logo
UK Islamophobia definition to protect right to 'insult religions'

UK Islamophobia definition to protect right to 'insult religions'

Middle East Eye24-03-2025

The UK government has published more details about a working group set up to advise it on a possible definition of Islamophobia which would also protect the right to "insult" religious beliefs and practices.
The membership of the working group appears to signal that the government is engaging with the recently launched British Muslim Network (BMN), but not the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) - the largest umbrella body claiming to represent British Muslims.
Dominic Grieve, a former Conservative attorney general, has been appointed chair of the group with BMN co-chair Akeela Ahmed among its four other members.
Earlier this year it emerged that the government was planning to create a working group to draw up an official definition for anti-Muslim discrimination.
This suggested it was rowing back plans to adopt the definition proposed in 2018 by the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for British Muslims.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
That definition, which the Conservative government rejected, was criticised by some as potentially stifling criticism of Islam, which the APPG strongly denied.
Adopted by Labour in opposition, the definition characterises Islamophobia as "a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness".
In September 2024, Labour's faith minister Lord Wajid Khan said that "the definition proposed by the APPG is not in line with the Equality Act 2010, which defines race in terms of colour, nationality and national or ethnic origins".
Freedom of speech
The new working group's terms of reference, published on Monday, include giving advice on "the merits of government adopting a non-statutory definition of unacceptable treatment of Muslims and anyone perceived to be Muslim, including what a proposed definition should be".
This establishes that the government has not yet decided that it will adopt any definition of Islamophobia.
In apparent reference to widespread criticism, the terms say that any proposed definition "must be compatible with the unchanging right of British citizens to exercise freedom of speech and expression - which includes the right to criticise, express dislike of, or insult religions and/or the beliefs and practices of adherents."
Ahmed's inclusion in the working group comes just weeks after the official launch of the BMN in February with backing from faith minister Khan, and after Middle East Eye had previously revealed it had lost much of its Muslim support and was being backed by a charity set up by disgraced former Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby.
Exclusive: British Muslim Network backed by charity set up by former archbishop Welby Read More »
MEE reported ahead of the launch that several Muslim MPs privately said they would not attend after a series of controversies.
Critics have suggested that the BMN's co-chairs and advisory board lack credibility, warning that the government could use the network to continue to avoid engaging with the Muslim Council of Britain.
But the BMN's leadership has argued that the government should engage with a "whole range" of Muslim groups, including both the MCB and BMN.
Consecutive governments have followed a policy of refusing to engage with the MCB - despite it having over 500 member organisations, including mosques, schools, local and county councils, professional networks and advocacy groups.
Starmer's government adopted this approach and even ignored communications from the MCB during the far-right riots that raged across the country for over a week in August.
The BMN does not claim to be a similarly representative body. But its representation on the new working group indicates that the government has chosen to engage with the organisation while continuing to boycott the MCB.
Another notable omission from the membership list is Tell Mama, an Islamophobia reporting service funded by the communities ministry and accused of severely under-reporting hate crimes.
The Guardian reported earlier this month that no grant will be provided to the organisation from the end of March, leaving it facing closure.
Working definition
Also on the working group is Professor Javed Khan, managing director of Equi, a new think tank which says it was "born out of the UK Muslim community".
At the parliamentary launch of an Equi report last month, Khan told parliamentarians and civil society figures that the think tank was "seeing engagement" from the Labour government, including ministers and special advisers.
"The government needs to be faith literate in its policy development," he said.
Equi's report on Muslims in the British arts and culture scene notably warned that Muslim creatives are often "herded" into receiving funding from the contentious Prevent counter-extremism programme, which "often toxifies, devalues and limits artistic intent".
British Muslim creators 'herded' into Prevent funding, says Equi think tank Read More »
Grieve, the chair of the working group, previously chaired the Citizens' UK Commission on Islam, aimed at promoting dialogue between Muslims and non-Muslims, and wrote the foreword to the contentious APPG report on Islamophobia in 2018, calling it "food both for thought and positive action".
He said last month that "defining Islamophobia is extremely difficult for perfectly valid reasons relating to freedom of expression", but noted that "perfectly law-abiding Muslims going about their business and well integrated into society are suffering discrimination and abuse".
Baroness Shaista Gohir, a crossbench peer and CEO of Muslim Women's Network UK (MWNUK), is another member of the working group.
MEE revealed in late February that an MWNUK event in parliament in March celebrating the "cultural contribution of Muslims in the UK" was supported by TikTok, the social media giant accused of censoring content on human rights abuses faced by Uyghur Muslims in China.
Aisha Affi, an independent consultant, is also named as a member of the working group.
The terms of reference say that the group will have six months to deliver a working definition of Islamophobia to ministers.
It establishes that the government "has the right to disband the Group at any point and without notice if they deem that it is no longer meeting its aims and objectives".

