BYD to nearly triple its South African dealer network by next year
BYD's move comes while competition in Africa's largest automotive market is growing, where sales of new energy vehicles are rising and other Chinese companies — such as GAC, Chery and GWM — are also making inroads.
Launched in 2023, with its BYD battery electric ATTO 3 vehicle, the carmaker has about 13 dealerships.
'By the end of the year we will have about 20 dealerships around the country. The aim is to expand that to about 30, 35 the next year,' Steve Chang, GM of BYD Auto South Africa told Reuters in an interview on Wednesday.
BYD offers six models in the South African market, with its plug-in hybrid Shark pickup, hybrid SEALION 6 and pure electric SEALION 7 SUV models launched in April, completing its hybrid and electric dual-powertrain strategy.
The dealership expansion will help BYD become a known brand and capture more buyers in a country slowly transitioning to EVs.
In 2024, sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs) — a term that describes battery-powered fully electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid cars — rose to 15,611 units from 7,782 units in 2023, according to data from automotive industry body Naamsa.
While the share of NEVs to total car sales is still low, BYD is hoping to capture the market early on, in preparation for a meaningful transition, Chang said.
'We want to educate and cultivate the market of South Africa and make sure South African consumers can catch up with the rest of the world.'
The uptake of EVs and investment in Africa is slow relative to emerging market peers due to limited charging infrastructure, unstable power supply and high import duties compared with fossil-fuelled cars.
But BYD sees potential.
'South Africa is one of the most important automotive markets in the southern hemisphere. It's probably the biggest market in Africa, so it's a market we have to look at and see how we can develop the market,' Chang said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
Did Elon Musk snub handshake to Ramaphosa?
A clip of Elon Musk seemingly snubbing a handshake from President Cyril Ramaphosa has gone viral. But is it all it seems for the Pretoria-born billionaire who has accused the South African government of promoting 'openly racist laws'? On the X app, a short clip of President Cyril Ramaphosa's visit to the White House resurfaced. In May, the president visited the Oval Office alongside a delegation, where he met with US President Donald Trump. In the video, Ramaphosa shakes the hands of US officials, whilst Elon Musk laughs and looks on. 'Elon Musk doesn't touch k******. This is embarrassing 💔', read a X post. However, a community note quickly corrected the fake news by posting the full clip of Elon shaking the president's hand. Last year, the two men met to discuss the potential operation of Elon Musk's internet satellite service, Starlink, in the country. In images posted by the president, Musk was seen smiling while shaking his hand. South Africa is one of a few African countries that has not granted Elon Musk's internet satellite service, Starlink, a licence to operate. According to the world's richest man, this is a result of 'racist laws', which require his company to adhere to a 30% local ownership mandate. The Pretoria-born billionaire is referring to the transformative legislation, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), which he has reportedly rejected. According to reports, Starlink, which falls under SpaceX, could effectively bypass the law with its plans to invest over R2 billion in the country. Business Day reports that the company would finance infrastructure to support the Southern African Development Community (SADC), which is made up of 16 countries. Could Starlink operate in South Africa without adehering to transformative legislation? Images via X: @starlink In May, Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies Solly Malatsi gazetted a policy direction for his department on Equity Equivalent Investment Programmes (EEIPs), which are considered 'alternatives' to transformative legislation. Without mentioning Starlink or Elon Musk, the minister claimed that the policy would 'attract investment,' specifically in operating licensing. The minister revealed that current legislation for foreign investments 'did not allow companies to contribute to transformation goals in ways other than traditional ownership'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
South African banks face scrutiny over political account closures
SA's big banks' trade policies in the spotlight Image: IOL Regulators have been warned against approaching complaints about South African banks in the same way as US president Donald Trump, who this week issued an executive order after accusing financial institutions of unacceptably restricting law-abiding individuals and businesses' access to banking services based on political or religious beliefs. Mametlwe Sebei, president of the General Industries Workers Union of SA (Giwusa), an affiliate of the SA Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu), said Giwusa would not support merely implementing moves similar to Trump's as the situation required the same interventions but for different reasons. Sebei said moves against the banks for being reactionary and assaulting human rights must be supported. "We also know that banks are not accountable in this country, there are political parties, trade unions, community organisations whose bank accounts were closed without an adequate explanation," he said. Sebei described banks as untransformed and that there is not much to look into as far as the banking industry and its conduct are concerned as many South Africans have suffered a lot. He said even Giwusa recently had a dispute with one of the country's major banks, which gave some members access to the union's accounts without authorisation and there were no adequate explanations. According to Sebei, companies perceived to be close to certain public figures have had their bank accounts closed without explanation. "When they close bank accounts, they are effectively condemning workers in those companies to unemployment, retrenchments and job losses. You cannot destroy a company to punish the owners," he said. Sebei said the idea that private banking institutions can take political decisions is extremely dangerous and that is why this should be strongly regulated. In addition, he said the law already provides for instances where there is suspicion of misuse of banking facilities by a client that is able to be reported to the authorities as provided for in the Financial Intelligence Commission Act. Sebei added that the current laws can be implemented without jeopardising jobs and the livelihoods of workers. "Financial services are a lubricant by which the economy is working, it has enormous power in society and in the economy that can destroy not only individuals but also companies and whole industries. These people are wielding enormous public power that has been privatised into institutions that are guided by profiteering and nothing else and want to exercise this power without transparency, accountability and even pass political judgment and that for me is deeply troubling," he said.


The South African
13 hours ago
- The South African
Shauwn Mkhize's Royal AM ordered to repay R27 million sponsorship
Royal AM Football Club will be required to repay all funds received from a controversial R27 million sponsorship deal with the Msunduzi Municipality, following a High Court ruling declaring the agreement unlawful. The judgment comes just weeks after the municipality moved to cancel the three-year sponsorship agreement, which had sparked public outrage. The football club is owned by Durban businesswoman Shauwn Mkhize and her son, Andile Mpisane. Local ratepayers and civil society groups, who have long opposed the deal, have welcomed the court's decision as a victory for transparency and accountability. 'We've been against the sponsorship from the start,' said Anthony Waldhausen, CEO of the Msunduzi Association of Residents, Ratepayers and Civics (MARRC). 'Now, we're looking forward to the municipality taking steps to recover the money owed. That funding should be redirected to urgently needed service delivery.' The sponsorship was originally pitched as a strategic investment in sports development and brand exposure. However, critics slammed it as irresponsible spending in a municipality grappling with service delivery challenges and financial strain. Calls have also intensified to broaden the investigation into the origins and motivations behind the deal, with demands for greater oversight of municipal finances. The court's ruling now compels the Msunduzi Municipality to initiate processes to recover the full R27 million from Royal AM. It remains to be seen whether the club will comply voluntarily or if further legal action will be required. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.