UK Islamophobia definition to protect right to 'insult religions'
The membership of the working group appears to signal that the government is engaging with the recently launched British Muslim Network (BMN), but not the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) - the largest umbrella body claiming to represent British Muslims.
Dominic Grieve, a former Conservative attorney general, has been appointed chair of the group with BMN co-chair Akeela Ahmed among its four other members.
Earlier this year it emerged that the government was planning to create a working group to draw up an official definition for anti-Muslim discrimination.
This suggested it was rowing back plans to adopt the definition proposed in 2018 by the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for British Muslims.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
That definition, which the Conservative government rejected, was criticised by some as potentially stifling criticism of Islam, which the APPG strongly denied.
Adopted by Labour in opposition, the definition characterises Islamophobia as "a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness".
In September 2024, Labour's faith minister Lord Wajid Khan said that "the definition proposed by the APPG is not in line with the Equality Act 2010, which defines race in terms of colour, nationality and national or ethnic origins".
Freedom of speech
The new working group's terms of reference, published on Monday, include giving advice on "the merits of government adopting a non-statutory definition of unacceptable treatment of Muslims and anyone perceived to be Muslim, including what a proposed definition should be".
This establishes that the government has not yet decided that it will adopt any definition of Islamophobia.
In apparent reference to widespread criticism, the terms say that any proposed definition "must be compatible with the unchanging right of British citizens to exercise freedom of speech and expression - which includes the right to criticise, express dislike of, or insult religions and/or the beliefs and practices of adherents."
Ahmed's inclusion in the working group comes just weeks after the official launch of the BMN in February with backing from faith minister Khan, and after Middle East Eye had previously revealed it had lost much of its Muslim support and was being backed by a charity set up by disgraced former Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby.
Exclusive: British Muslim Network backed by charity set up by former archbishop Welby Read More »
MEE reported ahead of the launch that several Muslim MPs privately said they would not attend after a series of controversies.
Critics have suggested that the BMN's co-chairs and advisory board lack credibility, warning that the government could use the network to continue to avoid engaging with the Muslim Council of Britain.
But the BMN's leadership has argued that the government should engage with a "whole range" of Muslim groups, including both the MCB and BMN.
Consecutive governments have followed a policy of refusing to engage with the MCB - despite it having over 500 member organisations, including mosques, schools, local and county councils, professional networks and advocacy groups.
Starmer's government adopted this approach and even ignored communications from the MCB during the far-right riots that raged across the country for over a week in August.
The BMN does not claim to be a similarly representative body. But its representation on the new working group indicates that the government has chosen to engage with the organisation while continuing to boycott the MCB.
Another notable omission from the membership list is Tell Mama, an Islamophobia reporting service funded by the communities ministry and accused of severely under-reporting hate crimes.
The Guardian reported earlier this month that no grant will be provided to the organisation from the end of March, leaving it facing closure.
Working definition
Also on the working group is Professor Javed Khan, managing director of Equi, a new think tank which says it was "born out of the UK Muslim community".
At the parliamentary launch of an Equi report last month, Khan told parliamentarians and civil society figures that the think tank was "seeing engagement" from the Labour government, including ministers and special advisers.
"The government needs to be faith literate in its policy development," he said.
Equi's report on Muslims in the British arts and culture scene notably warned that Muslim creatives are often "herded" into receiving funding from the contentious Prevent counter-extremism programme, which "often toxifies, devalues and limits artistic intent".
British Muslim creators 'herded' into Prevent funding, says Equi think tank Read More »
Grieve, the chair of the working group, previously chaired the Citizens' UK Commission on Islam, aimed at promoting dialogue between Muslims and non-Muslims, and wrote the foreword to the contentious APPG report on Islamophobia in 2018, calling it "food both for thought and positive action".
He said last month that "defining Islamophobia is extremely difficult for perfectly valid reasons relating to freedom of expression", but noted that "perfectly law-abiding Muslims going about their business and well integrated into society are suffering discrimination and abuse".
