logo
Century Club is public authority under RTI Act, upholds Karnataka HC

Century Club is public authority under RTI Act, upholds Karnataka HC

BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday declared that the Century Club is a public authority under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
Justice Suraj Govindaraj passed the order dismissing a petition filed by Century Club, questioning the order passed by the Karnataka Information Commission (KIC) declaring the club as a public authority.
Advocate S Umapathy had filed the application to the club, seeking certain documents under the RTI Act in 2012, and the club in November of the same year informed him that it is not a public authority as defined under Section 2(4) of the Act, and therefore, there is no necessity to furnish the said information to him.
Against this, Umapathy moved the KIC in 2013 on the ground that the Maharaja of Mysore, having provided a free grant of 7.5 acres of land abutting Cubbon Park to Century Club, amounts to substantial indirect finance by the state and therefore, the club would be covered under the RTI Act.
However, the Century Club contended before the KIC that though the land had been granted by the then Maharaja of Mysore, the same cannot be construed as substantially financing the club, which is an independent society, and it cannot come within the purview of the RTI Act.
Rejecting it, the KIC on March 14, 2018, passed the order impugned, directing the club to furnish the information. Therefore, the club moved the HC in 2018.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, Madhya Pradesh on plea against 237 ‘illegal' environmental clearances by SEIAA member-secretary
Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, Madhya Pradesh on plea against 237 ‘illegal' environmental clearances by SEIAA member-secretary

The Hindu

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Supreme Court issues notice to Centre, Madhya Pradesh on plea against 237 ‘illegal' environmental clearances by SEIAA member-secretary

The Supreme Court on Wednesday (July 23, 2025) decided to hear a petition seeking a declaration that 237 environmental clearances granted by the member-secretary of the Madhya Pradesh State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) are illegal and in systemic violation of the environmental laws. A three-judge Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai issued notice to the Union Government, the State, the SEIAA Chairman, and the member-secretary, Principal Secretary of the State Environment Department. The petitioner, Vijay Kumar Das, a Hindi newspaper publisher, has arraigned the Central Bureau of Investigation too as a respondent. The notices are returnable in two weeks. Mr. Das, represented by senior advocate Vivek Tankha and advocate Sumeer Sodhi, said the clearances were given unilaterally, without convening the mandatory SEIAA meetings and in breach of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986; and the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. The petition alleged that the clearances were the result of a deliberate strategy to bypass the collective decision-making process mandated by the law, and exploited the 'deemed approval' provisions after letting statutory periods lapse. It said that there was no properly constituted SEIAA or SEAC (State Expert Appraisal Committee) between June 11, 2024, to January 6, 2025. A new SEIAA was constituted on January 7 this year. The violations, it was alleged, began from May 23 this year when the first environmental clearance was issued unilaterally by the member-secretary without any SEIAA meeting. The petition said multiple clearances were issued in just one day, May 24, demonstrating the premeditated nature of the alleged violations. 'Despite the chairman of SEIAA writing almost 48 representations between April-June 2025 to prevent these illegal actions, addressed to various authorities including the Member Secretary, Principal Secretary, Chief Secretary, and Union of India, the systematic violations continued unabated. The authorities have turned a blind eye to these representations, which demonstrates not merely administrative negligence but willfull and deliberate facilitation of environmental crimes at the highest levels of the State government,' the petition said. It said the case was a 'classic example' of Secretaries and senior officials abusing their positions for ulterior motives, including personal gains, by facilitating illegal environmental clearances for mining lobbies and industrial interests. 'The member-secretary acted in active collusion with the principal secretary, department of environment, and other public officials, orchestrating a prolonged non-convening of SEIAA meetings with the calculated intention of allowing the statutory period for appraisal to lapse,' the petition argued.

Director General of Shipping to be renamed as Director General of Maritime Administration under the planned new Merchant Shipping Act
Director General of Shipping to be renamed as Director General of Maritime Administration under the planned new Merchant Shipping Act

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Director General of Shipping to be renamed as Director General of Maritime Administration under the planned new Merchant Shipping Act

