Ukraine: Zelenskyy to allow over-60s enlist in military – DW – 07/29/2025
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has signed a law allowing people over the age of 60 to voluntarily join the armed forces, which have struggled to find recruits since the Russian invasion started in February 2022.
Meanwhile, a Russian attack has killed at least 16 inmates at a prison near Zaporizhzhia, Ukrainian officials have said, with at least 35 more injured in the overnight bombing.
Eight strikes were reported as likely involving glide bombs, which also damaged nearby homes and left buildings inside the complex in ruins.
The Ukrainian president's chief of staff condemned the attack as a war crime.Polish authorities said a jailed Colombian man started two fires in Poland on behalf of Russia last year. Poland has a close political and military relationship with Ukraine and strained relations with Russia.
The 27-year-old man stands accused of setting fire to two material warehouses in Warsaw and Radom in 2024, a spokesman for the Interior Ministry in Warsaw said.
The fires were quickly extinguished, and no one was injured in either case.
The Colombian man had previously been trained by a person with links to Russian secret services, according to the Interior Ministry.
The public prosecutor's office is now investigating the man for working for a foreign secret service and for terrorism.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a bill on Tuesday allowing citizens over 60 to voluntarily join the military while the country is under martial law.
The new law allows people over 60 to sign one-year military service contracts if they pass a medical exam and receive approval from a unit commander.
Each recruit will face a two-month trial period, during which the contract can be terminated early if they are found unfit. While the law sets no maximum age for service, all contracts will automatically end when martial law concludes.
This measure expands Ukraine's recruitment pool by enabling older volunteers to serve in non-combat and specialized roles in Ukraine's ongoing manpower shortages.
The Kremlin has acknowledged a new ultimatum from US President Donald Trump, who has shortened his deadline for Moscow to move toward a ceasefire in Ukraine or face additional sanctions.
"We have taken note of President Trump's statement yesterday. The special military operation continues," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Tuesday during a press call, using Moscow's official term for the war. He added, "We remain committed to a peace process to resolve the conflict around Ukraine and to ensure our interests in the course of this settlement."
Trump, speaking Monday in Britain, gave Russia 10 to 12 days to show progress toward ending the war, citing frustration with the lack of results. "There's no reason in waiting... We just don't see any progress being made," he said.
The revised timeline accelerates a warning Trump issued on July 14, when he threatened new sanctions on Russia and countries purchasing its exports within 50 days — a deadline that would have expired in early September.
Trump, who has spoken with President Vladimir Putin multiple times since returning to the White House in January, also said he is "not so interested in talking anymore."
Missile and drone attacks have killed at least four people and wounded several others in Ukraine's central Dnipropetrovsk region, regional officials said Tuesday.
A strike on the city of Kamyanske killed two people, injured five, and damaged a hospital, according to regional military head Serhiy Lysak. Another person was killed and several wounded in an attack on the Synelnykivsky district.
In a separate strike on Velykomykhaylivska late Monday, a 75-year-old woman was killed and a 68-year-old man injured. A private home was also damaged, Lysak said.
Russian shelling has killed five civilians and wounded three others in Ukraine's northeastern Kharkiv region, local police said Tuesday.
"According to preliminary data, five civilians were killed and three more were wounded to varying degrees as a result of the shelling," police said in a Telegram post, noting that Russian forces likely used a multiple launch rocket system.
The regional capital, also called Kharkiv, is Ukraine's second-largest city and serves as a major economic and cultural hub.
Russia has hit Kharkiv with multiple strikes in recent months, including one that damaged a maternity ward in July.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said that a Russian airstrike on a prison near Zaporizhzhia was "deliberate" and not accidental, calling for increased international pressure on Moscow to end its attacks.
"It was a deliberate strike, intentional, not accidental," Zelenskyy said Tuesday in a social media statement. "The Russians could not have been unaware that they were targeting civilians in that facility."
He added that Russia "must be compelled to stop the killing and make peace."
A Ukrainian drone strike has killed one person in Russia's Rostov region, the area's acting governor, Yuri Sliusar, said Tuesday.
