
Inheritance Tax impact on your family explained as more changes 'being considered'
Rachel Reeves could be set to introduce more changes to Inheritance Tax, a report claims, including a possible cap on lifetime gifting.
Under current rules, if someone lives for more than seven years after making a gift, then this transfer is not subject to Inheritance Tax.
If the gift is given three to seven years before your death, then it is taxed on a sliding scale known as "taper relief" which starts at 32%.
This cap would limit the amount of money or value of assets an individual can donate, while the Treasury is also said to be looking at potential changes to the "taper relief" for lifetime gifting.
A Treasury spokesperson told The Mirror: 'As set out in the Plan for Change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus.
'Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn.
'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last Autumn's Budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of Income Tax, employee National Insurance, or VAT.'
The vast majority of families do not end up paying Inheritance Tax when a loved one dies, due to exemptions that are in place.
However, there are changes that have already been announced and that will come into force over the next few years, including making it so pensions are subject to Inheritance Tax.
What is Inheritance Tax?
Inheritance Tax is sometimes paid on the "estate" of someone that has died - this includes property, possessions and money. As we've mentioned above, Inheritance Tax is only due for wealth transferred within seven years of death.
Inheritance Tax is also only due if the value of your estate is above £325,000 - although this can actually often be much higher depending on who you leave your estate to.
For example, there is no Inheritance Tax to pay when an estate is left to your spouse or civil partner. If you give away your home to your children - this includes adopted, foster or stepchildren, or your grandchildren - then the Inheritance Tax threshold can increase to £500,000.
This includes the basic £325,000 allowance, plus an additional £175,000. If you are married or in a civil partnership, any Inheritance Tax allowance that isn't used can be passed on when someone dies.
This means a couple can potentially pass on as much as £1million without their estate being subject to Inheritance Tax. If your estate is subject to Inheritance Tax, then the standard rate is 40%.
There are ways to reduce how much Inheritance Tax is paid on your estate. Your rate of Inheritance Tax on some assets is reduced from 40% to 36% if you leave at least 10% of the net value after any deductions to a charity in your will.
Inheritance Tax changes that have already been announced
Inheritance Tax may be due on pensions you inherit from April 2027. At present, if you inherit a pension from someone who died before the age of 75, then there is no tax to pay.
If the person dies after the age of 75, then you pay Income Tax when you draw from the inherited pension, as it will be treated as income.
But from April 2027, inherited pensions will be subject to Inheritance Tax and included in the "estate" of someone who has died. Death in service payments will not be liable for Inheritance Tax.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Rachel Reeves eyes up inheritance tax changes - what you can do NOW to protect your finances
We explain what is happening and YOU can protect your finances DEATH TAX Rachel Reeves is eyeing up inheritance tax changes – what you can do NOW to protect your finances Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RACHEL Reeves is rumoured to have set her sights on changes to inheritance tax as a way to fill the £50billion blackhole in finances. Parents could be stopped from making unlimited tax-free gifts to kids, under proposed plans. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Chancellor Rachel Reeves is planning inheritance tax changes Credit: Reuters 2 Currently you can give away unlimited amounts of cash to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die. The Chancellor is reportedly also considering changing the tapered rate at which the tax is charged, according to The Guardian. Plus, inheritance tax will be charged on pension pots for the first time - a change that was announced in last year's Budget. Rachel Reeves said today that any decisions around taxes will have to wait for the autumn Budget - but what can YOU do now to protect your finances and how does inheritance tax affect your wallet? Read more on tax TAX IT HMRC spying on workers' social media posts in tax crackdown What is inheritance tax? IHT is a 40% tax on your estate when you die. Currently, your estate includes your house, cash savings and any other possessions. Your pension is exempt. You can pass on up to £325,000 in assets before any IHT is due, or up to £500,000 if you pass your property to your children or grandchildren. There is also no IHT due between spouses, and you can leave them your IHT exemption when you die, so they could pass on up to £1million. However, from April 2027, pensions will become part of your estate, which means they will also be liable for IHT. This week Labour also confirmed it will charge inheritance tax on workers' retirement pots even if they die before they reach the minimum pension age, which is currently 55. And from 2026, agricultural and business relief, which protects farms and businesses from IHT, will only apply up to £1million of assets. After this, 20% tax will be due. These changes could see people inheriting large pensions, farms or businesses being pulled into the net. What are the rules on gifting? YOU can currently give away unlimited amounts of money and assets to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die. If you pass away within seven years then the amount of tax you pay is charged at a tapered rate. For example, gifts that were given three years before you pass away are subject to 40% inheritance tax. But those that are handed over five years before your death are subject to inheritance tax at 16%. How many people does IHT affect? IHT is a big concern for many families, but figures suggest Brits hugely overestimate how many people are affected. A YouGov poll in 2023 found that 31% of people thought their assets would be subject to IHT, while 28% said they weren't sure. In reality, around 5% of estates are impacted, according to HMRC. 'A lot of people are concerned about it when it probably won't affect their family,' said Charlene Young, senior pensions and savings expert at AJ Bell. 