Baroness Shaista Gohir, a crossbench peer and CEO of Muslim Women's Network UK (MWNUK), is another member of the working group.
MEE revealed in late February that an MWNUK event in parliament in March celebrating the "cultural contribution of Muslims in the UK" was supported by TikTok, the social media giant accused of censoring content on human rights abuses faced by Uyghur Muslims in China.
Aisha Affi, an independent consultant, is also named as a member of the working group.
The terms of reference say that the group will have six months to deliver a working definition of Islamophobia to ministers.
It establishes that the government "has the right to disband the Group at any point and without notice if they deem that it is no longer meeting its aims and objectives".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
24 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Hamas accepts Gaza ceasefire proposal set out by mediators, sources say
Hamas told Egyptian and Qatari mediators on Monday that the group has accepted the Gaza ceasefire proposal that had been presented to them earlier that day, sources told Middle East Eye. This is the same proposal - barring some minor details - that Hamas had accepted on 1 June before both the Israelis and the Americans withdrew their teams from talks in Doha. Should this ceasefire come to fruition, it would demonstrate a major compromise by the Israelis, a source told MEE. Israel is on the verge of a military occupation of Gaza City that would mean a complete takeover of the Strip. There are more than one million Palestinians in Gaza's key northern hub, and the decision by Israel's war cabinet has been met with condemnations from around the world, including from major allies like the UK, France, Germany and Canada. An Egyptian official confirmed to Reuters news agency on Monday that the deal on the table would involve a suspension of military operations for 60 days, during which time Hamas and Israel could find a pathway to a permanent end to the war. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The terms include the release of half of the living Israeli captives held in Gaza, in exchange for an undetermined number of Palestinian prisoners from Israel. There are believed to be at least 20 Israeli captives, out of more than 50, who are still alive and being held by Hamas or another Palestinian faction. All of them are Israeli soldiers. Israel, meanwhile, has some 12,000 Palestinians from both Gaza and the occupied West Bank in its prisons, nearly half of whom were rounded up after 7 October 2023, when Hamas led its attack on southern Israel. Old proposals Earlier in the day Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty visited Egypt's Rafah border crossing into Gaza, accompanied by Palestinian Authority (PA) Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa. "As we speak now, there are Palestinian and Qatari delegations present on Egyptian soil working to intensify efforts to put an end to the systematic killing and starvation," Abdelatty said. UN military force needed to halt Israel's assault on Gaza, tribunal says Read More » For his part, Mustafa said the PA "will soon announce the establishment of a temporary committee to manage the affairs of the Strip under the auspices of the Palestinian government", which he described as a revival of the "State of Palestine and its government in Gaza". Just hours before Hamas made its announcement, US President Donald Trump said that Hamas must be "confronted and destroyed" in order for the captives to be retrieved from Gaza. "We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!! The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be," he wrote on his social media platform, TruthSocial. "Remember, I was the one who negotiated and got hundreds of hostages freed and released into Israel (and America!). I was the one who ended 6 wars, in just 6 months. I was the one who OBLITERATED Iran's Nuclear facilities. Play to WIN, or don't play at all! Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump said. While the US president has been credited with getting the January ceasefire over the finish line by applying pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the day before his inauguration, the deal was later revealed by the Qataris to be the very same one proposed in December 2023 and accepted by the Biden administration and Hamas, but repeatedly turned down by Israel. More than 61,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel in what is now widely considered a genocide in Gaza. Half of the casualties are women and children. More than 200 of the dead were starved to death because of Israel's total siege on the enclave, which began in March.
Middle East Eye
24 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Netanyahu is on a mission to seize the Middle East. Will anyone stop him?