Sliusar reported that the victim died after a car was hit on Ostrovsky Street. He said multiple locations were targeted in the overnight attack, including Salsk, Kamensk-Shakhtinsky, Volgodonsk, Bokovsky, Tarasovsky, and Slyusar.
Debris also struck the Salsk train station, damaging both a freight and a passenger train. Passengers were evacuated, and no additional injuries were reported.
Ukrainian officials say a Russian airstrike has killed at least 16 prisoners at a detention facility near the front-line city of Zaporizhzhia.
Another 35 inmates were injured in the overnight attack, which also damaged multiple buildings within the complex, according to regional governor Ivan Fedorov.
Federov said the area was struck eight times overnight, likely by Russian glide bombs, and nearby homes were also hit. The wounded were receiving medical care, he added.
Glide bombs, launched from Russian aircraft over occupied territory, strike Ukrainian targets with little warning. Their speed and range make them difficult for Ukraine's air defenses to intercept while keeping the launch aircraft out of range.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, condemned the strikes as "another war crime" committed by Russian President Vladimir Putin's Kremlin.
"Putin's regime, which also issues threats against the United States through some of its mouthpieces, must face economic and military blows that strip it of the capacity to wage war," Yermak said on X.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Welcome to DW's coverage of the latest developments in the Russian war on Ukraine.
You join us after Russia carried out eight strikes on the Zaporizhzhia region, hitting a prison where at least 16 people were killed.
The governor of Russia's Rostov region also said one person had been killed in a Ukrainian drone strike there.
Stay with us for the latest news and analysis from the ongoing war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
5 years after protests in Belarus: Have things changed? – DW – 08/08/2025
Five years ago, mass protests rocked Belarus — but the regime clamped down hard. What's changed since then? And could things have turned out differently? No one saw it coming when the largest protests in Belarus' history erupted five years ago — in a country that had already been ruled autocratically by Alexander Lukashenko for more than a quarter of a century. At the time, people took to the streets to protest against the results of the August 9, 2020, presidential election, which was rigged in Lukashenko's favor. They were also angered by the authorities' lack of steps to protect the population against the COVID-19 pandemic and the arrest of the most promising opposition presidential candidates and thousands of citizens. Women organized marches and students took to the streets. Workers, actors, and athletes protested, diplomats were dismissed, and doctors and teachers wrote open letters to voice their dissatisfaction. In turn, the country's security forces responded with a wave of violence. Many people were hurt and even killed, with a steady stream of injured people taken directly from police stations to hospitals. And the Hollywood story of the then housewife Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, who entered the race for the Belarusian presidency in place of her then-imprisoned husband Siarhei Tsikhanouski, ended without a happy ending. She was forced into exile in Lithuania. Over the years, Alexander Lukashenko increasingly worked to secure Russia's support. He helped Vladimir Putin in the war against Ukraine, triggered a migration crisis on the border with the European Union, gained power for another five-year term, and still has no intention of stepping down. But could things have turned out differently? The developments in Belarus could not have turned out any differently at the time, says Artyom Shraibman, an expert at the Carnegie Center, a foreign policy think tank. "The West had no leverage at these critical moments to weaken the Lukashenko regime in any way," the Berlin-based political scientist said in an interview with DW. DW columnist Alexander Friedman, who teaches Eastern European history at German universities, points to the global political paradigm, which was different in 2020. "From a European perspective, Belarus was perceived as a zone of Russian interests where extreme caution was required," he said. The situation might have been different if Putin had not supported Lukashenko and had instead taken a neutral position. Five years on, there are no longer even digital traces of the mass protests in Belarus. The media outlets that reported on them at the time are now closed or operate from abroad. Their websites are blocked by the Belarusian authorities. Many people have also deleted their private photos and videos of the events of 2020, fearful that authorities will use them to identify participants in the protests. Articles, reports, archives, and social media posts have also disappeared. At the same time, it is increasingly difficult for the regime in Belarus to hide the enormous scale of the repression. According to the human rights center "Viasna" in Belarus, at least 8,519 people have been prosecuted for political reasons since 2020, and a total of more than 60,000 people have been imprisoned. Among the most prominent prisoners is activist and flutist Maria Kolesnikova, who was sentenced to 11 years in prison. Her relatives have had