EU targets Russian oil in new Ukraine war sanctions
The new measures were approved after Slovakia dropped a weeks-long block following talks with Brussels over separate plans to phase out Russian gas imports. Kremlin-friendly Slovakian leader Robert Fico — whose country remains dependent on Russian energy — dropped his opposition after getting what he called "guarantees" from Brussels over future gas prices.
France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot called the latest moves "unprecedented" and said that "together with the United States we will force (Russian President) Vladimir Putin into a ceasefire". "We are keeping up the pressure on Russia", said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. But the Kremlin said it would seek to "minimise" the impact and warned the measures would backfire on the EU.
As part of the new sanctions designed to sap Russia's war chest, the EU agreed to lower its price cap on Russian oil exported to third countries around the world, to 15 per cent below market value. That comes despite EU allies failing to convince Trump to go along with the plan. The cap is a G7 initiative aimed at limiting the amount of money Russia makes by exporting oil to countries such as China and India. Set at $60 a barrel by the G7 in 2022, it is designed to limit the price Moscow can sell oil around the world by banning shipping firms and insurance companies dealing with Russia to export above that amount.
The EU has largely already cut off its imports of Russian oil. Under the new EU scheme — which Brussels hopes will get G7 allies like Britain and Canada on board with — the new level will start off at $47.60 and can be adjusted as oil prices change in the future. EU officials admit that the scheme will not be as effective without US involvement.
In addition, officials said the EU is blacklisting over 100 more vessels in the "shadow fleet" of ageing tankers used by Russia to circumvent oil export curbs. There are also measures to stop the defunct Baltic Sea gas pipelines Nord Stream 1 and 2 from being brought back online in the future. Among other targets, sanctions will be placed on a Russian-owned oil refinery in India and two Chinese banks as the EU seeks to curb Moscow's ties with international partners.
There is also an expanded transaction ban on dealings with Russian banks and more restrictions on the export of "dual-use" goods that could be used on the battlefield in Ukraine. The latest round of EU measures comes after Trump on Monday threatened to hit buyers of Russian energy with massive "secondary tariffs" if Russia doesn't halt the fighting in 50 days. The move from Trump represented a dramatic pivot from his previous effort of rapprochement with the Kremlin, as he said his patience was running out with Putin.
Meanwhile, Britain on Friday slapped sanctions on the GRU Russian intelligence agency and 18 agents accused of "spreading chaos and disorder" on the orders of Russian President Vladimir Putin. "GRU spies are running a campaign to destabilise Europe, undermine Ukraine's sovereignty and threaten the safety of British citizens", Foreign Secretary David Lammy said in a statement He added: "Putin's hybrid threats and aggression will never break our resolve". The Foreign Office said the sanctions targeted three GRU units and the 18 individual intelligence officers for a "sustained campaign of malicious cyber activity over many years, including in the UK". "The GRU routinely uses cyber and information operations to sow chaos, division and disorder in Ukraine and across the world with devastating real-world consequences", it said in a statement. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
Scramble for critical minerals
The world's superpowers have developed a seemingly insatiable appetite for the critical minerals that are essential to the ongoing energy and digital transitions, including rare-earth metals (for permanent magnets), cobalt (for batteries), and uranium (for nuclear reactors). The International Energy Agency forecasts that demand for these minerals will more than quadruple by 2040 for use in clean-energy technologies alone. But, in their race to control these vital resources, China, Europe, and the United States risk causing serious harm to the countries that possess them. As it stands, China is leading the pack, having gained ownership or control over an estimated 60-80 per cent of the critical minerals that are needed for industry (such as for magnets) and the green transition. This control extends across the supply chain: China is heavily invested in mining across Africa, Central Asia, and Latin America, and has been building up its processing capabilities. For Western powers, China's quasi-monopoly over critical minerals looks like an economic and national-security threat. This fear is not unfounded. In December 2024, China restricted exports of critical minerals to the US in retaliation for US restrictions on exports of advanced microchips to China. Since then, US President Donald Trump has forced Ukraine to relinquish a significant share of its critical minerals to the US in what he presents as repayment for American support in its fight against Russia. Trump also wants US sovereignty over mineral-rich Greenland, to the dismay of Denmark. And he has suggested that Canada, with all its natural resources, become America's 51st state. The European Union, for its part, has sought its own mining contracts, such as in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). From the Scramble for Africa in the nineteenth century to Western attempts to claim Middle Eastern oil in the twentieth century, such resource grabs are hardly new. They reflect a fundamental asymmetry: less industrialised developing economies tend to consume fewer resources than they produce, whereas the opposite is true for developed economies – and, nowadays, China. In principle, this asymmetry creates ideal conditions for mutually beneficial agreements: industrialised economies get the resources they desire, and non-industrialised economies get a windfall, which they can use to bolster their own development. But, in reality, vast natural-resource endowments have proven to be more of a curse than a blessing, with resource-rich countries often developing more slowly than their resource-poor counterparts. A key reason for this is that developed economies have more economic clout, advanced technology, and military might – all of which they bring to bear to acquire the resources they seek. For example, European imperial powers used steam-engine technology to help them explore and exploit Africa for resources like copper, tin, rubber, timber, diamonds, and gold in the nineteenth century. This, together with more advanced weaponry and other technologies, meant that, far from offering local communities fair compensation for their valuable resources, European powers could subjugate those communities and use their labour to extract and transport what they wanted. But even countries that are exporting their resources for a profit have often struggled to make progress on development, not only because of imbalanced deals with more powerful resource importers, but also because their governments have often mismanaged the associated bonanzas. It does not help that resource-rich countries and regions often grapple with internal and external