When South Africa brought the charge of genocide against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the court gave Israel nine months to present its rebuttal. That expired at the end of July. The panel of 17 judges accepted Israel's argument that it needed more time to prepare its case because of 'evidentiary issues' in South Africa's case. Accordingly, Israel's impunity before the ICJ was extended by another six months. It is now thought that the ICJ will not rule on the issue before 2027 at the earliest. In those nine months, more than 250 Palestinians, nearly half of them children, have died of starvation created expressly as a weapon of war by Israel's cabinet. The carnage has continued unabated. Thousands more civilians have been killed by bombings, and tens of thousands are set to die if Israeli forces retake Gaza City. A leak of the minutes of a cabinet meeting on 1 March, published recently by Channel 13, revealed how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, who now heads Israel's negotiating team, argued successfully - against the advice of top Israeli military and security officials - that Israel should starve Gaza into submission. Netanyahu decided to break the ceasefire that was at the time functioning, and to cut off all aid to Gaza to 'force Hamas to surrender', the leak noted. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Last week, however, Netanyahu claimed none of this has happened. The policy of starvation that he voted on at that cabinet meeting in March was a fiction, part of a mass vilification of Jews. Days later, the Israeli army joined in the campaign of denial, claiming there were no signs of widespread malnutrition in Gaza. In other words, Unicef, the World Food Programme, and all the other experts who say that a famine is playing out in Gaza, are lying. The images of children reduced to skin and bones are fake. It's all part of a 'blood libel' against Jews. Perverting the course of justice If the ICJ remains paralysed, the same applies to its sister court, the International Criminal Court (ICC). As Middle East Eye has reported in some detail, the arrest warrants against Netanyahu and his former defence minister, Yoav Gallant, have been effectively neutralised. This was by means of an organised and orchestrated campaign of vilification that forced the British chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, to take leave, pending the outcome of an external investigation into accusations of sexual assault - allegations Khan vigorously denies. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war On Friday, MEE reported that arrest warrants against two other ministers in the Israeli cabinet, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, were lying on the desks of two deputy prosecutors gathering dust. They are fully prepared, according to our sources, and if served, would represent the first time that the crime of apartheid was prosecuted at the ICC. A source within the ICC said: 'If the Ben Gvir and Smotrich applications just disappear, the opportunity to prosecute one of the most blatant examples of apartheid in the world today will likely be lost forever.' I am not holding my breath. The US sanctioned Khan in February, and in June, it sanctioned four ICC judges, two of whom approved Khan's application for arrest warrants. It's no longer 'plausible genocide', as the ICJ first determined. It's no longer genocide in inverted commas. It's genocide, period This campaign to pervert the course of international justice appears to be working. Whatever happens to Khan, Israel and the US have already succeeded in their primary aim of paralysing the court. It still exists in name. But it has stopped existing as far as Israel's daily crimes of ethnic cleansing, starvation and apartheid are concerned. News of the arrest warrants and South Africa's case at the ICJ triggered a wave of optimism in human rights circles that turned out to be premature. The argument at the time was that the world should suspend judgement on whether a genocide was taking place in Gaza, to allow the wheels of international justice to turn at last. With both courts disabled, this argument no longer applies. A number of countries have signed up to South Africa's action, but this too has become gesture politics. Even South Africa continues to sell coal to Israel. Turkey, whose rhetoric on Gaza is fierce, continues to allow Azerbaijani oil to flow through Ceyhan on its way to fuelling Israel's air force. It claims it has no sovereignty over the pipeline, and the transfer of Azeri oil to Israel-bound tankers takes place on the spot market in international waters. But would Ankara allow oil to flow through its ports if it was destined for a Greek air force that was bombing Northern Cyprus at the time? I don't think so. 