LogicMonitor Strengthens AI-Powered Observability Leadership with Agentic AIOps Innovations and Strategic Partnerships
DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- LogicMonitor, the leading SaaS-based platform for AI-powered data center transformation, today shared from its annual Elevate Community Conference a series of significant milestones achieved in the first half of 2025. Together with customers, partners, IT leaders, and industry analysts at its Elevate Community Conference 2025, LogicMonitor is showcasing the latest innovations in Agentic AIOps, new strategic partnerships, and insights on the future of AI-Powered Observability.
Driving Data Center Transformation with AI Innovation
LogicMonitor recently introduced new AI-driven enhancements to its platform, including important advances in Agentic AIOps within Edwin AI, the AI Agent for ITOps. These recent innovations empower IT teams with full visibility into AI workloads and applications, enhancing automation, intelligence, and insights for seamless performance across complex modern data centers.
Expanding Global Partnerships
LogicMonitor significantly expanded its strategic partner ecosystem in the first half of 2025 with several partnerships and an enhanced global partner program.
Amazon Web Services (AWS): LogicMonitor signed a Strategic Collaboration Agreement with AWS to simplify VMware migration journeys and accelerate data center modernization for enterprises.
OpenAI: Through a strategic collaboration with OpenAI, LogicMonitor supercharged its platform with cutting-edge AI models, delivering smarter automation and unlocking next-level operational efficiency.
GIEOM: LogicMonitor partnered with GIEOM, a leader in digital governance solutions, to bolster operational resilience within the highly regulated financial services sector.
Global Partner Program: With a focus on enabling partner growth and success, LogicMonitor enhanced its global partner program, and received multiple industry awards for its leadership in this area.
Advancing Federal Market Commitment with FedRAMP Progress
An important milestone for the public sector, LogicMonitor achieved FedRAMP In Process designation, further strengthening its commitment to delivering a secure, scalable AI-powered observability platform that meets security and compliance standards for federal government agencies.
Award-Winning Excellence Recognized Across the Industry
In the first half of 2025, LogicMonitor received several notable industry awards for its leadership in Cloud, AI, and Data Center Innovation, as well as its Global Partner Program. In addition, LogicMonitor was recognized as a Best Place to Work for its commitment to culture and employee satisfaction. These recognitions include:
"Coming together this week at Elevate with our customers and partners is an opportunity to reflect on the incredible innovations we've introduced in AI-powered observability and Agentic AIOps, the strength of our strategic partnerships, and the outstanding contributions of our global team," said Christina Kosmowski, CEO of LogicMonitor. "LogicMonitor is truly at the epicenter of the AI revolution — and this is just the beginning. The future of IT operations is being written today, and we're proud to be leading the way."
About LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor® offers AI-powered data center transformation. The company's SaaS-based platform, LM Envision, enables observability across on-prem and multi-cloud environments. A Visionary on the 2024 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Observability, LogicMonitor provides IT and business teams operational visibility and predictability across their technologies and applications to focus less on troubleshooting and more on delivering extraordinary employee and customer experiences. For more information, visit www.logicmonitor.com and our blog, or follow us on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and YouTube.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
31 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
AI isn't just standing by. It's doing things — without guardrails
Just two and a half years after OpenAI stunned the world with ChatGPT, AI is no longer only answering questions — it is taking actions. We are now entering the era of AI agents, in which AI large language models don't just passively provide information in response to your queries, they actively go into the world and do things for — or potentially against — you. AI has the power to write essays and answer complex questions, but imagine if you could enter a prompt and have it make a doctor's appointment based on your calendar, or book a family flight with your credit card, or file a legal case for you in small claims court. An AI agent submitted this op-ed. (I did, however, write the op-ed myself because I figured the Los Angeles Times wouldn't publish an AI-generated piece, and besides I can put in random references like I'm a Cleveland Browns fan because no AI would ever admit to that.) I instructed my AI agent to find out what email address The Times uses for op-ed submissions, the requirements for the submission, and then to draft the email title, draft an eye-catching pitch paragraph, attach my op-ed and submit the package. I pressed 'return,' 'monitor