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US warns countries not to join French, Saudi UN conference on Palestine: Report
US warns countries not to join French, Saudi UN conference on Palestine: Report

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US warns countries not to join French, Saudi UN conference on Palestine: Report

The US is lobbying foreign governments not to attend a UN conference next week sponsored by France and Saudi Arabia on a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, according to a US diplomatic cable reported by Reuters. The cable, sent to countries on Tuesday, warns them against taking "anti-Israel actions" and says attending the conference would be viewed by Washington as acting against US foreign policy interests. France, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, is a US ally in Nato. Saudi Arabia is one of the US's closest Middle East partners. US President Donald Trump was feted during a May visit to Riyadh, where Saudi Arabia signed billions of dollars of investment deals with the US. France and Saudi Arabia are co-hosting the gathering between 17 and 20 June in New York. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "We are urging governments not to participate in the conference, which we view as counterproductive to ongoing, life-saving efforts to end the war in Gaza and free hostages," the cable says, according to Reuters. "The United States opposes any steps that would unilaterally recognise a conjectural Palestinian state, which adds significant legal and political obstacles to the eventual resolution of the conflict and could coerce Israel during a war, thereby supporting its enemies,' it added. France had been lobbying the UK and other European allies to recognise a Palestinian state at the conference. However, Middle East Eye reported in June that the US has warned Britain and France against recognising a Palestinian state at the conference. At the same time, Arab states have been urging them to proceed with the move, sources told MEE. In late May, United Nations member states held consultations in preparation for the conference, during which the Arab Group urged states to recognise Palestinian statehood. The Arab Group said they would measure the success of the conference by whether significant states recognise Palestine, sources in the UK Foreign Office told MEE. Since the 1950s, successive American administrations have stated that their ultimate goal in ending the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a two-state solution. Many experts and diplomats have earmarked occupied East Jerusalem, the occupied West Bank and Gaza, which Israel seized from Egypt and Jordan in the 1967 war, as the heartland of a future Palestinian state. But US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told Bloomberg News on Tuesday that a Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank was no longer a US policy goal. He said Israel's 'Muslim neighbours' could give up their land to create one. According to the cable, the US said that "unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state would effectively render Oct. 7 Palestinian Independence Day'. Hamas led an attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing around 1,200 people. Israel responded by launching a devastating assault on Gaza that has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mainly women and children, and reduced the enclave to rubble. The US cable also said Washington was working with Egypt and Qatar to reach a ceasefire in Gaza and free the captives there. "This conference undermines these delicate negotiations and emboldens Hamas at a time when the terrorist group has rejected proposals by the negotiators that Israel has accepted,' it said. The Trump administration pushed Israel to agree to a three-phase ceasefire with Hamas in January. Israel broke that agreement by refusing to begin talks on ending the war permanently and unilaterally resumed attacking Gaza.

Could David Cameron be prosecuted for threatening the ICC?
Could David Cameron be prosecuted for threatening the ICC?

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Could David Cameron be prosecuted for threatening the ICC?