'Textbook case of genocide' The Middle East simply cannot sit back and watch this genocide happen. Genocide is a legal term, defined in international law. For several months, MEE has solicited the views of dozens of experts in international law and genocide studies. Some are experts on the Holocaust. There are differences of opinion as to when this genocide started, but all are unanimous in their conclusion: what is unfolding in Gaza meets the threshold of a genocide. This includes killing members of a group, causing serious bodily harm, and imposing measures calculated to bring about the destruction of the group or society. Israel's war on Gaza: Why do legal experts say it's genocide? Read More » Let me quote a few of these expert opinions. Raz Segal, associate professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Stockton University in New Jersey, was one of the first to use the term about the onslaught in Gaza. In Jewish Currents on 13 October 2023, he described Israel's assault as a 'textbook case of genocide'. He told MEE: 'As an Israeli American scholar of Jewish history and the Holocaust, I take seriously the moral imperative of 'never again'. In Holocaust and genocide studies, we teach students to identify early warning signs of genocide: processes that escalate, red flags that demand intervention.' Segal added: 'Critics asked why I used the term 'genocide' so early. My answer: because we were already seeing key indicators. Ethically and legally, the obligation to prevent genocide arises in the presence of significant risk, not just once destruction is fully evident.' Segal argued that Israel's order on 13 October 2023, for more than a million Palestinians to go to southern Gaza within 24 hours, was an indicator of a clear risk of genocide. 'I argued then, and continue to argue, that this marked a transition into the realm of genocide, or at the very least a significant risk of genocide, which, under the Genocide Convention, is sufficient to activate the duty to prevent.' Beyond dispute Expressions of intent are key to proving a case of genocide. Here, Barry Trachtenburg, a professor of Jewish history and Holocaust studies at Wake Forest University in North Carolina, said: 'From the very beginning, we saw genocidal statements made by Israeli leaders, which were soon followed by actions that aligned with those declarations of intent.' He added: 'In most cases of genocidal violence, we don't have explicit statements from political and military leaders saying they will target civilians, refuse to distinguish between combatants and non-combatants, or hold an entire population responsible. But we've seen exactly that in this case.' For Omer Bartov, a professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Brown University, war aims were key to his determination of genocide. 'My view has become that the war goals that Israel declared - which were to destroy Hamas and to free the hostages, by the spring of 2024 - turned out not to be the actual war goals,' he told MEE. 'The [Israeli army] was not actually trying to destroy Hamas and free the hostages. What it was trying to do was to make Gaza uninhabitable for its population.' MEE thus has no hesitation in calling what Israel is continuing to do in Gaza and the occupied West Bank a genocide. It's no longer 'plausible genocide', as the ICJ first determined. It's no longer genocide in inverted commas. It's genocide, period. Convenient bogeymen The ranks of western politicians who for 22 months argued for 'Israel's right of self-defence' - and this includes, among others, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Freidrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, all of whom now feign horror at the starvation that is taking place - are concentrating all the blame on Netanyahu, Ben Gvir and Smotrich. True, there is more than enough evidence to indict each for war crimes. But these are convenient bogeymen. Zeroing in on these leaders alone creates another convenient fiction. The myth is that if Netanyahu and religious Zionists fell from power, Israel would default to a leadership with no hegemonic intentions. Israel's neighbours are asleep to the threat they face. This is not a threat that can be negotiated away - nor is it a threat that Washington will do anything to stop These western leaders suggest that an Israel led by the more pragmatic Naftali Bennett would negotiate with Hamas a return of the hostages, and an end to the war in Gaza. In time, a Palestinian state would appear. Once negotiations restarted with the Palestinian leadership, Saudi Arabia would sign the Abraham Accords, and everything would magically default to 6 October 2023, the day before the Hamas attack. This, too, is dreamland. Those who style themselves 'friends of Israel' - and who now have to ask themselves whether they want to be remembered as the 'friends' of apartheid and genocide - have argued doggedly that Israel has a right to defend its borders. But 22 months into this campaign in Gaza, it turns out that Israel's existing borders are a mere pit stop on the collective journey to the ultimate goal - the biblical Land of Israel. As its forces have vanquished each neighbour in turn - first Gaza, then Lebanon, then Iran, and now Syria too - and as Israeli forces occupy Gaza, outposts in Lebanon and a substantial area of southern Syria, maps have begun to re-emerge laying claim to areas far beyond the lines where their conquering forces have stopped. Expanding borders This is no accident of timing. During an interview last week with i24 News, in which he was presented with an amulet depicting a map of the Promised Land, Netanyahu was asked whether he felt connected to this vision of Greater Israel. 