'Rahul Gandhi Can't Be Witness Against Himself': Court In Defamation Case
A court in Pune has rejected a petitioner's request to get a copy of a book which Congress MP Rahul Gandhi cited during a speech in March 2023, which led to the filing of a defamation case against the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha.
Satyaki Savarkar, the grand nephew of Vinayak Savarkar, filed the petition in a special MP/MLA court in Pune seeking a copy of the book which Mr Gandhi used while attacking Vinayak Savarkar.
The court, however, rejected the petition, saying the "accused cannot be compelled to be a witness against himself, nor can he be compelled to produce incriminating material against him."
The court said the trial has not yet started, so the defence cannot be compelled to disclose documents.
"... The burden of proof lies entirely on the complainant. The accused is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. If the application is allowed, it would cause serious prejudice to the accused's right to a fair trial and his right to defend himself effectively," judicial magistrate first class Amol Shriram Shinde said in the order.
"Forcing the defence to prematurely disclose defence materials is neither permitted under criminal procedure nor compatible with constitutional guarantees. It would violate the constitutional right provided under Article 20(3) of the Constitution," the court said.
The defamation case against Mr Gandhi alleged he had on several occasions maligned Vinayak Savarkar, and one particular incident in March 2023 during a speech in the UK crossed the limit.
As per Article 20(3) of the Constitution, no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself, the court said.
"Therefore, this court is of the opinion that an order cannot be passed directing the accused to file the incriminating documents. The documents in question are incriminating in nature and are sought to be produced against the accused.
"The accused cannot be compelled to be a witness against himself, nor can he be compelled to produce incriminating material against him. Hence, the application filed by the complainant is liable to be rejected and is accordingly rejected," the court said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Safety of warkaris is of prime importance, and police are alert to prevent any untoward incident: Shinde
Kolhapur: The safety of warkaris is the responsibility of the state govt, and the police department is alert to prevent any untoward incident in the wari, said deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde at Pandharpur. He was responding to a question from reporters regarding Shiv Sena MLC Manisha Kayande's claim that "urban naxals" had infiltrated the wari. Kayande raised the issue in the ongoing session of the state legislature on Wednesday. She said that atheist people and their organisations participated in the wari — the pilgrimage of the devotees to Pandharpur — in the guise of creating awareness about the Constitution and environment by organising 'Constitution Dindi' and 'Environment Dindi.' Kayande termed such people "urban naxals" who are using the wari to spread their ideology among warkaris. The state govt is bringing Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, and Kayande claimed that the bill was aimed at stopping the activities of "urban naxals". Her remark has been condemned by the opposition and various warkari groups. Asked about the anger among the warkari groups regarding the claim of "urban naxals" infiltrating the pilgrimage, Shinde said, "Everyone wants a safe wari to take place. It is the govt's responsibility. No single warkari should face trouble. The police are alert and ready for preventive action against any wrong incident. If someone is found indulging in such activities, police will take action immediately. " Dharmik, adhyatmik adishthan above political adisthan: Shinde Shinde said that he has come as a devotee. "For us, warkaris are VIPs. Arrangements have been made so that the time required for darshan has reduced to five to six hours from 15-16 hours. For me, dharmik and adhyatmik adishtan (religious and spiritual power) is above rajkiya adishthan (political power)," said Shinde. During the visit, Shinde and ministers Girish Mahajan and Prakash Abitkar visited Palkhi Sthal—the place where the Palkhis on their way to Pandharpur will rest. He asked the authorities to control the release of water from Ujani dam so that Bhima river (called Chandrabhaga) passing through the town empties the sand beach, allowing warkaris to access the river water for a holy dip. Palkhis of sant brothers meet In Malshiras tehsil, the palkhis of Sant Dnyaneshwar and his brother Sopandev Maharaj meet. The Bandhu Bhet is celebrated by the warkaris walking along with the palkhis. Afterwards, the palkhi of Sant Dnyaneshwar moved and entered Pandharpur tehsil.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
ED arguments over in Herald case, it's Gandhis' turn now
