
No Way Out: the 1987 thriller that prophesied a deeply corrupt US government
I n 1987 – right before he became the biggest movie star in the world with a five-year hot streak that included Field of Dreams, Dances with Wolves and The Bodyguard – Kevin Costner headlined two films that offered very different visions of America. The Untouchables assembles a group of plucky misfits to dole out frontier justice against those who would seek to extort the American dream – it's brash, gung ho and morally transparent. A guaranteed classic.
Far more interesting, though, is No Way Out, Roger Donaldson's 1987 political potboiler that's equal parts pulpy spectacle and damning critique of the US project. Functioning as a bridge between the conspiracy flicks of the 70s and the erotic thrillers of the 90s, the film starts with a sex scene in the back of a limo (complete with a perfectly timed cutaway to the Washington Monument) and ends with an unforgettable flourish.
Adapted from Kenneth Fearing's 1946 book The Big Clock (which also became a 1948 film), No Way Out transports its source novel's action from a New York magazine house to the beating, bloody heart of cold war-era Washington.
A baby-faced Costner plays Lt Cmdr Tom Farrell, a navy golden boy summoned to DC to work for the secretary of defense, David Brice (RIP Gene Hackman, fully stepping into his late-career 'craven bureaucrat' mode). Brice's special counsel/whipping boy Scott Pritchard (Will Patton, chewing every piece of available scenery as a textbook 80s 'evil gay') wants Farrell to help them derail an overly expensive stealth submarine program (shades of Aukus).
The problem is that Farrell is in love with Brice's kept woman, Susan Atwell (an infectiously delightful Sean Young, turning a potentially thankless role into the emotional centre of the movie). They happily continue their incredibly horny, incredibly doomed affair under Brice's nose, until – spoiler warning – Brice learns that there's another man in Atwell's life and and lashes out. Young as Susan Atwell. Photograph: Columbia/Sportsphoto/Allstar
This prompts Pritchard to go full Iago as he concocts a plan to get his boss off the hook. What if Atwell's other lover was a long-rumoured Russian mole, codename: Yuri? What if the investigation into the attack on her became a Soviet witch-hunt instead? And what if their new dogsbody, Farrell, was in charge of the case? This is the ingenious narrative engine that propels the rest of the film: Farrell was at Atwell's that night, right before Brice, making him the prime suspect in his own investigation. With all five walls of the Pentagon closing in on him, Farrell has to sabotage the manhunt and find the real villain before he's framed.
Donaldson (a Ballarat boy done good!) is one of those uber-reliable journeyman directors Hollywood doesn't make any more; guys you wouldn't recognise if you passed them on the street but whose films you've watched a thousand times at 11pm on 7mate: Cocktail, Species, Dante's Peak, Thirteen Days. No Way Out is highly competent entertainment but it also portrays a deeply corrupt US forever at war with both the world and itself – a nation where people are thrown under the bus at a moment's notice to protect the vested interests of powerful men. Perhaps the only thing more impressive than No Way Out's airtight thriller structure is its profoundly cynical view of US institutions – an outlook that feels almost radical in hindsight, given the chest-beating, self-congratulatory air of so much other Ronald Reagan-era Hollywood fare.
You can understand why The Untouchables went on to become a jewel in the crown of Costner's filmography while No Way Out has sat there, largely forgotten, for close to 40 years. In 2025, though, it's clear which version of the US rings truer, right down to a defense secretary accused of sexual assault (not to mention those damn submarines). Ten years ago I would have considered parts of No Way Out painfully outdated – today it feels almost too close to the bone.
No Way Out is streaming on Amazon Prime in Australia, the UK and the US. For more recommendations of what to stream in Australia, click here
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
A new golden era for opera begins at the Met
Once viewed as a static art form, opera is being revitalised with contemporary stories and fresh perspectives to connect with modern audiences. From groundbreaking productions like Grounded to the passion of young singers from around the globe, The Met embraces change while preserving opera's timeless ability to ground us as human beings. The Metropolitan Opera's Music Director Yannick Nézet-Séguin and General Manager Peter Gelb discuss the bright future of the art form alongside lauded tenor Benjamin Bernheim.