'Very much,' Netanyahu replied. Netanyahu said he was 'on a mission of generations - there are generations of Jews that dreamed of coming here and generations of Jews who will come after us'. An ever expanding Israel will pave the way for its demise Read More » He continued: 'So if you're asking if I have a sense of mission, historically and spiritually, the answer is yes.' The map itself was coyly hidden from viewers, but it is well known. The Promised Land would encompass all of the Palestinian territories, along with parts of Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Last year, Smotrich was filmed advocating an expansion of Israel's borders to include Damascus. The idea is not new. In January 2024, Israeli politician Avi Lipkin said that 'eventually, our borders will extend from Lebanon to the Great Desert, which is Saudi Arabia, and then from the Mediterranean to the Euphrates. 'And who is on the other side of the Euphrates? The Kurds! And the Kurds are friends,' he continued. 'So we have Mediterranean behind us, the Kurds in front of us, Lebanon, which really needs the umbrella of protection of Israel, and then we're gonna take, I believe we're gonna take Mecca, Medina and Mount Sinai, and to purify those places.' Time to wake up Theodor Herzl, the father of political Zionism, wrote in his diaries that the Jewish state should stretch 'from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates'. The phrase is taken from Book of Genesis, where God grants Abraham and his descendants a vast expanse of land. Some Israelis refer to a narrower vision mentioned in the Book of Deuteronomy. Others invoke the Book of Samuel, which describes lands secured by kings Saul and David, including Palestine, Lebanon, and sections of Jordan and Syria. For all, however, the pursuit of Greater Israel is the fulfilment of a divine mandate. None of this is new. What is new is that Israel has the military means to make its vision of the Promised Land a reality. Only a regional security pact, enforced by modern armies coming to each other's aid, will stop Israel's expansion and protect the young nation states of the Middle East The genocide being waged against Palestinians is not the unintended consequence of a westernised people who have grown fat off the land they have occupied. Nor is it solely the work of religious Zionists, who are just one part of the political spectrum. Rather, the genocide speaks to the fulfilment of a much deeper dream: the return of Jews to the Promised Land. The one thing standing in their way are the Palestinian people, who - whether armed or not - refuse to leave lands that are rightfully theirs. If Netanyahu's charge is stopped now, the halt will be temporary. No Israeli leader is going to order a retreat from Syria or Lebanon. The Golan Heights are lost forever. No Israeli leader will pull up to a million settlers out of the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel's neighbours are asleep to the threat they face. This is not a threat that can be negotiated away - nor is it a threat that Washington will do anything to stop. Only a regional security pact, enforced by modern armies coming to each other's aid, will stop Israel's expansion and protect the young nation states of the Middle East. They should wake up, and soon. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Dozens of Palestinian children from Gaza to be brought to UK for treatment
A group of between 30 and 50 Palestinian children will be evacuated from Gaza to Britain for medical treatment in the coming weeks, according to the BBC. Children from Gaza have been brought privately to the UK for medical treatment, but this marks the first time that the British government itself will evacuate children for treatment. Last week 96 MPs from several parties wrote to the government urging it to bring sick and injured children from Gaza to Britain, warning that many were at risk of imminent death. Earlier this month the government said plans to bring children to the UK for treatment were being carried out "at pace". The children will be allowed to travel with family members, and some are expected to enter the asylum system afterwards, since they may be unable to return to Gaza. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters More than 50,000 children have been killed or injured since October 2023, according to the UN. Is Britain finally realising that Palestinian children are human? Read More » Last month more than 100 humanitarian organisations warned that "mass famine" has been spreading across the Gaza Strip since Israel blocked humanitarian aid from entering in early March and began providing inadequate aid through the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Fund at the end of May. In February this year British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the government would seek to prevent Palestinian refugees from living in the UK using a refugee scheme established for Ukranians. Starmer insisted in parliament that the Home Office will shut a "legal loophole" that allowed a Palestinian refugee family from Gaza to stay in the UK. The Home Office refused an initial application by the Palestinian family in May last year, but in September an immigration tribunal ruled in their favour. More than 190,000 Ukranians have come to the country since Russia invaded in March 2022.
