logo
Middle East: UN says Gaza aid hub deaths 'unacceptable' – DW – 07/04/2025

Middle East: UN says Gaza aid hub deaths 'unacceptable' – DW – 07/04/2025

DW2 days ago
More than 600 Palestinians have died near Gaza aid sites since late May, says the UN. Meanwhile, doctors say Gaza's main hospital is now "one massive trauma ward" as the shootings continue. Follow DW for the latest.
The UN human rights office says it has counted more than 600 people killed near aid convoys and food distribution points in Gaza since the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operations in late May.
Most deaths happened at or near GHF sites, with hospital data used to compile the toll.
The UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR) said its figure is based on information from hospitals, cemeteries, families, Palestinian health authorities, NGOs and partners on the ground in Gaza.
It said fresh reports keep coming in, and called the situation unacceptable.
Meanwhile, Gaza's Nasser Hospital has turned into what health workers describe as a massive trauma ward.The UN human rights office (OHCHR) says it has recorded more than 600 killings in Gaza near humanitarian convoys and at distribution points run by the Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) since it began operating in late May.
Spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said the office could not assign responsibility for the deaths but added, "it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points" operated by GHF.
"We have recorded 613 killings, both at GHF points and near humanitarian convoys — this is a figure as of June 27. Since then... there have been further incidents," Ravina Shamdasani,
The OHCHR says 509 of the deaths were "GHF-related," meaning they happened at or near its sites.
"Information keeps coming in," Shamdasani said. "This is ongoing and it is unacceptable."
The tally was verified using strict methodology and relied partly on reports from hospitals that receive the dead, Shamdasani said.
The US- and Israel-backed GHF began handing out food packages at the end of May, using a delivery model the UN says is neither impartial nor neutral.
GHF has repeatedly denied that any killings or injuries have happened on its sites, while stressing that casualties in the vicinity of the sites are under Israeli military purview.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Welcome to our latest coverage of events in and around Israel and the Palestinian territories on Friday, July 4.
The UN human rights office says hundreds of Palestinians have now been killed near humanitarian convoys and aid distribution sites since late May.
It says the same scenes keep repeating as desperate families try to reach basic aid.
Most of these deaths have been recorded around sites run by the Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
The UN hasn't pinned formal blame for the deaths, but has said that Israeli forces have shelled and fired near crowds gathering for food.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Middle East: UN says Gaza aid hub deaths 'unacceptable' – DW – 07/04/2025
Middle East: UN says Gaza aid hub deaths 'unacceptable' – DW – 07/04/2025

DW

time2 days ago

  • DW

Middle East: UN says Gaza aid hub deaths 'unacceptable' – DW – 07/04/2025

More than 600 Palestinians have died near Gaza aid sites since late May, says the UN. Meanwhile, doctors say Gaza's main hospital is now "one massive trauma ward" as the shootings continue. Follow DW for the latest. The UN human rights office says it has counted more than 600 people killed near aid convoys and food distribution points in Gaza since the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operations in late May. Most deaths happened at or near GHF sites, with hospital data used to compile the toll. The UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR) said its figure is based on information from hospitals, cemeteries, families, Palestinian health authorities, NGOs and partners on the ground in Gaza. It said fresh reports keep coming in, and called the situation unacceptable. Meanwhile, Gaza's Nasser Hospital has turned into what health workers describe as a massive trauma UN human rights office (OHCHR) says it has recorded more than 600 killings in Gaza near humanitarian convoys and at distribution points run by the Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) since it began operating in late May. Spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said the office could not assign responsibility for the deaths but added, "it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points" operated by GHF. "We have recorded 613 killings, both at GHF points and near humanitarian convoys — this is a figure as of June 27. Since then... there have been further incidents," Ravina Shamdasani, The OHCHR says 509 of the deaths were "GHF-related," meaning they happened at or near its sites. "Information keeps coming in," Shamdasani said. "This is ongoing and it is unacceptable." The tally was verified using strict methodology and relied partly on reports from hospitals that receive the dead, Shamdasani said. The US- and Israel-backed GHF began handing out food packages at the end of May, using a delivery model the UN says is neither impartial nor neutral. GHF has repeatedly denied that any killings or injuries have happened on its sites, while stressing that casualties in the vicinity of the sites are under Israeli military purview. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Welcome to our latest coverage of events in and around Israel and the Palestinian territories on Friday, July 4. The UN human rights office says hundreds of Palestinians have now been killed near humanitarian convoys and aid distribution sites since late May. It says the same scenes keep repeating as desperate families try to reach basic aid. Most of these deaths have been recorded around sites run by the Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The UN hasn't pinned formal blame for the deaths, but has said that Israeli forces have shelled and fired near crowds gathering for food.

