Discontent flares up as JPJ slaps express bus passengers with RM300 fine for not buckling up -
The crash which claimed nine Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) members involved a lorry driver with previous convictions for drug offences.
Then came another heart-wrenching tragedy on June 9 that killed 15 Universiti Putra Sultan Idris (UPSI) students with a number of issues arising from the accident.
These include whether the driver was driving dangerously as well cs the road-worthiness of the vehicle. This has led to calls for a black box device and speed limiters being mandatory in all heavy vehicles.
So imagine the shock that greeted passengers on express buses when they were handed fines for failing to wear seat belts in Kedah.
As reported in the Harian Metro, the Kedah Road Transport Department (JPJ) issued compounds to 16 express and tour bus passengers for failing to wear seat belts during an enforcement operation on July 1.
Undercover RTD personnel were deployed on board buses to discreetly monitor and record violations by drivers and passengers with compounds issued on the spot based on the recorded evidence.
The news was shared on the Kedah Kini Facebook page and suffice to say, the reception was far from positive.
One commenter called out the operation as untimely given that most folks are already struggling with the recently implemented Sales and Services Tax (SST) expansion which has further exacerbated the cost-of-living crisis.
Just ignore the summons, declared one netizen. After all, many bus drivers who were summoned are still driving. He also noted that the RM300 fine 'could buy half-a-year's supply of rice'.
Get your priorities straight was the message conveyed by one irate observer. He contended that there should be – first and foremost – roadworthiness tests on the vehicles.
This should be followed on urine tests on the bus drivers to ensure they are not drug addicts.
Some pointed out that the authorities were targeting the wrong people, highlighting that commuters using express buses were usually low-income earners. 'Why punish them?' seems to be the overriding sentiment.
The general feeling tends to be that the guilty parties are allowed to get away scot-free while the common man-on-the-street is faulted.
However, on the flip side, one commenter did point out that the law must be enforced. This is the only way a society can progress and prosper.
Anyone unhappy with any laws can pressure (through the ballot box) the government of the day to make the necessary changes.
Yes, the laws are there for a reason. For sure the passengers were in the wrong for not buckling up. But the point of contention with many commenters is that enforcement seems selective.
As one commenter sarcastically remarked, 'as if such punitive actions will bring an end to fatal accidents involving buses'.
The manner in which this issue is being handled highlights how the authorities are simply tone deaf and do NOT seem to have the well-being of the rakyat at heart.
Surely, it could have been handled better. – July 4, 2025
Main image credit: Bernama
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Pahang youth who used fake gun to scare man among 26 doing community service
KUALA LUMPUR: Aidil (not his real name) admits he lost his temper when he brandished a replica gun during an argument with a man whom he said had been very rude to his mother. "I only wanted to scare him into thinking I would shoot him after he used very course language and was very rude to my mum. "I didn't actually want to shoot him," said the 20-year-old, who was sentenced to 240 hours community service for the incident last year. Aidil is one 26 people serving their community service orders today at the 2025 Beret Community Service Order Programme at the Civil Defence Force's (APM) Pahang headquarters. He said he was working as a security guard in Bentong at the time of the incident, and did not expect the brash decision would land him in trouble. "The pistol could fire only metal pellets. I bought it for RM300. I had no intention of hurting the man. I only wanted to scare him, nothing more. "I did not expect to be arrested by police just hours after the incident, charged in court and eventually sentenced to 240 hours of community service," he said. Aidil was charged with possession of a replica firearm and making criminal threats. He must complete his community service within two years under the supervision of the Pahang Social Welfare Department. Pahang Social Welfare Department director Khairul Amri Ahmad said there were 52 people in the state, including children, youths and adults, who are under community service orders. He said today's programme was designed to build inner strength, discipline and resilience, as well as helping them to develop physically, emotionally, spiritually and mentally in facing life's challenges. Khairul Amr added that those involved had committed various offences, including theft, sexual offences, traffic violations, rape, drug offences, threats, abuse and illegal street racing. Aidil's lapse in judgment in dealing with life's challenges is not unique, even among among older and supposedly more mature people. Forty-year-old Aida (not her real name) said that the extreme stress of living in Kuala Lumpur drove her to abuse her 18-month-old niece, which left bruises on the child's back. "The hardship of living in a cramped room made it difficult for me to control myself, and I ended up hitting the child. "At the time, I was also caring for my four children, aged 1 to 14. "I never imagined that when the child was taken to the hospital for seizures, the doctor would discover bruises on her back, which led to a police case. "The damage was done, and I was sentenced to 240 hours of community service," said Aida, who now lives in Cameron Highlands. For Salmah, 19, from Temerloh, she became involved in a mule account syndicate last year, which resulted in legal consequences when police traced a deposit of RM2,000 made by an individual into her bank account. "My advice to young people is to be extra cautious when sharing bank account details to prevent misuse by scam syndicates.