David Cameron, the former British foreign secretary, may be liable for prosecution under international law and within the UK for his attempts to obstruct the work of the International Criminal Court (ICC), experts have said. Middle East Eye revealed on Monday that Cameron privately threatened Karim Khan, the British chief prosecutor at the ICC, in April 2024 to defund and withdraw from the ICC if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. "A threat against the ICC, direct or indirect, is an obstruction of justice," Francesca Albanese, the UN's special rapporteur on Palestine, told MEE's live show on Tuesday. "It's incredibly serious that someone in a position of power might have had the audacity to do that." And Professor Sergey Vasiliev of the Open University of the Netherlands reacted: "If the reports are confirmed, David Cameron did cross the legal line when he threatened the Prosector with all kinds of consequences for applying for the warrants. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "This is a serious matter that shows Cameron's utter lack of respect for the ICC's judicial and prosecutorial independence." What did David Cameron do? Cameron, then foreign secretary in Rishi Sunak's Conservative government, made the threat on 23 April 2024 during a heated phone call with Khan. Cameron told Khan that the UK would "defund the court and withdraw from the Rome Statute" if the ICC issued warrants for Israeli leaders. At the time, Khan and his team of lawyers were preparing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-defence minister, Yoav Gallant, as well as for Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammed Deif. Khan's office applied for warrants on 20 May, less than a month after the phone call. 'Per the reported dialogue, David Cameron clearly seeks to pressure the ICC Prosecutor's decision regarding whether to pursue warrants for Israeli officials' - Professor Tom Dannenbaum Six months later, on 21 November, the warrants were approved by a panel of judges, officially charging Netanyahu and Gallant with war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Gaza since October 2023. MEE revealed details of the call based on information from several sources, including former staff in Khan's office familiar with the conversation and who have seen the minutes of the meeting. Cameron, a former British prime minister who was appointed foreign secretary by Sunak in November 2023, told Khan that applying for warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant would be "like dropping a hydrogen bomb". He said Khan was "on the brink of making a huge mistake" and that "the world is not ready for this". The report has drawn condemnation from British MPs who called for an investigation into Cameron's actions. Cameron has not responded to multiple requests for comment. Approached by MEE for a response to the exchange with Cameron, Khan said on Monday: "I have no comment to make at this time." What's the background to David Cameron's demands? The Conservative government was accused last year of being behind the delay in the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants against Israeli and Hamas officials, after filing a request with the pre-trial chamber to challenge the court's jurisdiction on Israeli nationals. The request prompted dozens of submissions from other states, but was later dropped by the Labour government, which came to power in July 2024. The revelations about Cameron came after the administration of US President Donald Trump said last week that it would sanction four ICC judges for investigations into the US and its ally Israel. In February, Khan was the first ICC official to be the target of US sanctions, carried out under an executive order issued shortly after Trump took office. The revelations also follow Khan's decision to take a leave of absence pending a UN-led investigation into alleged sexual misconduct, an accusation denied by his lawyers. What are the legal risks for Cameron? The ICC, established by the Rome Statute in 2002, is the only permanent international court that prosecutes individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. It has 125 signatories, including the UK and all EU countries, though Hungary has officially begun the withdrawal process. Leading international law experts have told Middle East Eye that Cameron's behaviour is an attack on judicial independence, and is prohibited under the Rome Statute and British law as an obstruction of justice. Professor Tom Dannenbaum of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy said that, in general, the UK is entitled to withdraw from the ICC, and, upon exit, would then cease its financial contribution. Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » Additionally, as a state party to the Rome Statute, the UK can advocate budget cuts within the Assembly of States Parties, the court's governing body, without having to pull out. But, he said, the issue here arises before any such withdrawal or defunding. "The problem here is David Cameron's reported threat to condition possible UK action or inaction in those respects on the decisions of the ICC Prosecutor regarding whom to investigate and prosecute," said Dannenbaum. "That threat is deeply concerning. The rule of law depends on prosecutors' insulation from political pressure in their identification of individuals for investigation and prosecution,. That is true at the ICC just as it is in domestic systems of criminal justice." Under what law could Cameron be charged? The four experts MEE spoke to said the ICC could charge Cameron, given the nature of the phone call with Khan, based on Article 70 of the Rome Statute, which prohibits offences against the administration of justice. These include "impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties; and retaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official." Dannenbaum argued that Cameron's threat to withdraw the UK from the ICC and defund the court may amount to "corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of … persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties". Although this particular provision has never been litigated before the ICC, Dannenbaum said, the relevant offence of "corruptly influencing a witness" has. "That case law indicates that 'corruptly influencing' includes 'pressuring' the protected person in a way 'capable of influencing the nature' of their contribution and thereby 'compromising' it, with the term 'corruptly' signifying the aim of 'contaminating' the person's contribution," Dannenbaum explained. "Per the reported dialogue, David Cameron clearly seeks to pressure the ICC Prosecutor's decision regarding whether to pursue warrants for Israeli officials. It is possible that this pressure would be understood to have been designed to 'contaminate' the Prosecutor's decision, although that concept may be less clear here than it is in the context of witness testimony. "Considerations regarding state withdrawal and budget cuts are plausibly 'capable' of influencing such decisions, albeit that the Prosecutor appears to have resisted the pressure in the case at hand." Given the above points, Dannenbaum concluded that Cameron's conduct may be consistent with the prohibited offences against the administration of justice listed under Article 70. The court has jurisdiction over Article 70 offences, irrespective of the nationality or location of the accused. What penalty could Cameron face? If successfully charged, Cameron is likely to face an arrest warrant by the court and, if convicted, could be sentenced to up to five years of imprisonment in The Hague or a fine. However, given the vulnerability of the ICC, with Trump's sanctions and Khan's leave of absence, Vasiliev suggested that Cameron's prosecution in The Hague would be "rather unlikely. "The ICC could in principle open the investigation into these allegations under Article 70 or request the UK to do so (or the UK could do so on its own). Whether this will in fact be done, is a big question." Could Cameron be prosecuted in the UK? Toby Cadman, a British barrister and international law expert, said that if the allegations are substantiated by clear evidence, then Cameron could be investigated at an international and domestic level "provided there's political will". Francesca Albanese: David Cameron could be criminally liable for threatening ICC Read More » In the UK, an investigation could be opened for the common law offence of obstruction or perverting the course of justice or the common law offence of misconduct in public offence, he said. An investigation in the UK can be carried out in accordance with Section 54 of the ICC Act 2001, which is based on Article 70 of the Rome Statute. The attorney general's consent would be required for any prosecution to go ahead. "It is quite clear that the allegation is serious and if the UK is committed to maintaining a system based on the rule of law with full respect for the state's international treaty obligations it should open an investigation and if the evidence supports it, bring charges," Cadman told MEE. Could Cameron be prosecuted outside the UK? But Vasiliev suggested that Cameron's prosecution before the courts of other states would be precluded by his functional immunity - the protection granted to senior officials if an alleged offence was committed during their official duties. "Cameron has a functional immunity for that act as he uttered those threats in the exercise of his official functions, and there is no exception to such immunity applicable in foreign courts for offences against the integrity of judicial system," Vasiliev argued. "The prosecution authorities of other states parties therefore will not eagerly pursue such a case."