The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Mum-of-22 Sue Radford flies family back to Disney Florida weeks after spending £50k on the same trip for her birthday
JUST months after parents-of-22 Sue and Noel Radford flew to Florida for Sue's £50,000 bumper 50th birthday trip - the family is back at Disney once more. The Morecambe-based brood has shared snaps from the popular holiday resort, including watching fireworks and enjoying giant slushies. 7 7 7 Sue, who is mum to Britain's biggest family, showed how her kids had been enjoying Disney's Boardwalk in Orlando and how they had visited a cake shop with some delicious treats. After walking away with some bites, they then caught some fireworks going off in the nearby theme park. The kids then seemed thrilled as they got super-sized slushy drinks to enjoy. This follows the Radfords having a sun-soaked extravaganza in Florida in April, which is estimated to cost them £52,000. Despite telling The Daily Mirror they have been "feeling the pinch" financially, they said they planned to spare no expense on the holiday of a lifetime. Sue and Noel star in Channel 5's 22 Kids and Counting and also earn money from their business Radford's Pie Company. £26,000 flights Sue and her husband Noel not only took their own children to Florida in April, but all of their grandchildren with them too - making the most of the Easter break from school. Sue, 50, and Noel, 54, are parents to Chris, 36, Sophie, 31, Chloe, 29, Jack, 28, Daniel, 26, Luke, 24, Millie, 23, Katie, 22, James, 21, Ellie, 20, Aimee, 19, Josh, 17, Max, 16, Tillie, 15, Oscar, 13, Casper, 12, Haillie, 10, Phoebe, 8, Archie, 7, Bonnie, 6, and Heidie, 5. Sadly the couple's 17th child Alfie was still born on July 6, 2014. All in, the family are thought to have sent a jaw-dropping £26,228 on flights - and that's before the excess charges or any extra baggage. It's not known if the whole family is back out for their second visit. £20k park tickets Based on the cost of a seven-day Disney visit, which would require each guest to hold a 7-Day Magic Ticket for entrance, Sue and Noel could have forked out £20,065 for each of their Florida trips this year. Luckily for Sue and Noel, children under the age of three go free. So some of the children on the trip won't cost a penny to get into the park. The tickets include access to the park and water parks with the eligibility to enter multiple parks per day. Holders will also have the 'memory maker' package which includes unlimited Disney photopass downloads - pictures taken by photographers around the park, on rides and in restaurants. 7 7 £6k accommodation Sue and Noel have spoken about their approach to holiday accommodation previously, while appearing on the This Morning show - they revealed they usually opt for a villa to save costs and ensure the bunch can bunk close together. Last September, they shared an Orlando Villa Tour on their Facebook page to their 944,000 followers. One eagle-eyed viewer recognised the accommodation as similar to a property listed on rental site, Vrbo. The glam Vrbo house sleeps 15 - so Sue and Noel will need to book 3 to comfortably house all 39 travellers. The accommodation costs £300 per night, working out at £2,100 per villa for a week and £6,300 in total for all three. And that's without any food in the villa or out in the parks. 7 7 How does family-of-22 the Radfords afford to live? AS Britain's biggest family, it may come as no surprise that Sue and Noel Radford must have some hefty bills. Between them, they have a whopping 22 children and seven dogs, which often has some people wonder how they manage their money. The Radfords support themselves with the proceeds of Noel's bakery, The Radford Pie Company, which is located near their home. On their website, it says: 'We have owned our own lovely bakery since 1999 which is how we manage to provide for (and feed) our huge and expanding family as well as for the local people of Heysham and Morecambe.' The family expanded their business to cater to online orders placed across the UK. The business is a family affair, with Noel at the helm, and some of their children helping out. The older kids, who are working at least part-time, don't get a free ride as they're made to pay a small amount of rent to their parents. "Us older ones do pay a little bit of board. Granted it's not a lot but I'm also trying to save up for my own house at the moment.' their daughter Chloe said in a video on the YouTube channel. Sue added: "We've always said if you want to buy somewhere, renting is a bit of dead money, so we'd rather you saved that money up and stayed at home a bit longer. 'I also do believe they should pay board if they are earning. We've always been brought up by our parents that we had to pay board.' Noel and Sue famously don't rely on benefits for their bumper brood and live off their pie shop for income. They also revealed they make money from brand partnerships on social media. The Radford family stars in their own reality TV show 22 Kids and Counting - which has run for four series. Brand expert Andy Barr believes Noel and Sue have been paid less than £10,000 for each show. He told the Daily Mail: "The typical fee per episode is going to be in the thousands rather than the tens or hundreds of thousands that people often think is the case with TV shows of this nature. "If they continue to get commissioned for a fourth or fifth season, then they are going to be able to command a higher fee." He estimates that the Radfords make £ 5,000 an episode.


