Bhupender Yadav presides over inaugural assembly of International Big Cat Alliance
New Delhi, June 16 (UNI) Union Environment Minister Bhupender Yadav on Monday chaired the inaugural Assembly of the International Big Cat Alliance (IBCA), marking a significant milestone in global conservation efforts for big cats.
The IBCA, an initiative envisioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2023, aims to protect and conserve big cat species across their range countries.
During the Assembly, an apex governing body of the IBCA, key decisions were made, including the approval of the workplan, the rules of procedure, and the staff and financial regulations manual, paving way for its functioning at the ground level.
These foundational steps are set to guide the entity's governance, operations, and international collaborations.
The Assembly also unanimously appointed Bhupender Yadav as the President of the IBCA, while SP Yadav was named the Director General of the alliance, as per a statement from the Union Environment Ministry.
A coalition of 95 range countries, IBCA has a mandate for conservation of seven big cats namely Tiger, Lion, Leopard, Snow Leopard, Cheetah, Jaguar and Puma.
Addressing the gathering, the Minister said that the collective action among big cat range countries is important for conservation and protection of the seven major big cat species and their natural habitats.
The assembly was attended by ministerial delegation from 9 countries including Bhutan, Cambodia, Eswatini, Guinea, India, Liberia, Suriname, Somalia and Kazakhstan.
"The ratification of the headquarter agreement signed by IBCA with India, will enable the entity to establish its headquarters and such other offices in the host country as may be necessary to fully and efficiently discharge its official functions and programmes," added the statement. UNI AJ SSP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India in touch with students in Iran to ensure their safety, says MEA
Amid the Iran-Israel conflict, the Centre on Monday said the Indian Embassy in Tehran was continuously monitoring the security situation and engaging Indian students in Iran to ensure their safety while also relocating them to safer places in some cases. The Ministry of External Affairs' statement read, 'The Indian Embassy in Tehran is continuously monitoring the security situation and engaging Indian students in Iran to ensure their safety.' The statement continued, 'In some cases, students are being relocated with Embassy's facilitation to safer places within Iran. Other feasible options are also under examination. Further updates will follow. Separately, the Embassy is in touch with community leaders regarding welfare and safety.' The Indian embassies in Israel and Iran have issued advisories on their X handles in view of the situation. 'In view of the current situation in Iran, all Indian nationals & persons of Indian origin in Iran are requested to remain vigilant, avoid all unnecessary movements, follow the Embassy's Social Media accounts & observe safety protocols as advised by local authorities,' the Indian Embassy in Iran's post on X read. Meanwhile, PDP president Mehbooba Mufti on Monday asked the MEA to take immediate steps to ensure the safe return of Indian students stranded in Iran. Hundreds of Kashmiri students, enrolled in various universities for professional courses in Iran, are stranded due to the escalated tensions with Israel. The families of the students have appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to take steps for their safe evacuation just like the government did at the time of the Russia-Ukraine War. 'If Indian students were evacuated from Ukraine within days during the war, why are our children not being rescued from Iran? They are also Indian citizens,' a worried parent said.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kandhamal residents move PM for railway station at Madhapur
Bhubaneswar: Civil society members and traders of Kandhamal district have moved Prime Minister Narendra Modi for a railway station at Madhapur in Boudh district on the Khurda Road-Balangir new line for better connectivity. There is no railway connectivity to Kandhamal at present and residents want a station at least close to the district's border. If a station is constructed at Madhapur, passengers can travel around 37 km from Kandhamal district headquarters town, Phulbani, to catch a train to Cuttack, Bhubaneswar and western Odisha towns, they said. Kandhamal Jagaran Manch, a civil society organisation, which wrote to the PM on Saturday, circulated the letter to the media on Monday. "Madhapur is situated between Adenigarh and Banigochha stations on the Khurda Road-Balangir new line project. It is under construction now. I hope the govt will listen to our demand," said manch president Seshadev Jani. He said people from Phulbani travel 200 km to reach Bhubaneswar, and a passenger has to shell out around Rs 400 as bus fare. "It is costly for a tribal man travelling for official or medical purposes. Rail connectivity will make the journey affordable for most people," said Jani. Phulbani market association president Ashok Kumar Patnaik said Madhapur is a junction for people coming from districts like Kandhamal, Boudh and Nayagarh. "The proposed station can be accessed by people from Kandhamal without changing buses or minibuses for Adenigarh or Banigochha," he added. East Coast Railway (ECoR) sources said Madhapur is located 6 km from Adenigarh and 8 km from Banigochha stations. Out of the 301-km project length, construction of 106 km of lines has been completed from Khurda Road to Daspalla and 120 km from Balangir to Purunakatak. Work on the remaining 75-km section from Purunakatak to Adenigarh is underway, official sources said.
