Peter Schiff Agrees With Trump That College Isn't Worth It For Most. His Fix? Scrap The Minimum Wage And Let Kids Learn Trades On The Job
Euro Pacific Asset Management Chief Economist Peter Schiff is siding with President Donald Trump when it comes to higher education: college just isn't worth it for most people.
In a recent post on X, Schiff said, 'Trump is right about colleges being a waste of money for most people. Trade schools make a lot more sense for high school grads who are not really academically inclined. Better yet, abolish the minimum wage so kids can get on-the-job training as apprentices for skilled craftsmen.'
Don't Miss:
Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:.Schiff's post sparked debate not just for agreeing with Trump, but for going a step further by calling for the elimination of the minimum wage.
His argument is that the barrier keeps young people from getting hands-on work experience under the guidance of experienced tradespeople. Instead of spending tens of thousands on a degree they may not use, Schiff believes teenagers could be earning while learning useful skills on job sites, in workshops or in vocational programs.
This isn't the first time Schiff has criticized the traditional education system. He has long argued that college degrees have been oversold as the only path to success while crowding out more practical, hands-on careers.
Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: .
Schiff's take lines up with new data showing younger generations are becoming increasingly skeptical of college. According to a March survey by Indeed and The Harris Poll, 51% of Gen Z workers with a degree said it wasn't worth the money. Only 20% of Baby Boomers felt the same. Rising tuition, student debt, and a flattening college wage premium have all contributed to this shift in thinking.
The financial burden is real: 52% of survey respondents said they graduated with student debt. Millennials had it even worse, with 58% still carrying loans. Nearly four in 10 respondents said their debt hurt their careers more than their degree helped.
Even more telling, 68% of Gen Z grads believe they could do their current jobs without having gone to college. That's compared to 64% of Millennials and just 49% of Boomers. Meanwhile, employers are responding too. A 2024 report showed that over half of job listings on Indeed no longer ask for a college degree.Mike Rowe, host of the TV show 'Dirty Jobs' and head of the Mike Rowe Works Foundation, has been making this case for years. Speaking to Fox Business last week, Rowe said, 'It is early for a victory lap, but as you know, I have been beating this drum for 16 years.'
He supports Trump's push to defund elite universities and redirect those funds into trade programs. 'If I had to choose between should Harvard get $3 billion or trade schools in that world—trade schools,' Rowe said. But he also added that not all trade schools are equal, and they should be evaluated just like universities.
Rowe warned that the stakes are high. He said he recently got a call from the maritime industrial base looking to hire 140,000 tradespeople over the next decade. The energy sector is also booming, with massive demand for workers to build data centers and support the country's digital infrastructure.
His message to graduates? 'If you have a skill that's in demand and you're hungry, if you are willing to get up early, stay late and go to where the work is... you are going to crush it.'
Read Next: Many are using retirement income calculators to check if they're on pace —Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article Peter Schiff Agrees With Trump That College Isn't Worth It For Most. His Fix? Scrap The Minimum Wage And Let Kids Learn Trades On The Job originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
Lululemon fans furious as tariffs threaten to drive prices even higher amid stock plunge
Lululemon lovers are already stretching their wallets to the limit — and now they've had enough. Fans and critics alike were clucking their tongues Friday after the athleisure giant warned customers they'd soon be paying even more for already-pricey workout gear — following a whopping stock nosedive. The culprit? President Donald Trump's tariffs — and, apparently, broke Americans tightening their purse strings. Advertisement 'We experienced lower store traffic in the Americas, partially reflective of economic uncertainty, inflationary pressures, lower consumer confidence, and changes in discretionary spending,' the company said in a recent statement. Translation: Even the brand's cult-following of millennial and Gen Z yoga bunnies aren't splurging $128 on leggings like they used to. 4 Even Lululemon's loyal legging junkies — from millennial moms to Gen Z gym rats — are tightening their waistbands on those $128 yoga pants. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement Execs are scrambling as the one-time Wall Street darling fell short of analyst predictions, seeing just a 1% increase in sales year-over-year, falling short of the 3% forecast. 'We are planning to take strategic price increases … on a small portion of our assortment, and they will be modest in nature,' chief financial officer Meghan Frank said on an earnings call, adding the hikes will roll out within weeks. 'It will be price increases on a small portion of our assortments, and they will be modest in nature,' she claimed. 4 The blame for all this? President Trump's tariffs — and cash-strapped shoppers cutting back. REUTERS Advertisement CEO Calvin McDonald admitted he was 'not happy' with U.S. growth figures and blamed the belt-tightening on skittish shoppers. 'We experienced lower store traffic … lower consumer confidence,' he echoed. While some may point to floundering new lines like the Glow Up collection or Daydrift trousers, the company is pinning the blame on tariffs — particularly those slapped on goods made in Vietnam and China, where the company sources most of its fabrics. In 2024, 40% of Lululemon's products were made in Vietnam, and 28% of its fabrics came from mainland China — both hit hard by Trump's trade crackdown. Advertisement Now, Lulu says it's working to cut costs and negotiate with vendors to offset the tariff hit. But customers aren't exactly downward dogging in support. On X, disgruntled users lashed out at the brand's pricing and manufacturing decisions. 