Gaza: What is the actual death toll, and how can we be sure? – DW – 07/03/2025
Gaza: What is the actual death toll, and how can we be sure? – DW – 07/03/2025

DW

time3 days ago

  • DW

Gaza: What is the actual death toll, and how can we be sure? – DW – 07/03/2025

The health ministry in Gaza has reported at least 55,000 Palestinians killed since October 2023. Israel routinely dismisses these death counts as too high. A new indepedent study says they are actually too low. Michael Spagat, a researcher of war and armed conflict at the University of London, has led a new study analyzing war-related deaths in Gaza. It estimates that more than 80,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel's military campaign in Gaza between October 7, 2023 and January 5, 2025. "Ultimately, the most important thing is to memorialize the victims one by one," the expert told DW. He said the Gazan Ministry of Health is ensuring every casualty is recorded on lists, and added that he considers these records to be "pretty accurate." Gaza's ministries are administrered by the ruling authority Hamas, which the European Union (EU), US, and others classify as a terrorist organization. "The Ministry of Health has a list of names with ID numbers, ages, sexes," Spagat told DW. "This can be easily verified." Such verification has already occurred: In February, scientists published a study in The Lancet journal comparing obituaries published on social media with records kept by Gaza's Ministry of Health, for example. It found that no extra names had been added to the ministry records. It did, however, find that many names were missing. This study therefore concluded that the actual Gaza death toll was likely being under-reported — by as much as 41%. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Now, for the first time, a study has been conducted that is completely independent of Gaza's Ministry of Health records. The team of scientists, led by Spagat, interviewed people in Gaza about deceased members of their households. To this end, the European scholars collaborated with Palestinian colleagues from the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR), an independent organization headed by political scientist Khalil Shikaki, and funded by private foundations and the European Union, among others. The PSR is based in Ramallah in the Occupied West Bank, but also has experienced staff working on the ground in Gaza. "We did not go into Gaza, we were already there through our partner organization," Spagat said as he explained the data collection process. Currently, COGAT, the Israeli Defense Ministry unit tasked with administering civil policy in the West Bank and coordinating logistics between Israel and Gaza, will barely permit anyone to enter the war zone, with the exception of a few aid organizations. Israel has also denied international journalists entry into Gaza since the beginning of Israel's siege and military campaign. "To my relief none of [the PSR] field workers got killed in the war," Spagat told DW. "All the people who worked on the survey are still alive." Researchers on the ground surveyed a sample of 2,000 households, representative of Gaza's population pre-October 7, 2023. They were unable to enter areas that had been declared active combat zones and were sealed off by Israel's armed forces. Since virtually Gaza's entire population has been displaced, researchers sought out inhabitants of refugee camps and tent gatherings that have been housing Palestinians from northern Gaza, Rafah, and elsewhere. The researchers found that between October 7, 2023, and January 5, 2025, some 75,200 Palestinians in Gaza died a violent death as a direct result of the war. This figure is about 40% higher than the one reported by Gaza's Ministry of Health for the same period (45,650 deaths). The researchers compiled a separate tally of nonviolent war-related deaths, including those who died from starvation or disease due to siege and displacement, and excluding those who were likely to have died of old age or illness regardless of the war. This count raised Gaza's death toll by about another 8,540 so-called "indirect" deaths for the period in question. This indirect death toll is significantly lower than previously estimated by observers. In July 2024, a study published in The Lancet estimated that for every death recorded, four more indirect deaths would have to be assumed. For months, aid organizations have been warning that tens of thousands of Gazan civilians are at risk of dying from disease and starvation brought on by Israel's blockade. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Spagat attributed this low indirect death toll to Gaza's young population, which he says was relatively healthy at the beginning of the war, as well as the coastal strip's "pretty good public health system" and "high vaccination rates, thanks to the UN and other aid organizations." He also said this death toll was by no means low compared to other war zones and that "aid organizations have done a good job in keeping people alive during the war who might have well died without this aid." But, he cautioned, the study was conducted before Israel's total blockade of aid deliveries to Gaza, adding that "a lot of people are alive, but malnourished. If infectious diseases break out, things could change rapidly." He also told DW that "even if there is a ceasefire next week and it sticks, there is still going to be excess, nonviolent death moving forward." As such, "this is not a final number." Their study has not yet been independently peer-reviewed by scientists who were not involved in the research project. This is another reason why these fatality figures cannot yet be considered final. The findings are, however, consistent with previous independent studies. Spagat, Shikaki and their teams applied different methods but pursued a similar question: They wanted to independently test the reliability of the numbers reported by Gaza's Health Ministry. What they found, is that the death reports are trustworthy insofar as they are by no means an exaggeration of the actual death toll, but a conservative minimum tally. "Here, we've got an independent measurement that shows pretty definitively, I believe, that they're not exaggerating the death toll," Spagat said. He added that their study shows Gaza's Ministry of Health provides "a pretty accurate picture of the demographics of the people killed, in particular of the women, children and elderly where our number is very similar to their number." According to the study, women, children and the elderly acount for well over half of the violent deaths observed during the study period. Most of the males killed were aged between 15 and 49. But, Spagat explained, this gives no indication as to whether Israel's armed forces were actually targeting combatants, as they claim. As the expert pointed out, young boys and men are killed more frequently in wars. Neither his study nor the Gaza Ministry of Health distinguish between combatants and civilians in their death counts. The scholar said that field researchers refrained from asking whether Hamas members lived in the households surveyed, as this would could have placed them at risk of being suspected as undercover Israeli agents. Spagat also said "large numbers of small children" had been killed in the war. While ordinarily hesitant to draw comparisons, he did point out that, strikingly, 4% of the Gaza population has been killed so far, making it "probably the highest percentage of population killed for any war in the 21st century." If you project the figures from Spagat and Shikaki's study to the present day, you quickly arrive at a death toll of 100,000. It is difficult to imagine such a staggering number of lives lost. Each figure stands for a person with a name and a story. Many of them we will never know, but some of them, like the al-Najjar family, we do. The children Yahya, Rakan, Ruslan, Jubran, Eve, Rivan, Saydeen, Luqman, and Sidra were killed on May 23, 2025, in an Israeli airstrike on Khan Younis. Their mother survived because she was on duty as a doctor at a hospital. Only her eleven-year-old son Adam survived the airstrike. The children's father, Hamdi al-Najjar, died a few days later from injuries sustained in the same attack. Unlike most other Gaza victims, their names became known around the world.