'In 95% of cases, no IHT is due whatsoever.' However, the upcoming changes could see more people owing the tax, which has sparked fresh concerns. The number of estates owing IHT is set to double to 10% by 2030, according to government estimates, with around 1.5% more estates impacted because of pension rule changes. Matt Smith, chartered financial planner at Buckingham Gate, said: 'We are seeing people being pulled into the net now who don't feel wealthy, they just see themselves as normal people who have saved diligently.' Who is likely to be affected most by the changes? The people most likely to be impacted by the IHT changes are those inheriting large businesses, farms or pension pots. Mr Smith explained: 'People who have most of their assets in their pension will go from having no liability to having a chunky liability. 'Farms are particularly likely to be affected as they often have expensive assets such as land, machinery and livestock, even if they don't have much actual cash." If you have a modest-sized pension and a typical home, your estate is still not likely to be impacted, particularly if you are planning to leave most of your assets to your spouse or children. For example, if your home is worth £268,000 - the average UK house price, according to Zoopla - and you have a private pension worth £111,700, which is the average pot size, according to Hargreaves Lansdown, you would have £379,700 of assets to pass on. If you left this to your spouse or kids, your estate would still be well below IHT thresholds. 'While plenty of people might be worried about the changes - particularly those who have worked hard to build up big pensions – most people will still remain unaffected,' Ms Young said. Tips and tricks to avoid paying IHT If you, your parents or your grandparents are concerned about IHT, there are a number of steps you can take to protect your assets. Make a will First, you should ensure your money gets to the right place by making a will, according to Ms Young. 'If you die without a will, your estate will fall under the rules of intestacy, which could mean a higher IHT bill. 'This is especially key for couples who aren't married, as unmarried partners will not automatically inherit from one another, even if they have lived together for many years.' Check how to make one in our guide. Get financial advice If you're worried it could be worth speaking to a financial adviser specialising in estate planning. They will ensure you have used all of your allowances and aren't paying more tax than you should. You can find one using - but remember, you will pay a fee. Utilise gifting allowances Until recently, pensions have been used as a way to harbour money to pass it on to loved ones, but experts say it may be more sensible to gift the money now if that was your plan. If your in retirement and income is more than you spend, then consider setting up a plan for utilising gift-free allowances. 'The 'annual exemption' lets you give away a total of £3,000 each year, either to one person or split between several, and you can bring forward unused annual exemption for one year,' Ms Young said. 'Unlimited 'small' gifts of up to £250 per person can also be made, if you haven't already used your annual exemption on the same person.' You can also gift up to £5,000 to a child tax-free or £2,500 for a grandchild if they are getting married. However, families with modest pensions and assets likely won't be affected by the changes, so don't give away any money unless you are sure you can afford to. Get life insurance Another way to ensure your family does not foot an IHT bill is to take out a life insurance policy. Mr Smith said you could use any extra income to pay the premiums, and this will pay out a lump sum to cover your IHT bill when you die. "You basically pay it at a discount, as what you pay in premiums is usually only 40% to 60% of what your beneficiaries would pay in IHT," he explained. Read our guide to getting protection. Invest for your children and grandchildren If you're got children or grandchildren, then you could invest for their future. You can save up to £9,000 a year tax-free into a Junior Isa - they will thank you for this in the future. A £50 a month investment could grow to almost £18,000 in 18 years - a nice chunk of cash for your loved ones.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Gold subdued as hot US data lifts dollar, yields; cools hopes for jumbo Fed cut
Aug 14 (Reuters) - Gold prices were subdued on Thursday as hotter-than-expected U.S. inflation data and a drop in jobless claims lifted the dollar and Treasury yields, trimming the odds of a supersized September rate cut. Spot gold fell 0.1% to $3,352.65 per ounce as of 9:15 a.m. ET (1315 GMT). U.S. gold futures for December delivery were down 0.2% to $3,400.60. The dollar index (.DXY), opens new tab gained 0.2% from an over two-week low, making bullion less attractive for non-U.S. buyers, while benchmark 10-year yields edged up from a one-week low. Stronger U.S. wholesale price data tempered bets on a larger, half-point cut next month. Traders are now leaning toward a quarter-point move with another in October, reinforcing comments from Fed's Mary Daly that such a large cut is not needed. The Labor Department reported the producer price index rose 3.3% year-on-year in July, beating forecasts of 2.5%. Weekly jobless claims also came in lower than expected, at 224,000 versus 228,000 forecast. "Gold trades lower as the stronger than expected U.S. PPI print may lower rate cut hopes (expectations) as they feed into a higher Core PCE inflation print for July as well, likely keeping the Federal Reserve cautious on rate cuts," said Saxo Bank's head of commodity strategy, Ole Hansen. "Overall, the print does not alter our bullish view on gold as the Fed eventually will have to choose between fighting inflation or supporting the economy." Gold, a traditional refuge in times of economic or geopolitical strain, tends to benefit from low interest rates. Investors also kept an eye on geopolitical risks. U.S. President Donald Trump warned of "severe consequences" if Russian President Vladimir Putin rejects a Ukraine peace proposal at their upcoming summit, hinting at a subsequent meeting with Ukraine's leader. Elsewhere, spot silver lost 1% to $38.11 per ounce, platinum gained 1% to $1,352.60 and palladium rose 1.7% to $1,140.81.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
So the economy isn't shrinking… but when will we feel any benefit, chancellor?