Sonia and Rahul Gandhi NEW DELHI: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) claimed before a Delhi court on Thursday that the National Herald case is a "classic case of money laundering". Young Indian Pvt Ltd, in which ex-Congress presidents Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi held a 76% stake, was allegedly created to launder Rs 2,000 crore from Associated Journals Ltd, the company that published 'National Herald' newspaper. "This is a classic case where the offence of money laundering is made against all the accused," submitted additional solicitor general SV Raju, appearing for the ED before the court of special judge Vishal Gogne. He asked the court to take cognisance of the chargesheet. The court was hearing arguments on the point of cognisance of the chargesheet filed against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in the money laundering case. The agency concluded its arguments in the case on Thursday. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi will make submissions before the court on Friday, appearing for Sonia Gandhi. The ED, through the ASG, submitted that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi were beneficial owners and in ultimate control of Young Indian, and that after the deaths of other shareholders they had 100% control. "These two persons controlled the All India Congress Committee. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trending in in 2025: Local network access control [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo They saw that AICC released a Rs 90 crore loan to Associated Journals Limited, or AJL, a Rs 2,000 crore company, the publisher of National Herald newspaper. The purpose was to have Rs 2,000 crore," Raju told the court. Raju claimed Sonia and Rahul Gandhi were responsible for the conduct of business of Young Indian and the fraudulent takeover of properties valued at over Rs 2,000 crore of AJL was with their connivance and consent. The ASG alleged that the shareholding in the venture was just in name and that all the other accused were puppets of the Gandhi family. He added that Sonia and Rahul Gandhi control Congress and wanted to get hold of Rs 2,000 crore instead of the said Rs 92 crore. As per the ED, Congress provided an interest-free loan of Rs 90 crore to AJL, which had assets worth Rs 2,000 crore, for a consideration of just Rs 50 lakh. This debt was allegedly converted into equity in YI's favour. "They deprived AJL's shareholders of their right. YI invested just Rs 50 lakh and got Rs 2,000 crore. YI gained wrongfully and shareholders suffered," he said. The court asked Raju if the shareholders are also witnesses in this case. Calling the matter a little peculiar, the judge asked whether they should not also be made witnesses. "The ED has not investigated the 1,000 shareholders. So will this trial go on without them being witnesses," the court asked. The ASG replied, "The record speaks for itself. This is a classic case of money laundering. The real culprits are these seven persons (including Sonia and Rahul), once you pierce the veil. Today, Sonia and Rahul Gandhi hold almost all shares. They're the beneficial owners of the company."
The Print
44 minutes ago
- The Print
`Defamation' of Savarkar: court says it can't compel Rahul Gandhi to produce `book' cited by him
Satyaki Savarkar, the complainant in the case, had filed the application in May, claiming no such book as cited by Gandhi existed, and he should be asked to produce it if it did. The Congress leader cannot be compelled to produce the book, said judge Amol Shinde of the special court for MPs and MLAs. Pune, July 3 (PTI) A court here on Thursday rejected a plea by the grandnephew of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar seeking access to a `book' cited by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi while allegedly making defamatory remarks against the late freedom fighter. The court, in its order, said the accused cannot be compelled to disclose his defense before the commencement of the trial. 'The accused may produce any relevant documents during the presentation of his defense evidence. If the accused is compelled to produce such evidence prematurely, it would amount to violation of his fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, which protects against self-incrimination,' the order stated. 'As per Article 20(3)…'No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. Therefore, this Court is of the opinion that an order cannot be passed directing the accused to file the incriminating documents,' the judge further said. Satyaki Savarkar has filed a defamation complaint against Rahul Gandhi, citing his speech in London in March 2023. As per the complaint, the Congress MP claimed during the speech that V D Savarkar had written in a 'book' that 'he and five to six of his friends once beat up a Muslim man, and he (Savarkar) felt happy'. No such incident ever took place, nor did Savarkar write any such account, Satyaki Savarkar said in his defamation complaint. PTI SPK KRK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