no contact with her to this day. The same applies to banker and philanthropist Viktor Babaryka, who is serving a 14-year prison sentence. And human rights activist Ales Bialiatski is currently the only Nobel Prize winner in the world who has to work six days a week in a penal colony. "Bialiatski's health is deteriorating; he has problems with his eyesight and his legs," said Leonid Sudalenko, a former political prisoner and Bialiatski's colleague at Viasna, in an interview with DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Even today, Belarusians are still being persecuted in connection with the 2020 protests. Since the beginning of the year, more than 1,700 people have been arrested on administrative, criminal, and politically motivated charges. And those are only the numbers known to human rights activists. The reasons for detention are manifold. Some were photographed during the protests. Others liked "extremist" web content – although in Belarus, all independent media is classified as "extremist", including DW. Some left "incorrect" comments on the web, campaigned for the "wrong" candidate in the 2020 elections, made donations or sent parcels to political prisoners. The list of "extremist" offenses is long. For example, a company that produced jewelry pendants in the shape of a map of Belarus was recently labeled "extremist." In recent months, the regime has released political prisoners in small groups — more than 300 people in total. In June 2025, this included Siarhei Tsikhanouski, blogger and husband of the leader of the Belarusian democratic forces, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. He was released from custody on the day Alexander Lukashenko met with US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Keith Kellogg. The Belarusian regime makes no secret of the fact that it would release political prisoners in exchange for concessions from the West. Lukashenko declared on July 31 that he was prepared to hand over several thousand people. "If you want them, take them! What do you offer in return?" he wrote after talks with the US delegation. Artyom Shraibman believes the West could do more to support people in Belarusian prisons. "It could negotiate more actively for the release of these people and offer Lukashenko concessions in terms of his reputation and diplomacy — phone calls, visits and contacts." In theory, Western countries could go even further, he said, and "consider lifting some sanctions in order to reach a kind of exchange with Lukashenko to end the migration crisis and release political prisoners." But the expert said that such steps would be unlikely to radically change the situation in Belarus. Instead, they could change the prospects of individual victims of this regime. Their fates are largely in the hands of the West. However, since Belarus has not been and is not a priority, there has been no sign of serious willingness to get involved so far.
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Will EU-India ties survive the latest Russia sanctions? – DW – 08/08/2025
Experts say Brussels' sanctions are largely symbolic, while the real threat to New Delhi comes from looming US tariffs. Ironically, the EU may still stand to gain. The year began on a high note for the European Union and India. In February, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen visited New Delhi and, alongside Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, instructed officials to resolve remaining differences and move forward on a long-delayed free trade agreement. But that momentum was disrupted in July, when India was drawn into the EU's 18th sanctions package against Russia. The move targets New Delhi's refining of discounted Russian crude and the export of those products, some of which are sold to Europe. Could this sanctions development derail a potential EU-India trade deal? Experts argue it won't, saying the US threat of imposing tariffs of up to 50% on Indian goods poses a far greater challenge than the impact of the EU's sanctions. And, paradoxically, that may work in the EU's favor. As part of efforts to cut off funding for Russia's war in Ukraine, the EU last month banned imports of refined petroleum products originating from Russian crude. This ban applies to such products coming from any third country, including India. The EU sanctioned Nayara Energy, an Indian refinery partly owned by Russian energy giant Rosneft. "For the first time, we're designating a flag registry and the biggest Rosneft refinery in India," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas posted on X. Nayara Energy was quick to push back, calling the move hypocritical. "While many European countries continue to import Russian energy through various sources, they take a high moral ground by chastising and sanctioning an Indian asset for processing Russian crude largely used by its domestic population of 1.4 billion Indians and businesses," Nayara Energy said in a statement in late July. However, experts told DW the EU's single designation is largely symbolic and unlikely to significantly impact India's energy trade or EU-bound exports. "The EU's sanctions lacks bite and will be difficult to enforce," said Garima Mohan of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, who researches Europe-India ties. "These exports are by no means running the Indian economy." India could easily pivot by substituting its exports with fuel refined from non-Russian sources, such as Iraqi oil. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, an economics expert at the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank, agreed. "It is definitely an escalation by the EU. But I would also say it won't hurt trade negotiations," he said. Instead, he argued the bigger pressure on India right now is coming from the United States. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video As both the EU and India seek to secure stable trade relationships amid an increasingly volatile global economy, experts say the threat of high US tariffs on Indian goods could strengthen their mutual interest in finalizing a free trade agreement. "First of all, the fact that there is no trade agreement between the US and India, then this mindless escalation by [US] President Trump," Kirkegaard said, "means India's desire to diversify away from the US and towards the EU has probably increased. "India now needs a deal with the EU a little more than when it had arguably better ties with the US," he added. Mohan arrived at a similar conclusion. "In a roundabout way, I think the shake-up in the India–US dynamic will end up benefiting the EU," she said. "Given this tariff announcement, India needs reliable and predictable economic partners, it needs investments." The EU has also taken a more measured approach during trade negotiations — particularly in the agricultural sector which employs close to 44% of India's population. If India were to provide greater access to European or US companies, there are fears it could cause job losses at home. "The EU understands that if we insist on a larger opening in the agriculture sector there will be no deal," said Kirkegaard, adding that the EU "understands India's political and economic sensitives in the agriculture sector far better than Trump." If India were to scale back purchases of Russian oil to avoid triggering punitive US tariffs, it could reduce a key Russian revenue stream for Moscow's war effort. That would align with EU and Ukrainian interests. However, an Indian diplomat who spoke with DW on the condition of anonymity warned that removing Russian oil from the global supply could lead to a spike in prices — which would in turn hurt everyone, not just Russia. Kirkegaard questioned why Trump "has not threatened China with the same, which buys more Russian oil." Experts agree that the EU's designation of Nayara Energy is unlikely to shift the war calculus for Russian President Vladimir Putin. But India's own math might change — and that could depend more on Washington that Brussels. So, while EU-India relations have faced a setback, the overall momentum toward a trade agreement remains resilient. What began as a promising year could still culminate in a breakthrough — especially if shifting geopolitical dynamics bring New Delhi and Brussels closer together.
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Says Court Halt Of Tariffs Would Cause 'Great Depression'
US President Donald Trump warned Friday of cataclysmic consequences on the US economy if a court rules that his imposition of sweeping tariffs constitutes an illegal power grab. If a "Radical Left Court" strikes down the tariffs, "it would be impossible to ever recover, or pay back, these massive sums of money and honor," he wrote on his Truth Social platform. "It would be 1929 all over again, a GREAT DEPRESSION!" he said. Trump's hyperbolic statements come as a US appeals court weighs the legality of his broad use of emergency powers to enact sweeping tariffs on trading partners. A lower court ruled against Trump in May, but the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit put the ruling on hold as it considers the case. Trump on Friday touted billions of dollars in tariff revenue "pouring" into the Treasury -- paid by US importers -- and recent stock market records, as proof his levies had created "the largest amount of money, wealth creation and influence the U.S.A. has ever seen." Many economists meanwhile worry the tariffs are stoking inflation and see trade policy uncertainty as slowing investment. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has announced a slew of new tariffs, seeking to force a reordering of global trade that he has long claimed is biased against the United States. In addition to sweeping tariffs invoked under declarations of economic emergencies, he has also instituted sectoral tariffs of between 25 percent and 50 percent on steel and other items. Those levies have generally followed government investigations and are not at issue in the pending litigation. At a July 31 hearing, members of the appeals court appeared skeptical of the Trump administration's arguments that it had broad discretion to declare national economic emergencies and invoke tariffs as a remedy. To invoke his so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on many US trade partners, Trump declared a national emergency over "large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits." Opponents to the White House policy have argued that such a reason does not qualify under the law Trump has cited for the tariffs, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. They also argue that levying blanket tariffs on imports requires the consent of Congress under the US Constitution. The case is likely to end up in the Supreme Court, where conservatives enjoy a 6-3 majority, though analysts say the outcome is uncertain.