The Sun
3 days ago
- The Sun
Art museum owner fined RM300k for illegal wildlife parts possession
KUALA LUMPUR: An art museum owner has been fined RM300,000 by the Sessions Court for illegally possessing protected wildlife parts without a licence. Yiu Shoou Rang, 66, pleaded guilty to eight amended charges and was also sentenced to nine months' imprisonment if he failed to pay the fine, which he later settled. The charges included possession of an orangutan skull, two estuarine crocodile skulls, and seven elephant tusks—all fully protected species under the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010. The offences took place at a business premises in Central Market, Jalan Hang Kasturi, on January 8, 2024. Yiu also faced four additional charges for possessing 150 wild boar parts, 10 porcupine quills, and six sambar deer parts without a valid licence. These offences fall under Section 60(1)(a) of the Wildlife Conservation Act, which carries penalties of up to RM50,000 in fines or three years' imprisonment. Deputy public prosecutor Suhaila Rashid pushed for a deterrent sentence, while defence counsel Teh See Khoon argued for leniency, stating the items were part of an Orang Asli collection meant for museum display. Five other charges were taken into consideration by the court. - Bernama
The Star
3 days ago
- The Star
Art museum owner fined RM300,000 for illegally possessing wildlife parts
KUALA LUMPUR: An art museum owner was fined RM300,000 by the Sessions Court here on Friday (July 25) for possessing various protected wildlife parts without a licence or special permit last year. Judge Mohd Zaki Mohd Salleh sentenced Yiu Shoou Rang, 66, after he pleaded guilty to eight amended charges. The court also ordered nine months' imprisonment in default of payment. Yiu subsequently paid the fine. Yiu was charged with four counts of possessing, without a special permit, protected wildlife parts, including an orangutan skull, two estuarine crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) skulls, and seven elephant tusks, all of which are fully protected species under the Second Schedule of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 (Act 716). The offences were committed at a business premises in Central Market, Jalan Hang Kasturi, around 3.20pm on Jan 8, 2024. He was charged under Section 68(1)(b) of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010, which carries a fine of between RM50,000 and RM500,000, or imprisonment for up to three years, or both. Yiu also faced four additional charges of possessing other wildlife parts without a valid licence at the same time and location. These included 150 parts of wild boar (Sus scrofa), 10 porcupine quills and six parts of sambar deer. These charges were brought under Section 60(1)(a) of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 (Act 716), which provides for a maximum fine of RM50,000, imprisonment for up to three years, or both, upon conviction. However, five additional charges previously brought against Yiu were taken into consideration by the court under Section 171A of the Criminal Procedure Code. Deputy Public Prosecutor Suhaila Rashid urged the court to impose a sentence commensurate with the severity of the offence to serve as a deterrent. In mitigation, defence counsel Teh See Khoon pleaded for a lenient sentence, submitting that the items in question were part of an Orang Asli collection intended for museum display. - Bernama