Democrats Publicly Shame Republicans by Name Whose Voters Would Lose Healthcare Under Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Democrats Publicly Shame Republicans by Name Whose Voters Would Lose Healthcare Under Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'

Int'l Business Times

time4 days ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Democrats Publicly Shame Republicans by Name Whose Voters Would Lose Healthcare Under Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'

Democratic lawmakers began naming Republican legislators who voted in favor of the Trump-backed "one big, beautiful" tax and spending bill, shaming particularly the ones whose constituents would lose healthcare as a result of the legislation. House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and House Minority Whip Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA) listed the names of Republican representatives in swing districts who they claimed effectively voted for their constituents to lose access to healthcare and other types of assistance during a press conference held by House Democratic Leaders Wednesday morning. "Why would anyone vote for this dangerous and extreme bill? Why would Rob Bresnahan vote for this bill? More than 30,000 people would lose access to their healthcare in his community in Pennsylvania. Almost 60,000 households could lose access to food assistance in his community. At the risk of going hungry, why would Rob Bresnahan vote for this bill?" Jeffries questioned. "Why would Scott Perry vote for this bill? Almost 25,000 people in his community would lose access to healthcare. In his community in Pennsylvania, almost 40,000 households would lose access to nutritional assistance. They're at risk of going hungry. Why would Scott Perry vote for this bill?" he continued. "You see? The difference between them and us, they work for the special interests, for the rich and the shameless, for the wealthy, the well-off and the well-connected. House Democrats work for the people," he added. Clark also took to the podium to continue Jeffries' shaming, calling out other Republican legislators that voted in favor of the bill. "Why would David Valadao vote for this bill? Over 65,000 people in his [California] district will lose access to healthcare if this passes. 60,000 households will lose access to their food assistance, and over 3,600 energy jobs will be lost," she said. "Why would Young Kim in California's 40th district vote for this bill either? Over 31,000 people in her communities will lose their healthcare, and 15,000 households could lose access to food assistance. Why indeed," she continued. "Well we've been told exactly where we stand. The vice president said these cuts are 'immaterial.' Mitch McConnell said people will get over it. Joni Ernst reminded us we're all going to die anyway. So at a time when most households are struggling to afford the basics, Republicans have a clear message for American families. You don't matter," she added. The spending bill ended in a tie Tuesday, leading Vice President JD Vance gave the tie-breaking vote, allowing the Senate to pass the bill with razor thin margins. The bill now heads back to the House where lawmakers will review the changes made by the Senate. Originally published on Latin Times

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store