centre in Warsaw back in May 2024. Reports of foreign election interference have also recently spooked voters.
As The Economist summed it up, there are two 'visions' dominating the election.
'One vision, from the candidate of the Law and Justice (pis) party, is a brand of right-wing nationalism that feeds off conflict with Poland's neighbours and the European Union. The other, from the centre, is that, in a dangerous world, Poland needs Europe to magnify its strengths, just as Europe needs Poland as a source of security and economic dynamism.'
Given these competing visons, it's hardly surprising then that many see Poland's future relationship with the EU has hinging on today's outcome.
'One election two futures,' is how one political commentator referred to it. For while EU membership has massively boosted Poland's development, the rise of populism has reshaped public debate in the country and the political landscape.
'Sunday's outcome means either a clean break with Poland's past as one of the bad boys of the EU, or a return to a more turbulent relationship with Brussels,' noted Politico magazine a few days ago.
Watching closely too are Europe's right wing populists who are keen to avoid a repeat of their recent defeat in Romania.
'Sunday's vote is crucial for the future of Europe,' George Simion, the Romanian ultranationalist who narrowly lost his country's presidential race earlier this month despite a surge in support for the far right,' told the Financial Times (FT).
Simion went on to warn that a loss in Poland could further diminish the influence of the populist right across central and eastern Europe and lead to defeat for Prime Minister Viktor Orban in next year's parliamentary elections in Hungary.
'If Maga really wants to go international, they need now a victory in Poland,' Simion was cited by the FT as warning about today's election outcome.
Under Tusk there's no doubt that Poland is back as one of the leading countries in the EU, setting the bloc's direction alongside Germany and France.
But his core promise of undoing the legal changes pushed through by PiS in the eight years it ruled Poland remains hamstrung making today's vote a potential lynchpin moment.
Sense of purpose
As Aleks Szczerbiak of the news portal 'Notes From Poland', says 'a victory for Trzaskowski will provide the Tusk government with renewed momentum and a clear two-and-a-half year run before the next parliamentary election, during which it can re-build its support base and restore a sense of purpose (as well, of course, as limiting the ability of a future PiS government to pursue its agenda)'
On the other hand a Nawrocki win, would prolong the impasse. He would continue blocking Tusk's reforms and his overriding goal would be to prepare the ground for PiS's return to power in the next parliamentary poll.
At the time of writing this campaigning in Poland is now all but over and polls open at 7am Polish time today and close at 9pm. Most expect exit polls will be published shortly afterwards with a full result likely known by Monday.
Poland, once a dreary backwater of Cold War communism is now a European powerhouse and prosperous member of the EU. It would be hard then to overstate just how important today's election is on so many levels.
From the future of the EU, to the survival of right-wing populist politics on the continent, to the war in Ukraine and role of NATO, so much hinges on this pivotal and potentially dangerous moment. The stakes then could not be higher and those Poles heading today to vote are no doubt acutely aware of it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump replaces his official portrait
Donald Trump has updated his official portrait just months after taking office, in an apparent bid to appear less menacing. The new image, as displayed on the White House's social media channels, casts Mr Trump in a warmer light and softens his expression from his first portrait in a break from presidential tradition. The other changes in the picture include swapping out a turquoise tie for his favoured red power tie, and changing the background – the US flag in what appears to be a state room – to black. It is uncommon for a US president to change their portrait so soon into their term, but Mr Trump, a former reality TV star, is famously conscious of his appearance. In his first portrait, published a few days before his inauguration in January, he appeared stony-faced, with his right eye narrowed and squinting, while his lips were pressed together tightly. It drew comparisons to the mugshot released by authorities in Georgia after his arrest on racketeering charges in 2023. The Republican is famously image-obsessed and reportedly practised how he would pose for the mugshot which was later released by Fulton County Sheriff's Office. He subsequently claimed it was the 'number-one selling mugshot' in history which 'beat Elvis' and 'beat Frank Sintara', and later installed it on a wall in the Oval Office after winning the presidential election last year. He appears to have been less enamoured of his official portrait, however. It's not the first time the president has sought to remove an unflattering portrait. Colorado removed the portrait of Mr Trump hanging in its state capitol in March when the president complained about its appearance and called on Governor Jared Polis to 'take it down'. That painting was by Sarah Boardman, a British artist, who after being commissioned for the piece in 2018 described it as showing the president with a 'serious, thoughtful, non-confontational' expression. But Mr Trump called it 'truly the worst'. 'Nobody likes a bad picture or painting of themselves, but the one in Colorado… was purposefully distorted to a level that even I, perhaps, have never seen before,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'The artist also did President Obama, and he looks wonderful, but the one on me is truly the worst. She must have lost her talent as she got older. 'In any event, I would much prefer not having a picture than having this one, but many people from Colorado have called and written to complain. In fact, they are actually angry about it!'


Evening Standard
42 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Trade Secretary to push for timeline on US tariff exemption
He said: 'Our deals with the US, EU and India are proof that the UK is the most connected country in the world to do business. Along with our modern industrial strategy, our Plan for Change is making the UK a safe, stable bet in uncertain times.


The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trade secretary Jonathan Reynolds to push for exemption on steel tariffs in crunch meeting with US officials
Trade secretary Jonathan Reynolds is meeting US officials on Tuesday as the UK faces a race against time to prevent Donald Trump bringing in new tariffs on steel. Earlier this month, a UK-US trade deal was unveiled that should have exempted Britain from steel tariffs; however, the move has yet to be implemented, and the details are still being worked out ahead of a formal deal. On Tuesday in Paris, Mr Reynolds and US trade representative Jamieson Greer are expected to discuss implementing the agreement. It comes amid uncertainty about the future of Mr Trump's tariffs after a US court last week ruled many of them unlawful, before an appeals court reinstated the levies pending a further hearing. Last week also saw Mr Trump announce that he would double tariffs on steel to 50 per cent, starting on Wednesday, and it remains unclear how the UK would be affected by his declaration. Mr Reynolds' visit to Paris is part of a three-day trip, during which he is expected to meet other trade ministers and attend a G7 ministerial meeting before heading to Brussels for meetings with his EU counterparts. During the trip, the trade secretary will argue that the UK is a dependable partner in an era of increasing global volatility. He said: 'Our deals with the US, EU and India are proof that the UK is the most connected country in the world to do business. Along with our modern industrial strategy, our Plan for Change is making the UK a safe, stable bet in uncertain times. 'We recognise our relationship with G7 allies and EU counterparts must continue to evolve and deliver a better trading environment for our businesses and exporters. 'That's why we want to wipe away costly, business-blocking barriers and open up opportunities to grow our economy, create jobs and put more money in people's pockets.' Andrew Griffith, Conservative shadow business secretary, said: 'Labour told the British public we had a deal with the US – but one month on, there is no deal in sight, meaning British businesses and workers continue to suffer because of Labour's failed negotiations. 'After snatching the winter fuel payment, lying about not increasing taxes, and misleading the public by saying the US trade deal was done, the public will rightly not trust a word Labour says. 'As all the other political parties wrangle over how to spend more taxpayers' money, only the Conservatives are committed to being responsible with the public finances.'