Advt Advt By , ETInfra Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. Get updates on your preferred social platform Follow us for the latest news, insider access to events and more. The Director General of Shipping will be renamed as the Director General of Maritime Administration in a key institutional reform under the new Merchant Shipping Bill which is expected to be moved in the Lok Sabha reform will 'appropriately reflect the office's duties to oversee maritime affairs , other than commercial aspects of ports, and supervise discharge of obligations of ports under international conventions,' said an Bill seeks to repeal and re-enact the Merchant Shipping Act, it seeks to set up a body responsible for carrying out regulatory and oversight functions in respect of the security of vessels and port facilities.'With a vast coastline and port development by private entities, efficient removal of security lapses and threats is a must. It is also the requirement under international conventions. This also ensures the integrity in operations of ports, which positively impacts the bankability of India as a maritime jurisdiction and has potential to reduce costs to trade,' the official National Shipping Board , under the proposed law, will consist of six Members of Parliament and other members, not exceeding sixteen, of which at least four will be women, to be appointed by the Central government to represent the Central Government, ship owners, seafarers and other interests. It provides that the ship owners and seafarers will be represented equally in Members of Parliament as members or Chairperson of the National Shipping Board are not considered to hold an office of profit for the purposes of Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution of Bill also seeks to introduce digitised processes to enhance ease of doing business and boost investor it seeks to set up an advisory board to be called Seafarer's Welfare Board to advise the central government on the measures to be taken for promoting the welfare of seafarers under the Act.

Sports minister introduces National Sports Bill for greater transparency in NSFs
Sports minister introduces National Sports Bill for greater transparency in NSFs

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Sports minister introduces National Sports Bill for greater transparency in NSFs

Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya on Wednesday introduced the National Sports Governance Bill in Lok Sabha that proposes to institute a Board which will have sweeping powers to lay down rules and oversee the functioning of federations, including the cash-rich introduced the bill that has provisions for a National Sports Board (NSB) to create a stringent system of accountability. All National Sports Federations (NSFs) will have to attain NSB's recognition for access to central government striking feature is the proposal for a National Sports Tribunal, which will have the powers of a civil court and decide disputes ranging from selection to election involving federations and athletes. Once instituted, Tribunal's decisions can only be challenged in the Supreme Court. The bill makes some concessions on the issue of age cap for administrators by allowing those in the bracket of 70 to 75 to contest elections if the concerned international bodies' statutes and byelaws allow for it. It is a departure from the national sports code that capped the age limit at 70."...as a part of the preparatory activities for the bidding of Summer Olympic Games 2036, it is imperative that the sports governance landscape undergoes a positive transformation to bring better outcomes, sporting excellence and aids in improved performance in major international competitions," read the bill's statement of recognised national sports bodies would also come under the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, something that the BCCI has vehemently opposed since it is not dependent on government ministry has insisted that the BCCI, which is now part of the Olympic movement following cricket's inclusion in the 2028 Los Angles Games roster, will have to comply with the provisions of the bill once it becomes an NSB will comprise a chairperson and its members will be appointed by the central government from "amongst persons of ability, integrity and standing."The Board's constituents will also be expected to possess "special knowledge or practical experience in the field of public administration, sports governance, sports law and other related fields."The appointments would be done based on the recommendations of a search-cum-selection committee, according to the draft bill that has been finalised after extensive consultations with stake-holders and public selection committee would be made up of the Cabinet Secretary or Secretary Sports as chairperson, the Director General of the Sports Authority of India, two sports administrators who have each served as the President or Secretary General or Treasurer of a National Sports Body and one eminent sportsperson who is a Dronacharya, or Khel Ratna or Arjuna is a felt need for a comprehensive legislation to improvethe governance of the sports bodies and achieve better results in sports and reducethe disputes and litigation, inter alia, involving sports federations," stated the objectives of the bill."There is an imperative need to curb factionalism, and administrative interventions which adversely affects the organised development of sports and related activities in India and also for its better presentation before the international sports community," it NSB will have the mandate to de-recognise a national body that fails to hold elections for its Executive Committee or has committed "gross irregularities in the election procedures."Failure to publish annual audited accounts or "misused, misapplied or misappropriated public funds" would also be liable for action by the NSB but it would be required to consult the concerned global body before making its bill also provides for a National Sports Election Panel consisting of former members of the Election Commission of India or the State Election Commission or former Chief Electoral Officers of the States or Deputy Election Commissioners."(They) shall act as electoral officers to oversee the conduct of free and fair elections to the Executive Committees and the Athletes Committee of the National Sports Bodies," the bill also introduced The National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill-2025 that seeks to incorporate the changes sought by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), which objected to "government interference" in the functioning of the country's Anti-Doping Agency (NADA).The act was originally passed in 2022 but its implementation had to be put on hold due to objections raised by world body objected to the institution of a National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports, which was empowered to make recommendations to the government on anti-doping Board, which was to comprise a chairperson and two members appointed by the central government, was also authorised to oversee the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) and even issue directions to rejected this provision as government interference in an autonomous the amended bill, the Board has been retained but without the powers to oversee NADA or the advisory role it was previously assigned.- EndsMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store