Police book suo motu case against Sharan Pumpwell for alleged hate speech
In his complaint, Udupi Town Police Sub-Inspector Bharatesh Kankanawadi said that when he was surfing social media on Thursday evening, he came across a video clip of Mr. Pumpwell's address to the media. In it, the accused stated that the Kunjalu cow butchering issue in Brahmavara taluk was a 'conspiracy by Islamist forces using Hindus' to create unrest in the country.
'Just as two Hindu youth were used by Islamist forces in the murder of Suhas Shetty in Bajpe on May 1, they might have used the six Hindus, who were arrested by the police later, to create unrest in society,' Mr. Pumpwell said in the video. He had also said 'Islamist forces' were attempting to create unrest in society using Hindus.
The video clip in question was circulated widely on different social media platforms and had the potential to create unrest in society by fomenting enmity between groups on the ground of religion, the PSI said in his complaint. The statement, given when the investigation was in progress at a press conference, was aimed at creating unrest in society, he said.
Accordingly, police booked a case under Section 353 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita against Mr. Pumpwell for issuing statements conducing to mischief. Mr. Pumpwell's statements were made at a press conference in Udupi on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Founded by Savarkar, revived by Godse's niece: Abhinav Bharat ‘vindicated', hails Malegaon acquittals
Originally floated by freedom fighter V D Savarkar in 1904 to carry out an armed struggle against the British and revived in post-Independence India, the Abhinav Bharat hit the headlines almost two decades ago after some of its members, including Lt Col Prasad Purohit, were accused of masterminding the 2008 Malegaon blasts. On Thursday, as a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court acquitted all the accused in the case, Milind Joshirao, a Pune resident who claims to be the organisation's head, said false allegations had been levelled against the outfit and the term 'saffron terror' was coined. 'The judgment shows that all allegations against Abhinav Bharat and Hindus arrested in the bomb blast case were false,' he said, hailing the verdict. Savarkar, also a Hindutva ideologue, had dissolved Abhinav Bharat in 1952, saying there was no need for an armed struggle in independent India and urged the youth to join the defence forces to serve the country. It was revived only in 2006 in Raigad by his brother Narayan's daughter-in-law Himani Savarkar, along with a group of historians, intellectuals, and activists. Himani, who later became the President of the revived organisation, is the daughter of Gopal Godse, the elder brother of Mahatma Gandhi's assassin Nathuram Godse. According to Himani, Abhinav Bharat, which was registered as a Trust on February 9, 2007, was revived to 'generate a sense of patriotism among youth,' create awareness on social issues and apprise them about 'injustice being meted out against Hindus'. The organisation aimed to fulfil its aims through lectures, discussions and seminars in colleges and public platforms within and outside Maharashtra. According to investigators who probed the Malegaon blasts, the Abhinav Bharat was an 'organised crime syndicate' whose members had been active since 2003. It was alleged that Lt Col Purohit, who was accused of procuring explosives from Kashmir for the attack, played a key part in the organisation's revival. Investigators also claimed that the Abhinav Bharat wanted to 'turn India into a Hindu Rashtra called Aryavart and place a government-in-exile' as its members were 'dissatisfied with the Constitution'. Its members were also accused of planning to train people in guerrilla warfare to eliminate people who opposed a Hindu Rashtra. 'It is unfortunate that an organisation undertaking constructive activities for society was harassed,' Purohit said after the verdict. Maharashtra ATS chargesheet claimed that Himani, in her statement, mentioned that Purohit discussed the Malegaon location during a meeting in Bhopal for taking revenge against Muslims. However, in a January 2009 interaction with The Indian Express she denied making any such mention in her statement during the probe. She passed away in 2015. Her son Satyaki Savarkar said his mother 'suffered a lot due to this case as false narratives of saffron terrorism were propagated'. Another acquitted member of the Abhinav Bharat, Ajay Rahirkar, was the treasurer of the organisation at the time of his arrest in 2008. Investigators alleged that Rahikar's house in Erandwane of Pune served as the 'head office' of Abhinav Bharat. However, Rahikar's advocate Nitin Apte said the body is a registered Trust and was not banned by the government. Joshirao, whom the NIA declared hostile, said though Abhinav Bharat was branded as an extremist outfit and its documents were seized, it continued to work in the 'national interest'. 'I had told the court on record how I was threatened by ATS officers to implicate RSS leaders and (Uttar Pradesh CM) Yogi Adityanath,' he said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Was stripped, kept in 5°C room, heard Pragya didi's screams': Shyam Sahu hails justice for entire Hindu community; says trauma still haunts him
INDORE: He says he was stripped, locked up in a chilled room, made to sit on shards of broken glass while he could hear Sadhvi Pragya Thakur scream in pain in the next room. For Shyam Sahu - one of the men who was arrested in connection with the Malegaon blast case , spent three years in jail and later discharged - the trauma he said he faced never ceased to haunt him. However, Thursday's verdict - acquitting seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case - came as a balm for Sahu, an Indore-based businessman, as he celebrated here, while reliving the torment. "It is a day of celebration of truth, but it reopens wounds that never healed," said Sahu, who was arrested on Oct 17, 2008, and spent over three years in jail before being discharged along with four others. "Truth was troubled, but never defeated. This is not just a personal victory, it's justice for the entire Hindu community that was vilified for political mileage," Sahu said. Sahu recalled the brutalities he faced in those early days of detention. "They kept us in illegal custody for 4 to 5 days. They stripped me, locked me in a chilled room at 5°C, beat me brutally on my soles, made me sit on broken glass bottles. We were reduced to crawling just to use