UK plc delivered a welcome, and largely unexpected, shot in the arm for Rachel Reeves, with the Office for National Statistics recording second quarter growth of 0.3 per cent, comfortably beating the City's consensus forecast of 0.1 per cent. After a gloomy April and May, the summer sunshine warmed June, during which the economy expanded by 0.4 per cent. The quarterly figure was also boosted by April's contribution being revised up from a contraction of 0.3 per cent to a smaller fall of 0.1 per cent. While cheerier than expected, these figures still aren't enough to solve Reeves's wider problems. The Resolution Foundation, a think tank focussed on the plight of low income Britons, put it well. The economy isn't shrinking, it said – but it is slowing, and quite a bit from the 0.7 per cent growth recoded in the first three months of the year. The first quarter was powered by manufacturers racing to get product made and sent across the Atlantic ahead of Donald Trump's tariffs. That effect went into reverse after Trump's 'Liberation Day' on April 2, when most of his levies on imports kicked in. The UK economy contracted as manufacturers paused for breath and the tax increases announced in Reeves's Budget gave industry pause. The initial chaos delivered by Trump has now washed through the economy and it has found a level. However, the negative impact of Reeves's tax rises is still casting a pall. Economists said it had resulted in a sharp fall in business investment, which is something the government wants and needs. It rose by 3.9 per cent in the first three months of the year, but then went hard into reverse, falling by 4 per cent in the second. Businesses inevitably responded to the increases in their taxes, as businesses are wont to do. They focussed on reducing their costs to mitigate the impact of the increased labour costs caused by Reeves's decision to raise employer national insurance. And they shelved their investment plans while they were at it. Higher government spending helped to offset these effects. But that isn't sustainable if the private sector continues to stutter. The danger now is that the Office for Budgetary Responsibility downgrades its forecasts. That matters because it uses those forecasts to check the Treasury's sums, and whether the chancellor's tax and spending plans comply with her fiscal rules. The latter requires that day-to-day government spending is funded by taxation. Ministers can only borrow more to invest. If the OBR forecasts are downgraded, then the fiscal hole Reeves is in only deepens, requiring more tax rises to fill it. The chancellor got another unexpected boost as it emerged that the decision to scrap non-dom status, a controversial tax break available to some wealthy people who live here but are considered to be domiciled overseas for tax purposes, has not led to the sort of mass exodus of millionaires some had predicted. A number have left – but the numbers are broadly in line with Treasury projections. File under 'small crumbs of comfort'. Reeves, naturally, has hailed the fact that the UK's performance beat expectations – but she is right that there is 'still more to do'. Some of that must include more pro-business policies to get investment flowing again. Promises not to further increase the tax burden on them must also be kept. Yes, the chancellor needs revenue. But she needs growth to sustainably deliver it. Adding to the burdens on businesses now would simply be cutting off her nose to spite her face. A year in, and it is hard to grade her economic stewardship at much better than, say, C+. True, these figures do show that Britain is still outpacing the rest of the G7 – something Reeves highlighted and a line you will hear a lot if you can stomach spending any time listening to debates in the House of Commons (it isn't an edifying activity). But just because the neighbours are doing badly doesn't mean the UK is doing well. It isn't. It needs to do better. The chancellor faced a challenging situation when she took office, true. But she also needs to do better. She can't keep blaming the other lot. It won't wash with the voters. Finally, a word or two about mortgages. While the Bank of England is primarily focussed on inflation, the labour market and wage settlements, these figures will nonetheless add to the case of the interest rate hawks when it comes to the question of further cuts following the Bank's recent decision to lop a quarter point off base rates to 4 per cent (which they opposed). That's bad news if your mortgage tracks base rates, and bad news if you're looking for a fixed-rate deal, the price of which is dependent on the City's interest rate swaps market. The expectation there is that the rate cut curve will be shallower than had previously been hoped. Barclays recently delivered a fillip to would-be borrowers by cutting the price of some of its deals. However, I wouldn't expect to see many more announcements like it, at least not until we see signs that inflation is on a downward track. And that isn't currently the case.