task' and 'confirm.' The AI agent completed the tasks in a few minutes. A few minutes is not speedy, and these were not complicated requests. But with each passing month the agents get faster and smarter. I used Operator by OpenAI, which is in research preview mode. Google's Project Mariner, which is also a research prototype, can perform similar agentic tasks. Multiple companies now offer AI agents that will make phone calls for you — in your voice or another voice — and have a conversation with the person at the other end of the line based on your instructions. Soon AI agents will perform more complex tasks and be widely available for the public to use. That raises a number of unresolved and significant concerns. Anthropic does safety testing of its models and publishes the results. One of its tests showed that the Claude Opus 4 model would potentially notify the press or regulators if it believed you were doing something egregiously immoral. Should an AI agent behave like a slavishly loyal employee, or a conscientious employee? OpenAI publishes safety audits of its models. One audit showed the o3 model engaged in strategic deception, which was defined as behavior that intentionally pursues objectives misaligned with user or developer intent. A passive AI model that engages in strategic deception can be troubling, but it becomes dangerous if that model actively performs tasks in the real world autonomously. A rogue AI agent could empty your bank account, make and send fake incriminating videos of you to law enforcement, or disclose your personal information to the dark web. Earlier this year, programming changes were made to xAI's Grok model that caused it to insert false information about white genocide in South Africa in responses to unrelated user queries. This episode showed that large language models can reflect the biases of their creators. In a world of AI agents, we should also beware that creators of the agents could take control of them without your knowledge. The U.S. government is far behind in grappling with the potential risks of powerful, advanced AI. At a minimum, we should mandate that companies deploying large language models at scale need to disclose the safety tests they performed and the results, as well as security measures embedded in the system. The bipartisan House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence, on which I served, published a unanimous report last December with more than 80 recommendations. Congress should act on them. We did not discuss general purpose AI agents because they weren't really a thing yet. To address the unresolved and significant issues raised by AI, which will become magnified as AI agents proliferate, Congress should turn the task force into a House Select Committee. Such a specialized committee could put witnesses under oath, hold hearings in public and employ a dedicated staff to help tackle one of the most significant technological revolutions in history. AI moves quickly. If we act now, we can still catch up. Ted Lieu, a Democrat, represents California's 36th Congressional District.
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
How Bill Gates thinks you should use AI
Brands that aren't using artificial intelligence will soon be left behind—but it's not too late to start, argues a new book, AI First: The Playbook for a Future-Proof Business or Brand. The same way that business leaders once explored what it means to be digital first or mobile first or video first, digital strategists and authors Adam Brotman and Andy Sack pose the question: What does it mean to be AI first? Brotman and Sack, cofounders of the digital consultancy Forum3, interviewed some of the most influential leaders in technology for their book, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates, and Reid Hoffman, best known for cofounding LinkedIn. The book shares their insights as well as a playbook for businesses on how to integrate AI. Brotman, the former chief digital officer for Starbucks who shaped the brand's highly successful mobile app and loyalty program, spoke to Fast Company about what he hopes readers will gain from their new book. We had actually been asked by Harvard Business Review Press to write a book on digital loyalty, which is my background and our specialty. But we had just had a 'holy s—' moment, like a lot of other people, when we saw ChatGPT. We didn't understand what was really behind these generative AI systems and where the various frontier labs and systems were going with it. We thought, we better learn this. We asked Harvard if we could go on this journey and share it with our readers, and they said yes. Why does AI feel different to you than other technological advances? There are two ways. One is that we're talking about intelligence as a service, and that just felt like something that was always reserved for either science fiction or human beings. It wasn't just software that you programmed, that either worked or didn't work. The fact that it could think and reason—at least seemingly so—felt very human and unlike anything that we had seen. The second thing was how fast it was moving. You brought up the 'holy-s— moment.' I've heard that you and Sack at one point wanted that to be the title of the book. Why? We talked to Sam Altman as our first interview