the toilet," he said. "They hit us for several hours and then gave us a balm to rub on our wounds so that it was not visible in medical examination. We were hit on our palms and asked to press paper balls in our hands to increase blood circulation to hide the wounds," he said. But what haunts him the most is what he heard from the next room. "Pragya didi's (Sadhvi Pragya Thakur) screams shook us to the core. We realised what real horror was," Sahu said. At the time, Sahu was 38 - a father of three, his youngest barely a year old. He ran a mobile phone showroom and real estate business, lived in a joint family. "When I was brought to Mumbai four months later, my elder brother Mohan came to see me in court. He suffered a heart attack right in front of me. I was in custody, couldn't even go to the hospital where he died. I carry that pain in me every day," Sahu added, Sahu was later granted temporary bail to attend his brother's and grandmother's funerals. He spent time in Nashik jail, then Arthur Road after MCOCA charges were added. Just days later, the 26/11 attacks happened. "Ajmal Kasab was brought in and kept in a nearby cell. The govt shifted us to Taloja jail with hardened criminals like Dawood's men, Chhota Rajan's aides, Arun Gawli's gang. They feared an attack on Kasab - we were moved for his safety," he said. Sahu was among five accused discharged earlier - including Shivnarayan Kalsangra, Jagdeep Mahatre (Dombivli), Praveen Takalki (Karnataka), and Rakesh Dhawde (Pune). "But there was no real relief. Society didn't accept us. People avoided our families. Financially, emotionally, we were ruined," he said. Sahu lashed out at the political narrative that followed. "Congress, for the sake of a vote bank, gave us the tag of 'Hindu terrorism'. Congress leaders defamed an entire community. Innocent people suffered - and not one apology came." As the last of the accused walk free, Sahu remains clear: justice delayed has been justice denied. "We're free men now, but what about our lost years, lost loved ones, lost dignity? No verdict can give that back."
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Families of blasts victims look back in anger
Malegaon: 'Have they been let off just today? Wasn't Sadhvi already free?' The youngest victim, Farheen, was 10 years old when she was killed in the blasts in 2008. 'Uparwala saza dega.' (God will punish them.) These words from relatives of those who died in the 2008 Malegaon blast, which occurred in the month of Ramzan, encapsulate the sentiment of the six affected families in this power loom city in Nashik district, soon after the National Investigation Agency (NIA) court's verdict on Thursday. Old, ailing and abandoned by all political parties, these families, among the poorest residents of this city, have barely been able to keep track of the many twists and turns of the case. After the acquittal of all the accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts last week, the question being asked in Malegaon was simple –– will this be repeated in the Malegaon blast case. And if so, will the government rush to appeal as it did in the train blasts case? 'The home minister's speech in Parliament gave an inkling of the verdict,' said Aleem Faizee, founder editor of the Malegaon-based news website referring to Amit Shah's comment on Wednesday that no Hindu could ever be a terrorist. 'We have not got justice; we will appeal,' said Mufti Ismail, Malegaon MLA and general secretary of the Jamiat Ulema, which arranged for lawyers to represent the intervenors in the case. Advocate Irfana Hamdani added, 'We need to study the judgment to know how the evidence was placed before the court. The ATS charge sheet had both audio and video records of strategy meetings and phone conversations, recorded by one of the accused, and these pointed to Pragya Thakur's involvement.' Infirm and hard of hearing, Syed Nisar, 74, whose son died in the blast, has been the voice of the victims in the NIA court. He intervened in 2017 when the NIA said it had no objection to Sadhvi Pragya's bail application. 'This was not out of enmity for any community, but for justice,'' he clarified. 'My son was just 19.' The former scrap dealer is ready to continue fighting. Ainoor Bi lost her 23-year-old son Irfan, who helped her sell vegetables, in the blast. 'How could they not have been punished?'' she asked. 'Imagine what it means for parents to lose their young child.' After Irfan's death, she tried to resume work but could not do so as returning to the same spot in the market where her son's friends worked was unbearable. Hussain Shaha, who lost his father Harun, a power loom worker, was at his usual spot selling vegetable fritters even on the day the verdict was pronounced. The verdict means nothing to his mother, he said. 'Her health started failing after my father died; she is so far gone, she does not even recognise me.' 'Hemant Karkare (then ATS chief) had uncovered everything. If only he'd been alive…' rued Liaquat, father of the youngest victim. Holding up a picture of his then 10-year-old daughter Farheen, he said it was given to him by her teacher who took it from Farheen's scholarship form. 'My daughter was clever. She loved studies,' said the former truck driver. Karkare is revered in the community. Another set of victims in Malegaon, inextricably linked to the 2008 blast, also remembered him. Nine Muslims were arrested for the first set of blasts in the city in 2006 on Shab e Baraat, a night of prayer, in which 31 Muslims were killed. These men could get bail in 2011 and were finally discharged in 2016 only because Karkare's investigations into the 2008 blast led to a different set of accused for the 2006 blasts too. The appeal against their discharge is pending in the Bombay high court. Thursday's verdict has left people in the community angry. 'Was NIA's duty just to prove the accused innocent, or also to find the real culprits?'' asked eminent surgeon Dr Saeed Farani, who treated victims of both blasts. 'Perhaps we should just learn to live with this.' But what of Malegaon's Hindus? The Mausam river divides Hindus and Muslims geographically in the city. The power loom industry on which the city runs, necessitates interaction but otherwise, there's little intermingling. Gandhian Subhash Pardeshi said: 'When 31 of their fellow citizens died in the 2006 blasts, though Shiv Sena MLA Dada Bhuse sent Shiv Sainiks to donate blood, no Hindu in Malegaon condemned the attack or stepped up to share the grief of the families of the deceased.' 'That silence will continue,' he added.