The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India's uneasy balancing act in the Bay of Bengal
India's economic engagements in the Bay of Bengal appear to be entering a new phase. On the face of it, there is reason for quiet confidence. Trade volumes through India's eastern ports are up. Cargo throughput at Visakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh), Paradip (Odisha), and Haldia (West Bengal) has grown steadily. The signing of the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) Maritime Transport Cooperation Agreement earlier this year promises to ease regulatory frictions and reduce port costs. For a region long characterised by low trade integration, these are welcome signs. The decision on Bangladesh And yet, the optimism sits uneasily alongside a decision that has raised more than a few eyebrows. In early April, India withdrew the transshipment facility it had granted to Bangladesh — an arrangement that had allowed Dhaka to route exports through Indian ports to third-country destinations. The official explanation was logistical: Indian terminals were congested, and delays were hurting exporters. That may well be true. But in Dhaka, the move was read differently — as a quiet assertion of Indian disapproval, possibly linked to Bangladesh's recent diplomatic overtures toward China. The timing was hardly a coincidence. The announcement came after Bangladesh's interim Chief Adviser, in a speech in Beijing, described India's northeastern States as 'landlocked' and cast Bangladesh as the region's maritime lifeline — a claim that did not sit well in New Delhi. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has repeatedly underscored the strategic and economic importance of the Northeast, with Indian Ministers also championing its role in regional connectivity. The suggestion that these States are dependent on Bangladesh for maritime access struck a nerve. This came as India has doubled down to position itself as a regional integrator. In recent years, New Delhi has invested heavily in port infrastructure through the Sagarmala programme to improve coastal logistics and connectivity. Cargo movement on the east coast has more than doubled in a decade, aided by policy changes such as Goods and Services Tax (GST) cuts on bunker fuel and incentives for coastal shipping. Maritime trade is, by all measures, a national priority. Tensions amid reenergised BIMSTEC At the regional level, India has sought to reinvigorate BIMSTEC. The BIMSTEC Maritime Transport Cooperation Agreement, for instance, aims to harmonise customs procedures and foster multimodal linkages, with the broader goal of reducing the cost and friction of trade within the Bay. For smaller economies such as Bhutan, Myanmar and Nepal, improved access through Indian ports remains a lifeline. That is what makes the rollback of Bangladesh's transshipment facility seem somewhat jarring. It reintroduces conditionality into what had been presented as a neutral economic architecture — one where trade facilitation serves regional integration, not shifting political winds. For Bangladesh, the impact is immediate: exporters, particularly in the ready-made garment sector (which accounts for over 85% of the country's foreign earnings), will likely bear the brunt. Many had come to rely on Indian gateways for faster, cheaper access to global markets. The alternatives — via Sri Lanka or Southeast Asia — are costlier and less time-efficient. The move injects uncertainty into Bangladesh's export logistics at a time of already fragile demand. Tensions have since escalated. In mid-May, India placed restrictions on the import of seven categories of Bangladeshi goods, which include garments, plastics, and processed foods, through land ports in the Northeast. These products can now only enter India through seaports such as Kolkata and Nhava Sheva (Maharashtra), which raises costs and delays. Indian officials cited Dhaka's restriction on yarn imports via land routes as justification, though India's revocation of the transshipment facility had preceded that move. Many in Bangladesh, nonetheless, view New Delhi's response as disproportionate. Some in Delhi argue that Dhaka is being reminded of the risks of strategic hedging. Bangladesh has, after all, stepped up diplomatic engagement with China, reopened maritime trade with Pakistan, and asserted its role as a regional connector. But these are choices Dhaka is entitled to make. If India recalibrates trade access to signal political displeasure, it risks undermining the very idea of cooperative regionalism it has sought to promote. This is not just a bilateral issue. What affects Dhaka will be noted in Naypyidaw, Bangkok, and Colombo. The concern is not that India has used leverage — major powers often do. The concern is that India has done so in a domain once insulated from overt geopolitical contest. Maritime trade corridors, once seen as shared infrastructure, are beginning to feel more transactional. The issue is about credibility India still holds many cards. Its port infrastructure remains the most extensive and efficient in the region. Cargo-handling capacity is expanding rapidly, and coastal shipping and multimodal linkages are more developed than those of any other BIMSTEC partner. But infrastructure alone does not confer leadership. In a region as fragmented and wary as the Bay, credibility matters as much as capacity. If neighbours begin to view Indian trade facilitation as shifting with the political winds, they will hedge — and the regional architecture India hopes to build will inevitably stall. The Bay of Bengal, then, is at an inflection point. On one level, it is a zone of opportunity. With improved connectivity, it could emerge as a self-sustaining corridor between South and Southeast Asia. A proposed BIMSTEC free trade agreement, if concluded and implemented well, could reshape regional trade patterns. On another level, the region remains vulnerable to strategic anxieties. The line between economic policy and geopolitical preference is beginning to blur. There may still be time to draw that line more clearly. India could clarify the circumstances under which the transshipment arrangement with Bangladesh might be reinstated — or, better yet, replace it with a rules-based mechanism that insulates trade from political cycles. That would send a reassuring signal not only to Dhaka but to the rest of the Bay. The larger question is whether India can maintain the balance between asserting strategic interests and cultivating regional trust. So far, the signals are mixed. Abhijit Singh is the former head of maritime policy at the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), New Delhi