Prominent Egyptian TV host says Gaza-bound convoy a 'ploy to embarrass' the country
Prominent Egyptian TV host says Gaza-bound convoy a 'ploy to embarrass' the country

Middle East Eye

time5 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Prominent Egyptian TV host says Gaza-bound convoy a 'ploy to embarrass' the country

Ahmed Moussa, a prominent pro-government presenter in Egypt, has taken to social media in criticism of a grassroots convoy heading towards Gaza in an attempt to break Israel's siege on the Palestinian enclave, calling the effort a "ploy to embarrass Egypt". The Sumud Convoy - which means steadfastness in Arabic - started in Tunisia this week, with thousands of volunteers from Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Morocco and Algeria. Organisers say they are aiming to raise international awareness about the humanitarian crisis in the besieged enclave and deliver aid to what the UN has called the "hungriest place on earth". The convoy is projected to reach Cairo by Thursday, though Egyptian officials have yet to authorise its entry into the Sinai Peninsula, where the Rafah crossing to Gaza is located. While the volunteers have received widespread praise and celebration along their journey on the North African coast, some pro-government figures in Egypt claim the plan is a "political scheme" by people affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, which is outlawed in Egypt - labelling it an "anti-Egyptian establishment", as opposed to a pro-Palestinian, effort. One of the loudest critics of the movement is television personality Moussa, who took to X, formerly Twitter, to accuse the convoy of being a "well-planned setup" to cast Egypt in a negative light with regards to the Palestinian cause. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Everyone must be vigilant to confront this trap that aims to put Egypt in a very embarrassing position, whether it allows the entry or prevents the convoy, and the repercussions of what may happen and the campaigns prepared in advance against the Egyptian state," he said in a post on Tuesday, adding that it was "strange" that the organisers did not choose an "easier and shorter sea route". عندهم البحر المتوسط وسواحلهم والمياه الدولية وينطلقوا منها الى غزة. غير كده غير مسموح. مصر لن تكون ارضا للفوضى مصر دولة لها سياده وعلى الجميع ان يحترمها ولن نسمح لأى تهديد لأمننا. ودا حق شرعى لنا. — القَاَئِد عَبْداللّه ◼️◾▪️ (@alqaeed36) June 10, 2025 Translation: They have the Mediterranean Sea, their coasts, and international waters to launch from to Gaza. Anything beyond that is not allowed. Egypt will not be a land of chaos. Egypt is a sovereign state, and everyone must respect that. We will not allow any threat to our security. This is our legitimate right. "Will the convoy save Gaza or is its goal media hype? The issue is not easy but rather carefully planned and the goal is to embarrass Egypt and not Israel," he continued. His sentiment was echoed by other pro-government voices on social media, who accused the convoy volunteers of being "actors", 'exploit[ing] the Palestinian cause', and posing a national security threat. دا مخطط له من دواعش الإخوان لإدخال مصر في مواجهة مع امريكا و النيل من سمعتها. على مصر التعامل بحزم و لي عايز يروح غزة عندهم البحر أو على الأقل التنسيق مع البلد الممر و ليس من هب و دب يدخل. — ❤️🇲🇦 سارة 🇸🇦❤️🇦🇪 (@Schauer100) June 10, 2025 Translation: This is a plot by the Muslim Brotherhood's ISIS members to pit Egypt against America and tarnish its reputation. Egypt must deal firmly, and anyone who wants to go to Gaza can go to the sea, or at least coordinate with the transit country, so that anyone who wants to go can't enter. Another prominent presenter, Hossam al-Ghamry, said the convoy was a "clear ploy" by the Muslim Brotherhood in a series of posts on X. "If the convoy reaches the borders with Gaza, it will force [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu to occupy Sinai to secure his borders and expel Palestinians into Egypt," he said. 'We wish the heroes safety' Many Egyptians on social media have countered these posts with comments voicing their support for the movement. Several people commented directly under Moussa's post, calling the land route the "logical" and "most appropriate" route given that Gaza would not be able to receive international ships. Others countered the claims that the convoy was a publicity stunt. بناءا على تغريدة هالعرص الأمنجي فالنظام المصير ممانع لدخول القافلة — Suhayb (@ThisIsSuhayb) June 10, 2025 Translation: Based on this security official's tweet, the regime is preventing the convoy from entering. One Facebook user commented: "the convoy includes doctors and elderly men and women that do not care for the media but are trying to do what they can". Some users were more harsh in their criticism. "The regime's mouthpiece claims that the land convoy is a trap set to put Egypt in an embarrassing position," said one user. "We wish the heroes of the convoy safety until they reach Gaza. And they bring in the aid piled up in Rafah." Others argued that Moussa's post was an indication that the Egyptian goverment would block the convoy. The volunteers for the Sumud convoy, led by the Joint Action for Palestine, reportedly include trade union and political figures, as well as human rights activists, athletes, lawyers, doctors, journalists and members of youth organisations. The group is part of the larger Global March to Gaza movement, which includes approximately 2,000 to 3,000 activists from around 50 countries who are expected to fly into Cairo on 12 June. Both the activists and volunteers on the Sumud convoy are expected to coordinate to march to the Rafah crossing together, a move they hope will pressure the international community to force Israel to end the bombardment and siege of Gaza, which has killed over 55,000 Palestinians and wounded over 127,000 more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store