for the book. He said that the mission of OpenAI was to achieve artificial general intelligence. And by definition, that's when the AI can effectively do what any human can do, if not better, pretty much instantly and for free. We were like, 'Oh my God, you're focused on that. When do you think that's going to happen?' And he said, 'I can't predict it, but probably in around five years.' That was a holy-s— moment for us. We were sort of stunned. When you try this technology, I think everybody has their own aha moment, if you will. How do I take advantage of this? What is this going to mean for jobs? What is this going to mean for society? There's a lot of exciting things but there's also a lot of scary unknowns. We thought that was an appropriate name, but of course that's not the best name for a book published by an established publisher. So we compromised and called the introduction chapter 'The Holy-S— Moment' and the book is called 'AI First.' Yeah, two things: One was that he likened the first time he saw ChatGPT4 to the first time he saw graphical user interface, before Microsoft came up and led the PC revolution with Windows. So he validated and confirmed the significance of this technology. The other thing Bill Gates said to us that was a key takeaway was about the contours of the concept of productivity. Most of us think of productivity as just quantitative, meaning output. He reminded us that productivity has a qualitative edge and dimension to it, and that if you have access to a tool like generative AI and you know how to harness it, you're going to not just up your productivity, but the quality of your work. I thought that was really interesting. How should business leaders today be leveraging AI? Most organizations want to skip to the AI innovation. They want to skip to the application, like the chatbot or the robot. What they're skipping over is the powerful effects of everybody using AI many times a day, every day, to enhance their decision-making and analysis and insights—frankly, to do their job better and faster. That's not as sexy as some advanced voice-mode, drive-thru technology you deploy across all your QSR [quick-service restaurant] locations. It's not as sexy as completely innovating your creative output through text-to-image, text-to-video capabilities. Those are really important AI use cases, but they're not the everyday, always-on superpower of letting every individual get that benefit of co-intelligence to make decisions faster. One of the key nuggets from the book is that AI-first organizations start with AI-first people. Is that what you mean when you say that business owners should be thinking of AI as a colleague? Yes. It's collaborating, soundboarding with the AI, inviting AI to the table, as [AI expert and Wharton] professor Ethan Mollick likes to say. It's thinking of it as a member of your team, a colleague. Is there anything else you want readers to know about your book or AI in general? I think a lot of people are intimidated or afraid of either not being able to keep up with the advancements in AI or of the implications of AI, given how fast-moving and powerful it is. What I would say is: It's absolutely not too late. There are so many business leaders in the same spot as you. This is the perfect time to develop a game plan to figure out how to make your organization keep up with what's going on. But don't wait—get started.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
In Pursuit of Godlike Technology, Mark Zuckerberg Amps Up the A.I. Race
In April, Mark Zuckerberg's lofty plans for the future of artificial intelligence crashed into reality. Weeks earlier, the 41-year-old chief executive of Meta had publicly boasted that his company's new A.I. model, which would power the latest chatbots and other cutting-edge experiments, would be a 'beast.' Internally, Mr. Zuckerberg told employees that he wanted it to rival the A.I. systems of competitors like OpenAI and be able to drive features such as voice-powered chatbots, people who spoke with him said. But at Meta's A.I. conference that month, the new A.I. model did not perform as well as those of rivals. Features like voice interactions were not ready. Many developers, who attended the event with high expectations, left underwhelmed. Mr. Zuckerberg knew Meta was falling behind in A.I., people close to him said, which was unacceptable. He began strategizing in a WhatsApp group with top executives, including Chris Cox, Meta's head of product, and Andrew Bosworth, the chief technology officer, about what to do. That kicked off a frenzy of activity that has reverberated across Silicon Valley. Mr. Zuckerberg demoted Meta's vice president in charge of generative A.I. He then invested $14.3 billion in the start-up Scale AI and hired Alexandr Wang, its 28-year-old founder. Meta approached other start-ups, including the A.I. search engine Perplexity, about deals. And Mr. Zuckerberg and his colleagues have embarked on a hiring binge, including reaching out this month to more than 45 A.I. researchers at rival OpenAI alone and offering them compensation packages as high as $100 million each, two people with knowledge of the matter said. Four OpenAI researchers have accepted offers from the company. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