4 The athleisure company says it's trimming costs and haggling with vendors to ease the tariff pain — but shoppers aren't exactly striking a warrior pose in approval. SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images 'You better get it together. Lulu. Using tariffs as an excuse in your rest of the year outlook is not a smart move. Amazon/Walmart tried this it didn't go well. You're Down 65$ today. Our family was a big lulu fan not so much anymore,' one raged. 'For what they charge for their products, you'd think it was made in America,' snapped another. 'It can't be that yoga pants shouldn't cost $125 a pair. No. That's not it,' someone joked. Others were more blunt: 'Their stuff is ridiculously overpriced… total ripoff.' 'Lululemon's collapse isn't about tariffs — it's about betting on foreign manufacturing while ignoring American resilience,' one critic seethed. Advertisement They continued, 'Relocating production… was always a gamble, and now they're paying for it.' Some simply slammed the entire brand: 'Lululemon clothing is so overpriced — always has been. Only the Gen Zers think its the name on them that make them special.' 4 In 2024, Lulu pumped out 40% of its gear in Vietnam and got 28% of its fabrics from China — two prime targets in Trump's tariff smackdown. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement Another scorched: 'Stupid rich women paying exorbitant prices for stretch pants. SMH.' Despite the backlash, Lululemon doesn't appear to be sweating just yet — but with costs climbing and customers stretching their budgets, the future might not be quite so flexible.
Newsweek
12 hours ago
- Newsweek
More Gen Z Delay Having Kids Than Millennials Amid Birth Rate Decline Fears
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Gen Z Americans are more likely to delay having kids due to economic conditions than millennials, according to a new report from AI platform It's what analysts say could be a concerning trend as the birth rate continues to decline, creating larger implications for the economy, workforce and global politics. Why It Matters The CDC recorded a "historic low" for the U.S. general fertility rate in 2023, aligning with global trends seen in several developed countries. The Congressional Budget Office projected that U.S. fertility will remain below replacement for decades to come. A newborn baby girl is reunited with her mother straight after birth in a hospital environment. A newborn baby girl is reunited with her mother straight after birth in a hospital environment. Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images What To Know In a new report from Gen Z, which consists of those born between 1997 and 2012, was slightly more likely to delay having children than their elder millennial counterparts. Roughly 39 percent of Gen Z said they had delayed having a child because of the current economic climate, while only 36 percent of millennials said the same. Katie Trowbridge, a multi-generational workplace strategist and CEO of Curiosity 2 Create, said the younger generations' decision to forgo parenthood has many reasons beyond just the economics of it, though. "This isn't about apathy. It's about discernment. I see a generation leaning into curiosity, creative and critical thinking, and seeking connection and meaning," Trowbridge told Newsweek. "They're not just putting off parenthood, they're rethinking, redefining, and reimaging what it means entirely." Thoai Ngo, a professor of population and family health at the Columbia School of Public Health, said Gen Z is prioritizing self-growth and career development before starting a family. They've also grown up in a world shaped by climate crisis and economic instability, he said. "Rising costs—student debt, housing, childcare—make financial stability an uphill battle," Ngo told Newsweek. "Climate anxiety and shifting social norms mean that Gen Z doesn't view marriage and children as inevitable milestones." Economic concerns are delaying other major life decisions as well, with 36 percent of Gen Z-ers in the survey saying they've given up on the idea of ever owning a home. Worries over their financial situations have driven 33 percent of Gen Z-ers and 40 percent of millennials to turn to artificial intelligence for personal budgeting, Pearl found, but the larger issue of it being too expensive to have a baby could have significant effects for the already declining birth rate. Declining Birth Rates and Demographic Shifts Research shows that those choosing not to have children—the "child-free"—are an increasingly visible identity group. Demographic breakdowns reveal higher proportions of white, urban, and employed individuals, with younger respondents more often uncertain or undecided about potential parenthood. Concerns over population decline have prompted legislative efforts, such as Ohio's proposed "Natural Family Month" bill to promote marriage and child-rearing. Policymakers and public figures, including President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, have advocated for policies aimed at increasing the birth rate. Meanwhile, discussions about climate change, reproductive rights, and economic factors remain central to the choices facing younger adults. "Ultimately, Gen Z is rethinking commitment and stability in a deeply uncertain future. If we don't address the structural barriers—economic insecurity, lack of family supports, climate threats—we'll see continued delays and declines in family formation, with broad impacts on our social and economic systems in the decades to come," Ngo said. Child-free Americans cite various reasons for forgoing parenthood. A significant subset of young adults, 23 percent, said having children was irresponsible due to climate change, according to a recent Newsweek/Independent Center poll. The same Newsweek report found one in three Gen Zers and millennials do not have and do not want to have children. What People Are Saying Moira Corcoran, a CPA and finance expert on Pearl, said in the report: "This data tells us that Americans, particularly younger generations, are feeling a sense of hopelessness when it comes to their financial outlook. With so many saying saving feels futile at this point, many are looking to make drastic changes to their lives in a way that's reminiscent of the 2008 recession." "Between postponing major life decisions like having a child or owning a home to cutting back on summer travel, it is clear consumers are approaching a state of panic – they need ways to access affordable, professional financial advice to navigate these ever-changing economic conditions." Katie Trowbridge, a multi-generational workplace strategist and CEO of Curiosity 2 Create, told Newsweek: "Gen Z isn't just delaying parenthood because of the economy. They're questioning the world they're inheriting. From climate anxiety and student debt to unstable jobs and rising costs, they're asking big questions like: Can I afford to raise a child in a world that doesn't feel built for thriving?" Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "It shows that in today's economy, it often takes both parents working full-time just to stay afloat. With prices rising and housing becoming less affordable, there's less room — and frankly, less patience — for adding more financial weight. We also saw birthrates start to decline decades ago as more women entered the workforce and opportunities expanded — and that trend is only continuing." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "Not only do inflationary pressures continue to way on the cost of living, but this generation that is newer to the workplace will more than likely be hit harder by many of the layoffs announced over the last six months." "And while the decision to not have children right away because of economic factors may not be fun, it is the right call. Having children is more expensive than ever, and having the maturity to understand it would be impossible to assume the role of parent under one's current income is pivotal for long-term financial growth." What Happens Next There are serious implications if the birth rate continues to decline as recent years would suggest, but these concerns tend to revolve around the workforce and national productivity. "The real concern lies in who's worried — and that's often those viewing the issue purely from an economic lens: fewer workers, fewer contributors to GDP, and slower growth," Thompson said. "Long-term, that could mean more economic stagnation. As populations age, we'll spend more on healthcare and social support and less on innovation and expansion. That's the deeper issue — not population size, but how the age imbalance affects productivity and prosperity."
Axios
13 hours ago
- Axios
The "look under the hood" jobs report
The May jobs report looks fine on the surface, but underneath there are signs of weakening in the labor market. Why it matters: The good news is that employers kept hiring at a healthy rate in May. But a few oddities in the report signal less momentum in the job market. What they're saying:"There are now clear trends in the data, not just vague signs, that even if the train is chugging forward, more and more people are getting left behind at the station," Cory Stahle, an economist at job search site Indeed, wrote in a note. "This isn't a bad report, per se, but there are clear signs of erosion just below the surface that may not be apparent just by looking only at the headline numbers," Stahle said. By the numbers: Payroll employment rose by 139,000 in May, roughly in line with what forecasters had anticipated. But the Labor Department revised down job gains in March and April by a combined 95,000 jobs. Job growth has averaged 124,000 a month in 2025, a downshift from 168,000 in 2024. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate was steady at 4.2% — but that masked a steep drop in the number of Americans in the labor force. The share of adults who were employed fell 0.3 percentage points to 59.7%, the lowest in more than three years. It was due to a whopping 625,000 fewer people in the labor force — neither working nor looking for work. The intrigue: The bulk of job creation continued to be concentrated in what Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called "government-adjacent" fields, including health care. That sector added 62,000 jobs last month, above the average monthly gain of 44,000 jobs over the prior 12 months. "The month's modest job gains were concentrated in non-cyclical sectors like healthcare," Comerica chief economist Bill Adams wrote in a note. "Job gains in other cyclical private industries were anemic, reflecting the drag from policy uncertainty." Of note: The federal government sector, which has been hit by DOGE-related layoffs, lost 22,000 jobs in May alone. It has shed 55,000 workers since January. (Local government employment rose by 21,000.) State of play: The reported size of the labor force can be volatile month-to-month just due to sampling error, but the drop in May was unusually large. It may have fallen because of potential workers becoming discouraged about job prospects, or it could be attributable to immigration cuts reducing the supply of labor, notes Nationwide chief economist Kathy Bostjancic. No rate cuts soon The new numbers are the worst of all worlds for those hoping for Fed interest rate cuts — including the guy in the Oval Office. State of play: The Fed is on high alert for any meaningful deterioration in the labor market, which could trigger interest rate cuts to try to fulfill its mandate for maximum employment. This report didn't provide that — it's hard to square a stable unemployment rate and solid payroll growth with the kind of falloff in the job market that would bring in the rate-cutting cavalry, no matter what the beneath-the-surface details show. Meanwhile, average hourly earnings rose 0.4% in May, an elevated level that suggests some residual inflation pressure remains in the job market. The policy-sensitive two-year Treasury yield was up a whopping 0.09 percentage points this morning on the news, reflecting expectations that rate cuts are looking more distant. Between the lines: The Fed's policy committee meets later this month and is all but certain to leave rates unchanged, consistent with its wait-and-see mode for the impact of the trade war on the economy. The meeting after that is in late July, but that means there will only be one more month of jobs data by then. A rate cut then also looks improbable, barring a complete collapse in the data in the weeks ahead. It's far more plausible that by September there will be enough evidence of a downshift in the job market and economic activity more broadly.