The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Viral trad wife Nara Smith pregnant with 4th child aged 23 – as trolls say ‘that's insane, as I'm sure the name will be'
NARA Smith has announced she's expecting her fourth child. The 23-year-old, who went viral as one of the first 'trad wives', took to Instagram to reveal that she and model husband Lucky Blue Smith will soon be growing their family again. 5 5 5 In a video, Nara modelled a low-slung white skirt and an off-the-shoulder cream top, which she lifted up to reveal her burgeoning bump. Lucky, who looked thrilled at the news of his wife's pregnancy, gave her a tight hug, before giving her stomach a tender kiss. "Baby no. 4 loading," she wrote over the top of the clip. "Our little surprise," she added in the caption. With the majority of people in the comments section offered their congratulations, others questioned what the baby would be called - considering the couple have chosen unique monikers for their other three children. Their first child, born in October 2020, is called Rumble Honey, while their current middle child, three, is called Slim Easy. Their youngest, who turned one in April, is named Whimsy Lou. Lucky is also dad to daughter Gravity, whose mother is model Stormi Bree. "4 kids by 23? That's insane as I'm sure the name of the baby will be too!" one wrote in the comments section. "Congratulations, patiently waiting for the name of the baby," another added. Channel 4 star horrifies fans as she reveals 'truly awful' baby names ahead of birth of second child "Omg congrats!!! Can we revisit Bubble for the name," a third commented. "Congratulations. I can't wait for the name announcement," someone else admitted. Others harked back to an interview Nara and Lucky had given to GQ magazine back in 2024, when they said that despite originally wanting six children, they were "absolutely done" with three. "After Whimsy, we are absolutely done now," Nara told the publication. "Having toddlers is the best sort of birth control, because they're wild." While Lucky added: "We feel like we couldn't be as good of parents if we added in any more." Are Unique Baby Names Worth The Hassle? YOU may think having a unique name helps you to stand out, but is it all it's cracked up to be? Fabulous' Deputy Editor Josie Griffiths reveals the turmoil she faced with her own name while growing up. When I was a child, all I wanted was one of those personalised keyrings with my name on it. But no joy, the closest I could find was Rosie, Joseph (not great for a little girl) and Joanne. Josie is short for Josephine, which is a French name, and I managed to reach my 20s without ever meeting anyone who shared it. When I try to introduce myself to people, I get all sorts of random things - like Tracey and Stacey - which can be pretty annoying. Although I have come into contact with a couple of Josies over the last year - there seems to be a few of us around my age - it's still a much rarer name than most of my friends have. On the whole I don't mind it, at least it's not rude or crazily spelt. And it means I can get away with 'doing a Cheryl' and just referring to myself as Josie. I'm getting married this year and some friends are shocked that I'm changing my surname, as it's not seen as very cool or feminist to do so these days, but I explain to them that I'm not that attached to Griffiths as I'd always just say 'hi it's Josie' when ringing a mate up. I think it's nice to be unique and I'll definitely try and replicate this when naming my own kids. It's the rude names you've got to watch out for, so after nine years as a lifestyle journalist I'll definitely be avoiding those. "Is no one gonna talk about how she was done after 3 kids and is popping out another one AGAIN?" one person wrote in the comments. "I'm almost certain you said you didn't want anymore… hmm. Well congrats anyways!" another added. "Didn't she say she's done with 3 kids?" a third questioned. "Loving this for you honey but it makes me laugh how last year you were dead set on 3 babies!" someone else said. "She literally killed me during her GQ couples quiz when she said she was absolutely done having kids," another wrote. "But I guess she's changed her mind about having 6!" "They took the mission of populating the earth very seriously," someone else joked. 5