conflicts. Consider the mineral-rich provinces of the DRC, such as Katanga and North Kivu, which have long suffered from violence and lawlessness, fuelled by neighbours such as Rwanda and Uganda. Today, the advance of the Rwanda-backed M23 rebels is fuelling bloodshed in eastern Congo – and creating an opportunity for outside powers to gain access to critical minerals. The DRC-Rwanda peace agreement brokered by the Trump administration promises precisely such access to the US, in exchange for security guarantees. But the resource curse is not inescapable, especially for countries with strong outward-facing institutions to manage the economy's external relations, including its resource sector's ability to attract investment and generate revenues for the state, and inward-facing institutions to govern how those revenues are used. If a country is to translate its resource endowments into economic development and improvements in human well-being, both have a critical role to play. Outward-facing institutions must negotiate fair and transparent mining contracts with multinational corporations and strengthen local governments' ability to do the same. Such contracts should include local-content requirements, which keep more high-value-added processing activities at home, increase local employment and strengthen the capacity of local suppliers and contractors. Since acquiring a 15 per cent stake in De Beers, Botswana has sought to ensure that diamond cutting – not just mining – occurs domestically, which requires inward-facing institutions to deliver adequate investment in these capabilities. Inward-facing institutions must also manage risks raised by resource extraction, from health and environmental damage (deforestation, biodiversity loss, pollution) to labour-rights violations (including child labour). Unfortunately, as it stands, many mineral-rich countries are falling far short, leading some to advocate boycotts of critical minerals coming from conflict zones or countries using forced labour. While such boycotts are unlikely to sway these governments, they could convince multinationals and foreign governments to demand better enforcement of environmental and social standards from countries with which they do business. Ultimately, however, it is up to mineral-rich countries to defend their interests and make the most of their endowments. This starts with efforts to strengthen institutions. @Project Syndicate, 2025
Times of Oman
7 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Trump credits his involvement for Cambodia-Thailand ceasefire, says "proud to be President of PEACE"
Washington, DC: US President Donald Trump touted his role in the Cambodia-Thailand ceasefire, saying that he has instructed his team to restart trade negotiations with the two south-east Asian nations. Trump said that he spoke to Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thai Acting PM Phumtham Wechayachai, warning them that no trade deals would be made while the conflict persisted. "Just spoke to the Acting Prime Minister of Thailand and the Prime Minister of Cambodia. I am pleased to announce that, after the involvement of President Donald J. Trump, both Countries have reached a CEASEFIRE and PEACE. Congratulations to all! By ending this War, we have saved thousands of lives, Trump wrote on Truth Social from Scotland. "I have instructed my Trade Team to restart negotiations on Trade. I have now ended many Wars in just six months -- I am proud to be the President of PEACE!," he added. "I have instructed my Trade Team to restart negotiations on Trade," he added. Over the weekend, Trump said he told the leaders he wouldn't make a trade deal with the countries "unless you settle the war." Speaking during a bilateral meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer earlier Monday, Trump took credit for the diplomatic breakthrough. "We solved that war, you probably saw it just, came out over the wire, so we solved it through trade. I said, 'I don't want to trade with anybody that's killing each other,' so we just got that one solved," he said. The ceasefire declaration between Cambodia and Thailand was announced by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, the current chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), who mediated talks between Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and acting Thai Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai at his official residence near the capital, Kuala Lumpur, CNN reported. Both sides have accused the other of starting the latest border flare-up and traded blame for the ongoing fighting, which has killed at least 35 people and injured more than 200, according to figures from Thai and Cambodian officials, as per CNN. The dispute over their border goes back decades. Reports of fighting dragged on even after the ceasefire was announced. The head of an evacuation shelter on the Cambodian side, Moun Nara, said that hours after the announcement, "I still hear the sound of the shooting... It's not yet ended yet. Let's wait and see until midnight." US President Donald Trump announced on Saturday that the Southeast Asian nations had agreed to ceasefire talks, but localised fighting continued throughout the weekend. Trump said he warned the Thai and Cambodian leaders that he would not make trade deals with either country if the deadly border conflict continued.
Times of Oman
7 hours ago
- Times of Oman
EU: Temu violated laws with 'illegal products'
The European Commission found that the Chinese online shopping platform Temu is not doing enough to stop the sale of illegal products. The Commission's preliminary findings indicate the Chinese online retail giant was violating rules set by the Digital Services Act (DSA). "Evidence showed that there is a high risk for consumers in the EU to encounter illegal products on the platform," a press release on Monday stated. Temu is classified as a "very large online platform" under the DSA. It requires the world's largest tech firms to do more to protect European consumers online. Temu has nearly 94 million average monthly active users in the European Union. Temu under investigation It comes after the European Commission launched a formal investigation into Temu's business model in October. Prominent on the EU executive arm's long list of complaints is the claim that Temu is exporting products to the EU that do not comply with the bloc's standards. "We shop online because we trust that products sold in our Single Market are safe and comply with our rules. In our preliminary view, Temu is far from assessing risks for its users at the standards required by the Digital Services Act," European Commission Vice President Henna Virkkunen. The Commission also accused the online retailer of offering fake discounts to customers, publishing fake reviews, insufficient vendor information, and having an addictive app design. Temu can respond to the allegations, but if concerns remain, the EU may declare a DSA violation and impose a fine of up to 6% of its global annual turnover, though no final decision has been made yet. A Temu spokesperson said the company would continue to "cooperate fully" with the Commission. "Consumers' safety online is not negotiable in the EU — our laws, including the Digital Services Act, are the foundation for a better protection online," Virkkunen said.
